by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #21 TOPIC AUTHOR PARAM wrote:And when this lawsuit is over Los Angeles should sue St. Louis like that guy is suing Fletcher Cox for ruining his marriage. After all they lured the Rams to the Midwest. Promised things they obviously couldn't deliver. Then didn't offer the Rams an upgrade until long after the move was evident. If the NFL is held accountable for "conspiring to swindle the St. Louis area", then those in charge of the deal the Rams received in 1995 are equally guilty. This thing really is a huge butt rub joke. The area supported the Rams with their hearts but not with their asses in the seats. Sure there were the loyal, die hard fans who did but unless they spread the money of any court settlement among those 20,000 or so, then there's another swindle going on.they also didn't live up to the agreement they signed. This is so lame. Was this article written by Bob "I'm going to sponge as much money from StL as I can" Blitz..? GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #22 Hacksaw wrote:they also didn't live up to the agreement they signed. This is so lame. Was this article written by Bob "I'm going to sponge as much money from StL as I can" Blitz..?What's funny is that some of the $18 million or so St. Louis spent in the fools folly to try and keep the Rams was money spent by Bob Blitz's law firm. Now they're suing even though they got paid? Talk about double dipping.When the revolution comes, the lawyers should be the first ones up against the wall. by Haden 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 2194 Joined: Sep 06 2016 Spokane, WA Pro Bowl St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #23 Elvis liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:What's funny is that some of the $18 million or so St. Louis spent in the fools folly to try and keep the Rams was money spent by Bob Blitz's law firm. Now they're suing even though they got paid? Talk about double dipping.When the revolution comes, the lawyers should be the first ones up against the wall.Hmmmmm........lawyers can't do anything without greedy clients who want to litigate. Haven't seen a lawyer start a lawsuit yet with no client. 1 by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #24 Hacksaw, aeneas1 liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:St. Louis has lost and will lose again.We stupidly threw about $20 million into the trash trying to keep the Rams when there was no way the team was staying here. We stupidly let Stan have a deal to buy Rams Park for $1. But vanity and pride have a cost and what we did should be a lesson to every other NFL city.Lol, I was talking about the rich and powerful, and the lawyers.No one gives a damn what silly working class sports fan thinks he lost. A team moves there for a lousy 17 years and people complain like they were supposed to stay? Teams move..it's a business..its inevitable..it's not a problem or mistake 2 by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #25 haroldjackson29 wrote:Lol, I was talking about the rich and powerful, and the lawyers.No one gives a damn what silly working class sports fan thinks he lost. A team moves there for a lousy 17 years and people complain like they were supposed to stay? Teams move..it's a business..its inevitable..it's not a problem or mistakeThe problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying. by Elvis 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 41167 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #26 St. Louis did have a chance of keeping the Rams, albeit a small chance. Nothing was certain until the vote in Houston... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #27 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hiss GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #28 St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.Billionaires lie for personal gain=the end by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #29 Hacksaw wrote:They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hissWe are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know. by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #30 TOPIC AUTHOR BobCarl liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:We are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know.Just responding to this quote so you might get perspective. St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 Reply 3 / 88 1 3 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Apr 28 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #22 Hacksaw wrote:they also didn't live up to the agreement they signed. This is so lame. Was this article written by Bob "I'm going to sponge as much money from StL as I can" Blitz..?What's funny is that some of the $18 million or so St. Louis spent in the fools folly to try and keep the Rams was money spent by Bob Blitz's law firm. Now they're suing even though they got paid? Talk about double dipping.When the revolution comes, the lawyers should be the first ones up against the wall. by Haden 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 2194 Joined: Sep 06 2016 Spokane, WA Pro Bowl St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #23 Elvis liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:What's funny is that some of the $18 million or so St. Louis spent in the fools folly to try and keep the Rams was money spent by Bob Blitz's law firm. Now they're suing even though they got paid? Talk about double dipping.When the revolution comes, the lawyers should be the first ones up against the wall.Hmmmmm........lawyers can't do anything without greedy clients who want to litigate. Haven't seen a lawyer start a lawsuit yet with no client. 1 by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #24 Hacksaw, aeneas1 liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:St. Louis has lost and will lose again.We stupidly threw about $20 million into the trash trying to keep the Rams when there was no way the team was staying here. We stupidly let Stan have a deal to buy Rams Park for $1. But vanity and pride have a cost and what we did should be a lesson to every other NFL city.Lol, I was talking about the rich and powerful, and the lawyers.No one gives a damn what silly working class sports fan thinks he lost. A team moves there for a lousy 17 years and people complain like they were supposed to stay? Teams move..it's a business..its inevitable..it's not a problem or mistake 2 by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #25 haroldjackson29 wrote:Lol, I was talking about the rich and powerful, and the lawyers.No one gives a damn what silly working class sports fan thinks he lost. A team moves there for a lousy 17 years and people complain like they were supposed to stay? Teams move..it's a business..its inevitable..it's not a problem or mistakeThe problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying. by Elvis 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 41167 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #26 St. Louis did have a chance of keeping the Rams, albeit a small chance. Nothing was certain until the vote in Houston... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #27 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hiss GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #28 St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.Billionaires lie for personal gain=the end by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #29 Hacksaw wrote:They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hissWe are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know. by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #30 TOPIC AUTHOR BobCarl liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:We are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know.Just responding to this quote so you might get perspective. St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 Reply 3 / 88 1 3 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Apr 28 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Haden 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 2194 Joined: Sep 06 2016 Spokane, WA Pro Bowl St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #23 Elvis liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:What's funny is that some of the $18 million or so St. Louis spent in the fools folly to try and keep the Rams was money spent by Bob Blitz's law firm. Now they're suing even though they got paid? Talk about double dipping.When the revolution comes, the lawyers should be the first ones up against the wall.Hmmmmm........lawyers can't do anything without greedy clients who want to litigate. Haven't seen a lawyer start a lawsuit yet with no client. 1 by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #24 Hacksaw, aeneas1 liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:St. Louis has lost and will lose again.We stupidly threw about $20 million into the trash trying to keep the Rams when there was no way the team was staying here. We stupidly let Stan have a deal to buy Rams Park for $1. But vanity and pride have a cost and what we did should be a lesson to every other NFL city.Lol, I was talking about the rich and powerful, and the lawyers.No one gives a damn what silly working class sports fan thinks he lost. A team moves there for a lousy 17 years and people complain like they were supposed to stay? Teams move..it's a business..its inevitable..it's not a problem or mistake 2 by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #25 haroldjackson29 wrote:Lol, I was talking about the rich and powerful, and the lawyers.No one gives a damn what silly working class sports fan thinks he lost. A team moves there for a lousy 17 years and people complain like they were supposed to stay? Teams move..it's a business..its inevitable..it's not a problem or mistakeThe problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying. by Elvis 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 41167 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #26 St. Louis did have a chance of keeping the Rams, albeit a small chance. Nothing was certain until the vote in Houston... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #27 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hiss GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #28 St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.Billionaires lie for personal gain=the end by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #29 Hacksaw wrote:They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hissWe are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know. by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #30 TOPIC AUTHOR BobCarl liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:We are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know.Just responding to this quote so you might get perspective. St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 Reply 3 / 88 1 3 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Apr 28 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #24 Hacksaw, aeneas1 liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:St. Louis has lost and will lose again.We stupidly threw about $20 million into the trash trying to keep the Rams when there was no way the team was staying here. We stupidly let Stan have a deal to buy Rams Park for $1. But vanity and pride have a cost and what we did should be a lesson to every other NFL city.Lol, I was talking about the rich and powerful, and the lawyers.No one gives a damn what silly working class sports fan thinks he lost. A team moves there for a lousy 17 years and people complain like they were supposed to stay? Teams move..it's a business..its inevitable..it's not a problem or mistake 2 by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #25 haroldjackson29 wrote:Lol, I was talking about the rich and powerful, and the lawyers.No one gives a damn what silly working class sports fan thinks he lost. A team moves there for a lousy 17 years and people complain like they were supposed to stay? Teams move..it's a business..its inevitable..it's not a problem or mistakeThe problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying. by Elvis 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 41167 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #26 St. Louis did have a chance of keeping the Rams, albeit a small chance. Nothing was certain until the vote in Houston... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #27 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hiss GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #28 St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.Billionaires lie for personal gain=the end by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #29 Hacksaw wrote:They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hissWe are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know. by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #30 TOPIC AUTHOR BobCarl liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:We are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know.Just responding to this quote so you might get perspective. St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 Reply 3 / 88 1 3 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Apr 28 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #25 haroldjackson29 wrote:Lol, I was talking about the rich and powerful, and the lawyers.No one gives a damn what silly working class sports fan thinks he lost. A team moves there for a lousy 17 years and people complain like they were supposed to stay? Teams move..it's a business..its inevitable..it's not a problem or mistakeThe problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying. by Elvis 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 41167 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #26 St. Louis did have a chance of keeping the Rams, albeit a small chance. Nothing was certain until the vote in Houston... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #27 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hiss GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #28 St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.Billionaires lie for personal gain=the end by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #29 Hacksaw wrote:They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hissWe are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know. by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #30 TOPIC AUTHOR BobCarl liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:We are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know.Just responding to this quote so you might get perspective. St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 Reply 3 / 88 1 3 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Apr 28 2025
by Elvis 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 41167 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #26 St. Louis did have a chance of keeping the Rams, albeit a small chance. Nothing was certain until the vote in Houston... RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #27 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hiss GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #28 St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.Billionaires lie for personal gain=the end by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #29 Hacksaw wrote:They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hissWe are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know. by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #30 TOPIC AUTHOR BobCarl liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:We are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know.Just responding to this quote so you might get perspective. St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 Reply 3 / 88 1 3 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Apr 28 2025
by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #27 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hiss GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #28 St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.Billionaires lie for personal gain=the end by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #29 Hacksaw wrote:They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hissWe are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know. by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #30 TOPIC AUTHOR BobCarl liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:We are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know.Just responding to this quote so you might get perspective. St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 Reply 3 / 88 1 3 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Apr 28 2025
by haroldjackson29 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 842 Joined: Feb 27 2016 LA Coliseum Veteran St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #28 St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. They even went so far as to demand design changes to the north riverfront stadium they knew was never going to be built.St. Louis deserved to lose the Rams for many reasons. But that still doesn't justify the team lying.Billionaires lie for personal gain=the end by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #29 Hacksaw wrote:They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hissWe are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know. by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #30 TOPIC AUTHOR BobCarl liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:We are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know.Just responding to this quote so you might get perspective. St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 Reply 3 / 88 1 3 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Apr 28 2025
by St. Loser Fan 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 10825 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #29 Hacksaw wrote:They wanted to leave. I think that's a given. Being able to was not so certain. they had to play both sides of the fence in case they were forced to stay. Can't forget there were influences out there (Richardson, McNair and others) who were working behind the scenes to stop the move,,, so there was nothing certain besides their desire. Those 'STL isn't a sports town' 'scorched earth' comments were a leverage play and was clearly a shot at Peacock-Blitz-task force and the CVC for dicking around until the last minute trying to stop them.No one knows what the Rams truly felt up until then or when they changed their direction. That's what is so lame about this suit. StL sports authority screwed up, then tried to throw a wrench into the teams plans to leave because of it after it was already too late and now wants to be reimbursed for an expense that never needed to happen in the first place. Boo - hissWe are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know. by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #30 TOPIC AUTHOR BobCarl liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:We are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know.Just responding to this quote so you might get perspective. St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 Reply 3 / 88 1 3 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Apr 28 2025
by Hacksaw 7 years 3 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #30 TOPIC AUTHOR BobCarl liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:We are fully aware of our crimes. No city would ever be as stupid as St. Louis. Tell me something I don’t know.Just responding to this quote so you might get perspective. St. Loser Fan wrote:The problem is the Rams told St. Louis they had a chance to keep the team. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS 1 Reply 3 / 88 1 3 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business