to me it sounded more like snead is happy with keenum as the starter, said he almost went 4-0, claimed he was a top 10 qb at one point when looking at analytics... frankly i have absolutely no idea where one would have to go to find analytics that painted keenum in a positive light, he sucks and his numbers tell the same story... very sadly, snead's comments were deja vu all over again, the exact same out of touch comments he made when trying to convince folks that bradford was the guy the rams needed at qb going forward because he was 5-2-1 against the nfc west... so deflating...
here's where the rams' offense ranked with keenum under center:
27th - offensive points scored per game
32nd - first downs per game
32nd - offensive yards per game
32nd - 3rd down conversions
31st - yards per offensive play
32nd - red zone drives per total drives %
31st - scoring drives per total drives %
1st - punts per drive
here's where keenum ranked among the 40 qbs with most pass attempts:
26th - qb rating
38th - pass yards per game
33rd - pass yards per attempt
32nd - td %
27th - completion %
and here's where keenum ranked in 3rd down passing:
38th - qb rating
40th - completion %
40th - yards per pass attempt
37th - pass attempts completed for a 1st down

for those who want to argue that the rams were 3-1 with keenum under center and that's all that counts, well all the power to ya...