[Hacksaw_64]

I know I'm afraid every time we are forced to throw the ball. The lack of an emergence of a "comfort" secondary receiver for Foles has hurt us big time. No Cook, Bailey, Quick, etc...

[Stranger]

I know I'm afraid every time we are forced to throw the ball. The lack of an emergence of a "comfort" secondary receiver for Foles has hurt us big time. No Cook, Bailey, Quick, etc...

Do u remember Pat Haden; Dieter Brock.... it's just like that all over again. No way we ever come back from a deficit. It's that same feeling all over again. No ability to move the ball vertically when we absolutely need to. I hate this feeling, especially when we have a great D and special teams players who play their guts out. It's just not fair to the team to hold them back like this. What's worse is now we're going to have to watch all this greatness picked apart by free agency before we ever get a capable offense.

[Rams the Legends live on]

I don't get the fear thing at all. I also didn't agree with a call at all and ultimately in the end it cost us the game. Or at least contributed.

When it comes to human psychology, studies have shown fear is a greater motivator than gain. When faced with the possibility of gain compared to the same possibility of loss most folks are indeed gonna chose to not lose what they feel they already have.

One such example is immigrants compared to Americans born here. Many times ya will see a immigrant open a store or shop and excel. Where as folks born here had the same opportunity to do so but never do. They don't do so because of fear of losing what they already have or disrupting their comfort zone. Where as the immigrant fears he has nothing to lose as he came here with nothing.

Ya started your own business bro and I am sure ya heard all the same lines when ya did. It takes money to make money. I would never risk my secure future on a gamble like that. Ya could lose everything and so forth.

This same psychology strikes against all avenue's of our life. So as far as Fish I find it could very well be a reason he continues year after year to have the same mediocre results. He finds his offense in his opinion as the half of the ball that could cost him a game. Why he does not take a lot of chances with it. Does not throw a lot over the middle, attack a opponents defense and make them beat ya. Which in Martz we found the opposite ideology.

Fish would rather have a aggressive defense and he does so as he feels if ya attack with your defense ya can put your offense or ST in a position where they can score. Which is a logical assumption. Problem is absent turn overs ya can often beat this notion by having a good punter. The punter can place the ball in a position where it is beyond the skill or expectations by the coach on the offense or ST's. So that the offense comes back out runs plays goes nowhere and punts the ball back and then the cycle starts all over again with ya leaning on the defense to make something happen.

So anyway psychologically Fish fears more the bad of what could happen to him on offense rather than the possibility of gain. So he uses his defense to attack and be aggressive where he uses his offense to just make sure it does not lose the game while he is waiting for the defense to make something happen.

Personally I think he would gain more if he instilled a more aggressive attitude with the offense and even instilled pride by showing he has higher expectations of them, make it so a opponent is being attacked by us on both sides of the ball. An instead of worrying about his offense losing him the game switch the tables so a opponent has to be worried about being attacked for 60 minutes from both sides of the ball and even have to worry about the x factor of gadget plays on ST's.

An for any of this to happen for him in my opinion he has to first understand the wise words of Dirty Harry.............A man has to know his limitations. I think once he is honest with himself and analysis his mediocrity he will will be able to blue print how he can change it and turn it all around.

[Hacksaw_64]

I know I'm afraid every time we are forced to throw the ball. The lack of an emergence of a "comfort" secondary receiver for Foles has hurt us big time. No Cook, Bailey, Quick, etc...

Do u remember Pat Haden; Dieter Brock.... it's just like that all over again. No way we ever come back from a deficit. It's that same feeling all over again. No ability to move the ball vertically when we absolutely need to. I hate this feeling, especially when we have a great D and special teams players who play their guts out. It's just not fair to the team to hold them back like this. What's worse is now we're going to have to watch all this greatness picked apart by free agency before we ever get a capable offense.

Well they basically blew the whole thing up at the beginning of this year New OC, OL, QB, RB. You can't have expect to have everything at once, especially the passing game. I sure didn't. Although, I thought it would be better than it has been. Expect snisher to adress it in the offseason.

[SoCalRam78]

What a complete and total joke of a performance.

And just like that, this season again looks like it is going nowhere.

[Elvis]

I'm hoping he leads us to Inglewood...

[SoCalRam78]

I also don't get the tie between mediocre football and relocation. Rams have been bad far longer than relocation has been an issue.

Anyone expecting this outfit to go 10-6, 11-5 were deluding themselves.

[Elvis]

The idea that Fisher is needed in any way for a move is flat-out offensive to me.

It's not rocket science, it's relocation. Give me a break.. his "leadership" means less than nothing to me.

Mother of God.

It's not that he's needed for the move, it's that the Rams aren't going to do a coach search while relocation is on the front burner.

The fact that Fisher isn't on the hot seat is one of the things that tells me the Rams are going to move...

[Stranger]

The idea that Fisher is needed in any way for a move is flat-out offensive to me.

It's not rocket science, it's relocation. Give me a break.. his "leadership" means less than nothing to me.

Mother of God.

It's not that he's needed for the move, it's that the Rams aren't going to do a coach search while relocation is on the front burner.

The fact that Fisher isn't on the hot seat is one of the things that tells me the Rams are going to move...

I hope you are right. As much as it pains me to say it, I'd take one more season in exchange for a move to LA during THIS offseason. But would Fisher be willing to coach without a renewal in the last year of his contract?

[RedAlice]

As to leadership, I have to believe that the playes want to win. If Fisher can't get them to winning, then I expect they would embrace a change in coaching.

They must be frustrated - they know how much talent they have right now. I expect Wes Welker is in shock.