by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #41 Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford. by Hacksaw_64 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 2686 Joined: Sep 08 2015 Inglewood, CA Moderator Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #42 The guard play argument is being overblown. The guards didn't run block well. But they did pass block. If you watched the game Bradford was practically untouched. Bradford had plenty of time to throw the ball. He just didn't do it well.As for Bradford vs Foles. One is a Ram one isn't. I could care less about Bradford as an Eagle, other than his return on the trade. May he play 50% of the snaps..Historically Bradford wasn't a very good Ram and so far he isn't a very good Eagle. by Stranger 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #43 Hacksaw wrote:I have a feeling A1 was just trying to support the fact that our former QB, who many weren't ready to say goodbye to, wasn't something that we Rams fans should be pining for based on his less than stellar performances. Similar to those he served up in the Lou. In other words,, words of encouragement for us Rams fans...Bradford was such a great idea. He just has never rocked the league as expected. Such a drag, such a waste of money, standings and fan pride ,, for a long time. Like the kid, , and wish him well, but I have never had much more than hope for Sam Bradford, and in the end, he disappointed me. I have to agree that Aeneas and his perception of our former QB has merit. Look at his body of work, his consistencies,, or lack of. Dude is in the perfect place for himself now, and to date he is floundering. I want for him to do well and perhaps he still will, but I'm very relieved that our team doesn't have to deal with that anymore.Very well said. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by aeneas1 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #44 Hacksaw_64 wrote:The guard play argument is being overblown. The guards didn't run block well. But they did pass block. If you watched the game Bradford was practically untouched. Bradford had plenty of time to throw the ball. He just didn't do it well.to see it any other way is just blind homerism towards bradford imo... also, fwiw, according to pff the eagles' oline ranks 8th best in pass pro through week 2. re the rest of your post, spot on. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #45 Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downs by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #46 aeneas1 wrote:moklerman wrote:Why someone has to LEAP to the conclusion that the first two games are definitive about anything seems VERY agenda driven to me and pot-stirring no doubt.good grief, is this for real? it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that he'll flourish in chip's system, it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that his 2015 preseason play was proof positive that the eagles would roll with him under center, but when someone points out that sam's poor play has continued in philly, when the real games start, when he has to face pressure, when the bullets start to fly, there's some sort of "agenda" going on? really? moreover trying to slap lipstick on sam's horrendous cowboys outing. in front of the home crowd, well that's certainly more than telling, if ya want to point to "agenda". hey, you like sam, i get it, you think bad luck follows him around every year, regardless of where the road takes him, that he's an elite talent who hasn't been given a real chance because of, well you name it, but whether you like it or not he's shown little at the pro level, after 51 nfl starts, that suggests he's anything more than below average. thankfully the rams moved on, even if nick doesn't pan out.Love.I didn't read up enough before I posted my pic to see it was already there....but I enjoyed this thread just now. Love this rant. Love it.I feel just massive relief and it has nothing to do with Foles. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #47 moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #48 ArizonaBlue wrote:moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line.Yeah, she helps keep me in good graces even when my posts aren't so warm and fuzzy. by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #49 dieterbrock wrote:Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downsActually, I wouldn't. Joe Buck is awful. Aikman was trying to be objective and is actually one of the best. Buck started chastising Bradford the first time he threw to the flat. He was going to criticize him for throwing it short no matter what. No mention by Buck of the dropped passes and the running backs getting hit 5 yards behind the LOS but the second Bradford threw a screen he starts claiming Bradford just "doesn't" throw the ball downfield.What's his screen name on the Rams boards? I can only assume that's why he started in on the subject. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #50 Airman was all over Bradford. More so than Buck. Reply 5 / 9 1 5 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 87 posts Jul 06 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw_64 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 2686 Joined: Sep 08 2015 Inglewood, CA Moderator Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #42 The guard play argument is being overblown. The guards didn't run block well. But they did pass block. If you watched the game Bradford was practically untouched. Bradford had plenty of time to throw the ball. He just didn't do it well.As for Bradford vs Foles. One is a Ram one isn't. I could care less about Bradford as an Eagle, other than his return on the trade. May he play 50% of the snaps..Historically Bradford wasn't a very good Ram and so far he isn't a very good Eagle. by Stranger 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #43 Hacksaw wrote:I have a feeling A1 was just trying to support the fact that our former QB, who many weren't ready to say goodbye to, wasn't something that we Rams fans should be pining for based on his less than stellar performances. Similar to those he served up in the Lou. In other words,, words of encouragement for us Rams fans...Bradford was such a great idea. He just has never rocked the league as expected. Such a drag, such a waste of money, standings and fan pride ,, for a long time. Like the kid, , and wish him well, but I have never had much more than hope for Sam Bradford, and in the end, he disappointed me. I have to agree that Aeneas and his perception of our former QB has merit. Look at his body of work, his consistencies,, or lack of. Dude is in the perfect place for himself now, and to date he is floundering. I want for him to do well and perhaps he still will, but I'm very relieved that our team doesn't have to deal with that anymore.Very well said. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by aeneas1 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #44 Hacksaw_64 wrote:The guard play argument is being overblown. The guards didn't run block well. But they did pass block. If you watched the game Bradford was practically untouched. Bradford had plenty of time to throw the ball. He just didn't do it well.to see it any other way is just blind homerism towards bradford imo... also, fwiw, according to pff the eagles' oline ranks 8th best in pass pro through week 2. re the rest of your post, spot on. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #45 Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downs by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #46 aeneas1 wrote:moklerman wrote:Why someone has to LEAP to the conclusion that the first two games are definitive about anything seems VERY agenda driven to me and pot-stirring no doubt.good grief, is this for real? it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that he'll flourish in chip's system, it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that his 2015 preseason play was proof positive that the eagles would roll with him under center, but when someone points out that sam's poor play has continued in philly, when the real games start, when he has to face pressure, when the bullets start to fly, there's some sort of "agenda" going on? really? moreover trying to slap lipstick on sam's horrendous cowboys outing. in front of the home crowd, well that's certainly more than telling, if ya want to point to "agenda". hey, you like sam, i get it, you think bad luck follows him around every year, regardless of where the road takes him, that he's an elite talent who hasn't been given a real chance because of, well you name it, but whether you like it or not he's shown little at the pro level, after 51 nfl starts, that suggests he's anything more than below average. thankfully the rams moved on, even if nick doesn't pan out.Love.I didn't read up enough before I posted my pic to see it was already there....but I enjoyed this thread just now. Love this rant. Love it.I feel just massive relief and it has nothing to do with Foles. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #47 moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #48 ArizonaBlue wrote:moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line.Yeah, she helps keep me in good graces even when my posts aren't so warm and fuzzy. by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #49 dieterbrock wrote:Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downsActually, I wouldn't. Joe Buck is awful. Aikman was trying to be objective and is actually one of the best. Buck started chastising Bradford the first time he threw to the flat. He was going to criticize him for throwing it short no matter what. No mention by Buck of the dropped passes and the running backs getting hit 5 yards behind the LOS but the second Bradford threw a screen he starts claiming Bradford just "doesn't" throw the ball downfield.What's his screen name on the Rams boards? I can only assume that's why he started in on the subject. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #50 Airman was all over Bradford. More so than Buck. Reply 5 / 9 1 5 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 87 posts Jul 06 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Stranger 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #43 Hacksaw wrote:I have a feeling A1 was just trying to support the fact that our former QB, who many weren't ready to say goodbye to, wasn't something that we Rams fans should be pining for based on his less than stellar performances. Similar to those he served up in the Lou. In other words,, words of encouragement for us Rams fans...Bradford was such a great idea. He just has never rocked the league as expected. Such a drag, such a waste of money, standings and fan pride ,, for a long time. Like the kid, , and wish him well, but I have never had much more than hope for Sam Bradford, and in the end, he disappointed me. I have to agree that Aeneas and his perception of our former QB has merit. Look at his body of work, his consistencies,, or lack of. Dude is in the perfect place for himself now, and to date he is floundering. I want for him to do well and perhaps he still will, but I'm very relieved that our team doesn't have to deal with that anymore.Very well said. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by aeneas1 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #44 Hacksaw_64 wrote:The guard play argument is being overblown. The guards didn't run block well. But they did pass block. If you watched the game Bradford was practically untouched. Bradford had plenty of time to throw the ball. He just didn't do it well.to see it any other way is just blind homerism towards bradford imo... also, fwiw, according to pff the eagles' oline ranks 8th best in pass pro through week 2. re the rest of your post, spot on. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #45 Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downs by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #46 aeneas1 wrote:moklerman wrote:Why someone has to LEAP to the conclusion that the first two games are definitive about anything seems VERY agenda driven to me and pot-stirring no doubt.good grief, is this for real? it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that he'll flourish in chip's system, it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that his 2015 preseason play was proof positive that the eagles would roll with him under center, but when someone points out that sam's poor play has continued in philly, when the real games start, when he has to face pressure, when the bullets start to fly, there's some sort of "agenda" going on? really? moreover trying to slap lipstick on sam's horrendous cowboys outing. in front of the home crowd, well that's certainly more than telling, if ya want to point to "agenda". hey, you like sam, i get it, you think bad luck follows him around every year, regardless of where the road takes him, that he's an elite talent who hasn't been given a real chance because of, well you name it, but whether you like it or not he's shown little at the pro level, after 51 nfl starts, that suggests he's anything more than below average. thankfully the rams moved on, even if nick doesn't pan out.Love.I didn't read up enough before I posted my pic to see it was already there....but I enjoyed this thread just now. Love this rant. Love it.I feel just massive relief and it has nothing to do with Foles. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #47 moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #48 ArizonaBlue wrote:moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line.Yeah, she helps keep me in good graces even when my posts aren't so warm and fuzzy. by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #49 dieterbrock wrote:Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downsActually, I wouldn't. Joe Buck is awful. Aikman was trying to be objective and is actually one of the best. Buck started chastising Bradford the first time he threw to the flat. He was going to criticize him for throwing it short no matter what. No mention by Buck of the dropped passes and the running backs getting hit 5 yards behind the LOS but the second Bradford threw a screen he starts claiming Bradford just "doesn't" throw the ball downfield.What's his screen name on the Rams boards? I can only assume that's why he started in on the subject. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #50 Airman was all over Bradford. More so than Buck. Reply 5 / 9 1 5 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 87 posts Jul 06 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by aeneas1 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #44 Hacksaw_64 wrote:The guard play argument is being overblown. The guards didn't run block well. But they did pass block. If you watched the game Bradford was practically untouched. Bradford had plenty of time to throw the ball. He just didn't do it well.to see it any other way is just blind homerism towards bradford imo... also, fwiw, according to pff the eagles' oline ranks 8th best in pass pro through week 2. re the rest of your post, spot on. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #45 Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downs by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #46 aeneas1 wrote:moklerman wrote:Why someone has to LEAP to the conclusion that the first two games are definitive about anything seems VERY agenda driven to me and pot-stirring no doubt.good grief, is this for real? it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that he'll flourish in chip's system, it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that his 2015 preseason play was proof positive that the eagles would roll with him under center, but when someone points out that sam's poor play has continued in philly, when the real games start, when he has to face pressure, when the bullets start to fly, there's some sort of "agenda" going on? really? moreover trying to slap lipstick on sam's horrendous cowboys outing. in front of the home crowd, well that's certainly more than telling, if ya want to point to "agenda". hey, you like sam, i get it, you think bad luck follows him around every year, regardless of where the road takes him, that he's an elite talent who hasn't been given a real chance because of, well you name it, but whether you like it or not he's shown little at the pro level, after 51 nfl starts, that suggests he's anything more than below average. thankfully the rams moved on, even if nick doesn't pan out.Love.I didn't read up enough before I posted my pic to see it was already there....but I enjoyed this thread just now. Love this rant. Love it.I feel just massive relief and it has nothing to do with Foles. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #47 moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #48 ArizonaBlue wrote:moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line.Yeah, she helps keep me in good graces even when my posts aren't so warm and fuzzy. by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #49 dieterbrock wrote:Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downsActually, I wouldn't. Joe Buck is awful. Aikman was trying to be objective and is actually one of the best. Buck started chastising Bradford the first time he threw to the flat. He was going to criticize him for throwing it short no matter what. No mention by Buck of the dropped passes and the running backs getting hit 5 yards behind the LOS but the second Bradford threw a screen he starts claiming Bradford just "doesn't" throw the ball downfield.What's his screen name on the Rams boards? I can only assume that's why he started in on the subject. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #50 Airman was all over Bradford. More so than Buck. Reply 5 / 9 1 5 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 87 posts Jul 06 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #45 Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downs by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #46 aeneas1 wrote:moklerman wrote:Why someone has to LEAP to the conclusion that the first two games are definitive about anything seems VERY agenda driven to me and pot-stirring no doubt.good grief, is this for real? it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that he'll flourish in chip's system, it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that his 2015 preseason play was proof positive that the eagles would roll with him under center, but when someone points out that sam's poor play has continued in philly, when the real games start, when he has to face pressure, when the bullets start to fly, there's some sort of "agenda" going on? really? moreover trying to slap lipstick on sam's horrendous cowboys outing. in front of the home crowd, well that's certainly more than telling, if ya want to point to "agenda". hey, you like sam, i get it, you think bad luck follows him around every year, regardless of where the road takes him, that he's an elite talent who hasn't been given a real chance because of, well you name it, but whether you like it or not he's shown little at the pro level, after 51 nfl starts, that suggests he's anything more than below average. thankfully the rams moved on, even if nick doesn't pan out.Love.I didn't read up enough before I posted my pic to see it was already there....but I enjoyed this thread just now. Love this rant. Love it.I feel just massive relief and it has nothing to do with Foles. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #47 moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #48 ArizonaBlue wrote:moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line.Yeah, she helps keep me in good graces even when my posts aren't so warm and fuzzy. by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #49 dieterbrock wrote:Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downsActually, I wouldn't. Joe Buck is awful. Aikman was trying to be objective and is actually one of the best. Buck started chastising Bradford the first time he threw to the flat. He was going to criticize him for throwing it short no matter what. No mention by Buck of the dropped passes and the running backs getting hit 5 yards behind the LOS but the second Bradford threw a screen he starts claiming Bradford just "doesn't" throw the ball downfield.What's his screen name on the Rams boards? I can only assume that's why he started in on the subject. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #50 Airman was all over Bradford. More so than Buck. Reply 5 / 9 1 5 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 87 posts Jul 06 2025
by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #46 aeneas1 wrote:moklerman wrote:Why someone has to LEAP to the conclusion that the first two games are definitive about anything seems VERY agenda driven to me and pot-stirring no doubt.good grief, is this for real? it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that he'll flourish in chip's system, it's ok for sam backers to LEAP to the conclusion that his 2015 preseason play was proof positive that the eagles would roll with him under center, but when someone points out that sam's poor play has continued in philly, when the real games start, when he has to face pressure, when the bullets start to fly, there's some sort of "agenda" going on? really? moreover trying to slap lipstick on sam's horrendous cowboys outing. in front of the home crowd, well that's certainly more than telling, if ya want to point to "agenda". hey, you like sam, i get it, you think bad luck follows him around every year, regardless of where the road takes him, that he's an elite talent who hasn't been given a real chance because of, well you name it, but whether you like it or not he's shown little at the pro level, after 51 nfl starts, that suggests he's anything more than below average. thankfully the rams moved on, even if nick doesn't pan out.Love.I didn't read up enough before I posted my pic to see it was already there....but I enjoyed this thread just now. Love this rant. Love it.I feel just massive relief and it has nothing to do with Foles. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #47 moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #48 ArizonaBlue wrote:moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line.Yeah, she helps keep me in good graces even when my posts aren't so warm and fuzzy. by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #49 dieterbrock wrote:Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downsActually, I wouldn't. Joe Buck is awful. Aikman was trying to be objective and is actually one of the best. Buck started chastising Bradford the first time he threw to the flat. He was going to criticize him for throwing it short no matter what. No mention by Buck of the dropped passes and the running backs getting hit 5 yards behind the LOS but the second Bradford threw a screen he starts claiming Bradford just "doesn't" throw the ball downfield.What's his screen name on the Rams boards? I can only assume that's why he started in on the subject. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #50 Airman was all over Bradford. More so than Buck. Reply 5 / 9 1 5 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 87 posts Jul 06 2025
by RedAlice 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 6781 Joined: Aug 07 2015 Seattle Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #47 moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line. Follow our RFU Instagram: @ramsfansunited RFU Season Ticket Holder by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #48 ArizonaBlue wrote:moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line.Yeah, she helps keep me in good graces even when my posts aren't so warm and fuzzy. by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #49 dieterbrock wrote:Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downsActually, I wouldn't. Joe Buck is awful. Aikman was trying to be objective and is actually one of the best. Buck started chastising Bradford the first time he threw to the flat. He was going to criticize him for throwing it short no matter what. No mention by Buck of the dropped passes and the running backs getting hit 5 yards behind the LOS but the second Bradford threw a screen he starts claiming Bradford just "doesn't" throw the ball downfield.What's his screen name on the Rams boards? I can only assume that's why he started in on the subject. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #50 Airman was all over Bradford. More so than Buck. Reply 5 / 9 1 5 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 87 posts Jul 06 2025
by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #48 ArizonaBlue wrote:moklerman wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Capt Checkdown throwing over 15 yards on 33% of his attempts is going to lose him that nickname.Add to that 6 drops and negative rushing yards from Murray and it's somehow all on Bradford.I only want to say I also love your sig line.Yeah, she helps keep me in good graces even when my posts aren't so warm and fuzzy. by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #49 dieterbrock wrote:Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downsActually, I wouldn't. Joe Buck is awful. Aikman was trying to be objective and is actually one of the best. Buck started chastising Bradford the first time he threw to the flat. He was going to criticize him for throwing it short no matter what. No mention by Buck of the dropped passes and the running backs getting hit 5 yards behind the LOS but the second Bradford threw a screen he starts claiming Bradford just "doesn't" throw the ball downfield.What's his screen name on the Rams boards? I can only assume that's why he started in on the subject. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #50 Airman was all over Bradford. More so than Buck. Reply 5 / 9 1 5 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 87 posts Jul 06 2025
by moklerman 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #49 dieterbrock wrote:Yup, anyone who watched the game would say that Bradford was awful. The announcers were trying to be polite but even they were dumbfounded by the screens and check downsActually, I wouldn't. Joe Buck is awful. Aikman was trying to be objective and is actually one of the best. Buck started chastising Bradford the first time he threw to the flat. He was going to criticize him for throwing it short no matter what. No mention by Buck of the dropped passes and the running backs getting hit 5 yards behind the LOS but the second Bradford threw a screen he starts claiming Bradford just "doesn't" throw the ball downfield.What's his screen name on the Rams boards? I can only assume that's why he started in on the subject. by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #50 Airman was all over Bradford. More so than Buck. Reply 5 / 9 1 5 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 87 posts Jul 06 2025
by dieterbrock 9 years 9 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Foles vs. Bradford POST #50 Airman was all over Bradford. More so than Buck. Reply 5 / 9 1 5 9 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business