by Hacksaw 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #811 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:What I do hope is after this the NFL pays for its own damn stadiums. I hope Allegiant in Las Vegas is the last public money spent on a stadium used 11 days a year.That seems fair. They are making gobs of money and could certainly afford it. Some team owners might prefer to privately fund so the sharing portions might get a little complicated. Also league funding to replace older stadiums could really add up. No doubt the municipalities and/or taxpayers should not be on the hook for construction costs. We already pay at the gate. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame Re: St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #812 by RamDog 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 215 Joined: Oct 23 2021 Atlanta Rookie St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #813 St. Loser Fan wrote:What I do hope is after this the NFL pays for its own damn stadiums. I hope Allegiant in Las Vegas is the last public money spent on a stadium used 11 days a year.100% agree. by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #814 by Hacksaw 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #815 TOPIC AUTHOR just wow. does this end the NFL part too? in other words is this crap over?$790m plus all the money they didn't spend to keep the Dome top tier, I'd say StL got away with it. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #816 Hacksaw wrote:just wow. does this end the NFL part too? in other words is this crap over?$790m plus all the money they didn't spend to keep the Dome top tier, I'd say StL got away with it. by SoCalRam78 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #817 790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offense by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #818 SoCalRam78 wrote:790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offenseLock it. Start a new thread about Stan vs the NFL. by AvengerRam 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 8686 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame Re: St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #819 The Rams are still in Los Angeles.Stan Kroenke still increased his wealth by moving the team to Los Angeles.St. Louis still does not have a team.There are a lot of lawyers who made a lot of money on this case.None of this will impact the Rams' fortunes this year or in the future. by actionjack 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 4576 Joined: May 19 2016 Sactown Superstar St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #820 Hacksaw wrote:No arguing those points. I can see reimbursement for costs as being a fair settlement. plus interest. The failed Riverfront stadium wasn't adequately funded and was obviously a last ditch attempt to block the Rams movement. At that point it was fairly obvious ESK was over it. Not so sure Peacock or Blitz should have bothered. They sure went down swinging though. Bottom line is that StL snoozed on their contractually agreed obligations and gave ESK control. Everything else happened (and was spent) afterwards. That was their choice and they should have realized the potential for failure at that point. The vitriol should also be focused at the sports authority who lost the control.I dont have a dog in this fight at all, but I know the development business as I have been involved in for 30+ years. ESK was going to move the team no matter what STL did, he didnt buy that land without the intent of moving the team. Now he has the right to move the team, it just did it in a fairly underhanded way which is validated by the 790 million. Fuk the Niners and Block Purdy Reply 82 / 88 1 82 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Dec 22 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame Re: St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #812 by RamDog 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 215 Joined: Oct 23 2021 Atlanta Rookie St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #813 St. Loser Fan wrote:What I do hope is after this the NFL pays for its own damn stadiums. I hope Allegiant in Las Vegas is the last public money spent on a stadium used 11 days a year.100% agree. by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #814 by Hacksaw 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #815 TOPIC AUTHOR just wow. does this end the NFL part too? in other words is this crap over?$790m plus all the money they didn't spend to keep the Dome top tier, I'd say StL got away with it. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #816 Hacksaw wrote:just wow. does this end the NFL part too? in other words is this crap over?$790m plus all the money they didn't spend to keep the Dome top tier, I'd say StL got away with it. by SoCalRam78 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #817 790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offense by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #818 SoCalRam78 wrote:790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offenseLock it. Start a new thread about Stan vs the NFL. by AvengerRam 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 8686 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame Re: St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #819 The Rams are still in Los Angeles.Stan Kroenke still increased his wealth by moving the team to Los Angeles.St. Louis still does not have a team.There are a lot of lawyers who made a lot of money on this case.None of this will impact the Rams' fortunes this year or in the future. by actionjack 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 4576 Joined: May 19 2016 Sactown Superstar St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #820 Hacksaw wrote:No arguing those points. I can see reimbursement for costs as being a fair settlement. plus interest. The failed Riverfront stadium wasn't adequately funded and was obviously a last ditch attempt to block the Rams movement. At that point it was fairly obvious ESK was over it. Not so sure Peacock or Blitz should have bothered. They sure went down swinging though. Bottom line is that StL snoozed on their contractually agreed obligations and gave ESK control. Everything else happened (and was spent) afterwards. That was their choice and they should have realized the potential for failure at that point. The vitriol should also be focused at the sports authority who lost the control.I dont have a dog in this fight at all, but I know the development business as I have been involved in for 30+ years. ESK was going to move the team no matter what STL did, he didnt buy that land without the intent of moving the team. Now he has the right to move the team, it just did it in a fairly underhanded way which is validated by the 790 million. Fuk the Niners and Block Purdy Reply 82 / 88 1 82 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Dec 22 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by RamDog 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 215 Joined: Oct 23 2021 Atlanta Rookie St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #813 St. Loser Fan wrote:What I do hope is after this the NFL pays for its own damn stadiums. I hope Allegiant in Las Vegas is the last public money spent on a stadium used 11 days a year.100% agree. by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #814 by Hacksaw 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #815 TOPIC AUTHOR just wow. does this end the NFL part too? in other words is this crap over?$790m plus all the money they didn't spend to keep the Dome top tier, I'd say StL got away with it. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #816 Hacksaw wrote:just wow. does this end the NFL part too? in other words is this crap over?$790m plus all the money they didn't spend to keep the Dome top tier, I'd say StL got away with it. by SoCalRam78 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #817 790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offense by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #818 SoCalRam78 wrote:790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offenseLock it. Start a new thread about Stan vs the NFL. by AvengerRam 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 8686 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame Re: St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #819 The Rams are still in Los Angeles.Stan Kroenke still increased his wealth by moving the team to Los Angeles.St. Louis still does not have a team.There are a lot of lawyers who made a lot of money on this case.None of this will impact the Rams' fortunes this year or in the future. by actionjack 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 4576 Joined: May 19 2016 Sactown Superstar St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #820 Hacksaw wrote:No arguing those points. I can see reimbursement for costs as being a fair settlement. plus interest. The failed Riverfront stadium wasn't adequately funded and was obviously a last ditch attempt to block the Rams movement. At that point it was fairly obvious ESK was over it. Not so sure Peacock or Blitz should have bothered. They sure went down swinging though. Bottom line is that StL snoozed on their contractually agreed obligations and gave ESK control. Everything else happened (and was spent) afterwards. That was their choice and they should have realized the potential for failure at that point. The vitriol should also be focused at the sports authority who lost the control.I dont have a dog in this fight at all, but I know the development business as I have been involved in for 30+ years. ESK was going to move the team no matter what STL did, he didnt buy that land without the intent of moving the team. Now he has the right to move the team, it just did it in a fairly underhanded way which is validated by the 790 million. Fuk the Niners and Block Purdy Reply 82 / 88 1 82 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Dec 22 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #814 by Hacksaw 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #815 TOPIC AUTHOR just wow. does this end the NFL part too? in other words is this crap over?$790m plus all the money they didn't spend to keep the Dome top tier, I'd say StL got away with it. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #816 Hacksaw wrote:just wow. does this end the NFL part too? in other words is this crap over?$790m plus all the money they didn't spend to keep the Dome top tier, I'd say StL got away with it. by SoCalRam78 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #817 790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offense by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #818 SoCalRam78 wrote:790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offenseLock it. Start a new thread about Stan vs the NFL. by AvengerRam 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 8686 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame Re: St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #819 The Rams are still in Los Angeles.Stan Kroenke still increased his wealth by moving the team to Los Angeles.St. Louis still does not have a team.There are a lot of lawyers who made a lot of money on this case.None of this will impact the Rams' fortunes this year or in the future. by actionjack 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 4576 Joined: May 19 2016 Sactown Superstar St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #820 Hacksaw wrote:No arguing those points. I can see reimbursement for costs as being a fair settlement. plus interest. The failed Riverfront stadium wasn't adequately funded and was obviously a last ditch attempt to block the Rams movement. At that point it was fairly obvious ESK was over it. Not so sure Peacock or Blitz should have bothered. They sure went down swinging though. Bottom line is that StL snoozed on their contractually agreed obligations and gave ESK control. Everything else happened (and was spent) afterwards. That was their choice and they should have realized the potential for failure at that point. The vitriol should also be focused at the sports authority who lost the control.I dont have a dog in this fight at all, but I know the development business as I have been involved in for 30+ years. ESK was going to move the team no matter what STL did, he didnt buy that land without the intent of moving the team. Now he has the right to move the team, it just did it in a fairly underhanded way which is validated by the 790 million. Fuk the Niners and Block Purdy Reply 82 / 88 1 82 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Dec 22 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #815 TOPIC AUTHOR just wow. does this end the NFL part too? in other words is this crap over?$790m plus all the money they didn't spend to keep the Dome top tier, I'd say StL got away with it. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #816 Hacksaw wrote:just wow. does this end the NFL part too? in other words is this crap over?$790m plus all the money they didn't spend to keep the Dome top tier, I'd say StL got away with it. by SoCalRam78 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #817 790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offense by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #818 SoCalRam78 wrote:790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offenseLock it. Start a new thread about Stan vs the NFL. by AvengerRam 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 8686 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame Re: St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #819 The Rams are still in Los Angeles.Stan Kroenke still increased his wealth by moving the team to Los Angeles.St. Louis still does not have a team.There are a lot of lawyers who made a lot of money on this case.None of this will impact the Rams' fortunes this year or in the future. by actionjack 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 4576 Joined: May 19 2016 Sactown Superstar St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #820 Hacksaw wrote:No arguing those points. I can see reimbursement for costs as being a fair settlement. plus interest. The failed Riverfront stadium wasn't adequately funded and was obviously a last ditch attempt to block the Rams movement. At that point it was fairly obvious ESK was over it. Not so sure Peacock or Blitz should have bothered. They sure went down swinging though. Bottom line is that StL snoozed on their contractually agreed obligations and gave ESK control. Everything else happened (and was spent) afterwards. That was their choice and they should have realized the potential for failure at that point. The vitriol should also be focused at the sports authority who lost the control.I dont have a dog in this fight at all, but I know the development business as I have been involved in for 30+ years. ESK was going to move the team no matter what STL did, he didnt buy that land without the intent of moving the team. Now he has the right to move the team, it just did it in a fairly underhanded way which is validated by the 790 million. Fuk the Niners and Block Purdy Reply 82 / 88 1 82 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Dec 22 2024
by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #816 Hacksaw wrote:just wow. does this end the NFL part too? in other words is this crap over?$790m plus all the money they didn't spend to keep the Dome top tier, I'd say StL got away with it. by SoCalRam78 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #817 790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offense by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #818 SoCalRam78 wrote:790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offenseLock it. Start a new thread about Stan vs the NFL. by AvengerRam 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 8686 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame Re: St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #819 The Rams are still in Los Angeles.Stan Kroenke still increased his wealth by moving the team to Los Angeles.St. Louis still does not have a team.There are a lot of lawyers who made a lot of money on this case.None of this will impact the Rams' fortunes this year or in the future. by actionjack 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 4576 Joined: May 19 2016 Sactown Superstar St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #820 Hacksaw wrote:No arguing those points. I can see reimbursement for costs as being a fair settlement. plus interest. The failed Riverfront stadium wasn't adequately funded and was obviously a last ditch attempt to block the Rams movement. At that point it was fairly obvious ESK was over it. Not so sure Peacock or Blitz should have bothered. They sure went down swinging though. Bottom line is that StL snoozed on their contractually agreed obligations and gave ESK control. Everything else happened (and was spent) afterwards. That was their choice and they should have realized the potential for failure at that point. The vitriol should also be focused at the sports authority who lost the control.I dont have a dog in this fight at all, but I know the development business as I have been involved in for 30+ years. ESK was going to move the team no matter what STL did, he didnt buy that land without the intent of moving the team. Now he has the right to move the team, it just did it in a fairly underhanded way which is validated by the 790 million. Fuk the Niners and Block Purdy Reply 82 / 88 1 82 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Dec 22 2024
by SoCalRam78 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #817 790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offense by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #818 SoCalRam78 wrote:790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offenseLock it. Start a new thread about Stan vs the NFL. by AvengerRam 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 8686 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame Re: St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #819 The Rams are still in Los Angeles.Stan Kroenke still increased his wealth by moving the team to Los Angeles.St. Louis still does not have a team.There are a lot of lawyers who made a lot of money on this case.None of this will impact the Rams' fortunes this year or in the future. by actionjack 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 4576 Joined: May 19 2016 Sactown Superstar St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #820 Hacksaw wrote:No arguing those points. I can see reimbursement for costs as being a fair settlement. plus interest. The failed Riverfront stadium wasn't adequately funded and was obviously a last ditch attempt to block the Rams movement. At that point it was fairly obvious ESK was over it. Not so sure Peacock or Blitz should have bothered. They sure went down swinging though. Bottom line is that StL snoozed on their contractually agreed obligations and gave ESK control. Everything else happened (and was spent) afterwards. That was their choice and they should have realized the potential for failure at that point. The vitriol should also be focused at the sports authority who lost the control.I dont have a dog in this fight at all, but I know the development business as I have been involved in for 30+ years. ESK was going to move the team no matter what STL did, he didnt buy that land without the intent of moving the team. Now he has the right to move the team, it just did it in a fairly underhanded way which is validated by the 790 million. Fuk the Niners and Block Purdy Reply 82 / 88 1 82 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Dec 22 2024
by St. Loser Fan 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 10716 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #818 SoCalRam78 wrote:790 million, what a riot.Well, time to lock this thread up and get back to McVay's tired offenseLock it. Start a new thread about Stan vs the NFL. by AvengerRam 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 8686 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame Re: St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #819 The Rams are still in Los Angeles.Stan Kroenke still increased his wealth by moving the team to Los Angeles.St. Louis still does not have a team.There are a lot of lawyers who made a lot of money on this case.None of this will impact the Rams' fortunes this year or in the future. by actionjack 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 4576 Joined: May 19 2016 Sactown Superstar St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #820 Hacksaw wrote:No arguing those points. I can see reimbursement for costs as being a fair settlement. plus interest. The failed Riverfront stadium wasn't adequately funded and was obviously a last ditch attempt to block the Rams movement. At that point it was fairly obvious ESK was over it. Not so sure Peacock or Blitz should have bothered. They sure went down swinging though. Bottom line is that StL snoozed on their contractually agreed obligations and gave ESK control. Everything else happened (and was spent) afterwards. That was their choice and they should have realized the potential for failure at that point. The vitriol should also be focused at the sports authority who lost the control.I dont have a dog in this fight at all, but I know the development business as I have been involved in for 30+ years. ESK was going to move the team no matter what STL did, he didnt buy that land without the intent of moving the team. Now he has the right to move the team, it just did it in a fairly underhanded way which is validated by the 790 million. Fuk the Niners and Block Purdy Reply 82 / 88 1 82 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Dec 22 2024
by AvengerRam 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 8686 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame Re: St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #819 The Rams are still in Los Angeles.Stan Kroenke still increased his wealth by moving the team to Los Angeles.St. Louis still does not have a team.There are a lot of lawyers who made a lot of money on this case.None of this will impact the Rams' fortunes this year or in the future. by actionjack 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 4576 Joined: May 19 2016 Sactown Superstar St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #820 Hacksaw wrote:No arguing those points. I can see reimbursement for costs as being a fair settlement. plus interest. The failed Riverfront stadium wasn't adequately funded and was obviously a last ditch attempt to block the Rams movement. At that point it was fairly obvious ESK was over it. Not so sure Peacock or Blitz should have bothered. They sure went down swinging though. Bottom line is that StL snoozed on their contractually agreed obligations and gave ESK control. Everything else happened (and was spent) afterwards. That was their choice and they should have realized the potential for failure at that point. The vitriol should also be focused at the sports authority who lost the control.I dont have a dog in this fight at all, but I know the development business as I have been involved in for 30+ years. ESK was going to move the team no matter what STL did, he didnt buy that land without the intent of moving the team. Now he has the right to move the team, it just did it in a fairly underhanded way which is validated by the 790 million. Fuk the Niners and Block Purdy Reply 82 / 88 1 82 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Dec 22 2024
by actionjack 3 years 4 weeks ago Total posts: 4576 Joined: May 19 2016 Sactown Superstar St. Louis NFL Rams Various Lawsuits POST #820 Hacksaw wrote:No arguing those points. I can see reimbursement for costs as being a fair settlement. plus interest. The failed Riverfront stadium wasn't adequately funded and was obviously a last ditch attempt to block the Rams movement. At that point it was fairly obvious ESK was over it. Not so sure Peacock or Blitz should have bothered. They sure went down swinging though. Bottom line is that StL snoozed on their contractually agreed obligations and gave ESK control. Everything else happened (and was spent) afterwards. That was their choice and they should have realized the potential for failure at that point. The vitriol should also be focused at the sports authority who lost the control.I dont have a dog in this fight at all, but I know the development business as I have been involved in for 30+ years. ESK was going to move the team no matter what STL did, he didnt buy that land without the intent of moving the team. Now he has the right to move the team, it just did it in a fairly underhanded way which is validated by the 790 million. Fuk the Niners and Block Purdy Reply 82 / 88 1 82 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business