103 posts
  • 9 / 11
  • 1
  • 9
  • 11
 by Elvis
5 years 2 months ago
 Total posts:   41540  
 Joined:  Mar 28 2015
United States of America   Los Angeles
Administrator

ramsman34 wrote:So by that logic, unless the color rush are yellow, we will have no yellow “regular” or “alt” jerseys. And, 2022 would be the throwbacks, assuming 40’s-50’s, Gabriel’s, or Feragammo’s?


On the one hand maybe the Feragamos because there are fans who will only buy those and nothing else but they're very similar to the current blue jersey and don't add much to the color palette.

Could they do the road Feragamos as a throwback? That might make sense.

The Gabriels seem like the obvious choice to me but i wouldn't rule out the Waterfields either...

 by Zen_Ronin
5 years 2 months ago
 Total posts:   2440  
 Joined:  Sep 26 2016
Canada   Edmonton, AB
Pro Bowl

ramsman34 wrote:So by that logic, unless the color rush are yellow, we will have no yellow “regular” or “alt” jerseys. And, 2022 would be the throwbacks, assuming 40’s-50’s, Gabriel’s, or Feragammo’s?


Yeah, that's my best guess right now. I can't see the color rush being yellow just because it would be too close to the current color rush. Unless the unknown isn't a throwback at all (which it totally possible considering how much KD and the head office actually care about history), and that one is yellow.

 by Ramsdude
5 years 2 months ago
 Total posts:   1071  
 Joined:  May 22 2018
United States of America   Pa.
Pro Bowl

Elvis wrote:The Rams can mix and match what they have now all they want. They may choose not to (and according to uniwatch that's the plan) but adding yellow pants to the bone jersey isn't a new uniform.


By not planning to "mix and match" would just be another mistake they are making. How many posts have we seen where certain combos just look better ie; Bone over Yellow? IMO, many fans would really dig that!

To just disregard the fans opinion again and dismiss the possibility would be stupid. Give yourself as many options as possible!! You would think Demoff would have learned that from the logo fiasco. Options are a GOOD thing.

 by ramsman34
5 years 2 months ago
 Total posts:   10040  
 Joined:  Apr 16 2015
United States of America   Back in LA baby!
Moderator

Zen_Ronin wrote:Yeah, that's my best guess right now. I can't see the color rush being yellow just because it would be too close to the current color rush. Unless the unknown isn't a throwback at all (which it totally possible considering how much KD and the head office actually care about history), and that one is yellow.


I am thinking they might still go all yellow but think the next 2 unis will also have different helmets; one yellow with metallic royal blue horns, and one white with the dumb LA logo. And like Elvis said, perhaps the throwbacks are the Waterfield's or Gabriel's.

 by Zen_Ronin
5 years 2 months ago
 Total posts:   2440  
 Joined:  Sep 26 2016
Canada   Edmonton, AB
Pro Bowl

ramsman34 wrote:I am thinking they might still go all yellow but think the next 2 unis will also have different helmets; one yellow with metallic royal blue horns, and one white with the dumb LA logo. And like Elvis said, perhaps the throwbacks are the Waterfield's or Gabriel's.


God I hope they don't try to cram that horrible logo onto the helmet. I've been fairly open to the rebrand but that logo is the one exception. It's so amateurish. Putting on the helmet would absolutely be a step too far.

I still think the color rush with be white on navy, a color rush and an homage to the Gabriel's all in one, but not an actual throwback. I have nothing at all to back this up, just a hunch. :lol2:

 by ramsman34
5 years 2 months ago
 Total posts:   10040  
 Joined:  Apr 16 2015
United States of America   Back in LA baby!
Moderator

Zen_Ronin wrote:God I hope they don't try to cram that horrible logo onto the helmet. I've been fairly open to the rebrand but that logo is the one exception. It's so amateurish. Putting on the helmet would absolutely be a step too far.

I still think the color rush with be white on navy, a color rush and an homage to the Gabriel's all in one, but not an actual throwback. I have nothing at all to back this up, just a hunch. :lol2:


Ya I'm with you and that shit logo. It will be interesting to see the new unis over the next 2 years. I only wonder if all of them are NFL approved already and if so, when the leaks will start.

 by moklerman
5 years 2 months ago
 Total posts:   7680  
 Joined:  Apr 17 2015
United States of America   Bakersfield, CA
Hall of Fame

ramsman34 wrote:Ya I'm with you and that shit logo. It will be interesting to see the new unis over the next 2 years. I only wonder if all of them are NFL approved already and if so, when the leaks will start.

I'm sorry I'm not on board with this stuff. I don't want to be a downer but all these different uniforms and helmets and combos...it's Nike trash and amateurish college shit. And it's making me hate this front office.

 by ramsman34
5 years 2 months ago
 Total posts:   10040  
 Joined:  Apr 16 2015
United States of America   Back in LA baby!
Moderator

moklerman wrote:I'm sorry I'm not on board with this stuff. I don't want to be a downer but all these different uniforms and helmets and combos...it's Nike trash and amateurish college shit. And it's making me hate this front office.


That's fair Moke. But, if they come up with one you actually like....not worth it?

 by moklerman
5 years 2 months ago
 Total posts:   7680  
 Joined:  Apr 17 2015
United States of America   Bakersfield, CA
Hall of Fame

ramsman34 wrote:That's fair Moke. But, if they come up with one you actually like....not worth it?
No, not for me. They already had one that I liked so turning the Rams into a dog and pony show isn't worth finding another one that I like.

Traditional and proud is what I would like the Rams to be. Now, they're just Hollywood trash.

  • 9 / 11
  • 1
  • 9
  • 11
103 posts Jul 18 2025