13 posts
  • 2 / 2
  • 1
  • 2
 by Hacksaw
9 years 8 months ago
 Total posts:   24523  
 Joined:  Apr 15 2015
United States of America   AT THE BEACH
Moderator

This situation is weird. Tonight, I'm pulling for SD fans making the same comments StL fans were making last night, but theirs I thought were bogus.

Still 55 years in SD, and the legacy shouldn't be destroyed. Oakland almost, almost the same thing. StL has a similar argument.
I really don't want any team to take the name away from the city it plays in (which was mentioned several times tonight), but the Rams are the exception because out of the 3 teams involved, the legacy of nearly 50 years, 50, trumps StL's claim,, making it somehow OK.

The more I watch all this, the more it seems that 2 of the 3 team cities are pulling for the Rams as that helps their cause. i didn't really expect that.

 by RedAlice
9 years 8 months ago
 Total posts:   6781  
 Joined:  Aug 07 2015
United States of America   Seattle
Hall of Fame

Most San Diego fans I know are happy to have the Rams back to LA, and do not want the Raiders back to LA.

 by Hacksaw
9 years 8 months ago
 Total posts:   24523  
 Joined:  Apr 15 2015
United States of America   AT THE BEACH
Moderator

Makes sense, The Rams in LA helps keep the Bolts in SD and the Raiders in SoCal might step on the Chargers market share, at least more than the Rams will when it comes to Chargers fans..

  • 2 / 2
  • 1
  • 2
13 posts Jul 06 2025