Rams Fans United - Los Angeles Rams Fan Discussion Forum

Robert Iger is ramping up his efforts to get Chargers and Raiders to L.A.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp ... story.html
Sam FarmerContact Reporter
As the clock winds down on the NFL's efforts to return to Los Angeles in time for the 2016 season, Disney Chairman and Chief Executive Robert Iger is ramping up his efforts to carry the San Diego Chargers and Oakland Raiders across the goal line.

"I've been selling hard," Iger said Thursday in his first public comments on the subject since the Chargers and Raiders announced his involvement last month in the effort to move the teams to a stadium in Carson.

Iger, who will continue to run Disney for the remaining two years of his contract, has agreed to oversee the NFL effort should the owners choose that plan over the Inglewood stadium proposal backed by St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke. Although he would draw a salary of only $1 per year, Iger would have an ownership stake in the Chargers and Raiders.

He's a lifelong NFL fan who since childhood has rooted for the Green Bay Packers. In fact, he has a bust of Hall of Fame coach Vince Lombardi outside his Disney office.

The Chargers made Iger available to multiple media outlets Thursday at Disney headquarters in Burbank. In a half-hour interview with print reporters, Iger said that he was first approached by Carolina Panthers owner Jerry Richardson, who visited him in L.A. during the summer.

"He asked whether I'd be interested in helping very specifically the partnership of the Raiders and Chargers move to L.A., develop a stadium, reposition themselves here," Iger said. "I engaged in conversations with Jerry, and then with both entities."

That could create waves in the league because Richardson is a member of the Committee on Los Angeles Opportunities, which is composed of six owners who will make a recommendation to the other 26. The committee members are presumed to be impartial, although Richardson has publicly said he supports the Carson project.

Iger said he did not immediately let the league know he had spoken to Richardson. "When Jerry approached me, he asked for some degree of confidentiality. I didn't discuss it until much later with the league."

Two NFL owners hoping Los Angeles relocation vote takes place in January
The NFL has scheduled a special meeting in Houston on Jan. 12-13 during which owners might vote on whether the Rams, Chargers and Raiders have satisfied their relocation requirements, and on the two L.A. plans. In order to pass, an initiative needs the support of at least a three-quarters majority of NFL owners, or at least 24 votes. Iger said he's not sure whether he will attend the Houston meetings.

Iger spoke on a variety of topics related to his involvement and vision for how the league should return to the nation's second-largest market.

On why he got involved: "I think it would be great for the community to have an NFL team. It's high time that we have that. I really was interested in the civic side of this. But I've also thought about my life post-Disney and how I would spend my time and my energy. The opportunity to be involved with either an NFL team, or in this case two NFL teams and a stadium project, and using my experience that I've obviously gained from Disney over these years to successfully move two teams here, I thought that would be a great next step for me."

On what he can bring to the table: "When you run the Walt Disney Co., you gain a fair amount of experience in customer-facing businesses, particularly in site-based entertainment. I have a lot of experience in marketing, a lot of experience in selling, particularly tickets to site-based entertainment or movies or whatever.

"I have tremendous brand experience. What I do a lot for Disney is manage the great brands of this company, whether it's Disney, ESPN, ABC, Pixar, Marvel, 'Star Wars.' And I'm very engaged in technology and its impact on the consumer, either what experience you deliver for them or how to market and sell to them."

On the Carson project: "There's a tremendous amount of support for Carson. What I'm trying to do is articulate not just the vision for the project itself but the values of Carson and the specific value of two teams moving at once as well as the value of the project itself and the location."

On the importance of not ignoring Orange County: "Orange County is a big, important market, and a football market too, particularly for the Chargers. So I think Carson is really well located to attract people both from L.A .County and Orange County and even possibly north San Diego County, particularly on a Sunday, when traffic is less of an issue."

On what he calls "repositioning" the brand of the Raiders: "I think it's incumbent upon us to make sure it doesn't scare people away, in how you portray yourself, how you present yourself to the public is one way to do that. And I think with a large new stadium where you have the ability to attract a real diverse fan base, diverse geographically, diverse ethnically and diverse from an age perspective, I think you have a shot at doing that."

On his preference for two teams in L.A.: "I'm a big believer in theatricality, so if you're going to bring the NFL back to a market this big, this important, then do it big. And two is much bigger than one and I really think it would create such a level of excitement and interest in the NFL in Los Angeles that it would do a world of good not just to the league but the teams."

On whether the NFL will be back in L.A. by next season: "I am gaining more and more confidence that the league … believes it is time to move a team or teams to L.A. I feel that they now hear the footsteps, to use a football analogy, and that the league believes it's good for them to do it now. They've debated it and considered it for a long time, and now it's time."

[email protected]

He's a solid partner but he did not make Disney what it is. I t already had a pretty good start.

That's right, and talk about Hail Mary's?!?!

Think about it, first Spanos/Davis secure the services of Carmen Policy who supposedly had great influence with the league.

Policy is ineffective, so Richardson a committee member, goes to Iger for help in moving the needle in favor of the Carson project.

I ask you...are those the actions of a side confident in their position?

They have been playing catch up all year. ESK just cant let them.

Hacksaw wrote:They have been playing catch up all year. ESK just cant let them.

Hard to believe ESK has just been standing idly by while they were catching up, especially with Richardson trying to stack the deck.

max wrote:
Hard to believe ESK has just been standing idly by while they were catching up, especially with Richardson trying to stack the deck.

Okay, I now like Robert Kraft better than Jerry Richardson.

Ultimately, the chicanery in StLoo is going to catch up to them. The State legislature is going to kill it.
Iger (not Disney) is a plant but one with enough juice to do some good for any project anywhere, but especially in LA.
Richardson, his OG committee and his agenda now exposed by Iger will come with consequences.

Bottom line is they have not caught up from a construction standpoint. They may have met their first goal which was to create as much resistance as possible to block Kroenke.
But Kroenke has the law, clout, the Comish (allegedly), money and a ready site on his side. It appears the vote (if any) will come to a draw. That means no one can move. In this scenario, the only guy who could still push the envelope in Kroenke, by either starting construction, threatening legal action, just moving them or a combination of all.

We are lined up better and no way does Carson get the nod.

den-the-coach wrote:

max wrote:
Hard to believe ESK has just been standing idly by while they were catching up, especially with Richardson trying to stack the deck.

Okay, I now like Robert Kraft better than Jerry Richardson.

I dunno. Richardson is NG according to that list and Kraft mentioned he was backing Spanos. Oh the inhumanity.

Nothing has literally happened in Carson since the plan was announced other than background noise. It's tumbleweeds. Perception isn't reality, "catching up" by how? Hiring past his prime Carmen Policy and Bob Iger to a dollar contract? Strategically dumping information on the media every week or before any meeting? The FAA articles? The only thing they did of significance was get the required local signatures to bypass an EIR, that was months ago.

It's all hot air and snippet quotes. I always believed this project was bullshit to run interference on SK and to garner Spanos sympathy and a crap load of money or a sweet lease deal with SK. I'll believe that to the end until proven otherwise. Congratulations jerk off, you've been successful at that. Spanos has also been thoroughly successful at avoiding any potential negative bit of information re: the Carson site despite the fact it sits on a toxic waste dump. "We're good" seemed to be enough to kill any further objections. If Carson was in Inglewood's position and had the better ownership, better plan, better financials, more surrounding development, the ability to build next week, and the teams remained the same, I'd say Inglewood and the Rams had zero chance.

By the way, give me the wildly successful owner who has built most of his fortune and is shrewd over Spanos and Davis any day. Always remember, they are heirs. Never worked for it. You want a more local example, one Jim Buss, who I believe is dumber than my shoe. His sister is a clown as well.

You want these guys being the face of LA football?