by RamsFanSince82 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 5851 Joined: Aug 20 2015 So. Cal. Hall of Fame Foles Benched POST #1 TOPIC AUTHOR by Stranger 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Foles Benched POST #2 Wow Wow Wow New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #3 Can I get another "wow"!As with the Welker signing, no one move will fix this offense but this is a huge admonition by this staff. by Stranger 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Foles Benched POST #4 I wonder what the environment is like inside the coaching offices right now? Are people excited, tense, nervous, scared or what? Are people starting to think about losing their jobs? I'd like to be a fly on the wall. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #5 Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #6 Stranger wrote:I wonder what the environment is like inside the coaching offices right now? Are people excited, tense, nervous, scared or what? Are people starting to think about losing their jobs? I'd like to be a fly on the wall.There's got to be pressure coming from somewhere, right? I mean, Foles was signed and then extended by this staff and for him to be benched makes you wonder who made the decision? by Elvis 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 41509 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Foles Benched POST #7 I don't know if it will help but it certainly can't hurt. Even Austin Davis gave us a spark at first... RFU Season Ticket Holder by snackdaddy 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 10048 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #8 moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #9 snackdaddy wrote:moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad.Well, as long as you don't start pining for Steve Walsh. I see that and someone's sending emergency services to your house! by SoCalRam78 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Foles Benched POST #10 Last edited by SoCalRam78 on Nov 16 2015, edited 1 time in total. As I said in another thread, Foles is as bad or worse than the merry go round of backups we've put out there the last couple of years, eye ball test and statistically. He was flat out putrid on Sunday. Yes, easy to blame Fisher and the OC, but Foles hasn't been good at all. Reply 1 / 3 1 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 27 posts Jul 09 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Stranger 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Foles Benched POST #2 Wow Wow Wow New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #3 Can I get another "wow"!As with the Welker signing, no one move will fix this offense but this is a huge admonition by this staff. by Stranger 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Foles Benched POST #4 I wonder what the environment is like inside the coaching offices right now? Are people excited, tense, nervous, scared or what? Are people starting to think about losing their jobs? I'd like to be a fly on the wall. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #5 Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #6 Stranger wrote:I wonder what the environment is like inside the coaching offices right now? Are people excited, tense, nervous, scared or what? Are people starting to think about losing their jobs? I'd like to be a fly on the wall.There's got to be pressure coming from somewhere, right? I mean, Foles was signed and then extended by this staff and for him to be benched makes you wonder who made the decision? by Elvis 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 41509 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Foles Benched POST #7 I don't know if it will help but it certainly can't hurt. Even Austin Davis gave us a spark at first... RFU Season Ticket Holder by snackdaddy 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 10048 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #8 moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #9 snackdaddy wrote:moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad.Well, as long as you don't start pining for Steve Walsh. I see that and someone's sending emergency services to your house! by SoCalRam78 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Foles Benched POST #10 Last edited by SoCalRam78 on Nov 16 2015, edited 1 time in total. As I said in another thread, Foles is as bad or worse than the merry go round of backups we've put out there the last couple of years, eye ball test and statistically. He was flat out putrid on Sunday. Yes, easy to blame Fisher and the OC, but Foles hasn't been good at all. Reply 1 / 3 1 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 27 posts Jul 09 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #3 Can I get another "wow"!As with the Welker signing, no one move will fix this offense but this is a huge admonition by this staff. by Stranger 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Foles Benched POST #4 I wonder what the environment is like inside the coaching offices right now? Are people excited, tense, nervous, scared or what? Are people starting to think about losing their jobs? I'd like to be a fly on the wall. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #5 Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #6 Stranger wrote:I wonder what the environment is like inside the coaching offices right now? Are people excited, tense, nervous, scared or what? Are people starting to think about losing their jobs? I'd like to be a fly on the wall.There's got to be pressure coming from somewhere, right? I mean, Foles was signed and then extended by this staff and for him to be benched makes you wonder who made the decision? by Elvis 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 41509 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Foles Benched POST #7 I don't know if it will help but it certainly can't hurt. Even Austin Davis gave us a spark at first... RFU Season Ticket Holder by snackdaddy 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 10048 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #8 moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #9 snackdaddy wrote:moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad.Well, as long as you don't start pining for Steve Walsh. I see that and someone's sending emergency services to your house! by SoCalRam78 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Foles Benched POST #10 Last edited by SoCalRam78 on Nov 16 2015, edited 1 time in total. As I said in another thread, Foles is as bad or worse than the merry go round of backups we've put out there the last couple of years, eye ball test and statistically. He was flat out putrid on Sunday. Yes, easy to blame Fisher and the OC, but Foles hasn't been good at all. Reply 1 / 3 1 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 27 posts Jul 09 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Stranger 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Foles Benched POST #4 I wonder what the environment is like inside the coaching offices right now? Are people excited, tense, nervous, scared or what? Are people starting to think about losing their jobs? I'd like to be a fly on the wall. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #5 Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #6 Stranger wrote:I wonder what the environment is like inside the coaching offices right now? Are people excited, tense, nervous, scared or what? Are people starting to think about losing their jobs? I'd like to be a fly on the wall.There's got to be pressure coming from somewhere, right? I mean, Foles was signed and then extended by this staff and for him to be benched makes you wonder who made the decision? by Elvis 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 41509 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Foles Benched POST #7 I don't know if it will help but it certainly can't hurt. Even Austin Davis gave us a spark at first... RFU Season Ticket Holder by snackdaddy 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 10048 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #8 moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #9 snackdaddy wrote:moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad.Well, as long as you don't start pining for Steve Walsh. I see that and someone's sending emergency services to your house! by SoCalRam78 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Foles Benched POST #10 Last edited by SoCalRam78 on Nov 16 2015, edited 1 time in total. As I said in another thread, Foles is as bad or worse than the merry go round of backups we've put out there the last couple of years, eye ball test and statistically. He was flat out putrid on Sunday. Yes, easy to blame Fisher and the OC, but Foles hasn't been good at all. Reply 1 / 3 1 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 27 posts Jul 09 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #5 Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #6 Stranger wrote:I wonder what the environment is like inside the coaching offices right now? Are people excited, tense, nervous, scared or what? Are people starting to think about losing their jobs? I'd like to be a fly on the wall.There's got to be pressure coming from somewhere, right? I mean, Foles was signed and then extended by this staff and for him to be benched makes you wonder who made the decision? by Elvis 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 41509 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Foles Benched POST #7 I don't know if it will help but it certainly can't hurt. Even Austin Davis gave us a spark at first... RFU Season Ticket Holder by snackdaddy 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 10048 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #8 moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #9 snackdaddy wrote:moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad.Well, as long as you don't start pining for Steve Walsh. I see that and someone's sending emergency services to your house! by SoCalRam78 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Foles Benched POST #10 Last edited by SoCalRam78 on Nov 16 2015, edited 1 time in total. As I said in another thread, Foles is as bad or worse than the merry go round of backups we've put out there the last couple of years, eye ball test and statistically. He was flat out putrid on Sunday. Yes, easy to blame Fisher and the OC, but Foles hasn't been good at all. Reply 1 / 3 1 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 27 posts Jul 09 2025
by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #6 Stranger wrote:I wonder what the environment is like inside the coaching offices right now? Are people excited, tense, nervous, scared or what? Are people starting to think about losing their jobs? I'd like to be a fly on the wall.There's got to be pressure coming from somewhere, right? I mean, Foles was signed and then extended by this staff and for him to be benched makes you wonder who made the decision? by Elvis 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 41509 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Foles Benched POST #7 I don't know if it will help but it certainly can't hurt. Even Austin Davis gave us a spark at first... RFU Season Ticket Holder by snackdaddy 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 10048 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #8 moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #9 snackdaddy wrote:moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad.Well, as long as you don't start pining for Steve Walsh. I see that and someone's sending emergency services to your house! by SoCalRam78 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Foles Benched POST #10 Last edited by SoCalRam78 on Nov 16 2015, edited 1 time in total. As I said in another thread, Foles is as bad or worse than the merry go round of backups we've put out there the last couple of years, eye ball test and statistically. He was flat out putrid on Sunday. Yes, easy to blame Fisher and the OC, but Foles hasn't been good at all. Reply 1 / 3 1 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 27 posts Jul 09 2025
by Elvis 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 41509 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Foles Benched POST #7 I don't know if it will help but it certainly can't hurt. Even Austin Davis gave us a spark at first... RFU Season Ticket Holder by snackdaddy 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 10048 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #8 moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #9 snackdaddy wrote:moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad.Well, as long as you don't start pining for Steve Walsh. I see that and someone's sending emergency services to your house! by SoCalRam78 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Foles Benched POST #10 Last edited by SoCalRam78 on Nov 16 2015, edited 1 time in total. As I said in another thread, Foles is as bad or worse than the merry go round of backups we've put out there the last couple of years, eye ball test and statistically. He was flat out putrid on Sunday. Yes, easy to blame Fisher and the OC, but Foles hasn't been good at all. Reply 1 / 3 1 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 27 posts Jul 09 2025
by snackdaddy 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 10048 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #8 moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad. by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #9 snackdaddy wrote:moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad.Well, as long as you don't start pining for Steve Walsh. I see that and someone's sending emergency services to your house! by SoCalRam78 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Foles Benched POST #10 Last edited by SoCalRam78 on Nov 16 2015, edited 1 time in total. As I said in another thread, Foles is as bad or worse than the merry go round of backups we've put out there the last couple of years, eye ball test and statistically. He was flat out putrid on Sunday. Yes, easy to blame Fisher and the OC, but Foles hasn't been good at all. Reply 1 / 3 1 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 27 posts Jul 09 2025
by moklerman 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles Benched POST #9 snackdaddy wrote:moklerman wrote:Dick84 wrote:Yup. Again.. Keenum makes sense because of the ability to do things with his legs. They need someone who can pick up a first down once in a while on foot. Hell.. they should add some read-option concepts to at least make a D a little less able to key so much on Gurley.I don't think Keenum's legs play much of a part in this. The offense hasn't been sputtering because Foles hasn't been able to take off and run. This is about Foles not seeing wide open receivers and missing the one's that he does see. If Keenum can just get the ball to the guys who have been open, the offense will be 10-20% better.Yeah, its hard to imagine Keenum being worse. Foles has been historically bad. I was starting to pine for the days of Tony Banks. Now that is bad.Well, as long as you don't start pining for Steve Walsh. I see that and someone's sending emergency services to your house! by SoCalRam78 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Foles Benched POST #10 Last edited by SoCalRam78 on Nov 16 2015, edited 1 time in total. As I said in another thread, Foles is as bad or worse than the merry go round of backups we've put out there the last couple of years, eye ball test and statistically. He was flat out putrid on Sunday. Yes, easy to blame Fisher and the OC, but Foles hasn't been good at all. Reply 1 / 3 1 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 27 posts Jul 09 2025
by SoCalRam78 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Foles Benched POST #10 Last edited by SoCalRam78 on Nov 16 2015, edited 1 time in total. As I said in another thread, Foles is as bad or worse than the merry go round of backups we've put out there the last couple of years, eye ball test and statistically. He was flat out putrid on Sunday. Yes, easy to blame Fisher and the OC, but Foles hasn't been good at all. Reply 1 / 3 1 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business