by Elvis 6 years 2 months ago Total posts: 38381 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator SNF Ratings POST #1 TOPIC AUTHOR Just wait till we get on there... RFU Season Ticket Holder by ramsfan1977 6 years 2 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl SNF Ratings POST #2 Good, I expect the Rams to be a part of SNF at least 2x's in 2018 by snackdaddy 6 years 2 months ago Total posts: 9631 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #3 RamsFanSince82 liked this post NFL is still the biggest game in town. They'll always beat other shows unless its something like the World Series. 1 by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #4 Further proof St. Louis is a bad football town and deserved to lose the Rams.St. Louis has nation's fourth-worst Super Bowl television ratinghttp://www.stltoday.com/sports/football ... 5556c.htmlSt. Louis and NBC just didn’t mix this NFL season.The local rating for Sunday’s Super Bowl telecast was worse than all but three of the 56 major markets in which Nielsen measures viewership electronically, and comes after St. Louis finished 47th for NBC’s “Sunday Night Football” telecasts in 2017.Nielsen says 41.6 percent of homes with a TV in the St. Louis market were tuned in, on average, to KSDK (Channel 5) on Sunday when it was airing NBC’s telecast of Philadelphia’s exciting 41-33 upset victory over New England. The only worse ratings among the major markets came in Los Angeles (41.0), Miami (38.7) and Salt Lake City (37.7). At the other end of the spectrum, Buffalo surprisingly led the way (56.4 rating), followed by Philadelphia (56.2) and Boston (55.9)... by Elvis 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 38381 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: SNF Ratings POST #5 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market... RFU Season Ticket Holder 1 by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #6 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market...That's why you have two teams and we have none. by dieterbrock 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #7 St. Loser Fan wrote:That's why you have two teams and we have none.Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed* by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #8 dieterbrock wrote:Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed*If we do that still equals a zero. by sloramfan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 1581 Joined: Jun 09 2015 cen coast cal Pro Bowl Re: SNF Ratings POST #9 "if we do that still equals zero"... lolthat was funny st loser fan...go ramsslo by BobCarl 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 4283 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar SNF Ratings POST #10 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big....I agree that L.A. is really really big. And I also agree with Loser's conclusion: that's why You have 2 and He has none.I'd be curious where the "41" and the "41.6" were drawn from. When it comes to St. Louis, the population of the city does not represent the demographics of the St. Louis metro area. 41.6% of the St. Louis metro area is closer to 1,200,000 and ..... total of the population of just the city is well less than 500,000.The Los Angeles metro has got to be well over 15,000,000 (just my guess)Also the "ratings" don't take into account the social habits of their respective areas. My guess is that the Los Angeles area as a whole is a lot more outgoing and more apt to be at a party watching the game (not at home). ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts Mar 28 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by ramsfan1977 6 years 2 months ago Total posts: 1319 Joined: Nov 02 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl SNF Ratings POST #2 Good, I expect the Rams to be a part of SNF at least 2x's in 2018 by snackdaddy 6 years 2 months ago Total posts: 9631 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #3 RamsFanSince82 liked this post NFL is still the biggest game in town. They'll always beat other shows unless its something like the World Series. 1 by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #4 Further proof St. Louis is a bad football town and deserved to lose the Rams.St. Louis has nation's fourth-worst Super Bowl television ratinghttp://www.stltoday.com/sports/football ... 5556c.htmlSt. Louis and NBC just didn’t mix this NFL season.The local rating for Sunday’s Super Bowl telecast was worse than all but three of the 56 major markets in which Nielsen measures viewership electronically, and comes after St. Louis finished 47th for NBC’s “Sunday Night Football” telecasts in 2017.Nielsen says 41.6 percent of homes with a TV in the St. Louis market were tuned in, on average, to KSDK (Channel 5) on Sunday when it was airing NBC’s telecast of Philadelphia’s exciting 41-33 upset victory over New England. The only worse ratings among the major markets came in Los Angeles (41.0), Miami (38.7) and Salt Lake City (37.7). At the other end of the spectrum, Buffalo surprisingly led the way (56.4 rating), followed by Philadelphia (56.2) and Boston (55.9)... by Elvis 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 38381 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: SNF Ratings POST #5 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market... RFU Season Ticket Holder 1 by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #6 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market...That's why you have two teams and we have none. by dieterbrock 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #7 St. Loser Fan wrote:That's why you have two teams and we have none.Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed* by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #8 dieterbrock wrote:Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed*If we do that still equals a zero. by sloramfan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 1581 Joined: Jun 09 2015 cen coast cal Pro Bowl Re: SNF Ratings POST #9 "if we do that still equals zero"... lolthat was funny st loser fan...go ramsslo by BobCarl 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 4283 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar SNF Ratings POST #10 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big....I agree that L.A. is really really big. And I also agree with Loser's conclusion: that's why You have 2 and He has none.I'd be curious where the "41" and the "41.6" were drawn from. When it comes to St. Louis, the population of the city does not represent the demographics of the St. Louis metro area. 41.6% of the St. Louis metro area is closer to 1,200,000 and ..... total of the population of just the city is well less than 500,000.The Los Angeles metro has got to be well over 15,000,000 (just my guess)Also the "ratings" don't take into account the social habits of their respective areas. My guess is that the Los Angeles area as a whole is a lot more outgoing and more apt to be at a party watching the game (not at home). ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts Mar 28 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by snackdaddy 6 years 2 months ago Total posts: 9631 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #3 RamsFanSince82 liked this post NFL is still the biggest game in town. They'll always beat other shows unless its something like the World Series. 1 by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #4 Further proof St. Louis is a bad football town and deserved to lose the Rams.St. Louis has nation's fourth-worst Super Bowl television ratinghttp://www.stltoday.com/sports/football ... 5556c.htmlSt. Louis and NBC just didn’t mix this NFL season.The local rating for Sunday’s Super Bowl telecast was worse than all but three of the 56 major markets in which Nielsen measures viewership electronically, and comes after St. Louis finished 47th for NBC’s “Sunday Night Football” telecasts in 2017.Nielsen says 41.6 percent of homes with a TV in the St. Louis market were tuned in, on average, to KSDK (Channel 5) on Sunday when it was airing NBC’s telecast of Philadelphia’s exciting 41-33 upset victory over New England. The only worse ratings among the major markets came in Los Angeles (41.0), Miami (38.7) and Salt Lake City (37.7). At the other end of the spectrum, Buffalo surprisingly led the way (56.4 rating), followed by Philadelphia (56.2) and Boston (55.9)... by Elvis 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 38381 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: SNF Ratings POST #5 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market... RFU Season Ticket Holder 1 by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #6 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market...That's why you have two teams and we have none. by dieterbrock 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #7 St. Loser Fan wrote:That's why you have two teams and we have none.Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed* by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #8 dieterbrock wrote:Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed*If we do that still equals a zero. by sloramfan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 1581 Joined: Jun 09 2015 cen coast cal Pro Bowl Re: SNF Ratings POST #9 "if we do that still equals zero"... lolthat was funny st loser fan...go ramsslo by BobCarl 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 4283 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar SNF Ratings POST #10 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big....I agree that L.A. is really really big. And I also agree with Loser's conclusion: that's why You have 2 and He has none.I'd be curious where the "41" and the "41.6" were drawn from. When it comes to St. Louis, the population of the city does not represent the demographics of the St. Louis metro area. 41.6% of the St. Louis metro area is closer to 1,200,000 and ..... total of the population of just the city is well less than 500,000.The Los Angeles metro has got to be well over 15,000,000 (just my guess)Also the "ratings" don't take into account the social habits of their respective areas. My guess is that the Los Angeles area as a whole is a lot more outgoing and more apt to be at a party watching the game (not at home). ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts Mar 28 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #4 Further proof St. Louis is a bad football town and deserved to lose the Rams.St. Louis has nation's fourth-worst Super Bowl television ratinghttp://www.stltoday.com/sports/football ... 5556c.htmlSt. Louis and NBC just didn’t mix this NFL season.The local rating for Sunday’s Super Bowl telecast was worse than all but three of the 56 major markets in which Nielsen measures viewership electronically, and comes after St. Louis finished 47th for NBC’s “Sunday Night Football” telecasts in 2017.Nielsen says 41.6 percent of homes with a TV in the St. Louis market were tuned in, on average, to KSDK (Channel 5) on Sunday when it was airing NBC’s telecast of Philadelphia’s exciting 41-33 upset victory over New England. The only worse ratings among the major markets came in Los Angeles (41.0), Miami (38.7) and Salt Lake City (37.7). At the other end of the spectrum, Buffalo surprisingly led the way (56.4 rating), followed by Philadelphia (56.2) and Boston (55.9)... by Elvis 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 38381 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: SNF Ratings POST #5 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market... RFU Season Ticket Holder 1 by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #6 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market...That's why you have two teams and we have none. by dieterbrock 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #7 St. Loser Fan wrote:That's why you have two teams and we have none.Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed* by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #8 dieterbrock wrote:Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed*If we do that still equals a zero. by sloramfan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 1581 Joined: Jun 09 2015 cen coast cal Pro Bowl Re: SNF Ratings POST #9 "if we do that still equals zero"... lolthat was funny st loser fan...go ramsslo by BobCarl 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 4283 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar SNF Ratings POST #10 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big....I agree that L.A. is really really big. And I also agree with Loser's conclusion: that's why You have 2 and He has none.I'd be curious where the "41" and the "41.6" were drawn from. When it comes to St. Louis, the population of the city does not represent the demographics of the St. Louis metro area. 41.6% of the St. Louis metro area is closer to 1,200,000 and ..... total of the population of just the city is well less than 500,000.The Los Angeles metro has got to be well over 15,000,000 (just my guess)Also the "ratings" don't take into account the social habits of their respective areas. My guess is that the Los Angeles area as a whole is a lot more outgoing and more apt to be at a party watching the game (not at home). ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts Mar 28 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Elvis 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 38381 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: SNF Ratings POST #5 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market... RFU Season Ticket Holder 1 by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #6 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market...That's why you have two teams and we have none. by dieterbrock 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #7 St. Loser Fan wrote:That's why you have two teams and we have none.Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed* by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #8 dieterbrock wrote:Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed*If we do that still equals a zero. by sloramfan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 1581 Joined: Jun 09 2015 cen coast cal Pro Bowl Re: SNF Ratings POST #9 "if we do that still equals zero"... lolthat was funny st loser fan...go ramsslo by BobCarl 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 4283 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar SNF Ratings POST #10 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big....I agree that L.A. is really really big. And I also agree with Loser's conclusion: that's why You have 2 and He has none.I'd be curious where the "41" and the "41.6" were drawn from. When it comes to St. Louis, the population of the city does not represent the demographics of the St. Louis metro area. 41.6% of the St. Louis metro area is closer to 1,200,000 and ..... total of the population of just the city is well less than 500,000.The Los Angeles metro has got to be well over 15,000,000 (just my guess)Also the "ratings" don't take into account the social habits of their respective areas. My guess is that the Los Angeles area as a whole is a lot more outgoing and more apt to be at a party watching the game (not at home). ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts Mar 28 2024
by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #6 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big. Basically twice as many people watched the SB in L.A. as there are TV households in the St. Louis market...That's why you have two teams and we have none. by dieterbrock 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #7 St. Loser Fan wrote:That's why you have two teams and we have none.Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed* by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #8 dieterbrock wrote:Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed*If we do that still equals a zero. by sloramfan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 1581 Joined: Jun 09 2015 cen coast cal Pro Bowl Re: SNF Ratings POST #9 "if we do that still equals zero"... lolthat was funny st loser fan...go ramsslo by BobCarl 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 4283 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar SNF Ratings POST #10 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big....I agree that L.A. is really really big. And I also agree with Loser's conclusion: that's why You have 2 and He has none.I'd be curious where the "41" and the "41.6" were drawn from. When it comes to St. Louis, the population of the city does not represent the demographics of the St. Louis metro area. 41.6% of the St. Louis metro area is closer to 1,200,000 and ..... total of the population of just the city is well less than 500,000.The Los Angeles metro has got to be well over 15,000,000 (just my guess)Also the "ratings" don't take into account the social habits of their respective areas. My guess is that the Los Angeles area as a whole is a lot more outgoing and more apt to be at a party watching the game (not at home). ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts Mar 28 2024
by dieterbrock 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #7 St. Loser Fan wrote:That's why you have two teams and we have none.Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed* by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #8 dieterbrock wrote:Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed*If we do that still equals a zero. by sloramfan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 1581 Joined: Jun 09 2015 cen coast cal Pro Bowl Re: SNF Ratings POST #9 "if we do that still equals zero"... lolthat was funny st loser fan...go ramsslo by BobCarl 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 4283 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar SNF Ratings POST #10 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big....I agree that L.A. is really really big. And I also agree with Loser's conclusion: that's why You have 2 and He has none.I'd be curious where the "41" and the "41.6" were drawn from. When it comes to St. Louis, the population of the city does not represent the demographics of the St. Louis metro area. 41.6% of the St. Louis metro area is closer to 1,200,000 and ..... total of the population of just the city is well less than 500,000.The Los Angeles metro has got to be well over 15,000,000 (just my guess)Also the "ratings" don't take into account the social habits of their respective areas. My guess is that the Los Angeles area as a whole is a lot more outgoing and more apt to be at a party watching the game (not at home). ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts Mar 28 2024
by St. Loser Fan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 10508 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame SNF Ratings POST #8 dieterbrock wrote:Hey, there’s still hope! Vince McMahon is rebooting the XFL so who knows?*fingers crossed*If we do that still equals a zero. by sloramfan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 1581 Joined: Jun 09 2015 cen coast cal Pro Bowl Re: SNF Ratings POST #9 "if we do that still equals zero"... lolthat was funny st loser fan...go ramsslo by BobCarl 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 4283 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar SNF Ratings POST #10 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big....I agree that L.A. is really really big. And I also agree with Loser's conclusion: that's why You have 2 and He has none.I'd be curious where the "41" and the "41.6" were drawn from. When it comes to St. Louis, the population of the city does not represent the demographics of the St. Louis metro area. 41.6% of the St. Louis metro area is closer to 1,200,000 and ..... total of the population of just the city is well less than 500,000.The Los Angeles metro has got to be well over 15,000,000 (just my guess)Also the "ratings" don't take into account the social habits of their respective areas. My guess is that the Los Angeles area as a whole is a lot more outgoing and more apt to be at a party watching the game (not at home). ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts Mar 28 2024
by sloramfan 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 1581 Joined: Jun 09 2015 cen coast cal Pro Bowl Re: SNF Ratings POST #9 "if we do that still equals zero"... lolthat was funny st loser fan...go ramsslo by BobCarl 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 4283 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar SNF Ratings POST #10 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big....I agree that L.A. is really really big. And I also agree with Loser's conclusion: that's why You have 2 and He has none.I'd be curious where the "41" and the "41.6" were drawn from. When it comes to St. Louis, the population of the city does not represent the demographics of the St. Louis metro area. 41.6% of the St. Louis metro area is closer to 1,200,000 and ..... total of the population of just the city is well less than 500,000.The Los Angeles metro has got to be well over 15,000,000 (just my guess)Also the "ratings" don't take into account the social habits of their respective areas. My guess is that the Los Angeles area as a whole is a lot more outgoing and more apt to be at a party watching the game (not at home). ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 10 posts Mar 28 2024
by BobCarl 6 years 1 month ago Total posts: 4283 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar SNF Ratings POST #10 Elvis wrote:That 41 in L.A. works out to 2,245,000 households whereas the 41.6 in St. Louis = 506,000 households.L.A. is just really, really big....I agree that L.A. is really really big. And I also agree with Loser's conclusion: that's why You have 2 and He has none.I'd be curious where the "41" and the "41.6" were drawn from. When it comes to St. Louis, the population of the city does not represent the demographics of the St. Louis metro area. 41.6% of the St. Louis metro area is closer to 1,200,000 and ..... total of the population of just the city is well less than 500,000.The Los Angeles metro has got to be well over 15,000,000 (just my guess)Also the "ratings" don't take into account the social habits of their respective areas. My guess is that the Los Angeles area as a whole is a lot more outgoing and more apt to be at a party watching the game (not at home). ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business