by 69RamFan 3 days 1 hour ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #61 Last edited by 69RamFan on Dec 08 2024, edited 2 times in total. actionjack liked this post ramsman34 wrote:Rams really have zero margin for error. Simply have to keep winning. Then they take the division regardless of what the others do.I just wanted to let you know, It was a great example of changing a play into a screen.On our last TD to Puka, Stafford changed the play,He saw cover zero and called a screen to Puka. So, now you know, a play can be changed into a screen play!!! 1 by PARAM 3 days 1 hour ago Total posts: 12622 Joined: Jul 15 2015 Just far enough North of Philadelphia Hall of Fame Bills week 14 POST #62 actionjack liked this post We have to give McVay, Stafford and the offense serious credit. TD drives of 6:34, 7:47, 5:29, 6:55, 3:36 and a FG drive of 4:45. That's 35:09 TOP and they had the ball 3 other times. 12 plays, 12 plays, 11 plays, 11 plays, 7 plays and 10 plays. With what Allen can do, keeping the ball away was paramount. 38:30 to 21:30. And still, the difference was the special teams TD. Been following the horns since the Coliseum had a Roman playing there. McVay: 77-49, 2 Superbowls, 1 Lombardi............Doubt at your own peril 1 by Zen_Ronin 3 days 1 hour ago Total posts: 2171 Joined: Sep 26 2016 Edmonton, AB Pro Bowl Bills week 14 POST #63 actionjack liked this post PARAM wrote:We have to give McVay, Stafford and the offense serious credit. TD drives of 6:34, 7:47, 5:29, 6:55, 3:36 and a FG drive of 4:45. That's 35:09 TOP and they had the ball 3 other times. 12 plays, 12 plays, 11 plays, 11 plays, 7 plays and 10 plays. With what Allen can do, keeping the ball away was paramount. 38:30 to 21:30. And still, the difference was the special teams TD.I have to say I was actually impressed with McVay for sticking to the run today. He slipped away from it the later into the game we got but, for the most part he FINALLY respected the run and the healthy mix of run/pass is a BIG reason we kept the Bills on their heels. I will continue to foolishly talk sh*t about random players because they get better IMMEDIATELY after I do!! I am a living breathing reverse jinx!! 1 by Elvis 3 days 12 minutes ago Total posts: 40001 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Bills week 14 POST #64 RFU Season Ticket Holder by ramsman34 3 days 3 minutes ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Bills week 14 POST #65 actionjack liked this post 69RamFan wrote:I just wanted to let you know, It was a great example of changing a play into a screen.On our last TD to Puka, Stafford changed the play,He saw cover zero and called a screen to Puka. So, now you know, a play can be changed into a screen play!!! In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure. 1 by safer 3 days 2 minutes ago Total posts: 1353 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bills week 14 POST #66 Elvis, ziggy, actionjack liked this post WOW just WOW!!!Since we were 1-4 this is the FIRST TIME we actually control our playoff destiny. No matter what the Seahawks do (and they have two very tough games yet to play) if we beat the other 3 teams in our division and the jets, we will be in the playoffs. IF we win 3 of the last 4 we probably will be IF one of those victories is over the Seahawks again. 3 by 69RamFan 2 days 23 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #67 ramsman34 wrote:In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure.As I stated prior, it all has to do with the defensive personnel, and the type of defensive scheme the other team is playing. That also includes in what PG and system McVay is using. Remember he wants to us his scheme to look all the same.Maybe his screen fit better to his WR running the screen game while using his PG & scheme, because he wants all plays to look the same.I believe McVay explained that question in one of his meetings/conference/talk shows. by ramsman34 2 days 22 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #68 I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way. by 69RamFan 2 days 21 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #69 ramsman34 wrote:I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way.I remember McVay using screens to his RB in the past after TG3,As I stated prior, a lot of team's defenses change their systems too,By having faster lbers, and they would sniff those screen plays out with our RBs.It just all depends on who we are playing, but a lot of teams went to the faster lbers around the league. So, maybe that's why he stopped using them or just not as much. by ramsman34 2 days 20 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #70 Maybe. It’s one little complaint. And it will be useful against really good pressure fronts. Let the RBs and OL worry about the LBs. Reply 7 / 9 1 7 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 86 posts Dec 11 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by PARAM 3 days 1 hour ago Total posts: 12622 Joined: Jul 15 2015 Just far enough North of Philadelphia Hall of Fame Bills week 14 POST #62 actionjack liked this post We have to give McVay, Stafford and the offense serious credit. TD drives of 6:34, 7:47, 5:29, 6:55, 3:36 and a FG drive of 4:45. That's 35:09 TOP and they had the ball 3 other times. 12 plays, 12 plays, 11 plays, 11 plays, 7 plays and 10 plays. With what Allen can do, keeping the ball away was paramount. 38:30 to 21:30. And still, the difference was the special teams TD. Been following the horns since the Coliseum had a Roman playing there. McVay: 77-49, 2 Superbowls, 1 Lombardi............Doubt at your own peril 1 by Zen_Ronin 3 days 1 hour ago Total posts: 2171 Joined: Sep 26 2016 Edmonton, AB Pro Bowl Bills week 14 POST #63 actionjack liked this post PARAM wrote:We have to give McVay, Stafford and the offense serious credit. TD drives of 6:34, 7:47, 5:29, 6:55, 3:36 and a FG drive of 4:45. That's 35:09 TOP and they had the ball 3 other times. 12 plays, 12 plays, 11 plays, 11 plays, 7 plays and 10 plays. With what Allen can do, keeping the ball away was paramount. 38:30 to 21:30. And still, the difference was the special teams TD.I have to say I was actually impressed with McVay for sticking to the run today. He slipped away from it the later into the game we got but, for the most part he FINALLY respected the run and the healthy mix of run/pass is a BIG reason we kept the Bills on their heels. I will continue to foolishly talk sh*t about random players because they get better IMMEDIATELY after I do!! I am a living breathing reverse jinx!! 1 by Elvis 3 days 12 minutes ago Total posts: 40001 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Bills week 14 POST #64 RFU Season Ticket Holder by ramsman34 3 days 3 minutes ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Bills week 14 POST #65 actionjack liked this post 69RamFan wrote:I just wanted to let you know, It was a great example of changing a play into a screen.On our last TD to Puka, Stafford changed the play,He saw cover zero and called a screen to Puka. So, now you know, a play can be changed into a screen play!!! In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure. 1 by safer 3 days 2 minutes ago Total posts: 1353 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bills week 14 POST #66 Elvis, ziggy, actionjack liked this post WOW just WOW!!!Since we were 1-4 this is the FIRST TIME we actually control our playoff destiny. No matter what the Seahawks do (and they have two very tough games yet to play) if we beat the other 3 teams in our division and the jets, we will be in the playoffs. IF we win 3 of the last 4 we probably will be IF one of those victories is over the Seahawks again. 3 by 69RamFan 2 days 23 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #67 ramsman34 wrote:In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure.As I stated prior, it all has to do with the defensive personnel, and the type of defensive scheme the other team is playing. That also includes in what PG and system McVay is using. Remember he wants to us his scheme to look all the same.Maybe his screen fit better to his WR running the screen game while using his PG & scheme, because he wants all plays to look the same.I believe McVay explained that question in one of his meetings/conference/talk shows. by ramsman34 2 days 22 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #68 I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way. by 69RamFan 2 days 21 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #69 ramsman34 wrote:I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way.I remember McVay using screens to his RB in the past after TG3,As I stated prior, a lot of team's defenses change their systems too,By having faster lbers, and they would sniff those screen plays out with our RBs.It just all depends on who we are playing, but a lot of teams went to the faster lbers around the league. So, maybe that's why he stopped using them or just not as much. by ramsman34 2 days 20 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #70 Maybe. It’s one little complaint. And it will be useful against really good pressure fronts. Let the RBs and OL worry about the LBs. Reply 7 / 9 1 7 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 86 posts Dec 11 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Zen_Ronin 3 days 1 hour ago Total posts: 2171 Joined: Sep 26 2016 Edmonton, AB Pro Bowl Bills week 14 POST #63 actionjack liked this post PARAM wrote:We have to give McVay, Stafford and the offense serious credit. TD drives of 6:34, 7:47, 5:29, 6:55, 3:36 and a FG drive of 4:45. That's 35:09 TOP and they had the ball 3 other times. 12 plays, 12 plays, 11 plays, 11 plays, 7 plays and 10 plays. With what Allen can do, keeping the ball away was paramount. 38:30 to 21:30. And still, the difference was the special teams TD.I have to say I was actually impressed with McVay for sticking to the run today. He slipped away from it the later into the game we got but, for the most part he FINALLY respected the run and the healthy mix of run/pass is a BIG reason we kept the Bills on their heels. I will continue to foolishly talk sh*t about random players because they get better IMMEDIATELY after I do!! I am a living breathing reverse jinx!! 1 by Elvis 3 days 12 minutes ago Total posts: 40001 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Bills week 14 POST #64 RFU Season Ticket Holder by ramsman34 3 days 3 minutes ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Bills week 14 POST #65 actionjack liked this post 69RamFan wrote:I just wanted to let you know, It was a great example of changing a play into a screen.On our last TD to Puka, Stafford changed the play,He saw cover zero and called a screen to Puka. So, now you know, a play can be changed into a screen play!!! In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure. 1 by safer 3 days 2 minutes ago Total posts: 1353 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bills week 14 POST #66 Elvis, ziggy, actionjack liked this post WOW just WOW!!!Since we were 1-4 this is the FIRST TIME we actually control our playoff destiny. No matter what the Seahawks do (and they have two very tough games yet to play) if we beat the other 3 teams in our division and the jets, we will be in the playoffs. IF we win 3 of the last 4 we probably will be IF one of those victories is over the Seahawks again. 3 by 69RamFan 2 days 23 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #67 ramsman34 wrote:In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure.As I stated prior, it all has to do with the defensive personnel, and the type of defensive scheme the other team is playing. That also includes in what PG and system McVay is using. Remember he wants to us his scheme to look all the same.Maybe his screen fit better to his WR running the screen game while using his PG & scheme, because he wants all plays to look the same.I believe McVay explained that question in one of his meetings/conference/talk shows. by ramsman34 2 days 22 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #68 I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way. by 69RamFan 2 days 21 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #69 ramsman34 wrote:I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way.I remember McVay using screens to his RB in the past after TG3,As I stated prior, a lot of team's defenses change their systems too,By having faster lbers, and they would sniff those screen plays out with our RBs.It just all depends on who we are playing, but a lot of teams went to the faster lbers around the league. So, maybe that's why he stopped using them or just not as much. by ramsman34 2 days 20 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #70 Maybe. It’s one little complaint. And it will be useful against really good pressure fronts. Let the RBs and OL worry about the LBs. Reply 7 / 9 1 7 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 86 posts Dec 11 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Elvis 3 days 12 minutes ago Total posts: 40001 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Bills week 14 POST #64 RFU Season Ticket Holder by ramsman34 3 days 3 minutes ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Bills week 14 POST #65 actionjack liked this post 69RamFan wrote:I just wanted to let you know, It was a great example of changing a play into a screen.On our last TD to Puka, Stafford changed the play,He saw cover zero and called a screen to Puka. So, now you know, a play can be changed into a screen play!!! In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure. 1 by safer 3 days 2 minutes ago Total posts: 1353 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bills week 14 POST #66 Elvis, ziggy, actionjack liked this post WOW just WOW!!!Since we were 1-4 this is the FIRST TIME we actually control our playoff destiny. No matter what the Seahawks do (and they have two very tough games yet to play) if we beat the other 3 teams in our division and the jets, we will be in the playoffs. IF we win 3 of the last 4 we probably will be IF one of those victories is over the Seahawks again. 3 by 69RamFan 2 days 23 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #67 ramsman34 wrote:In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure.As I stated prior, it all has to do with the defensive personnel, and the type of defensive scheme the other team is playing. That also includes in what PG and system McVay is using. Remember he wants to us his scheme to look all the same.Maybe his screen fit better to his WR running the screen game while using his PG & scheme, because he wants all plays to look the same.I believe McVay explained that question in one of his meetings/conference/talk shows. by ramsman34 2 days 22 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #68 I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way. by 69RamFan 2 days 21 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #69 ramsman34 wrote:I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way.I remember McVay using screens to his RB in the past after TG3,As I stated prior, a lot of team's defenses change their systems too,By having faster lbers, and they would sniff those screen plays out with our RBs.It just all depends on who we are playing, but a lot of teams went to the faster lbers around the league. So, maybe that's why he stopped using them or just not as much. by ramsman34 2 days 20 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #70 Maybe. It’s one little complaint. And it will be useful against really good pressure fronts. Let the RBs and OL worry about the LBs. Reply 7 / 9 1 7 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 86 posts Dec 11 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by ramsman34 3 days 3 minutes ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Bills week 14 POST #65 actionjack liked this post 69RamFan wrote:I just wanted to let you know, It was a great example of changing a play into a screen.On our last TD to Puka, Stafford changed the play,He saw cover zero and called a screen to Puka. So, now you know, a play can be changed into a screen play!!! In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure. 1 by safer 3 days 2 minutes ago Total posts: 1353 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bills week 14 POST #66 Elvis, ziggy, actionjack liked this post WOW just WOW!!!Since we were 1-4 this is the FIRST TIME we actually control our playoff destiny. No matter what the Seahawks do (and they have two very tough games yet to play) if we beat the other 3 teams in our division and the jets, we will be in the playoffs. IF we win 3 of the last 4 we probably will be IF one of those victories is over the Seahawks again. 3 by 69RamFan 2 days 23 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #67 ramsman34 wrote:In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure.As I stated prior, it all has to do with the defensive personnel, and the type of defensive scheme the other team is playing. That also includes in what PG and system McVay is using. Remember he wants to us his scheme to look all the same.Maybe his screen fit better to his WR running the screen game while using his PG & scheme, because he wants all plays to look the same.I believe McVay explained that question in one of his meetings/conference/talk shows. by ramsman34 2 days 22 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #68 I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way. by 69RamFan 2 days 21 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #69 ramsman34 wrote:I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way.I remember McVay using screens to his RB in the past after TG3,As I stated prior, a lot of team's defenses change their systems too,By having faster lbers, and they would sniff those screen plays out with our RBs.It just all depends on who we are playing, but a lot of teams went to the faster lbers around the league. So, maybe that's why he stopped using them or just not as much. by ramsman34 2 days 20 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #70 Maybe. It’s one little complaint. And it will be useful against really good pressure fronts. Let the RBs and OL worry about the LBs. Reply 7 / 9 1 7 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 86 posts Dec 11 2024
by safer 3 days 2 minutes ago Total posts: 1353 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bills week 14 POST #66 Elvis, ziggy, actionjack liked this post WOW just WOW!!!Since we were 1-4 this is the FIRST TIME we actually control our playoff destiny. No matter what the Seahawks do (and they have two very tough games yet to play) if we beat the other 3 teams in our division and the jets, we will be in the playoffs. IF we win 3 of the last 4 we probably will be IF one of those victories is over the Seahawks again. 3 by 69RamFan 2 days 23 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #67 ramsman34 wrote:In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure.As I stated prior, it all has to do with the defensive personnel, and the type of defensive scheme the other team is playing. That also includes in what PG and system McVay is using. Remember he wants to us his scheme to look all the same.Maybe his screen fit better to his WR running the screen game while using his PG & scheme, because he wants all plays to look the same.I believe McVay explained that question in one of his meetings/conference/talk shows. by ramsman34 2 days 22 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #68 I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way. by 69RamFan 2 days 21 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #69 ramsman34 wrote:I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way.I remember McVay using screens to his RB in the past after TG3,As I stated prior, a lot of team's defenses change their systems too,By having faster lbers, and they would sniff those screen plays out with our RBs.It just all depends on who we are playing, but a lot of teams went to the faster lbers around the league. So, maybe that's why he stopped using them or just not as much. by ramsman34 2 days 20 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #70 Maybe. It’s one little complaint. And it will be useful against really good pressure fronts. Let the RBs and OL worry about the LBs. Reply 7 / 9 1 7 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 86 posts Dec 11 2024
by 69RamFan 2 days 23 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #67 ramsman34 wrote:In deed. However, they have been working this wrinkle for a while now apparently. I am sure now they might have other screens and “can” options. I just want to know why no RB screens in the middle or at the tight tackle position. Especially with this 2 backs. But that was a monster check for sure.As I stated prior, it all has to do with the defensive personnel, and the type of defensive scheme the other team is playing. That also includes in what PG and system McVay is using. Remember he wants to us his scheme to look all the same.Maybe his screen fit better to his WR running the screen game while using his PG & scheme, because he wants all plays to look the same.I believe McVay explained that question in one of his meetings/conference/talk shows. by ramsman34 2 days 22 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #68 I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way. by 69RamFan 2 days 21 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #69 ramsman34 wrote:I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way.I remember McVay using screens to his RB in the past after TG3,As I stated prior, a lot of team's defenses change their systems too,By having faster lbers, and they would sniff those screen plays out with our RBs.It just all depends on who we are playing, but a lot of teams went to the faster lbers around the league. So, maybe that's why he stopped using them or just not as much. by ramsman34 2 days 20 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #70 Maybe. It’s one little complaint. And it will be useful against really good pressure fronts. Let the RBs and OL worry about the LBs. Reply 7 / 9 1 7 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 86 posts Dec 11 2024
by ramsman34 2 days 22 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #68 I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way. by 69RamFan 2 days 21 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #69 ramsman34 wrote:I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way.I remember McVay using screens to his RB in the past after TG3,As I stated prior, a lot of team's defenses change their systems too,By having faster lbers, and they would sniff those screen plays out with our RBs.It just all depends on who we are playing, but a lot of teams went to the faster lbers around the league. So, maybe that's why he stopped using them or just not as much. by ramsman34 2 days 20 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #70 Maybe. It’s one little complaint. And it will be useful against really good pressure fronts. Let the RBs and OL worry about the LBs. Reply 7 / 9 1 7 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 86 posts Dec 11 2024
by 69RamFan 2 days 21 hours ago Total posts: 3411 Joined: Oct 15 2016 LA CA by way of NY/NJ Superstar Bills week 14 POST #69 ramsman34 wrote:I get all that. Doesn’t explain why he has no RBs screens when he has used them prior - TG3 comes to mind. He can make them look like any play he wants to. I different than smoke, tunnel, outside bubble screens. Maybe he just doesn’t trust the RBs that way.I remember McVay using screens to his RB in the past after TG3,As I stated prior, a lot of team's defenses change their systems too,By having faster lbers, and they would sniff those screen plays out with our RBs.It just all depends on who we are playing, but a lot of teams went to the faster lbers around the league. So, maybe that's why he stopped using them or just not as much. by ramsman34 2 days 20 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #70 Maybe. It’s one little complaint. And it will be useful against really good pressure fronts. Let the RBs and OL worry about the LBs. Reply 7 / 9 1 7 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 86 posts Dec 11 2024
by ramsman34 2 days 20 hours ago Total posts: 9415 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: Bills week 14 POST #70 Maybe. It’s one little complaint. And it will be useful against really good pressure fronts. Let the RBs and OL worry about the LBs. Reply 7 / 9 1 7 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business