by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: The O line POST #221 TOPIC AUTHOR Canuck. Allen played well today. The stiffs to his left and right, did not. A Jax played well also. If I have time I will do the all-22 and just watch the OL. But we are ok at 3 positions. LT, C, RT. I think Bruss will end up being a good starter at RG. Anchrum and Arcuri should develop into good depth/spot starters and Anchrum possibly a really good player to plug in at LG. Evans’ head concerns and he’s not the greatest OG anyway. The Rams need to acquire much better interior OL and then build better depth quality in the draft. IMO by CanuckRightWinger 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 2777 Joined: Jan 13 2016 VANCOUVER, BC Superstar The O line POST #222 Sorry 34, but Brian Allen is a marginal NFL OC IMO. There is a reason that McVay wisely....very wisely, chose that end-around to Cooper Kupp, with our 3rd String TE blocking for him, to get that critical 1 yard on Fourth&One versus the Bengals in the 4th Quarter, in our own end, in SBLVI.........because there was no fucking way on green earth that we were gonna get the First Down running behind Brian ZeroPush! Allen on that crucial SBLVI play, sportsfans!! by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #223 TOPIC AUTHOR PARAM liked this post You know Canuck, can’t really disagree. He is serviceable certainly. I’m just saying the overhaul cannot be the entire OL this year. We don’t have the cap space, the draft capital, or the trade partners to pull that off. For an elite OL it will take 2 years, IMO. The SB window will be closed by then. So I am saying serviceable and above average at spots with cohesion, health, and a better run game design/better backs or back play and we can win. As we saw last year. We won’t the SB right? And we did it with these guys + a declining Whit and slightly above average Corbett. Feel me? 1 by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #224 I get it. Everyone who has been claiming the Rams were just fine at OL this year now realize they got it wrong. Only natural to say “well, what were we supposed to do?”Only 2 teams in the NFL have a worse point differential than Rams, Detroit and Steelers. That’s how bad we are this year. Not sure how we avoid a losing record this year. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #225 TOPIC AUTHOR Last edited by ramsman34 on Oct 30 2022, edited 1 time in total. max wrote:I get it. Everyone who has been claiming the Rams were just fine at OL this year now realize they got it wrong. Only natural to say “well, what were we supposed to do?”Only 2 teams in the NFL have a worse point differential than Rams, Detroit and Steelers. That’s how bad we are this year. Not sure how we avoid a losing record this year.We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model. Let’s see what happens before the trade deadline. Then we will pretty much know if there is hope or we are done. Playoffs 4 out of 5, 2 SB appearances, 1 championship. That speaks volumes and this season isn’t even halfway complete. Let’s see what happens. But ya, the OL is THE problem right now. (Not being sarcastic, they really are the glaring weakness). by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: The O line POST #226 TOPIC AUTHOR What WERE they supposed to do, exactly?? by PARAM 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 13220 Joined: Jul 15 2015 Just far enough North of Philadelphia Hall of Fame The O line POST #227 ramsman34 wrote:We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model.Sure you can. Clearly. We'll be able.to afford a great OL when Donald, Ramsey and Kupp come off the books. Then the complaint might be "they didn't plan well to replace those guys". Green Bay has a good O line. How they doing tonight? Yeah, they don't have good skill guys. Been following the horns since the Coliseum had a Roman playing there. McVay: 77-49, 2 Superbowls, 1 Lombardi............Doubt at your own peril by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #228 CanuckRightWinger liked this post ramsman34 wrote:What WERE they supposed to do, exactly??They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 1 by CanuckRightWinger 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 2777 Joined: Jan 13 2016 VANCOUVER, BC Superstar The O line POST #229 Oh look!!....it's a prediction about future Ramsnation sentiment from Pennsylvania.....y'know, the guy who called out all of his fellow RFUers who were fretting about the robustness of the 2022 OL, as:"feeble-minded chicken-littles", "thinking you are smarter than McSnead","having Alzheimer's","dwelling in the past","underestimating Noteboom and Allen"......etc etc etcHey, with that kind of a record at feckless prognostication, pardon me whilst I go home, have a beer, and take a nap.....and totally discard PA's attempt at being Nostradamus II. by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #230 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom.Well sure. Hindsight being 20-20. They thought they drafted a plug and play replacement for Corbett, they whiffed big time on Humphrey. They had tape on Boom showing quality performance against playoff caliber opponents and who was going to play LT if not Boom?, who was out #2 WR supposed to be? And if you say VJ at #2 then serious drop off at #3. See what you’re saying, don’t see plausible solutions. Reply 23 / 58 1 23 58 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 573 posts Jul 09 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by CanuckRightWinger 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 2777 Joined: Jan 13 2016 VANCOUVER, BC Superstar The O line POST #222 Sorry 34, but Brian Allen is a marginal NFL OC IMO. There is a reason that McVay wisely....very wisely, chose that end-around to Cooper Kupp, with our 3rd String TE blocking for him, to get that critical 1 yard on Fourth&One versus the Bengals in the 4th Quarter, in our own end, in SBLVI.........because there was no fucking way on green earth that we were gonna get the First Down running behind Brian ZeroPush! Allen on that crucial SBLVI play, sportsfans!! by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #223 TOPIC AUTHOR PARAM liked this post You know Canuck, can’t really disagree. He is serviceable certainly. I’m just saying the overhaul cannot be the entire OL this year. We don’t have the cap space, the draft capital, or the trade partners to pull that off. For an elite OL it will take 2 years, IMO. The SB window will be closed by then. So I am saying serviceable and above average at spots with cohesion, health, and a better run game design/better backs or back play and we can win. As we saw last year. We won’t the SB right? And we did it with these guys + a declining Whit and slightly above average Corbett. Feel me? 1 by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #224 I get it. Everyone who has been claiming the Rams were just fine at OL this year now realize they got it wrong. Only natural to say “well, what were we supposed to do?”Only 2 teams in the NFL have a worse point differential than Rams, Detroit and Steelers. That’s how bad we are this year. Not sure how we avoid a losing record this year. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #225 TOPIC AUTHOR Last edited by ramsman34 on Oct 30 2022, edited 1 time in total. max wrote:I get it. Everyone who has been claiming the Rams were just fine at OL this year now realize they got it wrong. Only natural to say “well, what were we supposed to do?”Only 2 teams in the NFL have a worse point differential than Rams, Detroit and Steelers. That’s how bad we are this year. Not sure how we avoid a losing record this year.We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model. Let’s see what happens before the trade deadline. Then we will pretty much know if there is hope or we are done. Playoffs 4 out of 5, 2 SB appearances, 1 championship. That speaks volumes and this season isn’t even halfway complete. Let’s see what happens. But ya, the OL is THE problem right now. (Not being sarcastic, they really are the glaring weakness). by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: The O line POST #226 TOPIC AUTHOR What WERE they supposed to do, exactly?? by PARAM 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 13220 Joined: Jul 15 2015 Just far enough North of Philadelphia Hall of Fame The O line POST #227 ramsman34 wrote:We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model.Sure you can. Clearly. We'll be able.to afford a great OL when Donald, Ramsey and Kupp come off the books. Then the complaint might be "they didn't plan well to replace those guys". Green Bay has a good O line. How they doing tonight? Yeah, they don't have good skill guys. Been following the horns since the Coliseum had a Roman playing there. McVay: 77-49, 2 Superbowls, 1 Lombardi............Doubt at your own peril by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #228 CanuckRightWinger liked this post ramsman34 wrote:What WERE they supposed to do, exactly??They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 1 by CanuckRightWinger 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 2777 Joined: Jan 13 2016 VANCOUVER, BC Superstar The O line POST #229 Oh look!!....it's a prediction about future Ramsnation sentiment from Pennsylvania.....y'know, the guy who called out all of his fellow RFUers who were fretting about the robustness of the 2022 OL, as:"feeble-minded chicken-littles", "thinking you are smarter than McSnead","having Alzheimer's","dwelling in the past","underestimating Noteboom and Allen"......etc etc etcHey, with that kind of a record at feckless prognostication, pardon me whilst I go home, have a beer, and take a nap.....and totally discard PA's attempt at being Nostradamus II. by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #230 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom.Well sure. Hindsight being 20-20. They thought they drafted a plug and play replacement for Corbett, they whiffed big time on Humphrey. They had tape on Boom showing quality performance against playoff caliber opponents and who was going to play LT if not Boom?, who was out #2 WR supposed to be? And if you say VJ at #2 then serious drop off at #3. See what you’re saying, don’t see plausible solutions. Reply 23 / 58 1 23 58 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 573 posts Jul 09 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #223 TOPIC AUTHOR PARAM liked this post You know Canuck, can’t really disagree. He is serviceable certainly. I’m just saying the overhaul cannot be the entire OL this year. We don’t have the cap space, the draft capital, or the trade partners to pull that off. For an elite OL it will take 2 years, IMO. The SB window will be closed by then. So I am saying serviceable and above average at spots with cohesion, health, and a better run game design/better backs or back play and we can win. As we saw last year. We won’t the SB right? And we did it with these guys + a declining Whit and slightly above average Corbett. Feel me? 1 by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #224 I get it. Everyone who has been claiming the Rams were just fine at OL this year now realize they got it wrong. Only natural to say “well, what were we supposed to do?”Only 2 teams in the NFL have a worse point differential than Rams, Detroit and Steelers. That’s how bad we are this year. Not sure how we avoid a losing record this year. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #225 TOPIC AUTHOR Last edited by ramsman34 on Oct 30 2022, edited 1 time in total. max wrote:I get it. Everyone who has been claiming the Rams were just fine at OL this year now realize they got it wrong. Only natural to say “well, what were we supposed to do?”Only 2 teams in the NFL have a worse point differential than Rams, Detroit and Steelers. That’s how bad we are this year. Not sure how we avoid a losing record this year.We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model. Let’s see what happens before the trade deadline. Then we will pretty much know if there is hope or we are done. Playoffs 4 out of 5, 2 SB appearances, 1 championship. That speaks volumes and this season isn’t even halfway complete. Let’s see what happens. But ya, the OL is THE problem right now. (Not being sarcastic, they really are the glaring weakness). by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: The O line POST #226 TOPIC AUTHOR What WERE they supposed to do, exactly?? by PARAM 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 13220 Joined: Jul 15 2015 Just far enough North of Philadelphia Hall of Fame The O line POST #227 ramsman34 wrote:We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model.Sure you can. Clearly. We'll be able.to afford a great OL when Donald, Ramsey and Kupp come off the books. Then the complaint might be "they didn't plan well to replace those guys". Green Bay has a good O line. How they doing tonight? Yeah, they don't have good skill guys. Been following the horns since the Coliseum had a Roman playing there. McVay: 77-49, 2 Superbowls, 1 Lombardi............Doubt at your own peril by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #228 CanuckRightWinger liked this post ramsman34 wrote:What WERE they supposed to do, exactly??They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 1 by CanuckRightWinger 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 2777 Joined: Jan 13 2016 VANCOUVER, BC Superstar The O line POST #229 Oh look!!....it's a prediction about future Ramsnation sentiment from Pennsylvania.....y'know, the guy who called out all of his fellow RFUers who were fretting about the robustness of the 2022 OL, as:"feeble-minded chicken-littles", "thinking you are smarter than McSnead","having Alzheimer's","dwelling in the past","underestimating Noteboom and Allen"......etc etc etcHey, with that kind of a record at feckless prognostication, pardon me whilst I go home, have a beer, and take a nap.....and totally discard PA's attempt at being Nostradamus II. by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #230 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom.Well sure. Hindsight being 20-20. They thought they drafted a plug and play replacement for Corbett, they whiffed big time on Humphrey. They had tape on Boom showing quality performance against playoff caliber opponents and who was going to play LT if not Boom?, who was out #2 WR supposed to be? And if you say VJ at #2 then serious drop off at #3. See what you’re saying, don’t see plausible solutions. Reply 23 / 58 1 23 58 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 573 posts Jul 09 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #224 I get it. Everyone who has been claiming the Rams were just fine at OL this year now realize they got it wrong. Only natural to say “well, what were we supposed to do?”Only 2 teams in the NFL have a worse point differential than Rams, Detroit and Steelers. That’s how bad we are this year. Not sure how we avoid a losing record this year. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #225 TOPIC AUTHOR Last edited by ramsman34 on Oct 30 2022, edited 1 time in total. max wrote:I get it. Everyone who has been claiming the Rams were just fine at OL this year now realize they got it wrong. Only natural to say “well, what were we supposed to do?”Only 2 teams in the NFL have a worse point differential than Rams, Detroit and Steelers. That’s how bad we are this year. Not sure how we avoid a losing record this year.We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model. Let’s see what happens before the trade deadline. Then we will pretty much know if there is hope or we are done. Playoffs 4 out of 5, 2 SB appearances, 1 championship. That speaks volumes and this season isn’t even halfway complete. Let’s see what happens. But ya, the OL is THE problem right now. (Not being sarcastic, they really are the glaring weakness). by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: The O line POST #226 TOPIC AUTHOR What WERE they supposed to do, exactly?? by PARAM 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 13220 Joined: Jul 15 2015 Just far enough North of Philadelphia Hall of Fame The O line POST #227 ramsman34 wrote:We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model.Sure you can. Clearly. We'll be able.to afford a great OL when Donald, Ramsey and Kupp come off the books. Then the complaint might be "they didn't plan well to replace those guys". Green Bay has a good O line. How they doing tonight? Yeah, they don't have good skill guys. Been following the horns since the Coliseum had a Roman playing there. McVay: 77-49, 2 Superbowls, 1 Lombardi............Doubt at your own peril by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #228 CanuckRightWinger liked this post ramsman34 wrote:What WERE they supposed to do, exactly??They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 1 by CanuckRightWinger 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 2777 Joined: Jan 13 2016 VANCOUVER, BC Superstar The O line POST #229 Oh look!!....it's a prediction about future Ramsnation sentiment from Pennsylvania.....y'know, the guy who called out all of his fellow RFUers who were fretting about the robustness of the 2022 OL, as:"feeble-minded chicken-littles", "thinking you are smarter than McSnead","having Alzheimer's","dwelling in the past","underestimating Noteboom and Allen"......etc etc etcHey, with that kind of a record at feckless prognostication, pardon me whilst I go home, have a beer, and take a nap.....and totally discard PA's attempt at being Nostradamus II. by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #230 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom.Well sure. Hindsight being 20-20. They thought they drafted a plug and play replacement for Corbett, they whiffed big time on Humphrey. They had tape on Boom showing quality performance against playoff caliber opponents and who was going to play LT if not Boom?, who was out #2 WR supposed to be? And if you say VJ at #2 then serious drop off at #3. See what you’re saying, don’t see plausible solutions. Reply 23 / 58 1 23 58 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 573 posts Jul 09 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #225 TOPIC AUTHOR Last edited by ramsman34 on Oct 30 2022, edited 1 time in total. max wrote:I get it. Everyone who has been claiming the Rams were just fine at OL this year now realize they got it wrong. Only natural to say “well, what were we supposed to do?”Only 2 teams in the NFL have a worse point differential than Rams, Detroit and Steelers. That’s how bad we are this year. Not sure how we avoid a losing record this year.We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model. Let’s see what happens before the trade deadline. Then we will pretty much know if there is hope or we are done. Playoffs 4 out of 5, 2 SB appearances, 1 championship. That speaks volumes and this season isn’t even halfway complete. Let’s see what happens. But ya, the OL is THE problem right now. (Not being sarcastic, they really are the glaring weakness). by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: The O line POST #226 TOPIC AUTHOR What WERE they supposed to do, exactly?? by PARAM 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 13220 Joined: Jul 15 2015 Just far enough North of Philadelphia Hall of Fame The O line POST #227 ramsman34 wrote:We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model.Sure you can. Clearly. We'll be able.to afford a great OL when Donald, Ramsey and Kupp come off the books. Then the complaint might be "they didn't plan well to replace those guys". Green Bay has a good O line. How they doing tonight? Yeah, they don't have good skill guys. Been following the horns since the Coliseum had a Roman playing there. McVay: 77-49, 2 Superbowls, 1 Lombardi............Doubt at your own peril by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #228 CanuckRightWinger liked this post ramsman34 wrote:What WERE they supposed to do, exactly??They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 1 by CanuckRightWinger 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 2777 Joined: Jan 13 2016 VANCOUVER, BC Superstar The O line POST #229 Oh look!!....it's a prediction about future Ramsnation sentiment from Pennsylvania.....y'know, the guy who called out all of his fellow RFUers who were fretting about the robustness of the 2022 OL, as:"feeble-minded chicken-littles", "thinking you are smarter than McSnead","having Alzheimer's","dwelling in the past","underestimating Noteboom and Allen"......etc etc etcHey, with that kind of a record at feckless prognostication, pardon me whilst I go home, have a beer, and take a nap.....and totally discard PA's attempt at being Nostradamus II. by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #230 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom.Well sure. Hindsight being 20-20. They thought they drafted a plug and play replacement for Corbett, they whiffed big time on Humphrey. They had tape on Boom showing quality performance against playoff caliber opponents and who was going to play LT if not Boom?, who was out #2 WR supposed to be? And if you say VJ at #2 then serious drop off at #3. See what you’re saying, don’t see plausible solutions. Reply 23 / 58 1 23 58 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 573 posts Jul 09 2025
by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator Re: The O line POST #226 TOPIC AUTHOR What WERE they supposed to do, exactly?? by PARAM 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 13220 Joined: Jul 15 2015 Just far enough North of Philadelphia Hall of Fame The O line POST #227 ramsman34 wrote:We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model.Sure you can. Clearly. We'll be able.to afford a great OL when Donald, Ramsey and Kupp come off the books. Then the complaint might be "they didn't plan well to replace those guys". Green Bay has a good O line. How they doing tonight? Yeah, they don't have good skill guys. Been following the horns since the Coliseum had a Roman playing there. McVay: 77-49, 2 Superbowls, 1 Lombardi............Doubt at your own peril by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #228 CanuckRightWinger liked this post ramsman34 wrote:What WERE they supposed to do, exactly??They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 1 by CanuckRightWinger 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 2777 Joined: Jan 13 2016 VANCOUVER, BC Superstar The O line POST #229 Oh look!!....it's a prediction about future Ramsnation sentiment from Pennsylvania.....y'know, the guy who called out all of his fellow RFUers who were fretting about the robustness of the 2022 OL, as:"feeble-minded chicken-littles", "thinking you are smarter than McSnead","having Alzheimer's","dwelling in the past","underestimating Noteboom and Allen"......etc etc etcHey, with that kind of a record at feckless prognostication, pardon me whilst I go home, have a beer, and take a nap.....and totally discard PA's attempt at being Nostradamus II. by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #230 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom.Well sure. Hindsight being 20-20. They thought they drafted a plug and play replacement for Corbett, they whiffed big time on Humphrey. They had tape on Boom showing quality performance against playoff caliber opponents and who was going to play LT if not Boom?, who was out #2 WR supposed to be? And if you say VJ at #2 then serious drop off at #3. See what you’re saying, don’t see plausible solutions. Reply 23 / 58 1 23 58 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 573 posts Jul 09 2025
by PARAM 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 13220 Joined: Jul 15 2015 Just far enough North of Philadelphia Hall of Fame The O line POST #227 ramsman34 wrote:We were relatively fine prior to injuries. Failed at replacing Whit, I’ll give you that and Bruss was supposed to replace Corbett failed due to injury and who knows how that woulda played out. But it’s not like they had/have endless resources to get what you and others suggest done. They paid the superstars. They made a business decision and it isnt working out as the OL is now a shell of what they penciled in and frankly was probably average if it all worked out anyway. Like I have been saying, can’t have it all. They weren’t a great OL last year and we still won it all. Can’t really fault them for not totally changing their business plan/model.Sure you can. Clearly. We'll be able.to afford a great OL when Donald, Ramsey and Kupp come off the books. Then the complaint might be "they didn't plan well to replace those guys". Green Bay has a good O line. How they doing tonight? Yeah, they don't have good skill guys. Been following the horns since the Coliseum had a Roman playing there. McVay: 77-49, 2 Superbowls, 1 Lombardi............Doubt at your own peril by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #228 CanuckRightWinger liked this post ramsman34 wrote:What WERE they supposed to do, exactly??They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 1 by CanuckRightWinger 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 2777 Joined: Jan 13 2016 VANCOUVER, BC Superstar The O line POST #229 Oh look!!....it's a prediction about future Ramsnation sentiment from Pennsylvania.....y'know, the guy who called out all of his fellow RFUers who were fretting about the robustness of the 2022 OL, as:"feeble-minded chicken-littles", "thinking you are smarter than McSnead","having Alzheimer's","dwelling in the past","underestimating Noteboom and Allen"......etc etc etcHey, with that kind of a record at feckless prognostication, pardon me whilst I go home, have a beer, and take a nap.....and totally discard PA's attempt at being Nostradamus II. by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #230 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom.Well sure. Hindsight being 20-20. They thought they drafted a plug and play replacement for Corbett, they whiffed big time on Humphrey. They had tape on Boom showing quality performance against playoff caliber opponents and who was going to play LT if not Boom?, who was out #2 WR supposed to be? And if you say VJ at #2 then serious drop off at #3. See what you’re saying, don’t see plausible solutions. Reply 23 / 58 1 23 58 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 573 posts Jul 09 2025
by max 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame The O line POST #228 CanuckRightWinger liked this post ramsman34 wrote:What WERE they supposed to do, exactly??They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom. ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 1 by CanuckRightWinger 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 2777 Joined: Jan 13 2016 VANCOUVER, BC Superstar The O line POST #229 Oh look!!....it's a prediction about future Ramsnation sentiment from Pennsylvania.....y'know, the guy who called out all of his fellow RFUers who were fretting about the robustness of the 2022 OL, as:"feeble-minded chicken-littles", "thinking you are smarter than McSnead","having Alzheimer's","dwelling in the past","underestimating Noteboom and Allen"......etc etc etcHey, with that kind of a record at feckless prognostication, pardon me whilst I go home, have a beer, and take a nap.....and totally discard PA's attempt at being Nostradamus II. by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #230 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom.Well sure. Hindsight being 20-20. They thought they drafted a plug and play replacement for Corbett, they whiffed big time on Humphrey. They had tape on Boom showing quality performance against playoff caliber opponents and who was going to play LT if not Boom?, who was out #2 WR supposed to be? And if you say VJ at #2 then serious drop off at #3. See what you’re saying, don’t see plausible solutions. Reply 23 / 58 1 23 58 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 573 posts Jul 09 2025
by CanuckRightWinger 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 2777 Joined: Jan 13 2016 VANCOUVER, BC Superstar The O line POST #229 Oh look!!....it's a prediction about future Ramsnation sentiment from Pennsylvania.....y'know, the guy who called out all of his fellow RFUers who were fretting about the robustness of the 2022 OL, as:"feeble-minded chicken-littles", "thinking you are smarter than McSnead","having Alzheimer's","dwelling in the past","underestimating Noteboom and Allen"......etc etc etcHey, with that kind of a record at feckless prognostication, pardon me whilst I go home, have a beer, and take a nap.....and totally discard PA's attempt at being Nostradamus II. by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #230 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom.Well sure. Hindsight being 20-20. They thought they drafted a plug and play replacement for Corbett, they whiffed big time on Humphrey. They had tape on Boom showing quality performance against playoff caliber opponents and who was going to play LT if not Boom?, who was out #2 WR supposed to be? And if you say VJ at #2 then serious drop off at #3. See what you’re saying, don’t see plausible solutions. Reply 23 / 58 1 23 58 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 573 posts Jul 09 2025
by ramsman34 2 years 8 months ago Total posts: 10040 Joined: Apr 16 2015 Back in LA baby! Moderator The O line POST #230 TOPIC AUTHOR max wrote:They were supposed to draft Humphrey, not pay ARob, pay Corbett or trade for a quality OG, not pay Noteboom.Well sure. Hindsight being 20-20. They thought they drafted a plug and play replacement for Corbett, they whiffed big time on Humphrey. They had tape on Boom showing quality performance against playoff caliber opponents and who was going to play LT if not Boom?, who was out #2 WR supposed to be? And if you say VJ at #2 then serious drop off at #3. See what you’re saying, don’t see plausible solutions. Reply 23 / 58 1 23 58 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business