Rams Fans United - Los Angeles Rams Fan Discussion Forum

http://www.stlamerican.com/sports/sport ... l?mode=jqm

Is STL an NFL city? Rams Exec VP Kevin Demoff isn’t sure
By Palmer Alexander III | Posted 24 hours ago

The St. Louis Rams organization is sending mixed signals to the people of St. Louis. I’m not referring to Head Coach Jeff Fisher or GM Les Snead. I’m not referring to the staffers and the people who work in community services like Nicole Woodie. I’m talking about Kevin Demoff, executive vice president of football operation.

Demoff has a tough job. For starters, his boss is Stan Kroenke. And Stan has demonstrated through this entire stadium process that St. Louis is not worthy of keeping the Rams and they should play in Los Angeles.

When Michelle Smallman asked Demoff, “Is STL an NFL city?” Demoff answered, “I hope we can continue to make this an NFL market. There is a really good core fan base here.”

He still didn’t answer the question about St. Louis being an NFL city or not. It’s a yes or no question.

If you ask attorney Bob Blitz that same question, it’s an emphatic yes. Can’t say the same about Demoff.

During his interview with Smallman, Demoff actually said, “People think Stan doesn’t care, but he cares significantly. To say he’s removed from the process this year is totally untrue.”

You don’t need Maury Povich to tell you that is a lie. Stan only cares about one thing. And it’s has nothing to do with winning.

Was Stan thinking about the Rams coaches and staffers laying new sod at the Herbert Hoovers Boys and Girls Club in 90-plus degree heat? Was he thinking about the community that has stood by this team, regardless of the fact they haven’t produced a winning season in going on 13 seasons?

No.

The same day as the Rams made their way to Herbert Hoovers, I read a tweet from Vincent Bonsignore from the LA Daily News: “#Rams also stressing willing participants helping #Chargers and #Raiders secure financially beneficial new stadiums and futures.”

Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!

So now Stan is willing to help two other teams with financing, but you can’t help out the STL Task Force?

Stop lying to the folks buying tickets and $15 beers. Kroenke helped take the Rams out of LA, but he’s willing to move the Rams back. For one reason only, money.

It’s only about money to Kroenke. Nothing wrong with that at all, just say it.

For more Rams Roundup, subscribe to youtube.com/stlamericanvideo. Follow us @StLAmerican and @thelegendkil.

Sports Columnist

Palmer Alexander is a sports columnist for the St. Louis American, covering the St. Louis Rams in his weekly column, Rams Roundup.​

The cooperate support is not there in STL. STL is not what it was 20 years ago when the Rams moved there. But don't say that to folks I'm STL they'll kill you. I think the Cardinals are so loved in STL that nothing could beat them. They hog all the money. Let be honest folks the Rams are worth32 and teams like the jags and raiders are higher. It's reality.

It wasn't strong then or when the Cardinals left. The Cardinals were near or at the bottom for both revenues and gate for the last 10 years in St Louis. The NFL said when the Rams moved, that the profits would be better for the team in the short term but would suffer in the long term after some of the guarantees went away in the 15th year. It just happens that was the same year Kroenke took control of the team.

The second richest owner in the league owning the least valued team in the league. What did they think was gonna happen?

The writer seems bitter. The StL press is acting emotionally a lot lately. Perhaps they know more or see the writing on the wall.
So could the league consider snackdaddy's take in all of this? I'd bet ESK might use it.

Demoff

It appears the task forces blazing speed was because they got a head start after the league gave them a heads up. They took a lot of credit, however they have moved pretty fast. The names haven't been changed to protect the innocent, Here's their story.......


Stadium task force started work a year ago, quietly.

By David Hunn

ST. LOUIS • Three civic leaders began planning for a new football stadium months before Gov. Jay Nixon announced his two-man task force.
Retired Anheuser-Busch President Dave Peacock, outgoing mayoral Chief of Staff Jeff Rainford and downtown business association President Doug Woodruff were quietly, privately emailing and meeting by at least July of last year, according to records obtained by the Post-Dispatch.

“Think about how we create an entity that can ‘represent’ the region with the Rams, make proposals and avoid the Sunshine Laws until such a time that we’re far enough along to have a real idea to share publicly,” Peacock wrote to Rainford and Woodruff on July 24.

The governor needs to “be seen as initiating this or at least endorsing it,” Peacock continued. Moreover, he said, the governor and city’s mayor need a “scapegoat if we fail.”

“I’m fine being the guy either way,” Peacock wrote. “I have nothing to lose like others. I’d deflect everything from public entities and just take the blame.”

Three months later, on Nov. 5, Nixon announced that he was appointing Peacock and Edward Jones Dome attorney Bob Blitz to a task force meant to keep the National Football League in St. Louis.

The emails focus largely on administrative tasks — planning meetings, discussing organizational options, sharing contacts. But they reveal, for the first time publicly, when civic leaders began planning their fight to keep the St. Louis Rams, how they chose the north riverfront site, and who was driving the effort. At one point, it even included former Missouri Speaker of the House John Diehl.

Peacock, Rainford and Woodruff all acknowledged on Wednesday that they had been meeting and talking well before Nixon was involved.

“What sneaking behind people’s backs did we do?” Rainford said on Wednesday.

“We started thinking about it. We didn’t spend money. We didn’t commit to anything, Rainford said. “That’s what you do when you’re prudent. That’s what you do when you’re doing your job well. You think ahead.”

Rainford said he and Mayor Francis Slay began talking to Peacock in 2012, soon after he left Anheuser-Busch. They figured Peacock would be perfect to work on such a project, said Rainford, who has since left his city job and is now consulting for Woodruff’s agency, Downtown STL.

Peacock had run a major company, had NFL connections, and, suddenly, had time.

That year, the city was negotiating with the Rams on lease-required upgrades to the Jones Dome, where the Rams play. The St. Louis Convention & Visitors Commission had recommended $124 million in renovations; the Rams asked for upgrades the city estimated at about $700 million. The case was slated to go to arbitration in 2013.

“Just in case we lose,” Rainford recalled asking Peacock, “could you start thinking about a Plan B? If we didn’t get moving, the bus was going to leave without us,” he said.

By the middle of 2014, Woodruff had been hired by Downtown STL and the three were communicating regularly, Rainford said.

City records track some of that communication. The documents, nearly all emails, were requested through Missouri public records laws by John Ammann, a professor and attorney at the St. Louis University legal clinic, who is working with students and residents on various stadium issues. Ammann shared the records with the Post-Dispatch.

One of the earliest emails is dated July 7, 2014. In it, Rainford asks Peacock and Woodruff about professional soccer. “I do know deep pockets,” Peacock replied, “and either custom or new stadium will be needed. Still think the Rams situation provides an opportunity to solve football and soccer …”

A few weeks later, Woodruff emails Diehl, the former House speaker, at his Armstrong Teasdale law firm. “Can you join Jeff, Dave and me at a meeting Tuesday at 10:00 to talk about the Stadium. There’s some urgency in light of a conversation Dave had with the NFL,” Woodruff wrote. “We’re meeting at the Four Seasons to be able to look over the site.”

That email identifies the riverfront site — just north of the Four Seasons Hotel St. Louis at Lumière Place — three months before Nixon announced the task force, and five months before Peacock and Blitz revealed stadium drawings at a Union Station press conference.

Woodruff said on Wednesday that the group was once considering four sites: the old Chrysler plant in Fenton, Paul McKee’s NorthPark, the south riverfront, and the spot north of Lumière.

“There was no big vote, there was no polling or anything else. It quickly became a matter of — it met more of the priorities we needed to get things going quickly,” Woodruff said. “And quite frankly everyone concurred that the best place was for it to be in or near downtown.

“The north riverfront of downtown needs to be redeveloped,” he continued. “North of Lumière is desolate. That’s terrible for a city that rests on one of the world’s great rivers.”

Near the end of July, last summer, Woodruff sent Peacock and Rainford a draft “predevelopment plan,” listing more than a dozen steps toward stadium development. He argued for the creation of a nonprofit to spearhead the work. And, he identifies a chief: “Dave Peacock should lead,” the predevelopment plan says.

Nixon was at first slow to engage, the emails say.

But Rainford and Mary Ellen Ponder, Slay’s current chief of staff, both said Wednesday that he has since played a key role.

“In order for us to be taken seriously, we had to have the state take the lead, and for the state to take the lead, we had to have the governor take the lead,” Ponder said. The city, alone, she said, “wouldn’t be a credible proposal.”

Rainford said the real action started when Nixon appointed the task force.

Peacock said the early work was essential; that the task force would be in trouble now without it. “Would we be too far behind to catch up?” he asked.

“I don’t know.”

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt ... 0b0f6.html