by ramsfan1977 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #1 TOPIC AUTHOR DEVELOPING: Multiple NFL owners, officials say consensus is building to pair Chargers Rams in Inglewood. by Hacksaw 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #2 http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp ... story.html"Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams." GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by ramsfan1977 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #3 TOPIC AUTHOR Even Vinny is on board now with his most recent tweet! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie It's GOING OUR WAY!!!!!! POST #4 Per the LA Timeshttp://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp ... story.html by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #5 This is great... by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #6 NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in InglewoodOn the brink of a vote that could return the NFL to Los Angeles, a consensus is building within the league for the St. Louis Rams and San Diego Chargers to share a stadium in Inglewood.Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams.The Chargers and Oakland Raiders want to build a stadium in Carson, and to this point, Chargers owner Dean Spanos has stood by his partnership with Raiders owner Mark Davis.The league insiders, who spoke on the condition they not be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter, say Spanos doesn't want to be seen as turning his back on a partner. This makes the path to what is emerging as the preferred pairing more difficult. But the insiders believe the matter can be resolved during the special meeting that starts Tuesday in Houston, where owners hope to find an answer to the two-decade L.A. vacancy.One influential owner whose preference has not been apparent in public or private, touted Inglewood over Carson, saying "the deals aren't even close."In the past week, there has been a flurry of behind-the-scenes activity among owners and NFL staff in an attempt to clear the way for a decision to be made at these meetings.It is extremely rare for the NFL to devote a full day to a single topic, much less two days in the middle of the playoffs. It underscores how determined the NFL owners and Commissioner Roger Goodell are to reach an accord that would bring professional football back to the country's second-largest market.It is widely thought that the L.A decision will help define the legacy of Goodell, and shape the financial future for a league that generates $10 billion in annual revenue.All three teams want to relocate to L.A. for the 2016 season, meaning time is of the essence to move their franchises and begin selling tickets.Although the general meetings start Tuesday, the Los Angeles committee is convening Monday.There's a sense that most owners want the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood, but aren't sure of the best way to make it happen. The idea of the Raiders returning to L.A. is not popular among many owners.One owner said that the NFL has to realize that "we just can't solve all three stadium problems in one fell swoop."It would mean striking a bargain that keeps the Raiders out of L.A. but doesn't leave them empty handed. Such a maneuver could mean that the Raiders return to Oakland in the short term, but can explore relocating to other cities, among them San Diego, St. Louis or joining the San Francisco 49ers in their new stadium in Santa Clara.There is some sentiment among owners that the L.A. matter should be determined by secret ballot to avoid the awkwardness of league partners voting against partners. A secret vote -- now used only for the selection of a commissioner or awarding a Super Bowl to a city -- would need the approval of 17 of the league's 32 owners, a simple majority.The idea of putting the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood has been floated for months and was formally proposed last week by Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones in a one-page letter to Goodell.There's a belief among some owners and league executives that Spanos would be willing to make a deal with Rams owner Stan Kroenke to share Inglewood if it were a 50-50 partnership that wouldn't put the Chargers at an economic disadvantage.When news of Jones' letter became public late Saturday, Mark Fabiani, the Chargers' point man on stadium issues, reached out to The Times and asked that a December letter Spanos sent the L.A. committee be referenced. The two-paragraph letter rejected Kroenke's offer to partner with a second team in his planned Inglewood stadium."Nothing in Stan's letter gives me any reason to reconsider my partnership with Mark Davis and our chosen stadium site," Spanos wrote.The one thing everyone can agree upon is that this is a very fluid process and plans can shift very quickly.Three-quarters of owners must approve any franchise relocation. It's believed both projects have the nine votes to block the other, although that could be shifting in favor of the Rams after last week's meetings of the finance, stadium and L.A. committees at league headquarters in New York.It's unclear if the six-owner L.A. committee will recommend a stadium plan or whether such an endorsement would be unanimous. Two members of that committee, Carolina Panthers owner Jerry Richardson and Houston Texans owner Bob McNair, have made it clear in public that they favor the Carson plan.Though the cost of the Inglewood stadium proposed by Kroenke has been publicly estimated at $1.86 billion, the league insiders say the cost likely would significantly exceed $2 billion. That would make it the most expensive venue in U.S. sports history. At 3 million square feet -- including identical locker rooms, office space and owner's suites for two teams -- it would also be the NFL's largest stadium. 'Bring Back the Rams' rally draws hundredsRams fans, days before the NFL's decision on moving one or more franchises to Los Angeles, rallied Saturday in hopes of getting the team back inSouthern California.The project would be the centerpiece of a 298-acre entertainment, retail and housing development, something one owner called an "NFL Disney World."According to the relocation application the Rams submitted to the league last week, the stadium would be ready for the 2019 season.Disney Chairman and CEO Robert Iger, who would oversee the Carson proposal if it is approved and have the opportunity for a minority ownership stake in the Chargers or Raiders, is expected to make a presentation to owners in Houston.On Saturday, Goodell sent a 48-page report to all franchises saying that the three home markets -- Oakland, San Diego and St. Louis -- failed to produce viable stadium plans.In the report, which did not make any recommendations, Goodell said market research supports the conclusion that L.A. is capable of being a two-team market.Though the L.A. Memorial Coliseum has expressed a willingness to temporarily host one NFL team starting next season, it's unclear where a second team would play. USC's lease to operate the Coliseum would need to be amended to allow two NFL teams.Los Angeles has had several sites proposed for an NFL stadium over the years, yet the nation's second-largest city is still without a team.Last summer, the Rose Bowl Bowl Operating Co. declined to respond to the NFL's request for a proposal to temporarily host a team.League officials, who have also looked at Angel Stadium, Dodger Stadium and the 27,000-seat StubHub Center, say they aren't concerned about finding temporary homes for two L.A. teams.[email protected]Twitter: @LATimesFarmer[email protected]Twitter: @nathanfenno RFU Season Ticket Holder by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #7 So maybe the delay is about letting Spanos have some input into the Inglewood stadium? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #8 GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by azramsfan93 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #9 Hacksaw wrote:http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-nfl-la-relocation-20160112-story.html"Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams."Yes!!! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #10 I love IT!..I am confident the Rams fans in SoCal can pack out Inglewood..Chargers? It will be an empty cavern..lol Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 31 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #2 http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp ... story.html"Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams." GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by ramsfan1977 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #3 TOPIC AUTHOR Even Vinny is on board now with his most recent tweet! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie It's GOING OUR WAY!!!!!! POST #4 Per the LA Timeshttp://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp ... story.html by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #5 This is great... by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #6 NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in InglewoodOn the brink of a vote that could return the NFL to Los Angeles, a consensus is building within the league for the St. Louis Rams and San Diego Chargers to share a stadium in Inglewood.Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams.The Chargers and Oakland Raiders want to build a stadium in Carson, and to this point, Chargers owner Dean Spanos has stood by his partnership with Raiders owner Mark Davis.The league insiders, who spoke on the condition they not be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter, say Spanos doesn't want to be seen as turning his back on a partner. This makes the path to what is emerging as the preferred pairing more difficult. But the insiders believe the matter can be resolved during the special meeting that starts Tuesday in Houston, where owners hope to find an answer to the two-decade L.A. vacancy.One influential owner whose preference has not been apparent in public or private, touted Inglewood over Carson, saying "the deals aren't even close."In the past week, there has been a flurry of behind-the-scenes activity among owners and NFL staff in an attempt to clear the way for a decision to be made at these meetings.It is extremely rare for the NFL to devote a full day to a single topic, much less two days in the middle of the playoffs. It underscores how determined the NFL owners and Commissioner Roger Goodell are to reach an accord that would bring professional football back to the country's second-largest market.It is widely thought that the L.A decision will help define the legacy of Goodell, and shape the financial future for a league that generates $10 billion in annual revenue.All three teams want to relocate to L.A. for the 2016 season, meaning time is of the essence to move their franchises and begin selling tickets.Although the general meetings start Tuesday, the Los Angeles committee is convening Monday.There's a sense that most owners want the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood, but aren't sure of the best way to make it happen. The idea of the Raiders returning to L.A. is not popular among many owners.One owner said that the NFL has to realize that "we just can't solve all three stadium problems in one fell swoop."It would mean striking a bargain that keeps the Raiders out of L.A. but doesn't leave them empty handed. Such a maneuver could mean that the Raiders return to Oakland in the short term, but can explore relocating to other cities, among them San Diego, St. Louis or joining the San Francisco 49ers in their new stadium in Santa Clara.There is some sentiment among owners that the L.A. matter should be determined by secret ballot to avoid the awkwardness of league partners voting against partners. A secret vote -- now used only for the selection of a commissioner or awarding a Super Bowl to a city -- would need the approval of 17 of the league's 32 owners, a simple majority.The idea of putting the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood has been floated for months and was formally proposed last week by Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones in a one-page letter to Goodell.There's a belief among some owners and league executives that Spanos would be willing to make a deal with Rams owner Stan Kroenke to share Inglewood if it were a 50-50 partnership that wouldn't put the Chargers at an economic disadvantage.When news of Jones' letter became public late Saturday, Mark Fabiani, the Chargers' point man on stadium issues, reached out to The Times and asked that a December letter Spanos sent the L.A. committee be referenced. The two-paragraph letter rejected Kroenke's offer to partner with a second team in his planned Inglewood stadium."Nothing in Stan's letter gives me any reason to reconsider my partnership with Mark Davis and our chosen stadium site," Spanos wrote.The one thing everyone can agree upon is that this is a very fluid process and plans can shift very quickly.Three-quarters of owners must approve any franchise relocation. It's believed both projects have the nine votes to block the other, although that could be shifting in favor of the Rams after last week's meetings of the finance, stadium and L.A. committees at league headquarters in New York.It's unclear if the six-owner L.A. committee will recommend a stadium plan or whether such an endorsement would be unanimous. Two members of that committee, Carolina Panthers owner Jerry Richardson and Houston Texans owner Bob McNair, have made it clear in public that they favor the Carson plan.Though the cost of the Inglewood stadium proposed by Kroenke has been publicly estimated at $1.86 billion, the league insiders say the cost likely would significantly exceed $2 billion. That would make it the most expensive venue in U.S. sports history. At 3 million square feet -- including identical locker rooms, office space and owner's suites for two teams -- it would also be the NFL's largest stadium. 'Bring Back the Rams' rally draws hundredsRams fans, days before the NFL's decision on moving one or more franchises to Los Angeles, rallied Saturday in hopes of getting the team back inSouthern California.The project would be the centerpiece of a 298-acre entertainment, retail and housing development, something one owner called an "NFL Disney World."According to the relocation application the Rams submitted to the league last week, the stadium would be ready for the 2019 season.Disney Chairman and CEO Robert Iger, who would oversee the Carson proposal if it is approved and have the opportunity for a minority ownership stake in the Chargers or Raiders, is expected to make a presentation to owners in Houston.On Saturday, Goodell sent a 48-page report to all franchises saying that the three home markets -- Oakland, San Diego and St. Louis -- failed to produce viable stadium plans.In the report, which did not make any recommendations, Goodell said market research supports the conclusion that L.A. is capable of being a two-team market.Though the L.A. Memorial Coliseum has expressed a willingness to temporarily host one NFL team starting next season, it's unclear where a second team would play. USC's lease to operate the Coliseum would need to be amended to allow two NFL teams.Los Angeles has had several sites proposed for an NFL stadium over the years, yet the nation's second-largest city is still without a team.Last summer, the Rose Bowl Bowl Operating Co. declined to respond to the NFL's request for a proposal to temporarily host a team.League officials, who have also looked at Angel Stadium, Dodger Stadium and the 27,000-seat StubHub Center, say they aren't concerned about finding temporary homes for two L.A. teams.[email protected]Twitter: @LATimesFarmer[email protected]Twitter: @nathanfenno RFU Season Ticket Holder by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #7 So maybe the delay is about letting Spanos have some input into the Inglewood stadium? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #8 GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by azramsfan93 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #9 Hacksaw wrote:http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-nfl-la-relocation-20160112-story.html"Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams."Yes!!! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #10 I love IT!..I am confident the Rams fans in SoCal can pack out Inglewood..Chargers? It will be an empty cavern..lol Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 31 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by ramsfan1977 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #3 TOPIC AUTHOR Even Vinny is on board now with his most recent tweet! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie It's GOING OUR WAY!!!!!! POST #4 Per the LA Timeshttp://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp ... story.html by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #5 This is great... by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #6 NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in InglewoodOn the brink of a vote that could return the NFL to Los Angeles, a consensus is building within the league for the St. Louis Rams and San Diego Chargers to share a stadium in Inglewood.Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams.The Chargers and Oakland Raiders want to build a stadium in Carson, and to this point, Chargers owner Dean Spanos has stood by his partnership with Raiders owner Mark Davis.The league insiders, who spoke on the condition they not be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter, say Spanos doesn't want to be seen as turning his back on a partner. This makes the path to what is emerging as the preferred pairing more difficult. But the insiders believe the matter can be resolved during the special meeting that starts Tuesday in Houston, where owners hope to find an answer to the two-decade L.A. vacancy.One influential owner whose preference has not been apparent in public or private, touted Inglewood over Carson, saying "the deals aren't even close."In the past week, there has been a flurry of behind-the-scenes activity among owners and NFL staff in an attempt to clear the way for a decision to be made at these meetings.It is extremely rare for the NFL to devote a full day to a single topic, much less two days in the middle of the playoffs. It underscores how determined the NFL owners and Commissioner Roger Goodell are to reach an accord that would bring professional football back to the country's second-largest market.It is widely thought that the L.A decision will help define the legacy of Goodell, and shape the financial future for a league that generates $10 billion in annual revenue.All three teams want to relocate to L.A. for the 2016 season, meaning time is of the essence to move their franchises and begin selling tickets.Although the general meetings start Tuesday, the Los Angeles committee is convening Monday.There's a sense that most owners want the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood, but aren't sure of the best way to make it happen. The idea of the Raiders returning to L.A. is not popular among many owners.One owner said that the NFL has to realize that "we just can't solve all three stadium problems in one fell swoop."It would mean striking a bargain that keeps the Raiders out of L.A. but doesn't leave them empty handed. Such a maneuver could mean that the Raiders return to Oakland in the short term, but can explore relocating to other cities, among them San Diego, St. Louis or joining the San Francisco 49ers in their new stadium in Santa Clara.There is some sentiment among owners that the L.A. matter should be determined by secret ballot to avoid the awkwardness of league partners voting against partners. A secret vote -- now used only for the selection of a commissioner or awarding a Super Bowl to a city -- would need the approval of 17 of the league's 32 owners, a simple majority.The idea of putting the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood has been floated for months and was formally proposed last week by Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones in a one-page letter to Goodell.There's a belief among some owners and league executives that Spanos would be willing to make a deal with Rams owner Stan Kroenke to share Inglewood if it were a 50-50 partnership that wouldn't put the Chargers at an economic disadvantage.When news of Jones' letter became public late Saturday, Mark Fabiani, the Chargers' point man on stadium issues, reached out to The Times and asked that a December letter Spanos sent the L.A. committee be referenced. The two-paragraph letter rejected Kroenke's offer to partner with a second team in his planned Inglewood stadium."Nothing in Stan's letter gives me any reason to reconsider my partnership with Mark Davis and our chosen stadium site," Spanos wrote.The one thing everyone can agree upon is that this is a very fluid process and plans can shift very quickly.Three-quarters of owners must approve any franchise relocation. It's believed both projects have the nine votes to block the other, although that could be shifting in favor of the Rams after last week's meetings of the finance, stadium and L.A. committees at league headquarters in New York.It's unclear if the six-owner L.A. committee will recommend a stadium plan or whether such an endorsement would be unanimous. Two members of that committee, Carolina Panthers owner Jerry Richardson and Houston Texans owner Bob McNair, have made it clear in public that they favor the Carson plan.Though the cost of the Inglewood stadium proposed by Kroenke has been publicly estimated at $1.86 billion, the league insiders say the cost likely would significantly exceed $2 billion. That would make it the most expensive venue in U.S. sports history. At 3 million square feet -- including identical locker rooms, office space and owner's suites for two teams -- it would also be the NFL's largest stadium. 'Bring Back the Rams' rally draws hundredsRams fans, days before the NFL's decision on moving one or more franchises to Los Angeles, rallied Saturday in hopes of getting the team back inSouthern California.The project would be the centerpiece of a 298-acre entertainment, retail and housing development, something one owner called an "NFL Disney World."According to the relocation application the Rams submitted to the league last week, the stadium would be ready for the 2019 season.Disney Chairman and CEO Robert Iger, who would oversee the Carson proposal if it is approved and have the opportunity for a minority ownership stake in the Chargers or Raiders, is expected to make a presentation to owners in Houston.On Saturday, Goodell sent a 48-page report to all franchises saying that the three home markets -- Oakland, San Diego and St. Louis -- failed to produce viable stadium plans.In the report, which did not make any recommendations, Goodell said market research supports the conclusion that L.A. is capable of being a two-team market.Though the L.A. Memorial Coliseum has expressed a willingness to temporarily host one NFL team starting next season, it's unclear where a second team would play. USC's lease to operate the Coliseum would need to be amended to allow two NFL teams.Los Angeles has had several sites proposed for an NFL stadium over the years, yet the nation's second-largest city is still without a team.Last summer, the Rose Bowl Bowl Operating Co. declined to respond to the NFL's request for a proposal to temporarily host a team.League officials, who have also looked at Angel Stadium, Dodger Stadium and the 27,000-seat StubHub Center, say they aren't concerned about finding temporary homes for two L.A. teams.[email protected]Twitter: @LATimesFarmer[email protected]Twitter: @nathanfenno RFU Season Ticket Holder by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #7 So maybe the delay is about letting Spanos have some input into the Inglewood stadium? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #8 GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by azramsfan93 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #9 Hacksaw wrote:http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-nfl-la-relocation-20160112-story.html"Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams."Yes!!! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #10 I love IT!..I am confident the Rams fans in SoCal can pack out Inglewood..Chargers? It will be an empty cavern..lol Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 31 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie It's GOING OUR WAY!!!!!! POST #4 Per the LA Timeshttp://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp ... story.html by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #5 This is great... by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #6 NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in InglewoodOn the brink of a vote that could return the NFL to Los Angeles, a consensus is building within the league for the St. Louis Rams and San Diego Chargers to share a stadium in Inglewood.Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams.The Chargers and Oakland Raiders want to build a stadium in Carson, and to this point, Chargers owner Dean Spanos has stood by his partnership with Raiders owner Mark Davis.The league insiders, who spoke on the condition they not be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter, say Spanos doesn't want to be seen as turning his back on a partner. This makes the path to what is emerging as the preferred pairing more difficult. But the insiders believe the matter can be resolved during the special meeting that starts Tuesday in Houston, where owners hope to find an answer to the two-decade L.A. vacancy.One influential owner whose preference has not been apparent in public or private, touted Inglewood over Carson, saying "the deals aren't even close."In the past week, there has been a flurry of behind-the-scenes activity among owners and NFL staff in an attempt to clear the way for a decision to be made at these meetings.It is extremely rare for the NFL to devote a full day to a single topic, much less two days in the middle of the playoffs. It underscores how determined the NFL owners and Commissioner Roger Goodell are to reach an accord that would bring professional football back to the country's second-largest market.It is widely thought that the L.A decision will help define the legacy of Goodell, and shape the financial future for a league that generates $10 billion in annual revenue.All three teams want to relocate to L.A. for the 2016 season, meaning time is of the essence to move their franchises and begin selling tickets.Although the general meetings start Tuesday, the Los Angeles committee is convening Monday.There's a sense that most owners want the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood, but aren't sure of the best way to make it happen. The idea of the Raiders returning to L.A. is not popular among many owners.One owner said that the NFL has to realize that "we just can't solve all three stadium problems in one fell swoop."It would mean striking a bargain that keeps the Raiders out of L.A. but doesn't leave them empty handed. Such a maneuver could mean that the Raiders return to Oakland in the short term, but can explore relocating to other cities, among them San Diego, St. Louis or joining the San Francisco 49ers in their new stadium in Santa Clara.There is some sentiment among owners that the L.A. matter should be determined by secret ballot to avoid the awkwardness of league partners voting against partners. A secret vote -- now used only for the selection of a commissioner or awarding a Super Bowl to a city -- would need the approval of 17 of the league's 32 owners, a simple majority.The idea of putting the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood has been floated for months and was formally proposed last week by Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones in a one-page letter to Goodell.There's a belief among some owners and league executives that Spanos would be willing to make a deal with Rams owner Stan Kroenke to share Inglewood if it were a 50-50 partnership that wouldn't put the Chargers at an economic disadvantage.When news of Jones' letter became public late Saturday, Mark Fabiani, the Chargers' point man on stadium issues, reached out to The Times and asked that a December letter Spanos sent the L.A. committee be referenced. The two-paragraph letter rejected Kroenke's offer to partner with a second team in his planned Inglewood stadium."Nothing in Stan's letter gives me any reason to reconsider my partnership with Mark Davis and our chosen stadium site," Spanos wrote.The one thing everyone can agree upon is that this is a very fluid process and plans can shift very quickly.Three-quarters of owners must approve any franchise relocation. It's believed both projects have the nine votes to block the other, although that could be shifting in favor of the Rams after last week's meetings of the finance, stadium and L.A. committees at league headquarters in New York.It's unclear if the six-owner L.A. committee will recommend a stadium plan or whether such an endorsement would be unanimous. Two members of that committee, Carolina Panthers owner Jerry Richardson and Houston Texans owner Bob McNair, have made it clear in public that they favor the Carson plan.Though the cost of the Inglewood stadium proposed by Kroenke has been publicly estimated at $1.86 billion, the league insiders say the cost likely would significantly exceed $2 billion. That would make it the most expensive venue in U.S. sports history. At 3 million square feet -- including identical locker rooms, office space and owner's suites for two teams -- it would also be the NFL's largest stadium. 'Bring Back the Rams' rally draws hundredsRams fans, days before the NFL's decision on moving one or more franchises to Los Angeles, rallied Saturday in hopes of getting the team back inSouthern California.The project would be the centerpiece of a 298-acre entertainment, retail and housing development, something one owner called an "NFL Disney World."According to the relocation application the Rams submitted to the league last week, the stadium would be ready for the 2019 season.Disney Chairman and CEO Robert Iger, who would oversee the Carson proposal if it is approved and have the opportunity for a minority ownership stake in the Chargers or Raiders, is expected to make a presentation to owners in Houston.On Saturday, Goodell sent a 48-page report to all franchises saying that the three home markets -- Oakland, San Diego and St. Louis -- failed to produce viable stadium plans.In the report, which did not make any recommendations, Goodell said market research supports the conclusion that L.A. is capable of being a two-team market.Though the L.A. Memorial Coliseum has expressed a willingness to temporarily host one NFL team starting next season, it's unclear where a second team would play. USC's lease to operate the Coliseum would need to be amended to allow two NFL teams.Los Angeles has had several sites proposed for an NFL stadium over the years, yet the nation's second-largest city is still without a team.Last summer, the Rose Bowl Bowl Operating Co. declined to respond to the NFL's request for a proposal to temporarily host a team.League officials, who have also looked at Angel Stadium, Dodger Stadium and the 27,000-seat StubHub Center, say they aren't concerned about finding temporary homes for two L.A. teams.[email protected]Twitter: @LATimesFarmer[email protected]Twitter: @nathanfenno RFU Season Ticket Holder by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #7 So maybe the delay is about letting Spanos have some input into the Inglewood stadium? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #8 GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by azramsfan93 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #9 Hacksaw wrote:http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-nfl-la-relocation-20160112-story.html"Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams."Yes!!! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #10 I love IT!..I am confident the Rams fans in SoCal can pack out Inglewood..Chargers? It will be an empty cavern..lol Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 31 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #5 This is great... by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #6 NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in InglewoodOn the brink of a vote that could return the NFL to Los Angeles, a consensus is building within the league for the St. Louis Rams and San Diego Chargers to share a stadium in Inglewood.Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams.The Chargers and Oakland Raiders want to build a stadium in Carson, and to this point, Chargers owner Dean Spanos has stood by his partnership with Raiders owner Mark Davis.The league insiders, who spoke on the condition they not be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter, say Spanos doesn't want to be seen as turning his back on a partner. This makes the path to what is emerging as the preferred pairing more difficult. But the insiders believe the matter can be resolved during the special meeting that starts Tuesday in Houston, where owners hope to find an answer to the two-decade L.A. vacancy.One influential owner whose preference has not been apparent in public or private, touted Inglewood over Carson, saying "the deals aren't even close."In the past week, there has been a flurry of behind-the-scenes activity among owners and NFL staff in an attempt to clear the way for a decision to be made at these meetings.It is extremely rare for the NFL to devote a full day to a single topic, much less two days in the middle of the playoffs. It underscores how determined the NFL owners and Commissioner Roger Goodell are to reach an accord that would bring professional football back to the country's second-largest market.It is widely thought that the L.A decision will help define the legacy of Goodell, and shape the financial future for a league that generates $10 billion in annual revenue.All three teams want to relocate to L.A. for the 2016 season, meaning time is of the essence to move their franchises and begin selling tickets.Although the general meetings start Tuesday, the Los Angeles committee is convening Monday.There's a sense that most owners want the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood, but aren't sure of the best way to make it happen. The idea of the Raiders returning to L.A. is not popular among many owners.One owner said that the NFL has to realize that "we just can't solve all three stadium problems in one fell swoop."It would mean striking a bargain that keeps the Raiders out of L.A. but doesn't leave them empty handed. Such a maneuver could mean that the Raiders return to Oakland in the short term, but can explore relocating to other cities, among them San Diego, St. Louis or joining the San Francisco 49ers in their new stadium in Santa Clara.There is some sentiment among owners that the L.A. matter should be determined by secret ballot to avoid the awkwardness of league partners voting against partners. A secret vote -- now used only for the selection of a commissioner or awarding a Super Bowl to a city -- would need the approval of 17 of the league's 32 owners, a simple majority.The idea of putting the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood has been floated for months and was formally proposed last week by Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones in a one-page letter to Goodell.There's a belief among some owners and league executives that Spanos would be willing to make a deal with Rams owner Stan Kroenke to share Inglewood if it were a 50-50 partnership that wouldn't put the Chargers at an economic disadvantage.When news of Jones' letter became public late Saturday, Mark Fabiani, the Chargers' point man on stadium issues, reached out to The Times and asked that a December letter Spanos sent the L.A. committee be referenced. The two-paragraph letter rejected Kroenke's offer to partner with a second team in his planned Inglewood stadium."Nothing in Stan's letter gives me any reason to reconsider my partnership with Mark Davis and our chosen stadium site," Spanos wrote.The one thing everyone can agree upon is that this is a very fluid process and plans can shift very quickly.Three-quarters of owners must approve any franchise relocation. It's believed both projects have the nine votes to block the other, although that could be shifting in favor of the Rams after last week's meetings of the finance, stadium and L.A. committees at league headquarters in New York.It's unclear if the six-owner L.A. committee will recommend a stadium plan or whether such an endorsement would be unanimous. Two members of that committee, Carolina Panthers owner Jerry Richardson and Houston Texans owner Bob McNair, have made it clear in public that they favor the Carson plan.Though the cost of the Inglewood stadium proposed by Kroenke has been publicly estimated at $1.86 billion, the league insiders say the cost likely would significantly exceed $2 billion. That would make it the most expensive venue in U.S. sports history. At 3 million square feet -- including identical locker rooms, office space and owner's suites for two teams -- it would also be the NFL's largest stadium. 'Bring Back the Rams' rally draws hundredsRams fans, days before the NFL's decision on moving one or more franchises to Los Angeles, rallied Saturday in hopes of getting the team back inSouthern California.The project would be the centerpiece of a 298-acre entertainment, retail and housing development, something one owner called an "NFL Disney World."According to the relocation application the Rams submitted to the league last week, the stadium would be ready for the 2019 season.Disney Chairman and CEO Robert Iger, who would oversee the Carson proposal if it is approved and have the opportunity for a minority ownership stake in the Chargers or Raiders, is expected to make a presentation to owners in Houston.On Saturday, Goodell sent a 48-page report to all franchises saying that the three home markets -- Oakland, San Diego and St. Louis -- failed to produce viable stadium plans.In the report, which did not make any recommendations, Goodell said market research supports the conclusion that L.A. is capable of being a two-team market.Though the L.A. Memorial Coliseum has expressed a willingness to temporarily host one NFL team starting next season, it's unclear where a second team would play. USC's lease to operate the Coliseum would need to be amended to allow two NFL teams.Los Angeles has had several sites proposed for an NFL stadium over the years, yet the nation's second-largest city is still without a team.Last summer, the Rose Bowl Bowl Operating Co. declined to respond to the NFL's request for a proposal to temporarily host a team.League officials, who have also looked at Angel Stadium, Dodger Stadium and the 27,000-seat StubHub Center, say they aren't concerned about finding temporary homes for two L.A. teams.[email protected]Twitter: @LATimesFarmer[email protected]Twitter: @nathanfenno RFU Season Ticket Holder by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #7 So maybe the delay is about letting Spanos have some input into the Inglewood stadium? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #8 GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by azramsfan93 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #9 Hacksaw wrote:http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-nfl-la-relocation-20160112-story.html"Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams."Yes!!! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #10 I love IT!..I am confident the Rams fans in SoCal can pack out Inglewood..Chargers? It will be an empty cavern..lol Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 31 posts Jul 13 2025
by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #6 NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in InglewoodOn the brink of a vote that could return the NFL to Los Angeles, a consensus is building within the league for the St. Louis Rams and San Diego Chargers to share a stadium in Inglewood.Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams.The Chargers and Oakland Raiders want to build a stadium in Carson, and to this point, Chargers owner Dean Spanos has stood by his partnership with Raiders owner Mark Davis.The league insiders, who spoke on the condition they not be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter, say Spanos doesn't want to be seen as turning his back on a partner. This makes the path to what is emerging as the preferred pairing more difficult. But the insiders believe the matter can be resolved during the special meeting that starts Tuesday in Houston, where owners hope to find an answer to the two-decade L.A. vacancy.One influential owner whose preference has not been apparent in public or private, touted Inglewood over Carson, saying "the deals aren't even close."In the past week, there has been a flurry of behind-the-scenes activity among owners and NFL staff in an attempt to clear the way for a decision to be made at these meetings.It is extremely rare for the NFL to devote a full day to a single topic, much less two days in the middle of the playoffs. It underscores how determined the NFL owners and Commissioner Roger Goodell are to reach an accord that would bring professional football back to the country's second-largest market.It is widely thought that the L.A decision will help define the legacy of Goodell, and shape the financial future for a league that generates $10 billion in annual revenue.All three teams want to relocate to L.A. for the 2016 season, meaning time is of the essence to move their franchises and begin selling tickets.Although the general meetings start Tuesday, the Los Angeles committee is convening Monday.There's a sense that most owners want the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood, but aren't sure of the best way to make it happen. The idea of the Raiders returning to L.A. is not popular among many owners.One owner said that the NFL has to realize that "we just can't solve all three stadium problems in one fell swoop."It would mean striking a bargain that keeps the Raiders out of L.A. but doesn't leave them empty handed. Such a maneuver could mean that the Raiders return to Oakland in the short term, but can explore relocating to other cities, among them San Diego, St. Louis or joining the San Francisco 49ers in their new stadium in Santa Clara.There is some sentiment among owners that the L.A. matter should be determined by secret ballot to avoid the awkwardness of league partners voting against partners. A secret vote -- now used only for the selection of a commissioner or awarding a Super Bowl to a city -- would need the approval of 17 of the league's 32 owners, a simple majority.The idea of putting the Chargers and Rams in Inglewood has been floated for months and was formally proposed last week by Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones in a one-page letter to Goodell.There's a belief among some owners and league executives that Spanos would be willing to make a deal with Rams owner Stan Kroenke to share Inglewood if it were a 50-50 partnership that wouldn't put the Chargers at an economic disadvantage.When news of Jones' letter became public late Saturday, Mark Fabiani, the Chargers' point man on stadium issues, reached out to The Times and asked that a December letter Spanos sent the L.A. committee be referenced. The two-paragraph letter rejected Kroenke's offer to partner with a second team in his planned Inglewood stadium."Nothing in Stan's letter gives me any reason to reconsider my partnership with Mark Davis and our chosen stadium site," Spanos wrote.The one thing everyone can agree upon is that this is a very fluid process and plans can shift very quickly.Three-quarters of owners must approve any franchise relocation. It's believed both projects have the nine votes to block the other, although that could be shifting in favor of the Rams after last week's meetings of the finance, stadium and L.A. committees at league headquarters in New York.It's unclear if the six-owner L.A. committee will recommend a stadium plan or whether such an endorsement would be unanimous. Two members of that committee, Carolina Panthers owner Jerry Richardson and Houston Texans owner Bob McNair, have made it clear in public that they favor the Carson plan.Though the cost of the Inglewood stadium proposed by Kroenke has been publicly estimated at $1.86 billion, the league insiders say the cost likely would significantly exceed $2 billion. That would make it the most expensive venue in U.S. sports history. At 3 million square feet -- including identical locker rooms, office space and owner's suites for two teams -- it would also be the NFL's largest stadium. 'Bring Back the Rams' rally draws hundredsRams fans, days before the NFL's decision on moving one or more franchises to Los Angeles, rallied Saturday in hopes of getting the team back inSouthern California.The project would be the centerpiece of a 298-acre entertainment, retail and housing development, something one owner called an "NFL Disney World."According to the relocation application the Rams submitted to the league last week, the stadium would be ready for the 2019 season.Disney Chairman and CEO Robert Iger, who would oversee the Carson proposal if it is approved and have the opportunity for a minority ownership stake in the Chargers or Raiders, is expected to make a presentation to owners in Houston.On Saturday, Goodell sent a 48-page report to all franchises saying that the three home markets -- Oakland, San Diego and St. Louis -- failed to produce viable stadium plans.In the report, which did not make any recommendations, Goodell said market research supports the conclusion that L.A. is capable of being a two-team market.Though the L.A. Memorial Coliseum has expressed a willingness to temporarily host one NFL team starting next season, it's unclear where a second team would play. USC's lease to operate the Coliseum would need to be amended to allow two NFL teams.Los Angeles has had several sites proposed for an NFL stadium over the years, yet the nation's second-largest city is still without a team.Last summer, the Rose Bowl Bowl Operating Co. declined to respond to the NFL's request for a proposal to temporarily host a team.League officials, who have also looked at Angel Stadium, Dodger Stadium and the 27,000-seat StubHub Center, say they aren't concerned about finding temporary homes for two L.A. teams.[email protected]Twitter: @LATimesFarmer[email protected]Twitter: @nathanfenno RFU Season Ticket Holder by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #7 So maybe the delay is about letting Spanos have some input into the Inglewood stadium? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #8 GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by azramsfan93 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #9 Hacksaw wrote:http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-nfl-la-relocation-20160112-story.html"Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams."Yes!!! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #10 I love IT!..I am confident the Rams fans in SoCal can pack out Inglewood..Chargers? It will be an empty cavern..lol Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 31 posts Jul 13 2025
by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #7 So maybe the delay is about letting Spanos have some input into the Inglewood stadium? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #8 GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by azramsfan93 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #9 Hacksaw wrote:http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-nfl-la-relocation-20160112-story.html"Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams."Yes!!! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #10 I love IT!..I am confident the Rams fans in SoCal can pack out Inglewood..Chargers? It will be an empty cavern..lol Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 31 posts Jul 13 2025
by Hacksaw 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Per Nathan Fenno, LA Times POST #8 GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by azramsfan93 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #9 Hacksaw wrote:http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-nfl-la-relocation-20160112-story.html"Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams."Yes!!! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #10 I love IT!..I am confident the Rams fans in SoCal can pack out Inglewood..Chargers? It will be an empty cavern..lol Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 31 posts Jul 13 2025
by azramsfan93 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #9 Hacksaw wrote:http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-nfl-la-relocation-20160112-story.html"Multiple league officials and owners not involved with the Inglewood project, or the competing proposal in Carson, say there is momentum to pair the two franchises in what one owner describes as a "transformational" project backed by the Rams."Yes!!! by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #10 I love IT!..I am confident the Rams fans in SoCal can pack out Inglewood..Chargers? It will be an empty cavern..lol Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 31 posts Jul 13 2025
by LoyalRam 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: NFL consensus builds for a Rams-Chargers stadium project in Inglewood POST #10 I love IT!..I am confident the Rams fans in SoCal can pack out Inglewood..Chargers? It will be an empty cavern..lol Reply 1 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business