34 posts
  • 3 / 4
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
 by Stranger
9 years 5 months ago
 Total posts:   3213  
 Joined:  Aug 12 2015
United States of America   Norcal
Superstar

"After the Rams won the Super Bowl in January 2000, Dick Vermeil suddenly retired which left the Rams in a lurch.They needed to restructure the organization and in the restructure Jay Zygmunt was named President of Football Operations.Also, as we all know, Mike Martz was named Head Coach and Charlie Armey was named General Manager.Martz still had the final call on all personnel decisions, but needed both Armey and Zygmunt’s approval."

"Crossing or disagreeing with Zygmunt (and to a lesser extent Suleiman) could not be a good plan in the Rams front office.Slowly, more people in the front office sided with Zygmunt and the people who did not were cut off or removed."

"Zygmunt’s lacks the qualifications to be a General Manager in the NFL.That would not matter as much if he was able to turn the St. Louis Rams into a productive, competitive squad year in and year out in his time as General Manager.But he has not.The Rams squad is old, one of the oldest in the league.The Rams are less talented than most of the other teams in the NFL.Ten of the players the Rams drafted in 2006 and 2007 are not on any 53 man roster in the NFL.Ten of the players that should be the young talent base for the Rams are not even on a roster!

This is a huge mistake in talent acquisition that has eroded the Rams talent base that forces the Rams to fill in their roster with other team’s roster cuts.Cut players are rarely young and talented, but usually on the downside of their careers.This results in the higher age of the Rams players and the lack of depth and talent at all positions.Billy Devaney was hired to oversee the draft and the Rams have made improvements in the 2008 draft.However, the Rams need a General Manager to turn around their squad and bring the Rams back to their glory days.Jay Zygmunt has shown in his years in charge that he is not the man to draft and sign the best talent in the NFL to turn around the Rams sinking fortunes."



Who Exactly is Rams GM Jay Zygmunt
September 27th, 2008
Jeff Roman
Posted in Off the Cuff, St. Louis Rams
http://archive.nflgridirongab.com/2008/ ... y-zygmunt/

There is a lot of blame going around for the Rams’ awful start to 2008 and their awful 2007 season under Scott Linehan.Scott Linehan is obviously facing most of the blame, but so is GM and President of Football Operations, Jay Zygmunt.But, who is Jay Zygmunt anyway?He does not come out and give interviews to the press often and is certainly a very low profile GM.Most Rams fans want him fired, but know very little about him.Let’s see if we can find out how Zygmunt got to where he is today.

Jay Zygmunt was hired by owner Georgia Frontiere and his friend John Shaw in 1982 for the L.A. Rams.Jay was an accountant and a lawyer by trade and was hired to be the Rams general council.Zygmunt had gone to college at Notre Dame and gotten his law degree at Northwestern.He moved to LA and became an accountant, where he met John Shaw.

When Shaw moved to the Rams, he convinced Georgia to bring on Zygmunt.Shaw and Zygmunt moved up the organization together and soon Zygmunt was negotiating player contracts for the Rams.He began to negotiate more and more contracts for the Rams, until he was negotiating over 90 contracts a year.As the salary cap rose in prominence in the 90s and into the new millennium, so did Jay Zygmunt rise through the ranks of the Rams front office.

He became the Rams cap expert and official contract negotiator.He would interface with the player agents and negotiate contract extensions, free agent contracts and other matters.Zygmunt moved to St. Louis with the Rams in 1995 at Frontiere and John Shaw’s insistence.In the St. Louis Rams organization, he steadily moved up to the position of Executive Vice President.Zygmunt also became one of the NFL’s most respected cap managers and regarded as someone who had a handle on the economics of the NFL in the salary cap era.

Soon, Zygmunt was given even more responsibility within the organization.After the Rams won the Super Bowl in January 2000, Dick Vermeil suddenly retired which left the Rams in a lurch.They needed to restructure the organization and in the restructure Jay Zygmunt was named President of Football Operations.Also, as we all know, Mike Martz was named Head Coach and Charlie Armey was named General Manager.Martz still had the final call on all personnel decisions, but needed both Armey and Zygmunt’s approval.

But if Martz had final call on all decisions, why would have need Armey and Zygmunt’s approval?In either case, Armey was in charge of evaluating talent, but the Rams still did not have a full scouting department, instead relying on an outside scouting agency.At this point, the Rams were a three-headed checks and balances front office with Armey, Zygmunt and Martz.

After the restructuring, the front office arrangement worked well for a few years, but all three began to disagree.Zygmunt tried to exert more power over player additions through free agency and the draft, which did not sit well with Martz.Armey was supposed to be the scouting and personnel guru based on his experience.Armey and Zygmunt were a good team with Armey as the player evaluator and Zygmunt as the cap guru and contract negotiator.It is unclear when this relationship broke down, but it did and we all know how that ended up.

Martz was admitted to the hospital during the 2005 season, took a leave of absence and eventually fired after the season.While he was on “leave”, Martz took his feud with Zygmunt and Armey public and there was no going back to the Rams for Martz.Martz even famously called the Rams during the game to try to relay a play call to the offensive coordinator at the time, Steve Fairchild.Jay Zygmunt intercepted the call and hung up on Martz.

After Martz was fired, Zygmunt hired Scott Linehan to become the Rams new head coach in 2006.By the beginning of the 2007 season, Zygmunt had been promoted again to President of Football Operations/General Manger.Charlie Armey moved to Director of Pro Personnel and later retired.Billy Devaney was hired from Atlanta before the 2008 NFL draft as Armey’s replacement.Zygmunt was now the first and last say on all contracts and players.

He would get advice from his scouts and personnel department, but he has the final authority.Zygmunt went from cap manager in 1995-1999 to general manager in 2007.Zygmunt was renowned in 2005 during his public struggle with Mike Martz as a great cap guy, but someone who didn’t have too much idea about how to evaluate and sign football talent.And for some reason the Rams continued to promote Zygmunt into higher responsibility positions in the football organization and began to increase his say on player acquisitions.

Zygmunt was known in agent circles as having one of the top five tempers in the NFL.He is a fiery and passionate man and negotiator.He has also been known to put his foot down on drafting specific players to the chagrin of all the scouts and coaches.His final word does not just end with the draft as Zygmunt has surrounded himself and by extension the Rams front office with his friends and compatriots.One of Zygmunt’s closest confidants is Samir Suleiman, who succeeded Zygmunt as Director of Football Operations.

Samir famously (or infamously) called up Bernie Miklasz of the St. Louis Post Dispatch in response to a story and said, “Tell your source that I’m not a back-stabber, I’m a (expletive) throat slasher, and he’ll know the difference before it’s all said and done.”Now, it does not need to be said that this is not the way a harmonious front office should work.Some see this as the mentality Zygmunt has fostered in the Rams front office.Crossing or disagreeing with Zygmunt (and to a lesser extent Suleiman) could not be a good plan in the Rams front office.Slowly, more people in the front office sided with Zygmunt and the people who did not were cut off or removed.

John Shaw as president of the Rams is the highest authority in the front office, but his activity in the front office has been waning as of late.As his friend’s activity has been decreasing, Zygmunt’s power has been increasing.With Shaw in semi-retirement by all accounts and the Rams ownership situation in flux, the whole front office is in upheaval.Zygmunt used that upheaval to his benefit and rose to the position of General Manager.

Jay Zygmunt has put his stamp on the Rams and by all accounts that stamp is not a good one.Since 2000, the Rams have not drafted well or signed top-flight free agents.Not all of this blame can be placed on Zygmunt; some goes to Mike Martz (Trung Candidate).But, with the state of the Rams there is plenty of blame to go around.But, what we do know is that the Rams have a man who is never been known for being a good player evaluator or eye for talent as their GM.Ideally, the Rams would be able to hire a new GM and Zygmunt would return to his player contracts role and being a salary cap guru.Would Zygmunt give up the General Manager position voluntarily?

Rams fans hope that he would, but in the past he has tried to exert more power over personnel decisions – even when not the GM – so he may not take kindly to the decrease in responsibilities.This is not to be mistaken; Zygmunt is one of the smartest executives in the NFL and one of the best so-called “cap guys”.But is he cut out to be a General Manager?

This is for certain; Zygmunt’s lacks the qualifications to be a General Manager in the NFL.That would not matter as much if he was able to turn the St. Louis Rams into a productive, competitive squad year in and year out in his time as General Manager.But he has not.The Rams squad is old, one of the oldest in the league.The Rams are less talented than most of the other teams in the NFL.Ten of the players the Rams drafted in 2006 and 2007 are not on any 53 man roster in the NFL.Ten of the players that should be the young talent base for the Rams are not even on a roster!

This is a huge mistake in talent acquisition that has eroded the Rams talent base that forces the Rams to fill in their roster with other team’s roster cuts.Cut players are rarely young and talented, but usually on the downside of their careers.This results in the higher age of the Rams players and the lack of depth and talent at all positions.Billy Devaney was hired to oversee the draft and the Rams have made improvements in the 2008 draft.However, the Rams need a General Manager to turn around their squad and bring the Rams back to their glory days.Jay Zygmunt has shown in his years in charge that he is not the man to draft and sign the best talent in the NFL to turn around the Rams sinking fortunes.

 by TSFH Fan
9 years 5 months ago
 Total posts:   699  
 Joined:  Jun 24 2015
United States of America   The OC
Veteran

A lot of what makes a "good coach" is being in the right place, at the right time. Barry Switzer with the Cowboys probably got the best benefit of right place, right time that I can think of. I think Martz started out right place, right time, but that quickly changed -- Jeff Roman in the article above mentions that power struggle.

Innate ability also plays a lot into what makes a "good coach" and while Martz clearly showed a lot in the beginning, I'm not so sure about the latter part of his career. I'm talking about the "schematic advantage" type of thing (thanks Charlie Weis). There are things in the NFL that will work well for a while, but teams adapt. The 46 Defense and the Wildcat are 2 examples. I think Martz's offense was like that. Ten sacks in one game against Martz's Bears offense?!?

I just think that if Martz was actually a genius that some people believed he was, he would have had a coaching career more like Kevin Gilbride. Gilbride started as a Run and Shoot guy, refined his approach, and won 2 rings with a more conventional offense, that used a fullback a lot, with the Giants. It's all about adapt and survive and I'm not convinced that Martz adapted.

I'm not saying that Martz was not a fantastic, phenomenal, other-worldly coach, what I am saying is he "was".

 by Stranger
9 years 5 months ago
 Total posts:   3213  
 Joined:  Aug 12 2015
United States of America   Norcal
Superstar

TSFH Fan wrote:A lot of what makes a "good coach" is being in the right place, at the right time. Barry Switzer with the Cowboys probably got the best benefit of right place, right time that I can think of. I think Martz started out right place, right time, but that quickly changed -- Jeff Roman in the article above mentions that power struggle.

Innate ability also plays a lot into what makes a "good coach" and while Martz clearly showed a lot in the beginning, I'm not so sure about the latter part of his career. I'm talking about the "schematic advantage" type of thing (thanks Charlie Weis). There are things in the NFL that will work well for a while, but teams adapt. The 46 Defense and the Wildcat are 2 examples. I think Martz's offense was like that. Ten sacks in one game against Martz's Bears offense?!?

I just think that if Martz was actually a genius that some people believed he was, he would have had a coaching career more like Kevin Gilbride. Gilbride started as a Run and Shoot guy, refined his approach, and won 2 rings with a more conventional offense, that used a fullback a lot, with the Giants. It's all about adapt and survive and I'm not convinced that Martz adapted.

I'm not saying that Martz was not a fantastic, phenomenal, other-worldly coach, what I am saying is he "was".

I am going to hazard a guess, a prediction, and say that had Martz been part of a functional front office, say an office like what the Rams have now, he would still be the Rams head coach and he would have continued to adapt his strategies to keep ahead of the curve. Perhaps the one thing that struck me more than anything, was when Martz explained that playing Defense is about rules. And he continued... that when an offense knows what those rules are, the offense can exploit them. So, I'd argue that as the defense's would have adapted - by changing their rules and the way they implemented them - Martz inturn would have changed his offensive strategies and tactics.

You could argue that the didn't do this in Chicago or SF, but then I'd say he was an OC who had unknown constraints placed upon him and how he ran the offense. So, in those scenarios, we can't really say how much of any "failure" was due to his own failings and how much was due to external constraints placed upon him by others.

Such a damn shame we lost one of the most innovative minds in the game... right when he was in his prime. I've never forgive Georgia and that stupid front office she assembled.

 by TSFH Fan
9 years 5 months ago
 Total posts:   699  
 Joined:  Jun 24 2015
United States of America   The OC
Veteran

Perhaps the one thing that struck me more than anything, was when Martz explained that playing Defense is about rules. And he continued... that when an offense knows what those rules are, the offense can exploit them.

I saw an interview with video where he talked about this. I thought it was a nice soundbite. The thing is, that's the way things have been since offenses started using motion. Also, I think Cover 2 has been around since the 50's and the rules haven't changed. As I recall, the 1999 Bucs were predominantly a Cover 2 team. So GSOT, with knowledge of the defense's rules, exploited that knowledge by eeking out an 11-8 win at home. A coach can talk about knowing the rules and can talk about exploiting them, but it still comes down to what coaches have been talking about for a century, "execution." So Martz talking about getting the defense to declare their rules and then exploiting them, was a nice soundbite, but, to me, it wasn't much more than that.

I'd argue that as the defense's would have adapted - by changing their rules and the way they implemented them - Martz inturn would have changed his offensive strategies and tactics.

I think at the most basic level (i.e., my level) one of the most significant defensive adaptions to Martz was to go hard to kill the quarterback. I thought Martz was partly to blame for Bulger's shell shock -- but I may have misremembered. I do remember the Bears getting sacked 10 times. My recollection is that Martz's basic, fundamental principles included everyone out in the pattern, and the quarterback will take hits but will have opportunities down field. The point is, that 10 sack game, to me, seemed to show that Martz was not willing to change two of his basic principles.

I'd say he was an OC who had unknown constraints placed upon him and how he ran the offense.

Well, yeah. But how much constraint is going to lead to a 10 sack game? Also, the idea behind the phrase "gaming the system" involves taking existing constraints, as they are, and exploiting them. If Martz was the genius the media pumped him up to be, I think he should have been able to do more with the constraints placed upon him. Going back to Kevin Gilbride -- he had to work with one of the biggest control freaks in the league, Tom Coughlin. Yet, with those constraints, 2 rings. On the one hand, yeah, I can accept that Martz was constrained, but it sorta feels like that constraint is almost on the way towards coming close to inferring an excuse and I'm not willing to infer that far.

So, in those scenarios, we can't really say how much of any "failure" was due to his own failings and how much was due to external constraints placed upon him by others.

True. And when people say the buck stops here, they're usually looking at the head coach. The problem with being labeled a genius is that Martz is also going to be the fall guy. In the blame shifting, butt covering, NFL, Martz's history does not help him. The NFL is a results league and with those other teams, rightfully or wrongfully, the label applied by the public has been "Martz's Offense."

Martz was fun. Martz was great.

 by dieterbrock
9 years 5 months ago
 Total posts:   11512  
 Joined:  Mar 31 2015
United States of America   New Jersey
Hall of Fame

In the last 25 years the only enjoyable seasons were with Mike Martz on the staff. Outside of his tenure it's been absolute misery. Coincidence?

 by Hacksaw
9 years 5 months ago
 Total posts:   24523  
 Joined:  Apr 15 2015
United States of America   AT THE BEACH
Moderator

dieterbrock wrote:In the last 25 years the only enjoyable seasons were with Mike Martz on the staff. Outside of his tenure it's been absolute misery. Coincidence?


Good point. After Vermiel left it was still fun but eroded rather quickly..

 by Elvis
9 years 5 months ago
 Total posts:   40500  
 Joined:  Mar 28 2015
United States of America   Los Angeles
Administrator

Let's not forget the two Vermeil years before Martz showed up were pretty awful.

And when Vermeil went to KC he took Al Saunders and Trent Green to run the Martz offense. He didn't try and roll with Mike White and Tony Banks...

 by dieterbrock
9 years 5 months ago
 Total posts:   11512  
 Joined:  Mar 31 2015
United States of America   New Jersey
Hall of Fame

Hacksaw wrote:
dieterbrock wrote:In the last 25 years the only enjoyable seasons were with Mike Martz on the staff. Outside of his tenure it's been absolute misery. Coincidence?


Good point. After Vermiel left it was still fun but eroded rather quickly..

And Vermeil without Martz was abysmal too

 by Hacksaw
9 years 5 months ago
 Total posts:   24523  
 Joined:  Apr 15 2015
United States of America   AT THE BEACH
Moderator

Those 2 should have stuck it out with HC DV managing and OC Martz wizarding.

 by Elvis
9 years 5 months ago
 Total posts:   40500  
 Joined:  Mar 28 2015
United States of America   Los Angeles
Administrator

It would've been nice to defend our title with our coaching staff in tact.

I really thought we had a dream team back then: Charlie Armey, the guy who found Kurt Warner and London Fletcher, Mike Martz, offensive genius and Jay Zygmut manning the salary cap...

  • 3 / 4
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
34 posts Feb 05 2025