[Elvis]

[OldSchool]

Interesting they recommend a stadium without a design plan.

[Hacksaw]

https://twitter.com/losangelesrams/status/686983672839405568

That's a bit ominous in our favor....

[dieterbrock]

If i remember right, Jets/Giants on a landfill, not toxic dump...

And you know what kind of rules they had back in the 60's and 70's as to what could be dumped in the landfill?
Yeah it was wild west stuff.

[Elvis]

[moklerman]

https://twitter.com/losangelesrams/status/686983672839405568

Wouldn't it be poetic to have it happen again on the same day.

[ramsfan1977]

Hearing if Stan would go 50/50 on everything with Dean in ING, we might have a deal.

[den-the-coach]

Hearing if Stan would go 50/50 on everything with Dean in ING, we might have a deal.

From where?

[ramsfan1977]

Washington post via Twitter. One of the obstacles. Dean does not want to be a tenant.

[Hacksaw]

We all expected to have the Spanos committee follow through with their recommendation. I'd love to hear how they justified that conclusion though. I hope it becomes public.

I believe there are enough owners who will see through that though. ESK is not hated by anyone other than Spanos possibly. He may be feared but with that comes respect and if the owners want the best deal in LA they will go with the money.
Now if they are all in the same poker club as Spanos (which I doubt), the restoration of our team is in jeopardy. But going out on a limb for Dean to support his imaginary stadium and accept his reason that since the Rams left they filled in and get to claim 2 markets,, that's just plain old preposterous.
If by some stretch of the imagination they actually do approve the Charaiders, ESK will hopefully just go for it. If not, sit back and watch the LA experiment fall flat on it's face. Perhaps ESK could help that by moving to SD.