1 / 1
-28 in point differential
PostPosted:6 months 2 weeks ago
by max
Rams are by far the worst in point differential in our division. It’s gotta be extremely rare for a team with that stat to win their division.
I can’t even imagine having a winning record at -28 points.
Seattle is +19, Niners and Cards are -6 and -5 respectively.
Just a crazy stat situation that indicates how differently the team is performing now compared to earlier in the season.
It’s quite possible Rams finish 11-6 and have a negative point differential. I bet that never happened before.
-28 in point differential
PostPosted:6 months 2 weeks ago
by PARAM
max wrote:Rams are by far the worst in point differential in our division. It’s gotta be extremely rare for a team with that stat to win their division.
I can’t even imagine having a winning record at -28 points.
Seattle is +19, Niners and Cards are -6 and -5 respectively.
Just a crazy stat situation that indicates how differently the team is performing now compared to earlier in the season.
It’s quite possible Rams finish 11-6 and have a negative point differential. I bet that never happened before.
Weird for sure!!! Of course that can be attributed mostly to the 41-10 loss to Arizona and 17 point deficit vs Philly (-48 total) combined with one score games (11). The other 4 losses were one score games. We've had 1 win (Minn) that wasn't a 1 score win and that was only because of a safety to end the game.
-28 in point differential
PostPosted:6 months 2 weeks ago
by max
PARAM wrote:Weird for sure!!! Of course that can be attributed mostly to the 41-10 loss to Arizona and 17 point deficit vs Philly (-48 total) combined with one score games (11). The other 4 losses were one score games. We've had 1 win (Minn) that wasn't a 1 score win and that was only because of a safety to end the game.
Yes. The AZ game was an aberration for sure. I bet the Rams are a TD favorite when they play again in 2 weeks.
It’s mostly a combination of all those injuries on offense and rookies playing major roles on defense early in the season. We’re a totally different team now on both sides of the ball.
Re: -28 in point differential
PostPosted:6 months 2 weeks ago
by snackdaddy
Is point differential a good indicator? Maybe not. If not for a safety all 8 wins would be one score wins. Shows how tough we are when we can win so many close games. Not a team you want to face in the playoffs in a close game late.
Re: -28 in point differential
PostPosted:6 months 2 weeks ago
by ramsman34
And the Rams are simply due to blow someone out, statistically. They are going to be a tough out for everyone - starting with the Jets.
-28 in point differential
PostPosted:6 months 2 weeks ago
by RedAlice
ramsman34 wrote:And the Rams are simply due to blow someone out, statistically. They are going to be a tough out for everyone - starting with the Jets.
A blowout against the Hawks would be fun.
-28 in point differential
PostPosted:6 months 2 weeks ago
by bremillard
Look at the Chiefs(12-1) point differential(+56) if looking for aberrations.
-28 in point differential
PostPosted:6 months 2 weeks ago
by PARAM
RedAlice wrote:A blowout against the Hawks would be fun.
After Seattle loses to Green Bay, Minnesota and da Bears, San Francisco loses to Detroit, and Arizona loses to the Rams, that final game will be a 'rest the starters for the postseason' game!!! How about a blowout of Arizona, sacking Kyler about 9 times?
-28 in point differential
PostPosted:6 months 2 weeks ago
by safer
Well when we got blown out by the Cards (-31) and the Beagles (-18) that pretty well sums it up
