by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #41 dieterbrock wrote:RamsFanSince82 wrote:Elvis wrote:Is it normal for PSL money to be counted as public money?No, Grubman said that the NFL considers that team money.So Stan is to pay 550 mill and give up 161 mill in PSLTotal- 711 mill for StanFor a tier 2 stadium he doesnt want.Oh and its nice to see ths sticker price is over 1.1 billion nowAnd now thanks to his buddy Jerry Richardson he gets to pay $1.5 million a year rent instead of $700k. by 69superbowl 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 477 Joined: Aug 19 2015 San Jose Starter Re: Howard Balzar... POST #42 Hey E. Stash, well played. I need some change, you got three tens for a twenty? Nice owner. by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #43 "From @davidhunn: The NFL came to STL to offer another $100M in exchange for the team not having to pay the amusement tax."There's a lot of ambiguity in this by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Howard Balzar... POST #44 Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #45 I know I shouldn't be shocked but it's astonishing the amount of people in St Louis that are celebrating this $100 million hahaha. They think it's a done deal and that it's a good thing. They have no concept that their overall package offered to the Rams just took a sharp turn from bad to absolute garbage. Stan gets the revenue that they claimed provided $110 million a year and in return he gets to pay an extra $800 a year in rent! I'm speechless! by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #46 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #47 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.Why would Stan be behind this? More private contribution via the G4 and more rent so he can pocket the amusement tax? Makes ZERO sense.No, this smells of Richardson and the committee trying to massage their favorite ending. Getting the BoA to pass does a lot to block Kroenke. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #48 dieterbrock wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this.Look at the exhibit, the G4 loan is now 300 million, not 200 million, there's the 100 million. All along it's been 450 million from the NFL/ESK with 161 in PSLs, now it's 550 million and 161 million. So it comes to paying back the RSA. Before, it was coming from this amusement tax, that the NFL was claiming should be earmarked for the team. However, the RSA will be paid back now by team rent (that has increased to 1.5 million from 700 k) as well as I assume a much smaller share of the amusement tax.Also, the total budget is now 1.1 billion, not 1.01 billion. by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #49 It's interesting that the Carson Team has been very active and Kroenke hasn't made one move to his advantage over the past few months. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #50 Just go Rogue, Baby.If Stan feels these owners (Richardson/Spanos) are trying to stick it to him, doesnt that increase the likelihood of him going rogue? Reply 5 / 8 1 5 8 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 75 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by 69superbowl 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 477 Joined: Aug 19 2015 San Jose Starter Re: Howard Balzar... POST #42 Hey E. Stash, well played. I need some change, you got three tens for a twenty? Nice owner. by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #43 "From @davidhunn: The NFL came to STL to offer another $100M in exchange for the team not having to pay the amusement tax."There's a lot of ambiguity in this by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Howard Balzar... POST #44 Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #45 I know I shouldn't be shocked but it's astonishing the amount of people in St Louis that are celebrating this $100 million hahaha. They think it's a done deal and that it's a good thing. They have no concept that their overall package offered to the Rams just took a sharp turn from bad to absolute garbage. Stan gets the revenue that they claimed provided $110 million a year and in return he gets to pay an extra $800 a year in rent! I'm speechless! by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #46 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #47 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.Why would Stan be behind this? More private contribution via the G4 and more rent so he can pocket the amusement tax? Makes ZERO sense.No, this smells of Richardson and the committee trying to massage their favorite ending. Getting the BoA to pass does a lot to block Kroenke. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #48 dieterbrock wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this.Look at the exhibit, the G4 loan is now 300 million, not 200 million, there's the 100 million. All along it's been 450 million from the NFL/ESK with 161 in PSLs, now it's 550 million and 161 million. So it comes to paying back the RSA. Before, it was coming from this amusement tax, that the NFL was claiming should be earmarked for the team. However, the RSA will be paid back now by team rent (that has increased to 1.5 million from 700 k) as well as I assume a much smaller share of the amusement tax.Also, the total budget is now 1.1 billion, not 1.01 billion. by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #49 It's interesting that the Carson Team has been very active and Kroenke hasn't made one move to his advantage over the past few months. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #50 Just go Rogue, Baby.If Stan feels these owners (Richardson/Spanos) are trying to stick it to him, doesnt that increase the likelihood of him going rogue? Reply 5 / 8 1 5 8 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 75 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #43 "From @davidhunn: The NFL came to STL to offer another $100M in exchange for the team not having to pay the amusement tax."There's a lot of ambiguity in this by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Howard Balzar... POST #44 Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #45 I know I shouldn't be shocked but it's astonishing the amount of people in St Louis that are celebrating this $100 million hahaha. They think it's a done deal and that it's a good thing. They have no concept that their overall package offered to the Rams just took a sharp turn from bad to absolute garbage. Stan gets the revenue that they claimed provided $110 million a year and in return he gets to pay an extra $800 a year in rent! I'm speechless! by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #46 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #47 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.Why would Stan be behind this? More private contribution via the G4 and more rent so he can pocket the amusement tax? Makes ZERO sense.No, this smells of Richardson and the committee trying to massage their favorite ending. Getting the BoA to pass does a lot to block Kroenke. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #48 dieterbrock wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this.Look at the exhibit, the G4 loan is now 300 million, not 200 million, there's the 100 million. All along it's been 450 million from the NFL/ESK with 161 in PSLs, now it's 550 million and 161 million. So it comes to paying back the RSA. Before, it was coming from this amusement tax, that the NFL was claiming should be earmarked for the team. However, the RSA will be paid back now by team rent (that has increased to 1.5 million from 700 k) as well as I assume a much smaller share of the amusement tax.Also, the total budget is now 1.1 billion, not 1.01 billion. by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #49 It's interesting that the Carson Team has been very active and Kroenke hasn't made one move to his advantage over the past few months. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #50 Just go Rogue, Baby.If Stan feels these owners (Richardson/Spanos) are trying to stick it to him, doesnt that increase the likelihood of him going rogue? Reply 5 / 8 1 5 8 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 75 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Howard Balzar... POST #44 Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #45 I know I shouldn't be shocked but it's astonishing the amount of people in St Louis that are celebrating this $100 million hahaha. They think it's a done deal and that it's a good thing. They have no concept that their overall package offered to the Rams just took a sharp turn from bad to absolute garbage. Stan gets the revenue that they claimed provided $110 million a year and in return he gets to pay an extra $800 a year in rent! I'm speechless! by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #46 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #47 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.Why would Stan be behind this? More private contribution via the G4 and more rent so he can pocket the amusement tax? Makes ZERO sense.No, this smells of Richardson and the committee trying to massage their favorite ending. Getting the BoA to pass does a lot to block Kroenke. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #48 dieterbrock wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this.Look at the exhibit, the G4 loan is now 300 million, not 200 million, there's the 100 million. All along it's been 450 million from the NFL/ESK with 161 in PSLs, now it's 550 million and 161 million. So it comes to paying back the RSA. Before, it was coming from this amusement tax, that the NFL was claiming should be earmarked for the team. However, the RSA will be paid back now by team rent (that has increased to 1.5 million from 700 k) as well as I assume a much smaller share of the amusement tax.Also, the total budget is now 1.1 billion, not 1.01 billion. by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #49 It's interesting that the Carson Team has been very active and Kroenke hasn't made one move to his advantage over the past few months. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #50 Just go Rogue, Baby.If Stan feels these owners (Richardson/Spanos) are trying to stick it to him, doesnt that increase the likelihood of him going rogue? Reply 5 / 8 1 5 8 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 75 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #45 I know I shouldn't be shocked but it's astonishing the amount of people in St Louis that are celebrating this $100 million hahaha. They think it's a done deal and that it's a good thing. They have no concept that their overall package offered to the Rams just took a sharp turn from bad to absolute garbage. Stan gets the revenue that they claimed provided $110 million a year and in return he gets to pay an extra $800 a year in rent! I'm speechless! by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #46 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #47 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.Why would Stan be behind this? More private contribution via the G4 and more rent so he can pocket the amusement tax? Makes ZERO sense.No, this smells of Richardson and the committee trying to massage their favorite ending. Getting the BoA to pass does a lot to block Kroenke. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #48 dieterbrock wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this.Look at the exhibit, the G4 loan is now 300 million, not 200 million, there's the 100 million. All along it's been 450 million from the NFL/ESK with 161 in PSLs, now it's 550 million and 161 million. So it comes to paying back the RSA. Before, it was coming from this amusement tax, that the NFL was claiming should be earmarked for the team. However, the RSA will be paid back now by team rent (that has increased to 1.5 million from 700 k) as well as I assume a much smaller share of the amusement tax.Also, the total budget is now 1.1 billion, not 1.01 billion. by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #49 It's interesting that the Carson Team has been very active and Kroenke hasn't made one move to his advantage over the past few months. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #50 Just go Rogue, Baby.If Stan feels these owners (Richardson/Spanos) are trying to stick it to him, doesnt that increase the likelihood of him going rogue? Reply 5 / 8 1 5 8 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 75 posts Jul 11 2025
by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #46 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #47 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.Why would Stan be behind this? More private contribution via the G4 and more rent so he can pocket the amusement tax? Makes ZERO sense.No, this smells of Richardson and the committee trying to massage their favorite ending. Getting the BoA to pass does a lot to block Kroenke. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #48 dieterbrock wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this.Look at the exhibit, the G4 loan is now 300 million, not 200 million, there's the 100 million. All along it's been 450 million from the NFL/ESK with 161 in PSLs, now it's 550 million and 161 million. So it comes to paying back the RSA. Before, it was coming from this amusement tax, that the NFL was claiming should be earmarked for the team. However, the RSA will be paid back now by team rent (that has increased to 1.5 million from 700 k) as well as I assume a much smaller share of the amusement tax.Also, the total budget is now 1.1 billion, not 1.01 billion. by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #49 It's interesting that the Carson Team has been very active and Kroenke hasn't made one move to his advantage over the past few months. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #50 Just go Rogue, Baby.If Stan feels these owners (Richardson/Spanos) are trying to stick it to him, doesnt that increase the likelihood of him going rogue? Reply 5 / 8 1 5 8 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 75 posts Jul 11 2025
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #47 Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.Why would Stan be behind this? More private contribution via the G4 and more rent so he can pocket the amusement tax? Makes ZERO sense.No, this smells of Richardson and the committee trying to massage their favorite ending. Getting the BoA to pass does a lot to block Kroenke. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #48 dieterbrock wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this.Look at the exhibit, the G4 loan is now 300 million, not 200 million, there's the 100 million. All along it's been 450 million from the NFL/ESK with 161 in PSLs, now it's 550 million and 161 million. So it comes to paying back the RSA. Before, it was coming from this amusement tax, that the NFL was claiming should be earmarked for the team. However, the RSA will be paid back now by team rent (that has increased to 1.5 million from 700 k) as well as I assume a much smaller share of the amusement tax.Also, the total budget is now 1.1 billion, not 1.01 billion. by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #49 It's interesting that the Carson Team has been very active and Kroenke hasn't made one move to his advantage over the past few months. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #50 Just go Rogue, Baby.If Stan feels these owners (Richardson/Spanos) are trying to stick it to him, doesnt that increase the likelihood of him going rogue? Reply 5 / 8 1 5 8 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 75 posts Jul 11 2025
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #48 dieterbrock wrote:Hacksaw wrote:Information came from whom? Did the committee actually say they would do this? If this is Richardson and the LA Spanos committee again it's not as bad as it appears. If its the league executives that's a different story. The story is clearly being put out there before the boa vote on purpose. JR istrying to get them to pass it. By getting approval he feels Kroenke will be stuck in St Louis and Spanos gets his way. To that I say, to hell with Spanos and Richardson.There are so many moving parts to that. Who controls the NFL money? Where does the 100 mill even come from?How much amusement tax gets collected annually?Do they spin that 100 mill to be "public" funding? Does it replace another source?My head is spinning trying to comprehend this.Look at the exhibit, the G4 loan is now 300 million, not 200 million, there's the 100 million. All along it's been 450 million from the NFL/ESK with 161 in PSLs, now it's 550 million and 161 million. So it comes to paying back the RSA. Before, it was coming from this amusement tax, that the NFL was claiming should be earmarked for the team. However, the RSA will be paid back now by team rent (that has increased to 1.5 million from 700 k) as well as I assume a much smaller share of the amusement tax.Also, the total budget is now 1.1 billion, not 1.01 billion. by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #49 It's interesting that the Carson Team has been very active and Kroenke hasn't made one move to his advantage over the past few months. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #50 Just go Rogue, Baby.If Stan feels these owners (Richardson/Spanos) are trying to stick it to him, doesnt that increase the likelihood of him going rogue? Reply 5 / 8 1 5 8 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 75 posts Jul 11 2025
by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Howard Balzar... POST #49 It's interesting that the Carson Team has been very active and Kroenke hasn't made one move to his advantage over the past few months. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #50 Just go Rogue, Baby.If Stan feels these owners (Richardson/Spanos) are trying to stick it to him, doesnt that increase the likelihood of him going rogue? Reply 5 / 8 1 5 8 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 75 posts Jul 11 2025
by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Howard Balzar... POST #50 Just go Rogue, Baby.If Stan feels these owners (Richardson/Spanos) are trying to stick it to him, doesnt that increase the likelihood of him going rogue? Reply 5 / 8 1 5 8 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business