by max 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5710 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #1 TOPIC AUTHOR Had Vinny B on today. Roggin said he checked his reports. Something's changed. Spanos won't deal with Kroenke, thinks he can win.Spanos apparently has more owners in his corner. He's got the Committee for sure. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by TSFH Fan 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 699 Joined: Jun 24 2015 The OC Veteran Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #2 Whew! Last Friday, I noticed that we hadn't had any anti-Inglewood Friday stuff for a while. viewtopic.php?t=529I was worried that the NFL was abandoning that part of their controlled media cycle. Now we have this! All is as it should be. Well, we already heard that Spanos did NOT have the committee (the 4-1-1 report) and that Kroenke DID have the owners. Guess this story is supposed to move the pendulum. Spanos won't deal with Kroenke -- really since Fake Carson Stadium is a fake and Spanos' goal is to wring the best deal possible out of SD, Spanos has no need to waste Stan's time. Yes, yes, Spanos, reportedly, thinks he can win -- he also thinks he can win over the LA market and can equal the Raiders in popularity in LA . . . w/e. Oh yeah, and there was that "Raiders are a sleeping giant' ready to conquer LA stuff earlier. If I wasn't so geared to hear anti-Inglewood stuff on Fridays, I could probably pretend to take this seriously. But all I can do is giggle. TSFH -- Two Steps From Hell -- Thomas Bergersen, Nick Phoenix -- Music Makes You Braverhttps://www.youtube.com/user/TwoStepsFromTheMusichttp://www.twostepsfromhell.com/ by Hacksaw 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #3 TSFH, , I noticed the two articles today as well,,, this one and St Louis will you drunky and the NFL won't let them leave if they get the financing in order. Strong day for the opposition. Lol.Doesn't sound reasonable that everyone would have changed their mind,, , , there was a meeting yesterday though.I wish I shared your confidence in the owner and their committees righteousness and intelligence.. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #4 Well we haven't had a bad news Friday in a while. And coming from Roggin i'm not sure how easily dismissed this news is, but we'll see... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #5 Agreed Elvis. He's been championing his other scenario all along so for him to recant publicly is a bit alarming GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #6 If Spanos won't deal with Stan, and Carson's a fake, then what's the likeliest scenario? New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #7 I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #8 So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #9 BuiltRamTough wrote:I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL.I agree with you. But that's also pretty much Fred Roggin's line.So either he's hearing from sources he trusts or he's going a little Dan Sileo on us.And let's not forget, Kroenke can just up and move if he wants to. That's a card he's yet to play. It's his team, his land, his stadium, he doesn't really need anyone's approval or help. If that's what he's dead set on doing, who's really going to stop him? Considering the NFL's record in court, they'd find a way to get on board... RFU Season Ticket Holder by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #10 Stranger wrote:So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders.If you ask my dad he thinks this is all a conspiracy theory. He says that this whole "mess" is for PR. Cause drama,mix it all together with 5 cities and when the accounment is made on LA the news coverage would be everywhere. Not just an isolated city. For example, if this was only LA and STL and STL got a stadium plan completed and the Rams moved anyway. That's not good the media coverage would "Rams left even though there was support and a stadium plan". This way the attention goes on everyone else. Another example, the Chargers move it would be oh well we had to move bc 25% of our support is in LA and we would lose leverage with SD with a team in LA. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 34 posts Feb 05 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by TSFH Fan 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 699 Joined: Jun 24 2015 The OC Veteran Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #2 Whew! Last Friday, I noticed that we hadn't had any anti-Inglewood Friday stuff for a while. viewtopic.php?t=529I was worried that the NFL was abandoning that part of their controlled media cycle. Now we have this! All is as it should be. Well, we already heard that Spanos did NOT have the committee (the 4-1-1 report) and that Kroenke DID have the owners. Guess this story is supposed to move the pendulum. Spanos won't deal with Kroenke -- really since Fake Carson Stadium is a fake and Spanos' goal is to wring the best deal possible out of SD, Spanos has no need to waste Stan's time. Yes, yes, Spanos, reportedly, thinks he can win -- he also thinks he can win over the LA market and can equal the Raiders in popularity in LA . . . w/e. Oh yeah, and there was that "Raiders are a sleeping giant' ready to conquer LA stuff earlier. If I wasn't so geared to hear anti-Inglewood stuff on Fridays, I could probably pretend to take this seriously. But all I can do is giggle. TSFH -- Two Steps From Hell -- Thomas Bergersen, Nick Phoenix -- Music Makes You Braverhttps://www.youtube.com/user/TwoStepsFromTheMusichttp://www.twostepsfromhell.com/ by Hacksaw 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #3 TSFH, , I noticed the two articles today as well,,, this one and St Louis will you drunky and the NFL won't let them leave if they get the financing in order. Strong day for the opposition. Lol.Doesn't sound reasonable that everyone would have changed their mind,, , , there was a meeting yesterday though.I wish I shared your confidence in the owner and their committees righteousness and intelligence.. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #4 Well we haven't had a bad news Friday in a while. And coming from Roggin i'm not sure how easily dismissed this news is, but we'll see... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #5 Agreed Elvis. He's been championing his other scenario all along so for him to recant publicly is a bit alarming GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #6 If Spanos won't deal with Stan, and Carson's a fake, then what's the likeliest scenario? New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #7 I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #8 So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #9 BuiltRamTough wrote:I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL.I agree with you. But that's also pretty much Fred Roggin's line.So either he's hearing from sources he trusts or he's going a little Dan Sileo on us.And let's not forget, Kroenke can just up and move if he wants to. That's a card he's yet to play. It's his team, his land, his stadium, he doesn't really need anyone's approval or help. If that's what he's dead set on doing, who's really going to stop him? Considering the NFL's record in court, they'd find a way to get on board... RFU Season Ticket Holder by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #10 Stranger wrote:So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders.If you ask my dad he thinks this is all a conspiracy theory. He says that this whole "mess" is for PR. Cause drama,mix it all together with 5 cities and when the accounment is made on LA the news coverage would be everywhere. Not just an isolated city. For example, if this was only LA and STL and STL got a stadium plan completed and the Rams moved anyway. That's not good the media coverage would "Rams left even though there was support and a stadium plan". This way the attention goes on everyone else. Another example, the Chargers move it would be oh well we had to move bc 25% of our support is in LA and we would lose leverage with SD with a team in LA. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 34 posts Feb 05 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #3 TSFH, , I noticed the two articles today as well,,, this one and St Louis will you drunky and the NFL won't let them leave if they get the financing in order. Strong day for the opposition. Lol.Doesn't sound reasonable that everyone would have changed their mind,, , , there was a meeting yesterday though.I wish I shared your confidence in the owner and their committees righteousness and intelligence.. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #4 Well we haven't had a bad news Friday in a while. And coming from Roggin i'm not sure how easily dismissed this news is, but we'll see... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #5 Agreed Elvis. He's been championing his other scenario all along so for him to recant publicly is a bit alarming GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #6 If Spanos won't deal with Stan, and Carson's a fake, then what's the likeliest scenario? New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #7 I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #8 So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #9 BuiltRamTough wrote:I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL.I agree with you. But that's also pretty much Fred Roggin's line.So either he's hearing from sources he trusts or he's going a little Dan Sileo on us.And let's not forget, Kroenke can just up and move if he wants to. That's a card he's yet to play. It's his team, his land, his stadium, he doesn't really need anyone's approval or help. If that's what he's dead set on doing, who's really going to stop him? Considering the NFL's record in court, they'd find a way to get on board... RFU Season Ticket Holder by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #10 Stranger wrote:So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders.If you ask my dad he thinks this is all a conspiracy theory. He says that this whole "mess" is for PR. Cause drama,mix it all together with 5 cities and when the accounment is made on LA the news coverage would be everywhere. Not just an isolated city. For example, if this was only LA and STL and STL got a stadium plan completed and the Rams moved anyway. That's not good the media coverage would "Rams left even though there was support and a stadium plan". This way the attention goes on everyone else. Another example, the Chargers move it would be oh well we had to move bc 25% of our support is in LA and we would lose leverage with SD with a team in LA. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 34 posts Feb 05 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #4 Well we haven't had a bad news Friday in a while. And coming from Roggin i'm not sure how easily dismissed this news is, but we'll see... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #5 Agreed Elvis. He's been championing his other scenario all along so for him to recant publicly is a bit alarming GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #6 If Spanos won't deal with Stan, and Carson's a fake, then what's the likeliest scenario? New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #7 I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #8 So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #9 BuiltRamTough wrote:I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL.I agree with you. But that's also pretty much Fred Roggin's line.So either he's hearing from sources he trusts or he's going a little Dan Sileo on us.And let's not forget, Kroenke can just up and move if he wants to. That's a card he's yet to play. It's his team, his land, his stadium, he doesn't really need anyone's approval or help. If that's what he's dead set on doing, who's really going to stop him? Considering the NFL's record in court, they'd find a way to get on board... RFU Season Ticket Holder by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #10 Stranger wrote:So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders.If you ask my dad he thinks this is all a conspiracy theory. He says that this whole "mess" is for PR. Cause drama,mix it all together with 5 cities and when the accounment is made on LA the news coverage would be everywhere. Not just an isolated city. For example, if this was only LA and STL and STL got a stadium plan completed and the Rams moved anyway. That's not good the media coverage would "Rams left even though there was support and a stadium plan". This way the attention goes on everyone else. Another example, the Chargers move it would be oh well we had to move bc 25% of our support is in LA and we would lose leverage with SD with a team in LA. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 34 posts Feb 05 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #5 Agreed Elvis. He's been championing his other scenario all along so for him to recant publicly is a bit alarming GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #6 If Spanos won't deal with Stan, and Carson's a fake, then what's the likeliest scenario? New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #7 I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #8 So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #9 BuiltRamTough wrote:I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL.I agree with you. But that's also pretty much Fred Roggin's line.So either he's hearing from sources he trusts or he's going a little Dan Sileo on us.And let's not forget, Kroenke can just up and move if he wants to. That's a card he's yet to play. It's his team, his land, his stadium, he doesn't really need anyone's approval or help. If that's what he's dead set on doing, who's really going to stop him? Considering the NFL's record in court, they'd find a way to get on board... RFU Season Ticket Holder by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #10 Stranger wrote:So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders.If you ask my dad he thinks this is all a conspiracy theory. He says that this whole "mess" is for PR. Cause drama,mix it all together with 5 cities and when the accounment is made on LA the news coverage would be everywhere. Not just an isolated city. For example, if this was only LA and STL and STL got a stadium plan completed and the Rams moved anyway. That's not good the media coverage would "Rams left even though there was support and a stadium plan". This way the attention goes on everyone else. Another example, the Chargers move it would be oh well we had to move bc 25% of our support is in LA and we would lose leverage with SD with a team in LA. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 34 posts Feb 05 2025
by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #6 If Spanos won't deal with Stan, and Carson's a fake, then what's the likeliest scenario? New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #7 I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #8 So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #9 BuiltRamTough wrote:I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL.I agree with you. But that's also pretty much Fred Roggin's line.So either he's hearing from sources he trusts or he's going a little Dan Sileo on us.And let's not forget, Kroenke can just up and move if he wants to. That's a card he's yet to play. It's his team, his land, his stadium, he doesn't really need anyone's approval or help. If that's what he's dead set on doing, who's really going to stop him? Considering the NFL's record in court, they'd find a way to get on board... RFU Season Ticket Holder by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #10 Stranger wrote:So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders.If you ask my dad he thinks this is all a conspiracy theory. He says that this whole "mess" is for PR. Cause drama,mix it all together with 5 cities and when the accounment is made on LA the news coverage would be everywhere. Not just an isolated city. For example, if this was only LA and STL and STL got a stadium plan completed and the Rams moved anyway. That's not good the media coverage would "Rams left even though there was support and a stadium plan". This way the attention goes on everyone else. Another example, the Chargers move it would be oh well we had to move bc 25% of our support is in LA and we would lose leverage with SD with a team in LA. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 34 posts Feb 05 2025
by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #7 I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #8 So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #9 BuiltRamTough wrote:I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL.I agree with you. But that's also pretty much Fred Roggin's line.So either he's hearing from sources he trusts or he's going a little Dan Sileo on us.And let's not forget, Kroenke can just up and move if he wants to. That's a card he's yet to play. It's his team, his land, his stadium, he doesn't really need anyone's approval or help. If that's what he's dead set on doing, who's really going to stop him? Considering the NFL's record in court, they'd find a way to get on board... RFU Season Ticket Holder by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #10 Stranger wrote:So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders.If you ask my dad he thinks this is all a conspiracy theory. He says that this whole "mess" is for PR. Cause drama,mix it all together with 5 cities and when the accounment is made on LA the news coverage would be everywhere. Not just an isolated city. For example, if this was only LA and STL and STL got a stadium plan completed and the Rams moved anyway. That's not good the media coverage would "Rams left even though there was support and a stadium plan". This way the attention goes on everyone else. Another example, the Chargers move it would be oh well we had to move bc 25% of our support is in LA and we would lose leverage with SD with a team in LA. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 34 posts Feb 05 2025
by Stranger 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #8 So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #9 BuiltRamTough wrote:I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL.I agree with you. But that's also pretty much Fred Roggin's line.So either he's hearing from sources he trusts or he's going a little Dan Sileo on us.And let's not forget, Kroenke can just up and move if he wants to. That's a card he's yet to play. It's his team, his land, his stadium, he doesn't really need anyone's approval or help. If that's what he's dead set on doing, who's really going to stop him? Considering the NFL's record in court, they'd find a way to get on board... RFU Season Ticket Holder by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #10 Stranger wrote:So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders.If you ask my dad he thinks this is all a conspiracy theory. He says that this whole "mess" is for PR. Cause drama,mix it all together with 5 cities and when the accounment is made on LA the news coverage would be everywhere. Not just an isolated city. For example, if this was only LA and STL and STL got a stadium plan completed and the Rams moved anyway. That's not good the media coverage would "Rams left even though there was support and a stadium plan". This way the attention goes on everyone else. Another example, the Chargers move it would be oh well we had to move bc 25% of our support is in LA and we would lose leverage with SD with a team in LA. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 34 posts Feb 05 2025
by Elvis 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 40508 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #9 BuiltRamTough wrote:I don't buy it but that's just me. I pay attention to ever single bit of news just like you guys but I don't believe everything I hear. I don't even believe Fred Roggin bc he's only reporting what he's been told. These are the reasons why I'm so confident in Stan. There's actually only one reason and that is MONEY. Follow the money in a league/business that is all about money. I guess I'm the Jerry Jones of this board. It's been a week where the league doesn't know if it wants to put 2 teams in LA at the same time, the Raiders will be the odd man out, Dean won't talk to Stan, the "home" cities won't present in October, strong opposition from MO leg and delaying LA for another year.This is what the NFL wants. The NFL wants everyone to keep on guessing and have HOPE. It's week 2. All 4 cities, keep the faith and get closer to a stadium deal by December. In the mean time to the fans, keep supporting the clubs.Btw to add to the "news" this week, hour 3 of today's Fred Roggins show around the end he says he talked to people involved in Inglewood yesterday and they said everything is on schedule. So ya...in the meantime let's cheer for our Rams this week and pay for Sunday ticket, pay for tickets, pay for GamePass and boost TV ratings. Bravo NFL.I agree with you. But that's also pretty much Fred Roggin's line.So either he's hearing from sources he trusts or he's going a little Dan Sileo on us.And let's not forget, Kroenke can just up and move if he wants to. That's a card he's yet to play. It's his team, his land, his stadium, he doesn't really need anyone's approval or help. If that's what he's dead set on doing, who's really going to stop him? Considering the NFL's record in court, they'd find a way to get on board... RFU Season Ticket Holder by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #10 Stranger wrote:So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders.If you ask my dad he thinks this is all a conspiracy theory. He says that this whole "mess" is for PR. Cause drama,mix it all together with 5 cities and when the accounment is made on LA the news coverage would be everywhere. Not just an isolated city. For example, if this was only LA and STL and STL got a stadium plan completed and the Rams moved anyway. That's not good the media coverage would "Rams left even though there was support and a stadium plan". This way the attention goes on everyone else. Another example, the Chargers move it would be oh well we had to move bc 25% of our support is in LA and we would lose leverage with SD with a team in LA. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 34 posts Feb 05 2025
by BuiltRamTough 9 years 4 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Roggin reports owners backing Carson over Inglewood. POST #10 Stranger wrote:So, what we're seeing is a PR campaign built upon double-speak in order to keep everyone's wallets open for as long as possible... is that the drill? If so, it makes total sense.Then the question becomes, what decisions have already really been made, and what are those decisions? But I double we'll know that 'cause we're not insiders.If you ask my dad he thinks this is all a conspiracy theory. He says that this whole "mess" is for PR. Cause drama,mix it all together with 5 cities and when the accounment is made on LA the news coverage would be everywhere. Not just an isolated city. For example, if this was only LA and STL and STL got a stadium plan completed and the Rams moved anyway. That's not good the media coverage would "Rams left even though there was support and a stadium plan". This way the attention goes on everyone else. Another example, the Chargers move it would be oh well we had to move bc 25% of our support is in LA and we would lose leverage with SD with a team in LA. We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business