by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #21 Gareth wrote:LoyalRam wrote:His theory(Roggins) is that if Pro Dean Stanos Forces are prevailing, then the ST Louis plan will be considered viable..If the NFL is trending toward Kroenke and Inglewood, it will be leaked/reported that the St Louis plan is viable.......According to Roggins, this would mean will tell Kroenke and Spanos to work things outI think you meant NOT viable on the Kroenke side.just corrected when you posted! by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #22 LoyalRam wrote:His theory(Roggins) is that if Pro Dean Stanos Forces are prevailing, then the ST Louis plan will be considered viable..If the NFL is trending toward Kroenke and Inglewood, it will be leaked/reported that the St Louis plan is viable.......According to Roggins, this would mean will tell Kroenke and Spanos to work things outSpanos has no leverage now.StL is not viable.Carson can't gurantee a date.What cards does Spanos have? No way the NFL is going to keep Rams in STL now given it's unviable proposal. Spanos can't threaten Carson any longer. So, Stan is certainly in Inglewood now. What's Spanos going to do about it? New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #23 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Elvis drops the pessimism card. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #24 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...But if StL is not viable, and Carson can't guarantee a stadium date, what does Stan have to lose? Seems like worst case for Stan is that he has to take-on Spanos as a partner with terms that aren't the best for him. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #25 Stranger wrote:Just what are all the StL media going to say tomorrow?They can't just throw all of this back onto Stan now? The NFL committees are now exposing the StL proposal. Fans in StL are going to be pissed, and they should be... but not at Stan, they should be pissed at their own leadership and media for selling everyone a bill of goods.tears will be shed and no one will care. by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #26 Roggins clarified that it was Scott Reed of the Orange County Register that provided the info. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #27 Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...) RFU Season Ticket Holder by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #28 Elvis wrote:Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...)thanks.. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #29 One huge thing I read is that each city would have to guarantee an opening date for their stadium to be considered viable. That's a huge blow to Carson. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #30 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Not worried since in order for that to be the case the league would have to offer something substantial to offset signing away his right to sue. Reply 3 / 6 1 3 6 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 60 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #22 LoyalRam wrote:His theory(Roggins) is that if Pro Dean Stanos Forces are prevailing, then the ST Louis plan will be considered viable..If the NFL is trending toward Kroenke and Inglewood, it will be leaked/reported that the St Louis plan is viable.......According to Roggins, this would mean will tell Kroenke and Spanos to work things outSpanos has no leverage now.StL is not viable.Carson can't gurantee a date.What cards does Spanos have? No way the NFL is going to keep Rams in STL now given it's unviable proposal. Spanos can't threaten Carson any longer. So, Stan is certainly in Inglewood now. What's Spanos going to do about it? New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #23 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Elvis drops the pessimism card. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #24 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...But if StL is not viable, and Carson can't guarantee a stadium date, what does Stan have to lose? Seems like worst case for Stan is that he has to take-on Spanos as a partner with terms that aren't the best for him. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #25 Stranger wrote:Just what are all the StL media going to say tomorrow?They can't just throw all of this back onto Stan now? The NFL committees are now exposing the StL proposal. Fans in StL are going to be pissed, and they should be... but not at Stan, they should be pissed at their own leadership and media for selling everyone a bill of goods.tears will be shed and no one will care. by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #26 Roggins clarified that it was Scott Reed of the Orange County Register that provided the info. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #27 Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...) RFU Season Ticket Holder by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #28 Elvis wrote:Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...)thanks.. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #29 One huge thing I read is that each city would have to guarantee an opening date for their stadium to be considered viable. That's a huge blow to Carson. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #30 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Not worried since in order for that to be the case the league would have to offer something substantial to offset signing away his right to sue. Reply 3 / 6 1 3 6 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 60 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #23 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Elvis drops the pessimism card. by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #24 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...But if StL is not viable, and Carson can't guarantee a stadium date, what does Stan have to lose? Seems like worst case for Stan is that he has to take-on Spanos as a partner with terms that aren't the best for him. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #25 Stranger wrote:Just what are all the StL media going to say tomorrow?They can't just throw all of this back onto Stan now? The NFL committees are now exposing the StL proposal. Fans in StL are going to be pissed, and they should be... but not at Stan, they should be pissed at their own leadership and media for selling everyone a bill of goods.tears will be shed and no one will care. by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #26 Roggins clarified that it was Scott Reed of the Orange County Register that provided the info. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #27 Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...) RFU Season Ticket Holder by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #28 Elvis wrote:Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...)thanks.. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #29 One huge thing I read is that each city would have to guarantee an opening date for their stadium to be considered viable. That's a huge blow to Carson. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #30 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Not worried since in order for that to be the case the league would have to offer something substantial to offset signing away his right to sue. Reply 3 / 6 1 3 6 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 60 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Stranger 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 3213 Joined: Aug 12 2015 Norcal Superstar Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #24 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...But if StL is not viable, and Carson can't guarantee a stadium date, what does Stan have to lose? Seems like worst case for Stan is that he has to take-on Spanos as a partner with terms that aren't the best for him. New HC. New L.A. Stadium. Future is Bright. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #25 Stranger wrote:Just what are all the StL media going to say tomorrow?They can't just throw all of this back onto Stan now? The NFL committees are now exposing the StL proposal. Fans in StL are going to be pissed, and they should be... but not at Stan, they should be pissed at their own leadership and media for selling everyone a bill of goods.tears will be shed and no one will care. by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #26 Roggins clarified that it was Scott Reed of the Orange County Register that provided the info. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #27 Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...) RFU Season Ticket Holder by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #28 Elvis wrote:Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...)thanks.. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #29 One huge thing I read is that each city would have to guarantee an opening date for their stadium to be considered viable. That's a huge blow to Carson. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #30 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Not worried since in order for that to be the case the league would have to offer something substantial to offset signing away his right to sue. Reply 3 / 6 1 3 6 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 60 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #25 Stranger wrote:Just what are all the StL media going to say tomorrow?They can't just throw all of this back onto Stan now? The NFL committees are now exposing the StL proposal. Fans in StL are going to be pissed, and they should be... but not at Stan, they should be pissed at their own leadership and media for selling everyone a bill of goods.tears will be shed and no one will care. by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #26 Roggins clarified that it was Scott Reed of the Orange County Register that provided the info. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #27 Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...) RFU Season Ticket Holder by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #28 Elvis wrote:Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...)thanks.. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #29 One huge thing I read is that each city would have to guarantee an opening date for their stadium to be considered viable. That's a huge blow to Carson. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #30 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Not worried since in order for that to be the case the league would have to offer something substantial to offset signing away his right to sue. Reply 3 / 6 1 3 6 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 60 posts Jul 12 2025
by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #26 Roggins clarified that it was Scott Reed of the Orange County Register that provided the info. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #27 Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...) RFU Season Ticket Holder by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #28 Elvis wrote:Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...)thanks.. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #29 One huge thing I read is that each city would have to guarantee an opening date for their stadium to be considered viable. That's a huge blow to Carson. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #30 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Not worried since in order for that to be the case the league would have to offer something substantial to offset signing away his right to sue. Reply 3 / 6 1 3 6 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 60 posts Jul 12 2025
by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41520 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #27 Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...) RFU Season Ticket Holder by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #28 Elvis wrote:Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...)thanks.. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #29 One huge thing I read is that each city would have to guarantee an opening date for their stadium to be considered viable. That's a huge blow to Carson. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #30 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Not worried since in order for that to be the case the league would have to offer something substantial to offset signing away his right to sue. Reply 3 / 6 1 3 6 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 60 posts Jul 12 2025
by LoyalRam 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 248 Joined: Jul 21 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #28 Elvis wrote:Coming from Scott Reid who's usually just pimping for the Chargers, this seems pretty big. (And it's Roggin, not Roggins, btw...)thanks.. by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #29 One huge thing I read is that each city would have to guarantee an opening date for their stadium to be considered viable. That's a huge blow to Carson. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #30 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Not worried since in order for that to be the case the league would have to offer something substantial to offset signing away his right to sue. Reply 3 / 6 1 3 6 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 60 posts Jul 12 2025
by OldSchool 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Growing Sentiment From 3 NFL Committees POST #29 One huge thing I read is that each city would have to guarantee an opening date for their stadium to be considered viable. That's a huge blow to Carson. by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #30 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Not worried since in order for that to be the case the league would have to offer something substantial to offset signing away his right to sue. Reply 3 / 6 1 3 6 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 60 posts Jul 12 2025
by The Ripper 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: NFL sets requirements Chargers, Raiders and Rams must agree to before vote on relocation to L.A. POST #30 Elvis wrote:I'm a little worried one of the requirements would be to support the outcome whatever it is, that would take away SK's trump card...Not worried since in order for that to be the case the league would have to offer something substantial to offset signing away his right to sue. Reply 3 / 6 1 3 6 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business