by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Does anyone think... POST #11 NFL coming to L.A. will be a positive story to pretty much everyone, except whoever is losing their team... RFU Season Ticket Holder by den-the-coach 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 870 Joined: May 22 2015 Fifty-four Forty or Fight Veteran Re: Does anyone think... POST #12 Elvis wrote:NFL coming to L.A. will be a positive story to pretty much everyone, except whoever is losing their team... That's correct from this: To This: by ramfaninsd 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 115 Joined: May 26 2015 san diego Practice Squad Re: Does anyone think... POST #13 I get it that spanos wants to block stan coz of that 25-30 percent support from the surrounding counties but do not underestimate the drawing power of a new stadium whether it be in mission valley or downtown. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #14 LA Rams will be a reality by next Thursday. by snackdaddy 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Does anyone think... POST #15 dieterbrock wrote:I guess When they announce, whatever they announce, will be spun in a most positive way I'm sure. And the majority of the NFL fan base will buy whatever they sell.Well, there might be a fan base somewhere in the Midwest that ain't too happy with it. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Does anyone think... POST #16 A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Does anyone think... POST #17 Stranger wrote:They will announce:1. Rams get approval to move immediately.2. Chargers get approval (now) to move when CoC is open3. Raiders get money for new stadium in Oakland.I agree with this. 2 however could end up being an approval to move and then Spanos announces he will stay to give his beloved SD one last chance. That locker room in LA is still huge leverage and Spanos can look like the good guy in SD (sort of) . GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #18 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...I don't get all the support for Spanos. He's been more toxic than Kroenke, SD has been a good market, a super bowl market, and his rationale for moving (25% of fan base) seems flimsy at best. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Does anyone think... POST #19 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...Diff between us and the reporters is that we aren't on someone's payroll who has a fight in this game, or some agenda to promote. Don't think these guys are objective independent animals, because that's an assumption that will lead one astray. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #20 I know I am repeating myself but the NFL does not want the appearance of a division with owners. They are going to come out of this with all three owners getting what they "need". That's right. Needs. The best way you do that is:1) Rams in Inglewood2) Chargers with the option of Inglewood and the NFL will work with Spanos to get a stadium deal in San Diego3) Raiders in Oakland with the NFL heavily involved in securing a new stadiumAll get what they "need".The St Louis stadium has clearly never been viable and the Carson stadium imaginary. This past week has been manic but it constantly moves towards Rams in LA. We will not be shocked about the Rams coming home. Just real happy. The St Louis folks will be shocked and haten on Stan. Ambivalent at best. Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 25 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by den-the-coach 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 870 Joined: May 22 2015 Fifty-four Forty or Fight Veteran Re: Does anyone think... POST #12 Elvis wrote:NFL coming to L.A. will be a positive story to pretty much everyone, except whoever is losing their team... That's correct from this: To This: by ramfaninsd 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 115 Joined: May 26 2015 san diego Practice Squad Re: Does anyone think... POST #13 I get it that spanos wants to block stan coz of that 25-30 percent support from the surrounding counties but do not underestimate the drawing power of a new stadium whether it be in mission valley or downtown. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #14 LA Rams will be a reality by next Thursday. by snackdaddy 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Does anyone think... POST #15 dieterbrock wrote:I guess When they announce, whatever they announce, will be spun in a most positive way I'm sure. And the majority of the NFL fan base will buy whatever they sell.Well, there might be a fan base somewhere in the Midwest that ain't too happy with it. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Does anyone think... POST #16 A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Does anyone think... POST #17 Stranger wrote:They will announce:1. Rams get approval to move immediately.2. Chargers get approval (now) to move when CoC is open3. Raiders get money for new stadium in Oakland.I agree with this. 2 however could end up being an approval to move and then Spanos announces he will stay to give his beloved SD one last chance. That locker room in LA is still huge leverage and Spanos can look like the good guy in SD (sort of) . GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #18 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...I don't get all the support for Spanos. He's been more toxic than Kroenke, SD has been a good market, a super bowl market, and his rationale for moving (25% of fan base) seems flimsy at best. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Does anyone think... POST #19 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...Diff between us and the reporters is that we aren't on someone's payroll who has a fight in this game, or some agenda to promote. Don't think these guys are objective independent animals, because that's an assumption that will lead one astray. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #20 I know I am repeating myself but the NFL does not want the appearance of a division with owners. They are going to come out of this with all three owners getting what they "need". That's right. Needs. The best way you do that is:1) Rams in Inglewood2) Chargers with the option of Inglewood and the NFL will work with Spanos to get a stadium deal in San Diego3) Raiders in Oakland with the NFL heavily involved in securing a new stadiumAll get what they "need".The St Louis stadium has clearly never been viable and the Carson stadium imaginary. This past week has been manic but it constantly moves towards Rams in LA. We will not be shocked about the Rams coming home. Just real happy. The St Louis folks will be shocked and haten on Stan. Ambivalent at best. Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 25 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by ramfaninsd 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 115 Joined: May 26 2015 san diego Practice Squad Re: Does anyone think... POST #13 I get it that spanos wants to block stan coz of that 25-30 percent support from the surrounding counties but do not underestimate the drawing power of a new stadium whether it be in mission valley or downtown. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #14 LA Rams will be a reality by next Thursday. by snackdaddy 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Does anyone think... POST #15 dieterbrock wrote:I guess When they announce, whatever they announce, will be spun in a most positive way I'm sure. And the majority of the NFL fan base will buy whatever they sell.Well, there might be a fan base somewhere in the Midwest that ain't too happy with it. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Does anyone think... POST #16 A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Does anyone think... POST #17 Stranger wrote:They will announce:1. Rams get approval to move immediately.2. Chargers get approval (now) to move when CoC is open3. Raiders get money for new stadium in Oakland.I agree with this. 2 however could end up being an approval to move and then Spanos announces he will stay to give his beloved SD one last chance. That locker room in LA is still huge leverage and Spanos can look like the good guy in SD (sort of) . GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #18 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...I don't get all the support for Spanos. He's been more toxic than Kroenke, SD has been a good market, a super bowl market, and his rationale for moving (25% of fan base) seems flimsy at best. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Does anyone think... POST #19 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...Diff between us and the reporters is that we aren't on someone's payroll who has a fight in this game, or some agenda to promote. Don't think these guys are objective independent animals, because that's an assumption that will lead one astray. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #20 I know I am repeating myself but the NFL does not want the appearance of a division with owners. They are going to come out of this with all three owners getting what they "need". That's right. Needs. The best way you do that is:1) Rams in Inglewood2) Chargers with the option of Inglewood and the NFL will work with Spanos to get a stadium deal in San Diego3) Raiders in Oakland with the NFL heavily involved in securing a new stadiumAll get what they "need".The St Louis stadium has clearly never been viable and the Carson stadium imaginary. This past week has been manic but it constantly moves towards Rams in LA. We will not be shocked about the Rams coming home. Just real happy. The St Louis folks will be shocked and haten on Stan. Ambivalent at best. Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 25 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #14 LA Rams will be a reality by next Thursday. by snackdaddy 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Does anyone think... POST #15 dieterbrock wrote:I guess When they announce, whatever they announce, will be spun in a most positive way I'm sure. And the majority of the NFL fan base will buy whatever they sell.Well, there might be a fan base somewhere in the Midwest that ain't too happy with it. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Does anyone think... POST #16 A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Does anyone think... POST #17 Stranger wrote:They will announce:1. Rams get approval to move immediately.2. Chargers get approval (now) to move when CoC is open3. Raiders get money for new stadium in Oakland.I agree with this. 2 however could end up being an approval to move and then Spanos announces he will stay to give his beloved SD one last chance. That locker room in LA is still huge leverage and Spanos can look like the good guy in SD (sort of) . GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #18 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...I don't get all the support for Spanos. He's been more toxic than Kroenke, SD has been a good market, a super bowl market, and his rationale for moving (25% of fan base) seems flimsy at best. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Does anyone think... POST #19 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...Diff between us and the reporters is that we aren't on someone's payroll who has a fight in this game, or some agenda to promote. Don't think these guys are objective independent animals, because that's an assumption that will lead one astray. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #20 I know I am repeating myself but the NFL does not want the appearance of a division with owners. They are going to come out of this with all three owners getting what they "need". That's right. Needs. The best way you do that is:1) Rams in Inglewood2) Chargers with the option of Inglewood and the NFL will work with Spanos to get a stadium deal in San Diego3) Raiders in Oakland with the NFL heavily involved in securing a new stadiumAll get what they "need".The St Louis stadium has clearly never been viable and the Carson stadium imaginary. This past week has been manic but it constantly moves towards Rams in LA. We will not be shocked about the Rams coming home. Just real happy. The St Louis folks will be shocked and haten on Stan. Ambivalent at best. Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 25 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by snackdaddy 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Does anyone think... POST #15 dieterbrock wrote:I guess When they announce, whatever they announce, will be spun in a most positive way I'm sure. And the majority of the NFL fan base will buy whatever they sell.Well, there might be a fan base somewhere in the Midwest that ain't too happy with it. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Does anyone think... POST #16 A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Does anyone think... POST #17 Stranger wrote:They will announce:1. Rams get approval to move immediately.2. Chargers get approval (now) to move when CoC is open3. Raiders get money for new stadium in Oakland.I agree with this. 2 however could end up being an approval to move and then Spanos announces he will stay to give his beloved SD one last chance. That locker room in LA is still huge leverage and Spanos can look like the good guy in SD (sort of) . GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #18 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...I don't get all the support for Spanos. He's been more toxic than Kroenke, SD has been a good market, a super bowl market, and his rationale for moving (25% of fan base) seems flimsy at best. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Does anyone think... POST #19 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...Diff between us and the reporters is that we aren't on someone's payroll who has a fight in this game, or some agenda to promote. Don't think these guys are objective independent animals, because that's an assumption that will lead one astray. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #20 I know I am repeating myself but the NFL does not want the appearance of a division with owners. They are going to come out of this with all three owners getting what they "need". That's right. Needs. The best way you do that is:1) Rams in Inglewood2) Chargers with the option of Inglewood and the NFL will work with Spanos to get a stadium deal in San Diego3) Raiders in Oakland with the NFL heavily involved in securing a new stadiumAll get what they "need".The St Louis stadium has clearly never been viable and the Carson stadium imaginary. This past week has been manic but it constantly moves towards Rams in LA. We will not be shocked about the Rams coming home. Just real happy. The St Louis folks will be shocked and haten on Stan. Ambivalent at best. Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 25 posts Jul 13 2025
by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Does anyone think... POST #16 A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Does anyone think... POST #17 Stranger wrote:They will announce:1. Rams get approval to move immediately.2. Chargers get approval (now) to move when CoC is open3. Raiders get money for new stadium in Oakland.I agree with this. 2 however could end up being an approval to move and then Spanos announces he will stay to give his beloved SD one last chance. That locker room in LA is still huge leverage and Spanos can look like the good guy in SD (sort of) . GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #18 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...I don't get all the support for Spanos. He's been more toxic than Kroenke, SD has been a good market, a super bowl market, and his rationale for moving (25% of fan base) seems flimsy at best. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Does anyone think... POST #19 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...Diff between us and the reporters is that we aren't on someone's payroll who has a fight in this game, or some agenda to promote. Don't think these guys are objective independent animals, because that's an assumption that will lead one astray. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #20 I know I am repeating myself but the NFL does not want the appearance of a division with owners. They are going to come out of this with all three owners getting what they "need". That's right. Needs. The best way you do that is:1) Rams in Inglewood2) Chargers with the option of Inglewood and the NFL will work with Spanos to get a stadium deal in San Diego3) Raiders in Oakland with the NFL heavily involved in securing a new stadiumAll get what they "need".The St Louis stadium has clearly never been viable and the Carson stadium imaginary. This past week has been manic but it constantly moves towards Rams in LA. We will not be shocked about the Rams coming home. Just real happy. The St Louis folks will be shocked and haten on Stan. Ambivalent at best. Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 25 posts Jul 13 2025
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Does anyone think... POST #17 Stranger wrote:They will announce:1. Rams get approval to move immediately.2. Chargers get approval (now) to move when CoC is open3. Raiders get money for new stadium in Oakland.I agree with this. 2 however could end up being an approval to move and then Spanos announces he will stay to give his beloved SD one last chance. That locker room in LA is still huge leverage and Spanos can look like the good guy in SD (sort of) . GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #18 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...I don't get all the support for Spanos. He's been more toxic than Kroenke, SD has been a good market, a super bowl market, and his rationale for moving (25% of fan base) seems flimsy at best. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Does anyone think... POST #19 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...Diff between us and the reporters is that we aren't on someone's payroll who has a fight in this game, or some agenda to promote. Don't think these guys are objective independent animals, because that's an assumption that will lead one astray. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #20 I know I am repeating myself but the NFL does not want the appearance of a division with owners. They are going to come out of this with all three owners getting what they "need". That's right. Needs. The best way you do that is:1) Rams in Inglewood2) Chargers with the option of Inglewood and the NFL will work with Spanos to get a stadium deal in San Diego3) Raiders in Oakland with the NFL heavily involved in securing a new stadiumAll get what they "need".The St Louis stadium has clearly never been viable and the Carson stadium imaginary. This past week has been manic but it constantly moves towards Rams in LA. We will not be shocked about the Rams coming home. Just real happy. The St Louis folks will be shocked and haten on Stan. Ambivalent at best. Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 25 posts Jul 13 2025
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #18 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...I don't get all the support for Spanos. He's been more toxic than Kroenke, SD has been a good market, a super bowl market, and his rationale for moving (25% of fan base) seems flimsy at best. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Does anyone think... POST #19 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...Diff between us and the reporters is that we aren't on someone's payroll who has a fight in this game, or some agenda to promote. Don't think these guys are objective independent animals, because that's an assumption that will lead one astray. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #20 I know I am repeating myself but the NFL does not want the appearance of a division with owners. They are going to come out of this with all three owners getting what they "need". That's right. Needs. The best way you do that is:1) Rams in Inglewood2) Chargers with the option of Inglewood and the NFL will work with Spanos to get a stadium deal in San Diego3) Raiders in Oakland with the NFL heavily involved in securing a new stadiumAll get what they "need".The St Louis stadium has clearly never been viable and the Carson stadium imaginary. This past week has been manic but it constantly moves towards Rams in LA. We will not be shocked about the Rams coming home. Just real happy. The St Louis folks will be shocked and haten on Stan. Ambivalent at best. Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 25 posts Jul 13 2025
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Does anyone think... POST #19 Elvis wrote:A lot of this has never really added up.Spanos wants to protect 25% of his market which he says comes from L.A. So to do that he's willing to share L.A. with a team that will be more popular in L.A. and let another team take SD from him? And he's wiling to forgo the Chargers name/brand altogether? Does that make sense?Well, maybe it does. The Clippers sold for $2 billion. Maybe being the 2nd banana NFL team in L.A. is better than any banana in SD?Or maybe Dean's bluffing? A lot of us think he is but none of the reporters covering this think so.We'll see...Diff between us and the reporters is that we aren't on someone's payroll who has a fight in this game, or some agenda to promote. Don't think these guys are objective independent animals, because that's an assumption that will lead one astray. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #20 I know I am repeating myself but the NFL does not want the appearance of a division with owners. They are going to come out of this with all three owners getting what they "need". That's right. Needs. The best way you do that is:1) Rams in Inglewood2) Chargers with the option of Inglewood and the NFL will work with Spanos to get a stadium deal in San Diego3) Raiders in Oakland with the NFL heavily involved in securing a new stadiumAll get what they "need".The St Louis stadium has clearly never been viable and the Carson stadium imaginary. This past week has been manic but it constantly moves towards Rams in LA. We will not be shocked about the Rams coming home. Just real happy. The St Louis folks will be shocked and haten on Stan. Ambivalent at best. Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 25 posts Jul 13 2025
by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Does anyone think... POST #20 I know I am repeating myself but the NFL does not want the appearance of a division with owners. They are going to come out of this with all three owners getting what they "need". That's right. Needs. The best way you do that is:1) Rams in Inglewood2) Chargers with the option of Inglewood and the NFL will work with Spanos to get a stadium deal in San Diego3) Raiders in Oakland with the NFL heavily involved in securing a new stadiumAll get what they "need".The St Louis stadium has clearly never been viable and the Carson stadium imaginary. This past week has been manic but it constantly moves towards Rams in LA. We will not be shocked about the Rams coming home. Just real happy. The St Louis folks will be shocked and haten on Stan. Ambivalent at best. Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business