by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #11 Other potential NFL opportunities on the campus include an NFL retail store, a WestCoast wing of the Pro Football Hall of Fame and NFL-themed hotels. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #12 Survey research and polling of Los Angeles fans have shown the Rams withsignificantly more support than either of the other potential applicants. A January 30,2015 Los Angeles Times poll showed that 62% of more than 35,000 Los Angeles fanswanted the Rams to move to Los Angeles, with the Raiders receiving 33% of the voteand the Chargers receiving 5% of the vote. A month later, another Los Angeles Timespoll was conducted after the Carson project announcement that included the option tovote for one team or combination of teams. In this poll, 53% of the votes wanted theRams only to relocate to Los Angeles as compared to 17% for the Raiders and 6% forthe Chargers. When adding in combinations with the other two franchises, 60% of fanswanted the Rams to return as compared to 30% for the Raiders and 20% for theChargers. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #13 Polling throughout the relocation process has consistently shown the Rams as a single team have more fan support than the Chargers and Raiders combined. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #14 The financing of the InglewoodProject has been reviewed with the NFL Stadium and Finance Committees and isconsistent with financing of similar projects of this size.The Rams owner will investover $800 million in equity in the project and has the ability to service the debt on thefacility. The Rams owner has the ability and is willing to pay a reasonable relocation fee. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #15 The team has spent extensivetime researching permanent training facility options and will look to design a state-of-the-art training complex upon relocation New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #16 C'mon, it's just for leverage... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #17 The First Tier Promise is set forth in great detail in the Lease.Because the RSA owned the stadium and was the source of public funds for improvements, the Rams insisted the RSA execute the First Tier provisions and expressly agree to them, including the Rams’ First Tier relocation remedy.The Rams were advised “to dot every ‘i’ and cross every ‘t’ before coming to St. Louis” by the lawyer for the NFL Cardinals who was well experienced in relocation and in St. Louis politics. Ex. 38, “Silence of the Rams - Teams Move to St. Louis Looked Like A Semi-Done Deal So What’s the Holdup?” St. Louis Post Dispatch , Dec. 25, 1994 at 3. The terms and procedures were expressly stated to bring certainty and specificity to the “communityengagement” process. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #18 The RSA Has Been In Default Of The First Tier Promise For MoreThan 12 Years. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #19 The Rams Have Exceeded Any Good Faith Requirement To EngageWith St. Louis and the RSA Under The NFL Relocation Guidelines. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #20 Twelve years of fruitless talks culminating in an intense 1 year exchange of proposals inan agreed upon process that cost the parties more than $7 million meets anystandard of good faith community engagement. It is only fair and equitable to holdthe RSA, the CVC and the Sponsors to their agreements. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. Reply 2 / 11 1 2 11 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 108 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #12 Survey research and polling of Los Angeles fans have shown the Rams withsignificantly more support than either of the other potential applicants. A January 30,2015 Los Angeles Times poll showed that 62% of more than 35,000 Los Angeles fanswanted the Rams to move to Los Angeles, with the Raiders receiving 33% of the voteand the Chargers receiving 5% of the vote. A month later, another Los Angeles Timespoll was conducted after the Carson project announcement that included the option tovote for one team or combination of teams. In this poll, 53% of the votes wanted theRams only to relocate to Los Angeles as compared to 17% for the Raiders and 6% forthe Chargers. When adding in combinations with the other two franchises, 60% of fanswanted the Rams to return as compared to 30% for the Raiders and 20% for theChargers. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #13 Polling throughout the relocation process has consistently shown the Rams as a single team have more fan support than the Chargers and Raiders combined. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #14 The financing of the InglewoodProject has been reviewed with the NFL Stadium and Finance Committees and isconsistent with financing of similar projects of this size.The Rams owner will investover $800 million in equity in the project and has the ability to service the debt on thefacility. The Rams owner has the ability and is willing to pay a reasonable relocation fee. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #15 The team has spent extensivetime researching permanent training facility options and will look to design a state-of-the-art training complex upon relocation New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #16 C'mon, it's just for leverage... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #17 The First Tier Promise is set forth in great detail in the Lease.Because the RSA owned the stadium and was the source of public funds for improvements, the Rams insisted the RSA execute the First Tier provisions and expressly agree to them, including the Rams’ First Tier relocation remedy.The Rams were advised “to dot every ‘i’ and cross every ‘t’ before coming to St. Louis” by the lawyer for the NFL Cardinals who was well experienced in relocation and in St. Louis politics. Ex. 38, “Silence of the Rams - Teams Move to St. Louis Looked Like A Semi-Done Deal So What’s the Holdup?” St. Louis Post Dispatch , Dec. 25, 1994 at 3. The terms and procedures were expressly stated to bring certainty and specificity to the “communityengagement” process. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #18 The RSA Has Been In Default Of The First Tier Promise For MoreThan 12 Years. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #19 The Rams Have Exceeded Any Good Faith Requirement To EngageWith St. Louis and the RSA Under The NFL Relocation Guidelines. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #20 Twelve years of fruitless talks culminating in an intense 1 year exchange of proposals inan agreed upon process that cost the parties more than $7 million meets anystandard of good faith community engagement. It is only fair and equitable to holdthe RSA, the CVC and the Sponsors to their agreements. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. Reply 2 / 11 1 2 11 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 108 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #13 Polling throughout the relocation process has consistently shown the Rams as a single team have more fan support than the Chargers and Raiders combined. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #14 The financing of the InglewoodProject has been reviewed with the NFL Stadium and Finance Committees and isconsistent with financing of similar projects of this size.The Rams owner will investover $800 million in equity in the project and has the ability to service the debt on thefacility. The Rams owner has the ability and is willing to pay a reasonable relocation fee. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #15 The team has spent extensivetime researching permanent training facility options and will look to design a state-of-the-art training complex upon relocation New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #16 C'mon, it's just for leverage... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #17 The First Tier Promise is set forth in great detail in the Lease.Because the RSA owned the stadium and was the source of public funds for improvements, the Rams insisted the RSA execute the First Tier provisions and expressly agree to them, including the Rams’ First Tier relocation remedy.The Rams were advised “to dot every ‘i’ and cross every ‘t’ before coming to St. Louis” by the lawyer for the NFL Cardinals who was well experienced in relocation and in St. Louis politics. Ex. 38, “Silence of the Rams - Teams Move to St. Louis Looked Like A Semi-Done Deal So What’s the Holdup?” St. Louis Post Dispatch , Dec. 25, 1994 at 3. The terms and procedures were expressly stated to bring certainty and specificity to the “communityengagement” process. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #18 The RSA Has Been In Default Of The First Tier Promise For MoreThan 12 Years. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #19 The Rams Have Exceeded Any Good Faith Requirement To EngageWith St. Louis and the RSA Under The NFL Relocation Guidelines. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #20 Twelve years of fruitless talks culminating in an intense 1 year exchange of proposals inan agreed upon process that cost the parties more than $7 million meets anystandard of good faith community engagement. It is only fair and equitable to holdthe RSA, the CVC and the Sponsors to their agreements. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. Reply 2 / 11 1 2 11 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 108 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #14 The financing of the InglewoodProject has been reviewed with the NFL Stadium and Finance Committees and isconsistent with financing of similar projects of this size.The Rams owner will investover $800 million in equity in the project and has the ability to service the debt on thefacility. The Rams owner has the ability and is willing to pay a reasonable relocation fee. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #15 The team has spent extensivetime researching permanent training facility options and will look to design a state-of-the-art training complex upon relocation New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #16 C'mon, it's just for leverage... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #17 The First Tier Promise is set forth in great detail in the Lease.Because the RSA owned the stadium and was the source of public funds for improvements, the Rams insisted the RSA execute the First Tier provisions and expressly agree to them, including the Rams’ First Tier relocation remedy.The Rams were advised “to dot every ‘i’ and cross every ‘t’ before coming to St. Louis” by the lawyer for the NFL Cardinals who was well experienced in relocation and in St. Louis politics. Ex. 38, “Silence of the Rams - Teams Move to St. Louis Looked Like A Semi-Done Deal So What’s the Holdup?” St. Louis Post Dispatch , Dec. 25, 1994 at 3. The terms and procedures were expressly stated to bring certainty and specificity to the “communityengagement” process. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #18 The RSA Has Been In Default Of The First Tier Promise For MoreThan 12 Years. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #19 The Rams Have Exceeded Any Good Faith Requirement To EngageWith St. Louis and the RSA Under The NFL Relocation Guidelines. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #20 Twelve years of fruitless talks culminating in an intense 1 year exchange of proposals inan agreed upon process that cost the parties more than $7 million meets anystandard of good faith community engagement. It is only fair and equitable to holdthe RSA, the CVC and the Sponsors to their agreements. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. Reply 2 / 11 1 2 11 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 108 posts Jul 13 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #15 The team has spent extensivetime researching permanent training facility options and will look to design a state-of-the-art training complex upon relocation New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #16 C'mon, it's just for leverage... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #17 The First Tier Promise is set forth in great detail in the Lease.Because the RSA owned the stadium and was the source of public funds for improvements, the Rams insisted the RSA execute the First Tier provisions and expressly agree to them, including the Rams’ First Tier relocation remedy.The Rams were advised “to dot every ‘i’ and cross every ‘t’ before coming to St. Louis” by the lawyer for the NFL Cardinals who was well experienced in relocation and in St. Louis politics. Ex. 38, “Silence of the Rams - Teams Move to St. Louis Looked Like A Semi-Done Deal So What’s the Holdup?” St. Louis Post Dispatch , Dec. 25, 1994 at 3. The terms and procedures were expressly stated to bring certainty and specificity to the “communityengagement” process. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #18 The RSA Has Been In Default Of The First Tier Promise For MoreThan 12 Years. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #19 The Rams Have Exceeded Any Good Faith Requirement To EngageWith St. Louis and the RSA Under The NFL Relocation Guidelines. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #20 Twelve years of fruitless talks culminating in an intense 1 year exchange of proposals inan agreed upon process that cost the parties more than $7 million meets anystandard of good faith community engagement. It is only fair and equitable to holdthe RSA, the CVC and the Sponsors to their agreements. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. Reply 2 / 11 1 2 11 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 108 posts Jul 13 2025
by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #16 C'mon, it's just for leverage... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #17 The First Tier Promise is set forth in great detail in the Lease.Because the RSA owned the stadium and was the source of public funds for improvements, the Rams insisted the RSA execute the First Tier provisions and expressly agree to them, including the Rams’ First Tier relocation remedy.The Rams were advised “to dot every ‘i’ and cross every ‘t’ before coming to St. Louis” by the lawyer for the NFL Cardinals who was well experienced in relocation and in St. Louis politics. Ex. 38, “Silence of the Rams - Teams Move to St. Louis Looked Like A Semi-Done Deal So What’s the Holdup?” St. Louis Post Dispatch , Dec. 25, 1994 at 3. The terms and procedures were expressly stated to bring certainty and specificity to the “communityengagement” process. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #18 The RSA Has Been In Default Of The First Tier Promise For MoreThan 12 Years. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #19 The Rams Have Exceeded Any Good Faith Requirement To EngageWith St. Louis and the RSA Under The NFL Relocation Guidelines. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #20 Twelve years of fruitless talks culminating in an intense 1 year exchange of proposals inan agreed upon process that cost the parties more than $7 million meets anystandard of good faith community engagement. It is only fair and equitable to holdthe RSA, the CVC and the Sponsors to their agreements. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. Reply 2 / 11 1 2 11 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 108 posts Jul 13 2025
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #17 The First Tier Promise is set forth in great detail in the Lease.Because the RSA owned the stadium and was the source of public funds for improvements, the Rams insisted the RSA execute the First Tier provisions and expressly agree to them, including the Rams’ First Tier relocation remedy.The Rams were advised “to dot every ‘i’ and cross every ‘t’ before coming to St. Louis” by the lawyer for the NFL Cardinals who was well experienced in relocation and in St. Louis politics. Ex. 38, “Silence of the Rams - Teams Move to St. Louis Looked Like A Semi-Done Deal So What’s the Holdup?” St. Louis Post Dispatch , Dec. 25, 1994 at 3. The terms and procedures were expressly stated to bring certainty and specificity to the “communityengagement” process. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #18 The RSA Has Been In Default Of The First Tier Promise For MoreThan 12 Years. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #19 The Rams Have Exceeded Any Good Faith Requirement To EngageWith St. Louis and the RSA Under The NFL Relocation Guidelines. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #20 Twelve years of fruitless talks culminating in an intense 1 year exchange of proposals inan agreed upon process that cost the parties more than $7 million meets anystandard of good faith community engagement. It is only fair and equitable to holdthe RSA, the CVC and the Sponsors to their agreements. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. Reply 2 / 11 1 2 11 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 108 posts Jul 13 2025
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #18 The RSA Has Been In Default Of The First Tier Promise For MoreThan 12 Years. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #19 The Rams Have Exceeded Any Good Faith Requirement To EngageWith St. Louis and the RSA Under The NFL Relocation Guidelines. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #20 Twelve years of fruitless talks culminating in an intense 1 year exchange of proposals inan agreed upon process that cost the parties more than $7 million meets anystandard of good faith community engagement. It is only fair and equitable to holdthe RSA, the CVC and the Sponsors to their agreements. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. Reply 2 / 11 1 2 11 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 108 posts Jul 13 2025
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #19 The Rams Have Exceeded Any Good Faith Requirement To EngageWith St. Louis and the RSA Under The NFL Relocation Guidelines. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #20 Twelve years of fruitless talks culminating in an intense 1 year exchange of proposals inan agreed upon process that cost the parties more than $7 million meets anystandard of good faith community engagement. It is only fair and equitable to holdthe RSA, the CVC and the Sponsors to their agreements. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. Reply 2 / 11 1 2 11 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 108 posts Jul 13 2025
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Rams Proposal for Relocation POST #20 Twelve years of fruitless talks culminating in an intense 1 year exchange of proposals inan agreed upon process that cost the parties more than $7 million meets anystandard of good faith community engagement. It is only fair and equitable to holdthe RSA, the CVC and the Sponsors to their agreements. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. Reply 2 / 11 1 2 11 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business