[aeneas1]

He threw 41. If you think Matthew is going to throw 40.8 TDs this year then he would be 2nd. Personally, I would follow mathematical rounding rules and say he is on pace for 41.

good, so you know 40.8 is less than 41, was beginning to worry....

[azramsfan93]

good, so you know 40.8 is less than 41, was beginning to worry....

How does a QB throw eight tenths of a TD pass?

[ramsman34]

How does a QB throw eight tenths of a TD pass?

Stafford to Calvin Johnson on the catch that wasn’t a catch but is a catch now??

[ramsman34]

I love Warner. Gave us the best (so far) years as a Rams fan, 2 super bowl appearances and 1 Lombardi. He calls it like HE sees it these days, even if he has gone a bit “Hollywood”.

And I am stoked for the movie about him. Going to hopefully see it with Mom (converted to a Warner fan by me but alas stuck with the Cards after Kurt retired bc of Larry Fitz) and my fiancé who I am slowly teaching the game to, although she says I talk way too fast while trying to explain. Heck, it’s during the game. I only have 40 seconds between plays and replays last like 8 seconds.

Heh heh

[Hacksaw]

StL picked him up. AZ didn't dump him. LA is big and scary. Got it.

[Elvis]

You can find him every Sunday morning at work right across the way from SoFi Stadium in Inglewood...

[Kid Charlamagne]

I do consider him a ram, everything came together in the gsot years and he was a big part of it. I don’t see how I can separate him from the fact they won the SB after 20 years, especially considering how he got shown the door. It’s gotta be tough, he’s got a ring with the rams but there has to be some bitterness about the way it ended.

[/zn/]

I have no problem whatsoever with Kurt Warner.

He was not a lifelong Ram and left under loaded circumstances so I don't expect him to be a deep Rams loyalist like many others we could name. I don't require it of him. It doesn't bother me when he doesn't act like an all-life Rams loyalist. I can appreciate him without that.

That's not to judge those who feel differently. Just putting in my own vote.

...

[Hacksaw]

It makes it a tad awkward when we we feel an allegiance to him for leading our winning Super Bowl team, but that allegiance doesn't blow back.

[PARAM]

I have no problem whatsoever with Kurt Warner.

He was not a lifelong Ram and left under loaded circumstances so I don't expect him to be a deep Rams loyalist like many others we could name. I don't require it of him. It doesn't bother me when he doesn't act like an all-life Rams loyalist. I can appreciate him without that.

That's not to judge those who feel differently. Just putting in my own vote.

...

Good point.

I just wish he was more like Ike or Torry who both left for other teams and yet consider themselves lifelong Rams (or it at least seems like they do). Sure he did leave under bad circumstances.....the Rams quitting on a SB winning QB/a thumb injury he didn't think affected his performance.....and he ended up in Arizona where he made it to yet another Superbowl. But it's not like he WON that game with Arizona. He certainly enjoyed much more success with the Rams than Arizona, whether you measure it in "wins" or stats. And the important part is whomever from the Rams he felt dissed him are certainly long gone but the fans, who appreciated him and had nothing to do with the events, are still there. Unless maybe he feels the fans dissed him too? To this fan, there appears to be a look in his eyes when he's discussing the Rams, akin to tasting a certain food for the first time that doesn't agree with him or trying to appear calm as he's getting a sigmoidoscapy in the doctors office. You can tell something is just not right.