by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #11 LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:ESPN's Jim Trotter tweeted this out on Friday regarding this extra $100 million being thrown toward the STL Stadium:Might be nothing, and simply a formality to get any future G4 funds approved, but it's something I hadn't seen before and yet ANOTHER layer in all of this.It's not something new but has been lost in the hype. It was one of the original objections to Carson when Fabiani said that the they would receive G4 money for a stadium that doesn't qualify and that there was no more G4 funds available. by BuiltRamTough 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #12 Jerry Jones should commit 400 mill to SD, thus SD will have an "actionable" plan.Fight fire with fire! We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #13 LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:ESPN's Jim Trotter tweeted this out on Friday regarding this extra $100 million being thrown toward the STL Stadium:Might be nothing, and simply a formality to get any future G4 funds approved, but it's something I hadn't seen before and yet ANOTHER layer in all of this.The absurdity of the lies being pushed out at us is repugnant. Just glad to see that this stuff is mostly retorted. Thx NFLPA. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #14 The problem for the players is that G4 money is taken from players today but gets paid back years from now when most of the current players will be retired and that they wouldn't benefit from the increase in revenues. The NFL is going to offer up something of value for the players to give in. It may be an independent arbitrator for disputes or for deferred compensation based upon years of service. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #15 If they are so Spanos-centric, why not offer the Chargers the extra $100M towards a SD solution unless Spanos really wants LA? Or is it all to give that impression?I have read far too many tea leaves this year. I need to take that 'plunge' into Boston Harbor to clear my eyes and head. Nothing seems to make sense. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:If they are so Spanos-centric, why not offer the Chargers the extra $100M towards a SD solution unless Spanos really wants LA? Or is it all to give that impression?I have read far too many tea leaves this year. I need to take that 'plunge' into Boston Harbor to clear my eyes and head. Nothing seems to make sense. They have done a lot to improve the water quality but I would never go anywhere near that water. I worked for 3 years at a restaurant that was above it. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #17 Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #18 OldSchool wrote:Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet They fail to realize that the CBA is a document that has legal standing where as the NFL Constitution and Bylaws works as a loose agreement between business owners. Daniel Kaplan tried to say that the Brady court case would help St Louis because the NFL didn't follow their rules but he fails to realize that courts give deference to CBA's in all cases. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #19 TOPIC AUTHOR And let's not forget this from the above article:While unable to bind the league, the committee members indicated that the extra $100 million would come from the redistribution of relocation fees paid by the team(s) that move to L.A.So that doesn't account for the $200 mil in G4 money but the extra $100 would allegedly come from relocation money... RFU Season Ticket Holder by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #20 There's really no point in trying to justify what cant be controlled. The old school is still ruling the roost at the NFL and they are taking care of Spanos. Its illogical, and nonsensical but apparently is what it is.So we will have Chargers/Raiders headed to LA and the Rams just sitting back waiting for Carson to fall apart.IF Stan agrees to deal with the St Louis crowd, Im not sure I can hang on to my "fandom"When this whole thing began, I felt pretty good as a fan that I'd see my team get a new stadium either way and that it was a win-win.But the way this has played out has me so disgusted Reply 2 / 5 1 2 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by BuiltRamTough 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #12 Jerry Jones should commit 400 mill to SD, thus SD will have an "actionable" plan.Fight fire with fire! We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #13 LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:ESPN's Jim Trotter tweeted this out on Friday regarding this extra $100 million being thrown toward the STL Stadium:Might be nothing, and simply a formality to get any future G4 funds approved, but it's something I hadn't seen before and yet ANOTHER layer in all of this.The absurdity of the lies being pushed out at us is repugnant. Just glad to see that this stuff is mostly retorted. Thx NFLPA. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #14 The problem for the players is that G4 money is taken from players today but gets paid back years from now when most of the current players will be retired and that they wouldn't benefit from the increase in revenues. The NFL is going to offer up something of value for the players to give in. It may be an independent arbitrator for disputes or for deferred compensation based upon years of service. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #15 If they are so Spanos-centric, why not offer the Chargers the extra $100M towards a SD solution unless Spanos really wants LA? Or is it all to give that impression?I have read far too many tea leaves this year. I need to take that 'plunge' into Boston Harbor to clear my eyes and head. Nothing seems to make sense. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:If they are so Spanos-centric, why not offer the Chargers the extra $100M towards a SD solution unless Spanos really wants LA? Or is it all to give that impression?I have read far too many tea leaves this year. I need to take that 'plunge' into Boston Harbor to clear my eyes and head. Nothing seems to make sense. They have done a lot to improve the water quality but I would never go anywhere near that water. I worked for 3 years at a restaurant that was above it. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #17 Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #18 OldSchool wrote:Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet They fail to realize that the CBA is a document that has legal standing where as the NFL Constitution and Bylaws works as a loose agreement between business owners. Daniel Kaplan tried to say that the Brady court case would help St Louis because the NFL didn't follow their rules but he fails to realize that courts give deference to CBA's in all cases. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #19 TOPIC AUTHOR And let's not forget this from the above article:While unable to bind the league, the committee members indicated that the extra $100 million would come from the redistribution of relocation fees paid by the team(s) that move to L.A.So that doesn't account for the $200 mil in G4 money but the extra $100 would allegedly come from relocation money... RFU Season Ticket Holder by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #20 There's really no point in trying to justify what cant be controlled. The old school is still ruling the roost at the NFL and they are taking care of Spanos. Its illogical, and nonsensical but apparently is what it is.So we will have Chargers/Raiders headed to LA and the Rams just sitting back waiting for Carson to fall apart.IF Stan agrees to deal with the St Louis crowd, Im not sure I can hang on to my "fandom"When this whole thing began, I felt pretty good as a fan that I'd see my team get a new stadium either way and that it was a win-win.But the way this has played out has me so disgusted Reply 2 / 5 1 2 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #13 LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:ESPN's Jim Trotter tweeted this out on Friday regarding this extra $100 million being thrown toward the STL Stadium:Might be nothing, and simply a formality to get any future G4 funds approved, but it's something I hadn't seen before and yet ANOTHER layer in all of this.The absurdity of the lies being pushed out at us is repugnant. Just glad to see that this stuff is mostly retorted. Thx NFLPA. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #14 The problem for the players is that G4 money is taken from players today but gets paid back years from now when most of the current players will be retired and that they wouldn't benefit from the increase in revenues. The NFL is going to offer up something of value for the players to give in. It may be an independent arbitrator for disputes or for deferred compensation based upon years of service. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #15 If they are so Spanos-centric, why not offer the Chargers the extra $100M towards a SD solution unless Spanos really wants LA? Or is it all to give that impression?I have read far too many tea leaves this year. I need to take that 'plunge' into Boston Harbor to clear my eyes and head. Nothing seems to make sense. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:If they are so Spanos-centric, why not offer the Chargers the extra $100M towards a SD solution unless Spanos really wants LA? Or is it all to give that impression?I have read far too many tea leaves this year. I need to take that 'plunge' into Boston Harbor to clear my eyes and head. Nothing seems to make sense. They have done a lot to improve the water quality but I would never go anywhere near that water. I worked for 3 years at a restaurant that was above it. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #17 Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #18 OldSchool wrote:Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet They fail to realize that the CBA is a document that has legal standing where as the NFL Constitution and Bylaws works as a loose agreement between business owners. Daniel Kaplan tried to say that the Brady court case would help St Louis because the NFL didn't follow their rules but he fails to realize that courts give deference to CBA's in all cases. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #19 TOPIC AUTHOR And let's not forget this from the above article:While unable to bind the league, the committee members indicated that the extra $100 million would come from the redistribution of relocation fees paid by the team(s) that move to L.A.So that doesn't account for the $200 mil in G4 money but the extra $100 would allegedly come from relocation money... RFU Season Ticket Holder by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #20 There's really no point in trying to justify what cant be controlled. The old school is still ruling the roost at the NFL and they are taking care of Spanos. Its illogical, and nonsensical but apparently is what it is.So we will have Chargers/Raiders headed to LA and the Rams just sitting back waiting for Carson to fall apart.IF Stan agrees to deal with the St Louis crowd, Im not sure I can hang on to my "fandom"When this whole thing began, I felt pretty good as a fan that I'd see my team get a new stadium either way and that it was a win-win.But the way this has played out has me so disgusted Reply 2 / 5 1 2 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #14 The problem for the players is that G4 money is taken from players today but gets paid back years from now when most of the current players will be retired and that they wouldn't benefit from the increase in revenues. The NFL is going to offer up something of value for the players to give in. It may be an independent arbitrator for disputes or for deferred compensation based upon years of service. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #15 If they are so Spanos-centric, why not offer the Chargers the extra $100M towards a SD solution unless Spanos really wants LA? Or is it all to give that impression?I have read far too many tea leaves this year. I need to take that 'plunge' into Boston Harbor to clear my eyes and head. Nothing seems to make sense. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:If they are so Spanos-centric, why not offer the Chargers the extra $100M towards a SD solution unless Spanos really wants LA? Or is it all to give that impression?I have read far too many tea leaves this year. I need to take that 'plunge' into Boston Harbor to clear my eyes and head. Nothing seems to make sense. They have done a lot to improve the water quality but I would never go anywhere near that water. I worked for 3 years at a restaurant that was above it. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #17 Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #18 OldSchool wrote:Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet They fail to realize that the CBA is a document that has legal standing where as the NFL Constitution and Bylaws works as a loose agreement between business owners. Daniel Kaplan tried to say that the Brady court case would help St Louis because the NFL didn't follow their rules but he fails to realize that courts give deference to CBA's in all cases. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #19 TOPIC AUTHOR And let's not forget this from the above article:While unable to bind the league, the committee members indicated that the extra $100 million would come from the redistribution of relocation fees paid by the team(s) that move to L.A.So that doesn't account for the $200 mil in G4 money but the extra $100 would allegedly come from relocation money... RFU Season Ticket Holder by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #20 There's really no point in trying to justify what cant be controlled. The old school is still ruling the roost at the NFL and they are taking care of Spanos. Its illogical, and nonsensical but apparently is what it is.So we will have Chargers/Raiders headed to LA and the Rams just sitting back waiting for Carson to fall apart.IF Stan agrees to deal with the St Louis crowd, Im not sure I can hang on to my "fandom"When this whole thing began, I felt pretty good as a fan that I'd see my team get a new stadium either way and that it was a win-win.But the way this has played out has me so disgusted Reply 2 / 5 1 2 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #15 If they are so Spanos-centric, why not offer the Chargers the extra $100M towards a SD solution unless Spanos really wants LA? Or is it all to give that impression?I have read far too many tea leaves this year. I need to take that 'plunge' into Boston Harbor to clear my eyes and head. Nothing seems to make sense. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:If they are so Spanos-centric, why not offer the Chargers the extra $100M towards a SD solution unless Spanos really wants LA? Or is it all to give that impression?I have read far too many tea leaves this year. I need to take that 'plunge' into Boston Harbor to clear my eyes and head. Nothing seems to make sense. They have done a lot to improve the water quality but I would never go anywhere near that water. I worked for 3 years at a restaurant that was above it. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #17 Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #18 OldSchool wrote:Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet They fail to realize that the CBA is a document that has legal standing where as the NFL Constitution and Bylaws works as a loose agreement between business owners. Daniel Kaplan tried to say that the Brady court case would help St Louis because the NFL didn't follow their rules but he fails to realize that courts give deference to CBA's in all cases. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #19 TOPIC AUTHOR And let's not forget this from the above article:While unable to bind the league, the committee members indicated that the extra $100 million would come from the redistribution of relocation fees paid by the team(s) that move to L.A.So that doesn't account for the $200 mil in G4 money but the extra $100 would allegedly come from relocation money... RFU Season Ticket Holder by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #20 There's really no point in trying to justify what cant be controlled. The old school is still ruling the roost at the NFL and they are taking care of Spanos. Its illogical, and nonsensical but apparently is what it is.So we will have Chargers/Raiders headed to LA and the Rams just sitting back waiting for Carson to fall apart.IF Stan agrees to deal with the St Louis crowd, Im not sure I can hang on to my "fandom"When this whole thing began, I felt pretty good as a fan that I'd see my team get a new stadium either way and that it was a win-win.But the way this has played out has me so disgusted Reply 2 / 5 1 2 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jul 12 2025
by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:If they are so Spanos-centric, why not offer the Chargers the extra $100M towards a SD solution unless Spanos really wants LA? Or is it all to give that impression?I have read far too many tea leaves this year. I need to take that 'plunge' into Boston Harbor to clear my eyes and head. Nothing seems to make sense. They have done a lot to improve the water quality but I would never go anywhere near that water. I worked for 3 years at a restaurant that was above it. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #17 Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #18 OldSchool wrote:Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet They fail to realize that the CBA is a document that has legal standing where as the NFL Constitution and Bylaws works as a loose agreement between business owners. Daniel Kaplan tried to say that the Brady court case would help St Louis because the NFL didn't follow their rules but he fails to realize that courts give deference to CBA's in all cases. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #19 TOPIC AUTHOR And let's not forget this from the above article:While unable to bind the league, the committee members indicated that the extra $100 million would come from the redistribution of relocation fees paid by the team(s) that move to L.A.So that doesn't account for the $200 mil in G4 money but the extra $100 would allegedly come from relocation money... RFU Season Ticket Holder by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #20 There's really no point in trying to justify what cant be controlled. The old school is still ruling the roost at the NFL and they are taking care of Spanos. Its illogical, and nonsensical but apparently is what it is.So we will have Chargers/Raiders headed to LA and the Rams just sitting back waiting for Carson to fall apart.IF Stan agrees to deal with the St Louis crowd, Im not sure I can hang on to my "fandom"When this whole thing began, I felt pretty good as a fan that I'd see my team get a new stadium either way and that it was a win-win.But the way this has played out has me so disgusted Reply 2 / 5 1 2 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jul 12 2025
by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #17 Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #18 OldSchool wrote:Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet They fail to realize that the CBA is a document that has legal standing where as the NFL Constitution and Bylaws works as a loose agreement between business owners. Daniel Kaplan tried to say that the Brady court case would help St Louis because the NFL didn't follow their rules but he fails to realize that courts give deference to CBA's in all cases. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #19 TOPIC AUTHOR And let's not forget this from the above article:While unable to bind the league, the committee members indicated that the extra $100 million would come from the redistribution of relocation fees paid by the team(s) that move to L.A.So that doesn't account for the $200 mil in G4 money but the extra $100 would allegedly come from relocation money... RFU Season Ticket Holder by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #20 There's really no point in trying to justify what cant be controlled. The old school is still ruling the roost at the NFL and they are taking care of Spanos. Its illogical, and nonsensical but apparently is what it is.So we will have Chargers/Raiders headed to LA and the Rams just sitting back waiting for Carson to fall apart.IF Stan agrees to deal with the St Louis crowd, Im not sure I can hang on to my "fandom"When this whole thing began, I felt pretty good as a fan that I'd see my team get a new stadium either way and that it was a win-win.But the way this has played out has me so disgusted Reply 2 / 5 1 2 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jul 12 2025
by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #18 OldSchool wrote:Funny I was having a debate with a clown who I suspect is a PD regular on another board. I mentioned the union and the fact there was a finite amount of money in the G4 funds and was brushed off. Vindication is sweet They fail to realize that the CBA is a document that has legal standing where as the NFL Constitution and Bylaws works as a loose agreement between business owners. Daniel Kaplan tried to say that the Brady court case would help St Louis because the NFL didn't follow their rules but he fails to realize that courts give deference to CBA's in all cases. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #19 TOPIC AUTHOR And let's not forget this from the above article:While unable to bind the league, the committee members indicated that the extra $100 million would come from the redistribution of relocation fees paid by the team(s) that move to L.A.So that doesn't account for the $200 mil in G4 money but the extra $100 would allegedly come from relocation money... RFU Season Ticket Holder by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #20 There's really no point in trying to justify what cant be controlled. The old school is still ruling the roost at the NFL and they are taking care of Spanos. Its illogical, and nonsensical but apparently is what it is.So we will have Chargers/Raiders headed to LA and the Rams just sitting back waiting for Carson to fall apart.IF Stan agrees to deal with the St Louis crowd, Im not sure I can hang on to my "fandom"When this whole thing began, I felt pretty good as a fan that I'd see my team get a new stadium either way and that it was a win-win.But the way this has played out has me so disgusted Reply 2 / 5 1 2 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jul 12 2025
by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #19 TOPIC AUTHOR And let's not forget this from the above article:While unable to bind the league, the committee members indicated that the extra $100 million would come from the redistribution of relocation fees paid by the team(s) that move to L.A.So that doesn't account for the $200 mil in G4 money but the extra $100 would allegedly come from relocation money... RFU Season Ticket Holder by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #20 There's really no point in trying to justify what cant be controlled. The old school is still ruling the roost at the NFL and they are taking care of Spanos. Its illogical, and nonsensical but apparently is what it is.So we will have Chargers/Raiders headed to LA and the Rams just sitting back waiting for Carson to fall apart.IF Stan agrees to deal with the St Louis crowd, Im not sure I can hang on to my "fandom"When this whole thing began, I felt pretty good as a fan that I'd see my team get a new stadium either way and that it was a win-win.But the way this has played out has me so disgusted Reply 2 / 5 1 2 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jul 12 2025
by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Two L.A. Committee members suggested extra $100 million for St. Louis stadium POST #20 There's really no point in trying to justify what cant be controlled. The old school is still ruling the roost at the NFL and they are taking care of Spanos. Its illogical, and nonsensical but apparently is what it is.So we will have Chargers/Raiders headed to LA and the Rams just sitting back waiting for Carson to fall apart.IF Stan agrees to deal with the St Louis crowd, Im not sure I can hang on to my "fandom"When this whole thing began, I felt pretty good as a fan that I'd see my team get a new stadium either way and that it was a win-win.But the way this has played out has me so disgusted Reply 2 / 5 1 2 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business