1 / 1

SNF Ratings

PostPosted:6 years 2 months ago
by Elvis
Just wait till we get on there...


SNF Ratings

PostPosted:6 years 2 months ago
by ramsfan1977
Good, I expect the Rams to be a part of SNF at least 2x's in 2018

SNF Ratings

PostPosted:6 years 2 months ago
by snackdaddy
NFL is still the biggest game in town. They'll always beat other shows unless its something like the World Series.

SNF Ratings

PostPosted:6 years 1 month ago
by St. Loser Fan
Further proof St. Louis is a bad football town and deserved to lose the Rams.

St. Louis has nation's fourth-worst Super Bowl television rating
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football ... 5556c.html

St. Louis and NBC just didn’t mix this NFL season.

The local rating for Sunday’s Super Bowl telecast was worse than all but three of the 56 major markets in which Nielsen measures viewership electronically, and comes after St. Louis finished 47th for NBC’s “Sunday Night Football” telecasts in 2017.

Nielsen says 41.6 percent of homes with a TV in the St. Louis market were tuned in, on average, to KSDK (Channel 5) on Sunday when it was airing NBC’s telecast of Philadelphia’s exciting 41-33 upset victory over New England. The only worse ratings among the major markets came in Los Angeles (41.0), Miami (38.7) and Salt Lake City (37.7). At the other end of the spectrum, Buffalo surprisingly led the way (56.4 rating), followed by Philadelphia (56.2) and Boston (55.9)...

Re: SNF Ratings

PostPosted:6 years 1 month ago
by Elvis
That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.

L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market...

SNF Ratings

PostPosted:6 years 1 month ago
by St. Loser Fan
Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.

L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market...


That's why you have two teams and we have none.

SNF Ratings

PostPosted:6 years 1 month ago
by dieterbrock
St. Loser Fan wrote:That's why you have two teams and we have none.

Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?
*fingers crossed*

SNF Ratings

PostPosted:6 years 1 month ago
by St. Loser Fan
dieterbrock wrote:Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?
*fingers crossed*


If we do that still equals a zero.

Re: SNF Ratings

PostPosted:6 years 1 month ago
by sloramfan
"if we do that still equals zero"... lol

that was funny st loser fan...

go rams

slo

SNF Ratings

PostPosted:6 years 1 month ago
by BobCarl
Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.

L.A. is just really, really big....


I agree that L.A. is really really big.
And I also agree with Loser's conclusion: that's why You have 2 and He has none.

I'd be curious where the "41" and the "41.6" were drawn from.

When it comes to St. Louis, the population of the city does not represent the demographics of the St. Louis metro area. 41.6% of the St. Louis metro area is closer to 1,200,000 and ..... total of the population of just the city is well less than 500,000.

The Los Angeles metro has got to be well over 15,000,000 (just my guess)

Also the "ratings" don't take into account the social habits of their respective areas. My guess is that the Los Angeles area as a whole is a lot more outgoing and more apt to be at a party watching the game (not at home).