by SoCalRam78 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #11 max wrote:According to Bernie, he spoke to a bunch of people close to this and feels good that it all gets done. He said these politicians will back down in the end because if they don't they will just hurt the state even more by damaging their rating.Nice, now we know it won't get passed. by max 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #12 SoCalRam78 wrote:max wrote:According to Bernie, he spoke to a bunch of people close to this and feels good that it all gets done. He said these politicians will back down in the end because if they don't they will just hurt the state even more by damaging their rating.Nice, now we know it won't get passed.LOL! ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #13 Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #14 Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #15 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #17 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year.They are cooked IMO. There is only one way to see this unless it was a veiled red flag, get the $100MM or else warning. But why do that publicly unless to expose them?StL Rams home game left = 2. Both are 4 days apart. So in less than 9 days that should be the last time we see the inside of that empty dome.(BTW. you know the italicized was a quote not my take) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by ramsfan1977 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #18 Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease? by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #19 ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41516 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #20 TOPIC AUTHOR SWAdude wrote:ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before.I think it was Ripper who posted it would take 24 votes to sanction Kroenke for going rogue. There's an excellent chance those votes wouldn't be there... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by max 9 years 7 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #12 SoCalRam78 wrote:max wrote:According to Bernie, he spoke to a bunch of people close to this and feels good that it all gets done. He said these politicians will back down in the end because if they don't they will just hurt the state even more by damaging their rating.Nice, now we know it won't get passed.LOL! ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #13 Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #14 Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #15 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #17 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year.They are cooked IMO. There is only one way to see this unless it was a veiled red flag, get the $100MM or else warning. But why do that publicly unless to expose them?StL Rams home game left = 2. Both are 4 days apart. So in less than 9 days that should be the last time we see the inside of that empty dome.(BTW. you know the italicized was a quote not my take) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by ramsfan1977 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #18 Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease? by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #19 ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41516 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #20 TOPIC AUTHOR SWAdude wrote:ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before.I think it was Ripper who posted it would take 24 votes to sanction Kroenke for going rogue. There's an excellent chance those votes wouldn't be there... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #13 Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #14 Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #15 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #17 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year.They are cooked IMO. There is only one way to see this unless it was a veiled red flag, get the $100MM or else warning. But why do that publicly unless to expose them?StL Rams home game left = 2. Both are 4 days apart. So in less than 9 days that should be the last time we see the inside of that empty dome.(BTW. you know the italicized was a quote not my take) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by ramsfan1977 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #18 Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease? by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #19 ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41516 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #20 TOPIC AUTHOR SWAdude wrote:ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before.I think it was Ripper who posted it would take 24 votes to sanction Kroenke for going rogue. There's an excellent chance those votes wouldn't be there... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #14 Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #15 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #17 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year.They are cooked IMO. There is only one way to see this unless it was a veiled red flag, get the $100MM or else warning. But why do that publicly unless to expose them?StL Rams home game left = 2. Both are 4 days apart. So in less than 9 days that should be the last time we see the inside of that empty dome.(BTW. you know the italicized was a quote not my take) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by ramsfan1977 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #18 Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease? by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #19 ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41516 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #20 TOPIC AUTHOR SWAdude wrote:ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before.I think it was Ripper who posted it would take 24 votes to sanction Kroenke for going rogue. There's an excellent chance those votes wouldn't be there... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #15 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #17 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year.They are cooked IMO. There is only one way to see this unless it was a veiled red flag, get the $100MM or else warning. But why do that publicly unless to expose them?StL Rams home game left = 2. Both are 4 days apart. So in less than 9 days that should be the last time we see the inside of that empty dome.(BTW. you know the italicized was a quote not my take) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by ramsfan1977 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #18 Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease? by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #19 ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41516 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #20 TOPIC AUTHOR SWAdude wrote:ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before.I think it was Ripper who posted it would take 24 votes to sanction Kroenke for going rogue. There's an excellent chance those votes wouldn't be there... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #16 Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Tim McKernan @tmckernan 29s29 seconds agoBoard of Alderman Pres Lewis Reed on @CBSSports920: the vote will take place tomorrow, and it's currently 4-4. He will cast deciding vote.Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #17 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year.They are cooked IMO. There is only one way to see this unless it was a veiled red flag, get the $100MM or else warning. But why do that publicly unless to expose them?StL Rams home game left = 2. Both are 4 days apart. So in less than 9 days that should be the last time we see the inside of that empty dome.(BTW. you know the italicized was a quote not my take) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by ramsfan1977 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #18 Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease? by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #19 ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41516 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #20 TOPIC AUTHOR SWAdude wrote:ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before.I think it was Ripper who posted it would take 24 votes to sanction Kroenke for going rogue. There's an excellent chance those votes wouldn't be there... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #17 SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:SoCalRam78 wrote:Listen to Grubman interview, he basically said doesn't matter. What's offered is offered. No Hail Marys.This B of A thing will have little impact.I tend to agree, however it would be easier to come up with 24 votes if they don't . A typical StL PD response:Cards are starting to be shown and the NFL (Grubman) knows SK doesn't have the winning hand for LA.Negotiations for a new venue in STL just started...Amazing how 2 different groups can look at the same thing so differently.What negotiations? The money offered won't change unless a new proposal is submitted to officials. At least another year.They are cooked IMO. There is only one way to see this unless it was a veiled red flag, get the $100MM or else warning. But why do that publicly unless to expose them?StL Rams home game left = 2. Both are 4 days apart. So in less than 9 days that should be the last time we see the inside of that empty dome.(BTW. you know the italicized was a quote not my take) GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by ramsfan1977 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #18 Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease? by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #19 ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41516 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #20 TOPIC AUTHOR SWAdude wrote:ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before.I think it was Ripper who posted it would take 24 votes to sanction Kroenke for going rogue. There's an excellent chance those votes wouldn't be there... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025
by ramsfan1977 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #18 Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease? by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #19 ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41516 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #20 TOPIC AUTHOR SWAdude wrote:ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before.I think it was Ripper who posted it would take 24 votes to sanction Kroenke for going rogue. There's an excellent chance those votes wouldn't be there... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025
by SWAdude 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 2450 Joined: Sep 21 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #19 ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41516 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #20 TOPIC AUTHOR SWAdude wrote:ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before.I think it was Ripper who posted it would take 24 votes to sanction Kroenke for going rogue. There's an excellent chance those votes wouldn't be there... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025
by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41516 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Nixon receives list of 120 Missouri House members opposed to stadium proposal POST #20 TOPIC AUTHOR SWAdude wrote:ramsfan1977 wrote:Since Stan has all the leverage, and we know the owners do not see the STL Stadium as viable. If Stan does not get the votes can he sue the league for keeping him from moving when he has the right too since the CVC defaulted on the lease?Stan may move anyways. The owners will decide if THEY want to sue.And they won't. Just like before.I think it was Ripper who posted it would take 24 votes to sanction Kroenke for going rogue. There's an excellent chance those votes wouldn't be there... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business