The Absurdity of JT's 50 Best and 50 Worst Draft Picks
PostPosted:1 decade 2 months ago
Here are the 50 best: http://www.stltoday.com/gallery/sports/ ... 216.html#0
And here are the 50 worst: http://www.stltoday.com/gallery/sports/ ... 52e.html#0
First of all there's the math: 20 years of the Rams equals, what do you get 8, 9 picks a year? So the 50 best and 50 worst would be more than half of all the draft picks. That's ridiculous right there. A lot of guys could easily go on both lists.
And look at the lists: Brian Quick is the 50th worst, Tavon Austin 48th worst, while Austin Pettis is the 49th best? AP's write up starts, "after washing out for the Rams," and he's one of the best...
And here are the 50 worst: http://www.stltoday.com/gallery/sports/ ... 52e.html#0
First of all there's the math: 20 years of the Rams equals, what do you get 8, 9 picks a year? So the 50 best and 50 worst would be more than half of all the draft picks. That's ridiculous right there. A lot of guys could easily go on both lists.
And look at the lists: Brian Quick is the 50th worst, Tavon Austin 48th worst, while Austin Pettis is the 49th best? AP's write up starts, "after washing out for the Rams," and he's one of the best...