max wrote:The Saints D has been as good as the Lions D this year and Goff had a rating of 115.7 in New Orleans.
Of course its harder against a good D on the road for any QB, but in the cold is tougher for some QBs. And Goff looks to be one of them.
I don't think the "on paper as good" thing is the issue. Patricia had an extra three days (because of playing a Thursday game the week before) to prepare a defense designed to throw the Rams off-track. Given his pedigree, Patricia could do that. And in fact that's half of what (a very good) Spielman talked about all game--the extent to which Detroit, unlike pretty much anyone else, was reading Rams plays at the snap, something which the entire Rams offense is built around avoiding (which is why they run so many different kinds of plays out of the same formations).
There are three games where Goff was not his normal self. At Seattle, Denver, and Detroit. In each case it's a defense on the road which may not rank as high as the best (though Seattle is top 10) but which as it happens threw things at the Rams and Goff they (and he) had not seen.
Spielman for example went overboard explaining how it is Lions defenders sniffed out those 2 screens for 2 near-pick 6s.
Those three games all have several things in common, and weather was a factor in only one of them.
Not saying weather won't be a factor in Chicago, but they also have a defense capable of pulling off the kinds of things Denver, Seattle (in Seattle) and Detroit did. Seattle is Seattle, Denver had those pass rushers, and Detroit had Patricia with extra days to gameplan. I would just say that New Orleans didn't crack the code to the same extent those 3 did.
In contrast, Goff against top defenses at home (Chargers, Seattle) did very well.
I think of those 3 games where he did not do as well and try to come up with things they have in common. That way all 3 of Goff's lesser games come into the equation.
....