by Youngblood22 18 hours 11 minutes ago Total posts: 39 Joined: Aug 31 2023 LA Coliseum Undrafted Free Agent The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #31 No proof, not one person offers any proof. Bone headed plays yes, but no proof. And like someone else said, why watch if you think its rigged? by AvengerRam 17 hours 14 minutes ago Total posts: 8795 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame Re: The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #32 Clearly, the league is rigged by Jake from State Farm. by BobCarl 11 hours 43 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #33 ramman2999 wrote:It’s a post about rigging.Agreed. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret by AvengerRam 11 hours 16 minutes ago Total posts: 8795 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #34 Elvis liked this post ramman2999 wrote:It’s a post about rigging. Two bonehead plays not running the ball with Marshawn lynch and throwing. And not running with Devonte Freeman when a field goal makes it a two score game. When Brady can’t tie. And you get a sack.I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack? 1 by BobCarl 8 hours 41 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #35 Youngblood22 wrote:... why watch if you think its rigged?why not? ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret by rams1974 8 hours 8 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:If there's ever a fanbase that is "owed" a Super Bowl championship; it's the Buffalo Bills.I used to think this way, that ended about 48 hours after Super Bowl XXXVI and seeing the gross behavior that was emerging from the supremely "owed" fans in Boston. Yeah, real classy .. pardon me if I don't join in the sad violin woe is me act Lions fans are putting on. Trading in who is and isn't owed is a media optics trap. by rams1974 8 hours 4 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR BrooklynRam74 wrote:Game definitely rigged.What a disgrace this League is now. Fixed game.C'mon - how many times has it borne out that where the ball is when the player finishes landing is NOT where the ball should be marked down by contact? You see this on goal line reviews all the time - to the naked eye it looks like a TD, then on review it's obvious a knee is down clearly short.I've watched the video here and I'm not saying he didn't get it before down by contact, but it's definitely not as conclusive as that still suggests.You have to be good enough to not let this stuff influence the outcome of the game, period .. by rams1974 8 hours 2 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #38 TOPIC AUTHOR Elvis liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:He might not be wrong.Very confused by this. It really wasn't even very close, in terms of the naked eye in real time. I distinctly recall being 99% sure he didn't make it, watching on a standard def television, at that odd angle. (Specifically, my eyes went right to that ref jogging in to see him raise his hand to spot the ball - who knows why he did nothing lol, but it made my heart stop for 3 seconds) And replay was in effect for the 1999 season .. so even if TD, would have been overturned. Not 100% sure if the 10 second runoff was in effect though - it was the first year of the new replay rules - so, yikes. 1 by rams1974 7 hours 56 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #39 TOPIC AUTHOR ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack?SB 49 and 51 are just classic examples of Patriots Opponent Brainlock, previously known to us in the 1990s as 49ers Opponent Brainlock ... 1 by BobCarl 7 hours 15 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #40 ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:Do you think some "controller" directed the .....bullshit does happen .... and dishonesty seeps in ... on rare occasion officials take bribes ... and blatant pass interference sometimes doesn't get called.A 1972 Playoff game was decided when a field official, Fred Swearingen, called "upstairs" where Pittsburgh Steelers Owner handed the phone to the NFL's Supervisor of Officials, Art McNally, and together they decided a play that changed the outcome of the playoff game. Could it be true that in 2015 a "deep state" was so intricate that Pete Carroll and Tom Brady could choreograph a Patriots win at the goal line? If this is true, then I want Tom Brady to buy my team and hire Pete Carroll to be it's head coach. This might be the only way to stop the Chiefs from rigging the outcome of every NFL season. And that's why I keep watching the NFL. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret 1 Reply 4 / 5 1 4 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jan 31 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by AvengerRam 17 hours 14 minutes ago Total posts: 8795 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame Re: The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #32 Clearly, the league is rigged by Jake from State Farm. by BobCarl 11 hours 43 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #33 ramman2999 wrote:It’s a post about rigging.Agreed. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret by AvengerRam 11 hours 16 minutes ago Total posts: 8795 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #34 Elvis liked this post ramman2999 wrote:It’s a post about rigging. Two bonehead plays not running the ball with Marshawn lynch and throwing. And not running with Devonte Freeman when a field goal makes it a two score game. When Brady can’t tie. And you get a sack.I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack? 1 by BobCarl 8 hours 41 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #35 Youngblood22 wrote:... why watch if you think its rigged?why not? ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret by rams1974 8 hours 8 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:If there's ever a fanbase that is "owed" a Super Bowl championship; it's the Buffalo Bills.I used to think this way, that ended about 48 hours after Super Bowl XXXVI and seeing the gross behavior that was emerging from the supremely "owed" fans in Boston. Yeah, real classy .. pardon me if I don't join in the sad violin woe is me act Lions fans are putting on. Trading in who is and isn't owed is a media optics trap. by rams1974 8 hours 4 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR BrooklynRam74 wrote:Game definitely rigged.What a disgrace this League is now. Fixed game.C'mon - how many times has it borne out that where the ball is when the player finishes landing is NOT where the ball should be marked down by contact? You see this on goal line reviews all the time - to the naked eye it looks like a TD, then on review it's obvious a knee is down clearly short.I've watched the video here and I'm not saying he didn't get it before down by contact, but it's definitely not as conclusive as that still suggests.You have to be good enough to not let this stuff influence the outcome of the game, period .. by rams1974 8 hours 2 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #38 TOPIC AUTHOR Elvis liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:He might not be wrong.Very confused by this. It really wasn't even very close, in terms of the naked eye in real time. I distinctly recall being 99% sure he didn't make it, watching on a standard def television, at that odd angle. (Specifically, my eyes went right to that ref jogging in to see him raise his hand to spot the ball - who knows why he did nothing lol, but it made my heart stop for 3 seconds) And replay was in effect for the 1999 season .. so even if TD, would have been overturned. Not 100% sure if the 10 second runoff was in effect though - it was the first year of the new replay rules - so, yikes. 1 by rams1974 7 hours 56 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #39 TOPIC AUTHOR ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack?SB 49 and 51 are just classic examples of Patriots Opponent Brainlock, previously known to us in the 1990s as 49ers Opponent Brainlock ... 1 by BobCarl 7 hours 15 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #40 ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:Do you think some "controller" directed the .....bullshit does happen .... and dishonesty seeps in ... on rare occasion officials take bribes ... and blatant pass interference sometimes doesn't get called.A 1972 Playoff game was decided when a field official, Fred Swearingen, called "upstairs" where Pittsburgh Steelers Owner handed the phone to the NFL's Supervisor of Officials, Art McNally, and together they decided a play that changed the outcome of the playoff game. Could it be true that in 2015 a "deep state" was so intricate that Pete Carroll and Tom Brady could choreograph a Patriots win at the goal line? If this is true, then I want Tom Brady to buy my team and hire Pete Carroll to be it's head coach. This might be the only way to stop the Chiefs from rigging the outcome of every NFL season. And that's why I keep watching the NFL. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret 1 Reply 4 / 5 1 4 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jan 31 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by BobCarl 11 hours 43 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #33 ramman2999 wrote:It’s a post about rigging.Agreed. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret by AvengerRam 11 hours 16 minutes ago Total posts: 8795 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #34 Elvis liked this post ramman2999 wrote:It’s a post about rigging. Two bonehead plays not running the ball with Marshawn lynch and throwing. And not running with Devonte Freeman when a field goal makes it a two score game. When Brady can’t tie. And you get a sack.I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack? 1 by BobCarl 8 hours 41 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #35 Youngblood22 wrote:... why watch if you think its rigged?why not? ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret by rams1974 8 hours 8 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:If there's ever a fanbase that is "owed" a Super Bowl championship; it's the Buffalo Bills.I used to think this way, that ended about 48 hours after Super Bowl XXXVI and seeing the gross behavior that was emerging from the supremely "owed" fans in Boston. Yeah, real classy .. pardon me if I don't join in the sad violin woe is me act Lions fans are putting on. Trading in who is and isn't owed is a media optics trap. by rams1974 8 hours 4 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR BrooklynRam74 wrote:Game definitely rigged.What a disgrace this League is now. Fixed game.C'mon - how many times has it borne out that where the ball is when the player finishes landing is NOT where the ball should be marked down by contact? You see this on goal line reviews all the time - to the naked eye it looks like a TD, then on review it's obvious a knee is down clearly short.I've watched the video here and I'm not saying he didn't get it before down by contact, but it's definitely not as conclusive as that still suggests.You have to be good enough to not let this stuff influence the outcome of the game, period .. by rams1974 8 hours 2 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #38 TOPIC AUTHOR Elvis liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:He might not be wrong.Very confused by this. It really wasn't even very close, in terms of the naked eye in real time. I distinctly recall being 99% sure he didn't make it, watching on a standard def television, at that odd angle. (Specifically, my eyes went right to that ref jogging in to see him raise his hand to spot the ball - who knows why he did nothing lol, but it made my heart stop for 3 seconds) And replay was in effect for the 1999 season .. so even if TD, would have been overturned. Not 100% sure if the 10 second runoff was in effect though - it was the first year of the new replay rules - so, yikes. 1 by rams1974 7 hours 56 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #39 TOPIC AUTHOR ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack?SB 49 and 51 are just classic examples of Patriots Opponent Brainlock, previously known to us in the 1990s as 49ers Opponent Brainlock ... 1 by BobCarl 7 hours 15 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #40 ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:Do you think some "controller" directed the .....bullshit does happen .... and dishonesty seeps in ... on rare occasion officials take bribes ... and blatant pass interference sometimes doesn't get called.A 1972 Playoff game was decided when a field official, Fred Swearingen, called "upstairs" where Pittsburgh Steelers Owner handed the phone to the NFL's Supervisor of Officials, Art McNally, and together they decided a play that changed the outcome of the playoff game. Could it be true that in 2015 a "deep state" was so intricate that Pete Carroll and Tom Brady could choreograph a Patriots win at the goal line? If this is true, then I want Tom Brady to buy my team and hire Pete Carroll to be it's head coach. This might be the only way to stop the Chiefs from rigging the outcome of every NFL season. And that's why I keep watching the NFL. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret 1 Reply 4 / 5 1 4 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jan 31 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by AvengerRam 11 hours 16 minutes ago Total posts: 8795 Joined: Oct 03 2017 Lake Mary, Florida Hall of Fame The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #34 Elvis liked this post ramman2999 wrote:It’s a post about rigging. Two bonehead plays not running the ball with Marshawn lynch and throwing. And not running with Devonte Freeman when a field goal makes it a two score game. When Brady can’t tie. And you get a sack.I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack? 1 by BobCarl 8 hours 41 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #35 Youngblood22 wrote:... why watch if you think its rigged?why not? ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret by rams1974 8 hours 8 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:If there's ever a fanbase that is "owed" a Super Bowl championship; it's the Buffalo Bills.I used to think this way, that ended about 48 hours after Super Bowl XXXVI and seeing the gross behavior that was emerging from the supremely "owed" fans in Boston. Yeah, real classy .. pardon me if I don't join in the sad violin woe is me act Lions fans are putting on. Trading in who is and isn't owed is a media optics trap. by rams1974 8 hours 4 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR BrooklynRam74 wrote:Game definitely rigged.What a disgrace this League is now. Fixed game.C'mon - how many times has it borne out that where the ball is when the player finishes landing is NOT where the ball should be marked down by contact? You see this on goal line reviews all the time - to the naked eye it looks like a TD, then on review it's obvious a knee is down clearly short.I've watched the video here and I'm not saying he didn't get it before down by contact, but it's definitely not as conclusive as that still suggests.You have to be good enough to not let this stuff influence the outcome of the game, period .. by rams1974 8 hours 2 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #38 TOPIC AUTHOR Elvis liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:He might not be wrong.Very confused by this. It really wasn't even very close, in terms of the naked eye in real time. I distinctly recall being 99% sure he didn't make it, watching on a standard def television, at that odd angle. (Specifically, my eyes went right to that ref jogging in to see him raise his hand to spot the ball - who knows why he did nothing lol, but it made my heart stop for 3 seconds) And replay was in effect for the 1999 season .. so even if TD, would have been overturned. Not 100% sure if the 10 second runoff was in effect though - it was the first year of the new replay rules - so, yikes. 1 by rams1974 7 hours 56 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #39 TOPIC AUTHOR ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack?SB 49 and 51 are just classic examples of Patriots Opponent Brainlock, previously known to us in the 1990s as 49ers Opponent Brainlock ... 1 by BobCarl 7 hours 15 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #40 ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:Do you think some "controller" directed the .....bullshit does happen .... and dishonesty seeps in ... on rare occasion officials take bribes ... and blatant pass interference sometimes doesn't get called.A 1972 Playoff game was decided when a field official, Fred Swearingen, called "upstairs" where Pittsburgh Steelers Owner handed the phone to the NFL's Supervisor of Officials, Art McNally, and together they decided a play that changed the outcome of the playoff game. Could it be true that in 2015 a "deep state" was so intricate that Pete Carroll and Tom Brady could choreograph a Patriots win at the goal line? If this is true, then I want Tom Brady to buy my team and hire Pete Carroll to be it's head coach. This might be the only way to stop the Chiefs from rigging the outcome of every NFL season. And that's why I keep watching the NFL. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret 1 Reply 4 / 5 1 4 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jan 31 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by BobCarl 8 hours 41 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #35 Youngblood22 wrote:... why watch if you think its rigged?why not? ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret by rams1974 8 hours 8 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:If there's ever a fanbase that is "owed" a Super Bowl championship; it's the Buffalo Bills.I used to think this way, that ended about 48 hours after Super Bowl XXXVI and seeing the gross behavior that was emerging from the supremely "owed" fans in Boston. Yeah, real classy .. pardon me if I don't join in the sad violin woe is me act Lions fans are putting on. Trading in who is and isn't owed is a media optics trap. by rams1974 8 hours 4 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR BrooklynRam74 wrote:Game definitely rigged.What a disgrace this League is now. Fixed game.C'mon - how many times has it borne out that where the ball is when the player finishes landing is NOT where the ball should be marked down by contact? You see this on goal line reviews all the time - to the naked eye it looks like a TD, then on review it's obvious a knee is down clearly short.I've watched the video here and I'm not saying he didn't get it before down by contact, but it's definitely not as conclusive as that still suggests.You have to be good enough to not let this stuff influence the outcome of the game, period .. by rams1974 8 hours 2 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #38 TOPIC AUTHOR Elvis liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:He might not be wrong.Very confused by this. It really wasn't even very close, in terms of the naked eye in real time. I distinctly recall being 99% sure he didn't make it, watching on a standard def television, at that odd angle. (Specifically, my eyes went right to that ref jogging in to see him raise his hand to spot the ball - who knows why he did nothing lol, but it made my heart stop for 3 seconds) And replay was in effect for the 1999 season .. so even if TD, would have been overturned. Not 100% sure if the 10 second runoff was in effect though - it was the first year of the new replay rules - so, yikes. 1 by rams1974 7 hours 56 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #39 TOPIC AUTHOR ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack?SB 49 and 51 are just classic examples of Patriots Opponent Brainlock, previously known to us in the 1990s as 49ers Opponent Brainlock ... 1 by BobCarl 7 hours 15 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #40 ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:Do you think some "controller" directed the .....bullshit does happen .... and dishonesty seeps in ... on rare occasion officials take bribes ... and blatant pass interference sometimes doesn't get called.A 1972 Playoff game was decided when a field official, Fred Swearingen, called "upstairs" where Pittsburgh Steelers Owner handed the phone to the NFL's Supervisor of Officials, Art McNally, and together they decided a play that changed the outcome of the playoff game. Could it be true that in 2015 a "deep state" was so intricate that Pete Carroll and Tom Brady could choreograph a Patriots win at the goal line? If this is true, then I want Tom Brady to buy my team and hire Pete Carroll to be it's head coach. This might be the only way to stop the Chiefs from rigging the outcome of every NFL season. And that's why I keep watching the NFL. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret 1 Reply 4 / 5 1 4 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jan 31 2025
by rams1974 8 hours 8 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:If there's ever a fanbase that is "owed" a Super Bowl championship; it's the Buffalo Bills.I used to think this way, that ended about 48 hours after Super Bowl XXXVI and seeing the gross behavior that was emerging from the supremely "owed" fans in Boston. Yeah, real classy .. pardon me if I don't join in the sad violin woe is me act Lions fans are putting on. Trading in who is and isn't owed is a media optics trap. by rams1974 8 hours 4 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR BrooklynRam74 wrote:Game definitely rigged.What a disgrace this League is now. Fixed game.C'mon - how many times has it borne out that where the ball is when the player finishes landing is NOT where the ball should be marked down by contact? You see this on goal line reviews all the time - to the naked eye it looks like a TD, then on review it's obvious a knee is down clearly short.I've watched the video here and I'm not saying he didn't get it before down by contact, but it's definitely not as conclusive as that still suggests.You have to be good enough to not let this stuff influence the outcome of the game, period .. by rams1974 8 hours 2 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #38 TOPIC AUTHOR Elvis liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:He might not be wrong.Very confused by this. It really wasn't even very close, in terms of the naked eye in real time. I distinctly recall being 99% sure he didn't make it, watching on a standard def television, at that odd angle. (Specifically, my eyes went right to that ref jogging in to see him raise his hand to spot the ball - who knows why he did nothing lol, but it made my heart stop for 3 seconds) And replay was in effect for the 1999 season .. so even if TD, would have been overturned. Not 100% sure if the 10 second runoff was in effect though - it was the first year of the new replay rules - so, yikes. 1 by rams1974 7 hours 56 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #39 TOPIC AUTHOR ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack?SB 49 and 51 are just classic examples of Patriots Opponent Brainlock, previously known to us in the 1990s as 49ers Opponent Brainlock ... 1 by BobCarl 7 hours 15 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #40 ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:Do you think some "controller" directed the .....bullshit does happen .... and dishonesty seeps in ... on rare occasion officials take bribes ... and blatant pass interference sometimes doesn't get called.A 1972 Playoff game was decided when a field official, Fred Swearingen, called "upstairs" where Pittsburgh Steelers Owner handed the phone to the NFL's Supervisor of Officials, Art McNally, and together they decided a play that changed the outcome of the playoff game. Could it be true that in 2015 a "deep state" was so intricate that Pete Carroll and Tom Brady could choreograph a Patriots win at the goal line? If this is true, then I want Tom Brady to buy my team and hire Pete Carroll to be it's head coach. This might be the only way to stop the Chiefs from rigging the outcome of every NFL season. And that's why I keep watching the NFL. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret 1 Reply 4 / 5 1 4 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jan 31 2025
by rams1974 8 hours 4 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR BrooklynRam74 wrote:Game definitely rigged.What a disgrace this League is now. Fixed game.C'mon - how many times has it borne out that where the ball is when the player finishes landing is NOT where the ball should be marked down by contact? You see this on goal line reviews all the time - to the naked eye it looks like a TD, then on review it's obvious a knee is down clearly short.I've watched the video here and I'm not saying he didn't get it before down by contact, but it's definitely not as conclusive as that still suggests.You have to be good enough to not let this stuff influence the outcome of the game, period .. by rams1974 8 hours 2 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #38 TOPIC AUTHOR Elvis liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:He might not be wrong.Very confused by this. It really wasn't even very close, in terms of the naked eye in real time. I distinctly recall being 99% sure he didn't make it, watching on a standard def television, at that odd angle. (Specifically, my eyes went right to that ref jogging in to see him raise his hand to spot the ball - who knows why he did nothing lol, but it made my heart stop for 3 seconds) And replay was in effect for the 1999 season .. so even if TD, would have been overturned. Not 100% sure if the 10 second runoff was in effect though - it was the first year of the new replay rules - so, yikes. 1 by rams1974 7 hours 56 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #39 TOPIC AUTHOR ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack?SB 49 and 51 are just classic examples of Patriots Opponent Brainlock, previously known to us in the 1990s as 49ers Opponent Brainlock ... 1 by BobCarl 7 hours 15 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #40 ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:Do you think some "controller" directed the .....bullshit does happen .... and dishonesty seeps in ... on rare occasion officials take bribes ... and blatant pass interference sometimes doesn't get called.A 1972 Playoff game was decided when a field official, Fred Swearingen, called "upstairs" where Pittsburgh Steelers Owner handed the phone to the NFL's Supervisor of Officials, Art McNally, and together they decided a play that changed the outcome of the playoff game. Could it be true that in 2015 a "deep state" was so intricate that Pete Carroll and Tom Brady could choreograph a Patriots win at the goal line? If this is true, then I want Tom Brady to buy my team and hire Pete Carroll to be it's head coach. This might be the only way to stop the Chiefs from rigging the outcome of every NFL season. And that's why I keep watching the NFL. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret 1 Reply 4 / 5 1 4 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jan 31 2025
by rams1974 8 hours 2 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #38 TOPIC AUTHOR Elvis liked this post St. Loser Fan wrote:He might not be wrong.Very confused by this. It really wasn't even very close, in terms of the naked eye in real time. I distinctly recall being 99% sure he didn't make it, watching on a standard def television, at that odd angle. (Specifically, my eyes went right to that ref jogging in to see him raise his hand to spot the ball - who knows why he did nothing lol, but it made my heart stop for 3 seconds) And replay was in effect for the 1999 season .. so even if TD, would have been overturned. Not 100% sure if the 10 second runoff was in effect though - it was the first year of the new replay rules - so, yikes. 1 by rams1974 7 hours 56 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #39 TOPIC AUTHOR ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack?SB 49 and 51 are just classic examples of Patriots Opponent Brainlock, previously known to us in the 1990s as 49ers Opponent Brainlock ... 1 by BobCarl 7 hours 15 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #40 ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:Do you think some "controller" directed the .....bullshit does happen .... and dishonesty seeps in ... on rare occasion officials take bribes ... and blatant pass interference sometimes doesn't get called.A 1972 Playoff game was decided when a field official, Fred Swearingen, called "upstairs" where Pittsburgh Steelers Owner handed the phone to the NFL's Supervisor of Officials, Art McNally, and together they decided a play that changed the outcome of the playoff game. Could it be true that in 2015 a "deep state" was so intricate that Pete Carroll and Tom Brady could choreograph a Patriots win at the goal line? If this is true, then I want Tom Brady to buy my team and hire Pete Carroll to be it's head coach. This might be the only way to stop the Chiefs from rigging the outcome of every NFL season. And that's why I keep watching the NFL. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret 1 Reply 4 / 5 1 4 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jan 31 2025
by rams1974 7 hours 56 minutes ago Total posts: 585 Joined: Sep 15 2022 LA Coliseum Veteran The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #39 TOPIC AUTHOR ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:I'm trying to understand your theory here...So, in both cases, you believe (as many do) that running the ball was the better option. Instead, pass plays were called, resulting in an interception (Seahawks) and a sack (Falcons) that determined (Seahawks) or significantly impacted (Falcons) the outcome.How are these examples of rigging?Do you think some "controller" directed the Seahawks and Falcons to throw the ball? And, if so, did they direct Russell Wilson to throw an interception and Matt Ryan to take a sack?SB 49 and 51 are just classic examples of Patriots Opponent Brainlock, previously known to us in the 1990s as 49ers Opponent Brainlock ... 1 by BobCarl 7 hours 15 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #40 ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:Do you think some "controller" directed the .....bullshit does happen .... and dishonesty seeps in ... on rare occasion officials take bribes ... and blatant pass interference sometimes doesn't get called.A 1972 Playoff game was decided when a field official, Fred Swearingen, called "upstairs" where Pittsburgh Steelers Owner handed the phone to the NFL's Supervisor of Officials, Art McNally, and together they decided a play that changed the outcome of the playoff game. Could it be true that in 2015 a "deep state" was so intricate that Pete Carroll and Tom Brady could choreograph a Patriots win at the goal line? If this is true, then I want Tom Brady to buy my team and hire Pete Carroll to be it's head coach. This might be the only way to stop the Chiefs from rigging the outcome of every NFL season. And that's why I keep watching the NFL. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret 1 Reply 4 / 5 1 4 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 43 posts Jan 31 2025
by BobCarl 7 hours 15 minutes ago Total posts: 4430 Joined: Mar 08 2017 LA Coliseum Superstar The Chiefs and the NFL's "Rigging" POST #40 ramman2999 liked this post AvengerRam wrote:Do you think some "controller" directed the .....bullshit does happen .... and dishonesty seeps in ... on rare occasion officials take bribes ... and blatant pass interference sometimes doesn't get called.A 1972 Playoff game was decided when a field official, Fred Swearingen, called "upstairs" where Pittsburgh Steelers Owner handed the phone to the NFL's Supervisor of Officials, Art McNally, and together they decided a play that changed the outcome of the playoff game. Could it be true that in 2015 a "deep state" was so intricate that Pete Carroll and Tom Brady could choreograph a Patriots win at the goal line? If this is true, then I want Tom Brady to buy my team and hire Pete Carroll to be it's head coach. This might be the only way to stop the Chiefs from rigging the outcome of every NFL season. And that's why I keep watching the NFL. ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret 1 Reply 4 / 5 1 4 5 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business