1 / 1
Scott, not Rapp
PostPosted:3 years 5 months ago
by SolarRam
Nick Scott is a flat out stud coming into his own. The angles he takes, the patience on routes, he sets up QB/WR and flys the ball. Laying wood, INTs, and hes staying healthy w those hits. I love this guy in our starting D.
I thinking we can all agree that Rapp doesn't get his job back when he's healthy.
Welcome to the starting 11 on D. In the words of Doc Brown: "Great Scott!"
Re: Scott, not Rapp
PostPosted:3 years 5 months ago
by KillRazor
Agreed. Rapp has been pretty bad in coverage all year.
I think the sample size is large enough to proclaim Scott deserving to start the Super Bowl.
Scott, not Rapp
PostPosted:3 years 5 months ago
by ramsrams
That’s a no-brainer.
I think Aikman said that hit on Dweebo was “textbook”.
It is just so great to see that when a backup has to play that the stage isn’t too big for him.
Quite the contrary.
Scott, not Rapp
PostPosted:3 years 5 months ago
by PARAM
Nice to see a Nittany Lion doing it for the Rams!!!!
Re: Scott, not Rapp
PostPosted:3 years 5 months ago
by azramsfan93
While being interviewed by Steve Wyche post-game, Stan Kroenke used Nick Scott as an example of a player that McVay's staff has developed to success.
100% Nick Scott is slated to start in 2 weeks.
Scott, not Rapp
PostPosted:3 years 5 months ago
by faulkrram
KillRazor wrote:Agreed. Rapp has been pretty bad in coverage all year.
I think the sample size is large enough to proclaim Scott deserving to start the Super Bowl.
I'm thinking Rapp has been ready to go but the coaching staff knows we can't have 2 horrible Coverage guys ( Williams) in at the same time. Question is, Is Rapp better than Williams? Because williams almost cost us the season again yesterday!!