Rams Fans United - Los Angeles Rams Fan Discussion Forum

https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/news-pa ... renovation

Maybe St. Louis .......????

Mexico City?

BrooklynRam74 wrote:https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/news-pa ... renovation

Maybe St. Louis .......????

Yeah, that ain't happening. Regardless of what you thought of the merits of the lawsuit, the lawsuit guaranteed that the NFL is never getting in bed with St. Louis ever again.

The problem with the Panthers is inept ownership.

The top teams have ownership that understand what it takes to build a team.

rams1974 wrote:Yeah, that ain't happening. Regardless of what you thought of the merits of the lawsuit, the lawsuit guaranteed that the NFL is never getting in bed with St. Louis ever again.

St. Louis is done being in an abusive relationship with the NFL. The NFL was Ike Turner and St. Louis is Tina Turner where she got to keep her name.

Anyone who thinks St. Louis will ever host an NFL team ever again is clueless.

I just hope some city soon stands up/pushes back as there aren't many good threat cities any more to extract public tax money from. California law pretty very very tough so San Diego and Oakland. We've already established St. Louis is done. So where will the Panthers threaten to go to? Mexico City? London? Portland?

St. Loser Fan wrote:St. Louis is done being in an abusive relationship with the NFL. The NFL was Ike Turner and St. Louis is Tina Turner where she got to keep her name.

Anyone who thinks St. Louis will ever host an NFL team ever again is clueless.

I just hope some city soon stands up/pushes back as there aren't many good threat cities any more to extract public tax money from. California law pretty very very tough so San Diego and Oakland. We've already established St. Louis is done. So where will the Panthers threaten to go to? Mexico City? London? Portland?

Yeahhh, St. Louis will SHOW the NFL. They won't take a team again, that'll teach 'em....

St. Loser Fan wrote:Anyone who thinks St. Louis will ever host an NFL team ever again is clueless.

Never say never but NFL is looking to expand and that means outside the US most likely.

Tepper OTOH, i'm pretty sure will be staying put...

BrooklynRam74 wrote:Yeahhh, St. Louis will SHOW the NFL. They won't take a team again, that'll teach 'em....

Feel better about yourself? We know LA won, St. Louis lost and will never have football again.

I'm talking about St. Louis' unwillingness to put any more (or not much) public money in to any pro sports venues.
-We voted down the MLS stadium public funding and that ended getting built with 99% private money.
-The Blues got half of what they wanted to renovate Enterprise Center with the money coming from the parking garages/lots the City of St. Louis owns around the arena.
-the Cardinals baseball team wanted public money to renovate Busch Stadium III and the blow back was so loud the whole thing was pulled back.

Screw you.

And now it looks like Missouri will lose two more teams as the Chiefs and Royals will go to Kansas.



So even more of a win for you @BrooklynRam74 . Enjoy your laughter.

St. Loser Fan wrote:And now it looks like Missouri will lose two more teams as the Chiefs and Royals will go to Kansas.



So even more of a win for you @BrooklynRam74 . Enjoy your laughter.

I'm on the side of St. Louis should have ALWAYS had an NFL Team. The Cardinals shouldn't have left, but when they did, St. Louis should have been awarded a team the next expansion, along with Baltimore. Those 2 spots went to Jacksonville and Carolina, a big mistake IMO setting off the whole Rams to St. Louis and back shitshow. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I am very pro St. Louis.