Sleepless In Seattle 2
PostPosted:9 years 4 months ago
> our D gave up big chunks of yardage to what was supposed to be a weak offense. What was up with the wide open receivers all day? And why were they able to escape so many 3rd and longs?
> St. Louis is here for good. We got tore up by a third string running back. Gurley will feast on our current D.
> Rams had 8 plays of 20 yards or more. (what?)?
> I would think that 31 points should be enough to win with our elite Defense?
> Very troublesome. Especially since the Rams didn't have their top two running backs. The D was as bad as I've seen it under PC today. Not a good first test for Kris Richard.
> It's the first game... Against the only team in the NFL that knows how to kick our butts and do it our way.
> Our entire system relied on a great run game and we decided a bunch of guys from off the street could do it too. Big mistake that I think we will be paying dearly for all year. Also part of why Russ didn't look like Russ today, nobody had to honor Lynch as a threat at all.
> a smart man could of had Evan Mathis and Unger on this team....
> Yes the offensive line had a lot to do with Foles picking apart our secondary.
> Today our offensive line was sooo over matched that the Ram safety's were able to creep up and dominate our short passing game and defend against Russell's and Lynch's running. Our offensive staff is going to have to go back to the drawing board because things have changed.
> This oline in addition to the most conservative qb in the history plus a horrible OC is just a bad combo.
> Enough with the Unger BS. Making the trade was the right call. Max Unger showed that he cannot stay on the field. He missed 10 games last season. You couldn't count on him to be there week in and week out. I bully our line too, but the Unger talk is idiotic. If you can't be on the field for large chunks of time, you can't be counted on. So just stop.
> Our Oline deficiencies cut our playbook down significantly, and we already had a small playbook. Russell did not take a snap under center the entire 2nd half. No bootlegs, no play action at all. We have Marshawn Lynch, but don't have the OLine to exploit half of what he brings.
> I thought the tackling just looked bad overall today, and couldn't believe how a 3rd string RB was running rampant on the defense.
> One question, unless Nick Foles and SUPPOESEDLY inept O- Linemen are using magic dust on our Defense, how does the Rams 3rd & 4th string RB's make B.Wags disappear for over half a game?
> Rams do have a new OC, we are seeing different stuff. Do we know for sure if the Rams offense is bad? I thought Foles played pretty well. Personally I'm getting annoyed with ridiculous perfect passes coming at us in the end of games.
> Leave the Oline in St Louis. Hire 5 sumo wrestlers and watch the improvement
> Did Lynch Not Hit The Hole On That Last Play? Looked to me like he could have easily picked up the first down, but he hesitated. Can anyone confirm?
> No hole. St Louis blew right by us, and earned that stop and the win
> what hole....there were many blue shirts in front of him. The OL decided to call it a day.
Report this post
> St. Louis is here for good. We got tore up by a third string running back. Gurley will feast on our current D.
> Rams had 8 plays of 20 yards or more. (what?)?
> I would think that 31 points should be enough to win with our elite Defense?
> Very troublesome. Especially since the Rams didn't have their top two running backs. The D was as bad as I've seen it under PC today. Not a good first test for Kris Richard.
> It's the first game... Against the only team in the NFL that knows how to kick our butts and do it our way.
> Our entire system relied on a great run game and we decided a bunch of guys from off the street could do it too. Big mistake that I think we will be paying dearly for all year. Also part of why Russ didn't look like Russ today, nobody had to honor Lynch as a threat at all.
> a smart man could of had Evan Mathis and Unger on this team....
> Yes the offensive line had a lot to do with Foles picking apart our secondary.
> Today our offensive line was sooo over matched that the Ram safety's were able to creep up and dominate our short passing game and defend against Russell's and Lynch's running. Our offensive staff is going to have to go back to the drawing board because things have changed.
> This oline in addition to the most conservative qb in the history plus a horrible OC is just a bad combo.
> Enough with the Unger BS. Making the trade was the right call. Max Unger showed that he cannot stay on the field. He missed 10 games last season. You couldn't count on him to be there week in and week out. I bully our line too, but the Unger talk is idiotic. If you can't be on the field for large chunks of time, you can't be counted on. So just stop.
> Our Oline deficiencies cut our playbook down significantly, and we already had a small playbook. Russell did not take a snap under center the entire 2nd half. No bootlegs, no play action at all. We have Marshawn Lynch, but don't have the OLine to exploit half of what he brings.
> I thought the tackling just looked bad overall today, and couldn't believe how a 3rd string RB was running rampant on the defense.
> One question, unless Nick Foles and SUPPOESEDLY inept O- Linemen are using magic dust on our Defense, how does the Rams 3rd & 4th string RB's make B.Wags disappear for over half a game?
> Rams do have a new OC, we are seeing different stuff. Do we know for sure if the Rams offense is bad? I thought Foles played pretty well. Personally I'm getting annoyed with ridiculous perfect passes coming at us in the end of games.
> Leave the Oline in St Louis. Hire 5 sumo wrestlers and watch the improvement
> Did Lynch Not Hit The Hole On That Last Play? Looked to me like he could have easily picked up the first down, but he hesitated. Can anyone confirm?
> No hole. St Louis blew right by us, and earned that stop and the win
> what hole....there were many blue shirts in front of him. The OL decided to call it a day.
Report this post
