moklerman wrote:dieterbrock wrote:Elvis wrote:Foles has a passer rating of 79.7, Bradford 79.5...
Considering that one guy plays in a system that made Mark Sanchez look great while the other guy plays for....
Nah, forget it....
Overall, both are still disappointing but my point of bumping the thread was that Bradford finally came through in a big moment on national tv and I wonder if that will vault him to better production. Foles hasn't had a 200 yard game in quite a while and seems to be regressing so those early two good games he had are carrying his overall rating I think.
Bradford was really good against the Cowboys who allegedly have a good D. Actually, that's letting my bias type. He was great, particularly in the 2nd half
And I do fear that the lightbulb may have actually gone on for him and he'll continue to do great things.
As for Foles, I dont see any difference in his play than from what we saw from Clemens/Hill/Davis. I'd like to blame him for it, but the reality is that I just cant see how any QB would be successful in that offense.
Well, check that, I could see a QB who was capable of making plays with his feet be succesful, but we clearly dont have that. Again, another non scheme fit with an offensive player acquisition