Hokahey on talk with Kevin Demoff
PostPosted:9 years 5 months ago
From the PD (i know)...
http://interact.stltoday.com/forums/vie ... &t=1127748
I just had a conversation with Kevin Demoff for the last 40 minutes or so in the cafe at my work. I honestly feel like I learned more in those 40 minutes than I have all year from the media.
Key points (all according to Demoff of course, but he appeared to be very genuine):
- Kroenke NEVER said St. Louis no longer works for the Rams. Demoff personally called Dave Peacock to tell him that never happened.
- The Rams are not keen on sharing the stadium with an MLS team. Not sure region can support 4 teams, and causes concerns about who gets paid what for non game day events.
- St. Louis still has a chance. Nothing is definite. The Rams will not remove L.A. from the equation until they know the final deal from St. Louis. He flat out said "doing so would remove all leverage in case something falls through here."
- He and Peacock talk all the time, about "multiple options and scenarios." Said he wishes Peacock had been involved three years ago, and that he's the best person he's ever worked with in St. Louis.
- This is not just a financial decision. If it was, L.A. would win out hands down all day long. There is a civic aspect to this. But there is concern about the long term financial stability of the St. Louis region.
- Attendance is a non-issue. The team and league both understand that the poor product and lease issue is causing the lowered attendance. The team has never once used attendance as a reason to the league that they might move.
- Everything will be decided by December.
Feel free to ask me any questions. I'll post more if I remember.
Oh, and he said Stan will not speak and does not speak because people that want to believe the Rams will stay will believe him if he says they will and those that don't, won't. He said it's pointless.
If no one shows up for the games because it's understandable, so out reach from Kroenke to the community for the sake of improving attendance isn't necessarily important. What is important is resolving the stadium issue and then moving on from there.
http://interact.stltoday.com/forums/vie ... &t=1127748
I just had a conversation with Kevin Demoff for the last 40 minutes or so in the cafe at my work. I honestly feel like I learned more in those 40 minutes than I have all year from the media.
Key points (all according to Demoff of course, but he appeared to be very genuine):
- Kroenke NEVER said St. Louis no longer works for the Rams. Demoff personally called Dave Peacock to tell him that never happened.
- The Rams are not keen on sharing the stadium with an MLS team. Not sure region can support 4 teams, and causes concerns about who gets paid what for non game day events.
- St. Louis still has a chance. Nothing is definite. The Rams will not remove L.A. from the equation until they know the final deal from St. Louis. He flat out said "doing so would remove all leverage in case something falls through here."
- He and Peacock talk all the time, about "multiple options and scenarios." Said he wishes Peacock had been involved three years ago, and that he's the best person he's ever worked with in St. Louis.
- This is not just a financial decision. If it was, L.A. would win out hands down all day long. There is a civic aspect to this. But there is concern about the long term financial stability of the St. Louis region.
- Attendance is a non-issue. The team and league both understand that the poor product and lease issue is causing the lowered attendance. The team has never once used attendance as a reason to the league that they might move.
- Everything will be decided by December.
Feel free to ask me any questions. I'll post more if I remember.
Oh, and he said Stan will not speak and does not speak because people that want to believe the Rams will stay will believe him if he says they will and those that don't, won't. He said it's pointless.
If no one shows up for the games because it's understandable, so out reach from Kroenke to the community for the sake of improving attendance isn't necessarily important. What is important is resolving the stadium issue and then moving on from there.