68 posts
  • 6 / 7
  • 1
  • 6
  • 7
 by laram
5 years 3 months ago
 Total posts:   444  
 Joined:  Sep 30 2015
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Starter

Elvis wrote:Who gives a shit what Fluker said?

The Seahawks didn't win the SB. The Titans didn't win the SB, SF didn't win the SB. KC was the most pass reliant and worst run stopping team in the playoffs.

Nothing wrong with running the ball and stopping the run but it's not the 70's.

Give me a top echelon passing game...


Points come out of the passing game that’s the way the NFL is setup but if you can’t get stops, especially at crucial points in the game you ain’t winning.

KC has a top flight passing game but only got over the hump when the defense started stopping people.

That’s a fact so I care about what’s said about the Rams defense because it’s relevant to what they need to do to reach the next level.

But hey....that’s me I don’t like soft football teams.

Not good for the psyche.

 by laram
5 years 3 months ago
 Total posts:   444  
 Joined:  Sep 30 2015
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Starter

Dick84 wrote:But that wasn't a soft team. Soft teams don't win like they did.


Don’t win what, did the Rams win the SB?

Throughout history there have been soft teams that won regular season games but fell short in winning it all.

Isn’t that the goal?

The Pats physically whipped the Rams on both sides of the ball.

That’s just a fact.

 by aeneas1
5 years 3 months ago
 Total posts:   16894  
 Joined:  Sep 13 2015
United States of America   Norcal
Hall of Fame

laram wrote:Don’t win what, did the Rams win the SB?

Throughout history there have been soft teams that won regular season games but fell short in winning it all.

Isn’t that the goal?

The Pats physically whipped the Rams on both sides of the ball.

That’s just a fact.

yeah, that '86 bears team, won 14 games, allowed an average of 10 offensive points per game, and were first in fewest offensive yards allowed per play by a wide margin, but they were soft i tell ya because they didn't win it all - honestly, where do you come up with this stuff? good grief.

and how about that run stuffing jets team last year? first in fewest yards allowed per carry, 17th in offensive points allowed.

 by aeneas1
5 years 3 months ago
 Total posts:   16894  
 Joined:  Sep 13 2015
United States of America   Norcal
Hall of Fame

Dick84 wrote:But that wasn't a soft team. Soft teams don't win like they did.

of course it wasn't, nor were the 2018 rams... hell, last year's super bowl winning chiefs finished 29th in yards allowed per carry, oooooo they were soft! :roll2:

 by aeneas1
5 years 3 months ago
 Total posts:   16894  
 Joined:  Sep 13 2015
United States of America   Norcal
Hall of Fame

Dick84 wrote:Held Zeke Elliot to 47 yards..

Sooooofffft.

and shoved around the cowboys 4th ranked defense in yards allowed per carry, to the tune of 270 yards on the day , another example of that soft 2018 rams team, ha ha....

 by laram
5 years 3 months ago
 Total posts:   444  
 Joined:  Sep 30 2015
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Starter

Dick84 wrote:Just bizzare.
The Pats scored 13 points but "whipped the Rams on both sides of the ball."

Oooooooooookaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy



There are always outliers is that what you want or do you want some level of consistency??

The Rams high flying offense that scored 30 during the regular season scored 3 points in the SB!

Why??

So a mEdiocre Pats team
Scored 10 points more than they needed.

This is bizarre it’s nit even a secret that physically tough teams Bears, Ravens beat up the Rams physically.

Anytime a team runs for 200+ yards vs you they owned the line of scrimmage.

Simpletons.

 by laram
5 years 3 months ago
 Total posts:   444  
 Joined:  Sep 30 2015
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Starter

Dick84 wrote:The Pats ran for 200 yards?

Lol.

This guy.

And I'm talking about the team that you quoted Fluker whining about.
Rams BEAT them.


Now you’re just being stupid

The 200 yards comment was in general, but Seahags, Ravens and Cowboys all ran for 200 on the Rams defense.

That’s year to year with basically same personnel.

Yeah everybody probably including YOU were lamenting how bad the Rams o-line looked vs the Pats.

This is silly.

I’m out.

 by laram
5 years 3 months ago
 Total posts:   444  
 Joined:  Sep 30 2015
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Starter

Dick84 wrote:We were talking about the Rams defense.
You chose to zig to that point.
Also.. to me, the Rams didn't get out toughed.. they got out schemed. McVay wasn't ready for it and has said as much.

But... you go on about "toughness".


Soft teams has been mentioned throughout but you gloomed on to my comment that the Pats won both trenches.

That’s what took it there.

Try again.

 by aeneas1
5 years 3 months ago
 Total posts:   16894  
 Joined:  Sep 13 2015
United States of America   Norcal
Hall of Fame

laram wrote:Now you’re just being stupid

The 200 yards comment was in general, but Seahags, Ravens and Cowboys all ran for 200 on the Rams defense.

That’s year to year with basically same personnel.

Yeah everybody probably including YOU were lamenting how bad the Rams o-line looked vs the Pats.

This is silly.

I’m out.

which means so is moronic football talk. mahalo!

 by laram
5 years 3 months ago
 Total posts:   444  
 Joined:  Sep 30 2015
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Starter

Dick84 wrote:And.. you brought up "both".. why?

And... again.. the Rams D was very, very good in that game.


No the Pats were very, very bad in that game.

Question.

What happened on the very next play after the Gronk catch in the red zone, do you remember??

  • 6 / 7
  • 1
  • 6
  • 7
68 posts Jul 06 2025