[Hacksaw]

If the owners are really angry, it's probably jealousy that a (bleep) up like Spanos is going to see his team's net worth double and play in a great new stadium while their teams stay the same and are stuck playing in 10 year old dumpy stadiums.

For sure. Spanos doesn't deserve this. Coat-tailer I say...

However, they can put the kibosh on Deano's plans if the want to.

[Elvis]

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... ign=buffer

Is NFL regretting the Chargers’ move to L.A.?

Posted by Mike Florio on January 23, 2017, 8:16 PM EST

The early days of the Chargers’ return to L.A. haven’t gone well. There’s now a question as to whether they’ve gone so poorly as to spark a full-fledged case of mover’s regret.

Adam Schefter of ESPN.com recently wrote that the move “angered NFL owners and executives just as much” as it angered folks in San Diego, if not more.

Per the report, the NFL has been “beside itself” regarding the move.

“There are a ton of owners very upset that [the Chargers] moved,” an unnamed source told Schefter, adding that the NFL actually wants the Chargers to move back to San Diego.

While there may be some who believe that the Chargers shouldn’t have moved and who may be pushing that agenda now, the prevailing view in league circles is that it’s a done deal. Indeed, it was a done deal a year ago, when the owners specifically gave the Chargers a 12-month window to move to L.A.

There was no equivocation or hesitation. The die was cast in January 2016, there was never a peep about it being a mistake for the ensuing 12 months, and then the Chargers opted to utilize the right to relocate.

As one source who is very well connected regarding franchise dynamics told PFT in response to the ESPN.com report, “I have heard nothing about it.”

There simply aren’t “a ton of owners” upset about the move. The more likely reality here is that some in the league office are sensing that the Chargers’ move to L.A. is going to be a debacle, and that they want to be able to say “I told you so” if/when the Chargers fail in L.A.

Regardless, the owners had a clear opportunity a year ago to tell Chargers owner Dean Spanos “no” to a move. The owners overwhelmingly allowed the Rams to move right away, and to give the Chargers the ability to do the same more than a year ago.

In the ensuing 12 months, there was never a public or private sense of remorse or regret. Yes, there was a periodic impression that owner Roger Goodell wanted to keep the team in San Diego, but there was never any report with the kind of specificity that has now emerged, far too late for it to matter.

Even if the Chargers would turn tail and return to San Diego, what would they do about a stadium? That’s the problem; the money isn’t available to build a stadium — unless Rams owner Stan Kroenke would be willing to write a very, very large check for exclusive rights to the L.A. market.

Share this:

[Hacksaw]

"....unless Rams owner Stan Kroenke would be willing to write a very, very large check for exclusive rights to the L.A. market."

[69superbowl]

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... gers-move/

Seems that E. Stash, according to PFT, has offered to barf up a check to help building a new SD stadium. Looks like Spanos will be a real fun roommate.

E. Stash: "Hey Dean, did you drink my beer?"
Dean: "Uhhh, (blurp), no buddy. But I'll take another one..."

[dieterbrock]

I think this turns out to be an epically great move by Spanos or a total disaster....

[moklerman]

Facebook just recommended the Los Angeles Chargers page to me(for some unknown reason) and it has 27,000+ members. For comparison, I had to see what the Rams FB page has because 27,000 seemed like a lot more LA Chargers fans than I would have expected. The Rams are just under 800,000.

Don't know if it means anything but I hope the league, Spanos and Kroenke find a way to keep the Chargers in SD. No one wants them in LA.

[Hacksaw]

So the NFL kicks in $300M, the Rams kick in $100M?, the Chargers kick in $500M, = $900M.
It would appear the fans in SD don't care enough to keep the team if they won't kick in a couple hundred million paid for by a visitor hotel tax.

Los Angeles Chargers - BOO HISS..

[Elvis]

L.A. didn't kick in any money to get the Rams back.

But a privately funded stadium in SD doesn't make sense so kind of a rock and a hard place...

[dieterbrock]

Facebook just recommended the Los Angeles Chargers page to me(for some unknown reason) and it has 27,000+ members. For comparison, I had to see what the Rams FB page has because 27,000 seemed like a lot more LA Chargers fans than I would have expected. The Rams are just under 800,000.

Don't know if it means anything but I hope the league, Spanos and Kroenke find a way to keep the Chargers in SD. No one wants them in LA.

Was it the San Diego Chargers page that was re-named Los Angeles?

[Hacksaw]

L.A. didn't kick in any money to get the Rams back.

But a privately funded stadium in SD doesn't make sense so kind of a rock and a hard place...

True but it's a different situation. The fans have to realize they are not LA and their owner isn't filthy rich or apparently very bright.