by Hacksaw 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #191 TOPIC AUTHOR StL, jerked around way to long and had to scramble at the end. It was their choice to throw that hail mary expense. It was StL's decision which only came about after the STL and the sports authority there failed to live up to their obligations under their agreement.Folks buying gear made that choice with full knowledge of what was happening. Perhaps they were just cold.Those garment purchases had no bearing on or relativity to the stadium situation. Other possible developments came about as a result of the way StL handled the whole thing. Kroenke just figured a way out.Thank you St Louis for choking away our team.. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #192 Last edited by St. Loser Fan on Feb 07 2019, edited 1 time in total. Hacksaw liked this post Hacksaw wrote:StL, jerked around way to long and had to scramble at the end. It was their choice to throw that hail mary expense. It was StL's decision which only came about after the STL and the sports authority there failed to live up to Their obligations under their agreement.St. Louis made the decision for the hail mary. It was the Rams decision to show interest and demand changes to the design of the north Riverfront stadium.Hacksaw wrote:Folks buying gear made that choice with full knowledge of what was happening. Perhaps they were just cold.Those garment purchases had no bearing on or relativity to the stadium situation. Petty.I still remember the 50% off sale they had at the last home game for anything that said "St. Louis". And I want to say it was nice and warm that day: like 70 degrees or something because I didn't ever wear a jacket into the game.But I agree it's just petty. This trial should never see a court room or bother the LA Rams. It's just lawyers, regardless of city, doing what they do naturally and chasing the money. 1 by Hacksaw 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #193 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:Stan was never involved with either of the proposals that were floated for the area north of the Edward Jones Tomb.Stan never proposed anything by the Dome, so how could the city demand .....Haha, love the "Tomb" reference. Touchè.Stan did throw a $700M set of plans at the CVC for his desired upgrades for the tomb to get them within lease stipulations.. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #194 Hacksaw wrote:Haha, love the "Tomb" reference. Touchè.It did suck; horribly.Hacksaw wrote:Stan did throw a $700M set of plans at the CVC for his desired upgrades for the tomb to get them within lease stipulations..$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city. by Hacksaw 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #195 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:It did suck; horribly.$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city.Just clarifying that he did do something with regard to the "tomb" even if it was a nonstarter. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #196 St. Loser Fan wrote:It did suck; horribly.$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city.Exactly. Stan was willing to work with St Louis but they poo poo’d Him so he got pissed and bought half of Los Angeles by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #197 St. Loser Fan wrote:Stan was never involved with either of the proposals that were floated for the area north of the Edward Jones Tomb.The first was in the mid 2000's and collapsed with the Great Recession.https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/sto ... tory5.htmlThe second was from a guy named Paul McKee. If you want more homework here are some articles about him.https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 6e49f.htmlhttps://www.riverfronttimes.com/stlouis ... ul%20McKeeStan never proposed anything by the Dome, so how could the city demand profits and control?(The only thing the city did with Stan was ask if he was interested in building one of his Wal Mart/Sams strip plazas about 3 miles away by the Saint Louis University campus. IIRC this happened 2008/2009 right as the Great Recession slammed the economy and Stan said no. In the end it's where the IKEA was built.)Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance. I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off. by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #198 moklerman wrote:I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off.That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the Lou by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #199 dieterbrock wrote:That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the LouYeah, I've got it stuck in my head that he had GRAND plans to not only build the Rams a stadium of their own but to make a sports an entertainment hub that would be hosting Final Fours, NFL Drafts...I think soccer and so on. Basically what he's doing in LA.And, depending on how sentimental one thinks he might be, it's still hard to believe that he wanted to screw over Missouri. by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #200 moklerman wrote:Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.I don't remember it and can't find anything about that proposal.moklerman wrote:In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance.St. Louis probably wanted to give Stan enough land for a Kroenkeworld but couldn't because the previously mentioned Paul McKee held first rights. St. Louis and the state had to jump through a bunch of hoops to yank the NGA West land from him.http://nextngawest.com/ Reply 20 / 88 1 20 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #192 Last edited by St. Loser Fan on Feb 07 2019, edited 1 time in total. Hacksaw liked this post Hacksaw wrote:StL, jerked around way to long and had to scramble at the end. It was their choice to throw that hail mary expense. It was StL's decision which only came about after the STL and the sports authority there failed to live up to Their obligations under their agreement.St. Louis made the decision for the hail mary. It was the Rams decision to show interest and demand changes to the design of the north Riverfront stadium.Hacksaw wrote:Folks buying gear made that choice with full knowledge of what was happening. Perhaps they were just cold.Those garment purchases had no bearing on or relativity to the stadium situation. Petty.I still remember the 50% off sale they had at the last home game for anything that said "St. Louis". And I want to say it was nice and warm that day: like 70 degrees or something because I didn't ever wear a jacket into the game.But I agree it's just petty. This trial should never see a court room or bother the LA Rams. It's just lawyers, regardless of city, doing what they do naturally and chasing the money. 1 by Hacksaw 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #193 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:Stan was never involved with either of the proposals that were floated for the area north of the Edward Jones Tomb.Stan never proposed anything by the Dome, so how could the city demand .....Haha, love the "Tomb" reference. Touchè.Stan did throw a $700M set of plans at the CVC for his desired upgrades for the tomb to get them within lease stipulations.. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #194 Hacksaw wrote:Haha, love the "Tomb" reference. Touchè.It did suck; horribly.Hacksaw wrote:Stan did throw a $700M set of plans at the CVC for his desired upgrades for the tomb to get them within lease stipulations..$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city. by Hacksaw 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #195 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:It did suck; horribly.$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city.Just clarifying that he did do something with regard to the "tomb" even if it was a nonstarter. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #196 St. Loser Fan wrote:It did suck; horribly.$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city.Exactly. Stan was willing to work with St Louis but they poo poo’d Him so he got pissed and bought half of Los Angeles by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #197 St. Loser Fan wrote:Stan was never involved with either of the proposals that were floated for the area north of the Edward Jones Tomb.The first was in the mid 2000's and collapsed with the Great Recession.https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/sto ... tory5.htmlThe second was from a guy named Paul McKee. If you want more homework here are some articles about him.https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 6e49f.htmlhttps://www.riverfronttimes.com/stlouis ... ul%20McKeeStan never proposed anything by the Dome, so how could the city demand profits and control?(The only thing the city did with Stan was ask if he was interested in building one of his Wal Mart/Sams strip plazas about 3 miles away by the Saint Louis University campus. IIRC this happened 2008/2009 right as the Great Recession slammed the economy and Stan said no. In the end it's where the IKEA was built.)Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance. I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off. by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #198 moklerman wrote:I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off.That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the Lou by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #199 dieterbrock wrote:That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the LouYeah, I've got it stuck in my head that he had GRAND plans to not only build the Rams a stadium of their own but to make a sports an entertainment hub that would be hosting Final Fours, NFL Drafts...I think soccer and so on. Basically what he's doing in LA.And, depending on how sentimental one thinks he might be, it's still hard to believe that he wanted to screw over Missouri. by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #200 moklerman wrote:Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.I don't remember it and can't find anything about that proposal.moklerman wrote:In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance.St. Louis probably wanted to give Stan enough land for a Kroenkeworld but couldn't because the previously mentioned Paul McKee held first rights. St. Louis and the state had to jump through a bunch of hoops to yank the NGA West land from him.http://nextngawest.com/ Reply 20 / 88 1 20 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #193 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:Stan was never involved with either of the proposals that were floated for the area north of the Edward Jones Tomb.Stan never proposed anything by the Dome, so how could the city demand .....Haha, love the "Tomb" reference. Touchè.Stan did throw a $700M set of plans at the CVC for his desired upgrades for the tomb to get them within lease stipulations.. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #194 Hacksaw wrote:Haha, love the "Tomb" reference. Touchè.It did suck; horribly.Hacksaw wrote:Stan did throw a $700M set of plans at the CVC for his desired upgrades for the tomb to get them within lease stipulations..$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city. by Hacksaw 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #195 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:It did suck; horribly.$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city.Just clarifying that he did do something with regard to the "tomb" even if it was a nonstarter. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #196 St. Loser Fan wrote:It did suck; horribly.$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city.Exactly. Stan was willing to work with St Louis but they poo poo’d Him so he got pissed and bought half of Los Angeles by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #197 St. Loser Fan wrote:Stan was never involved with either of the proposals that were floated for the area north of the Edward Jones Tomb.The first was in the mid 2000's and collapsed with the Great Recession.https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/sto ... tory5.htmlThe second was from a guy named Paul McKee. If you want more homework here are some articles about him.https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 6e49f.htmlhttps://www.riverfronttimes.com/stlouis ... ul%20McKeeStan never proposed anything by the Dome, so how could the city demand profits and control?(The only thing the city did with Stan was ask if he was interested in building one of his Wal Mart/Sams strip plazas about 3 miles away by the Saint Louis University campus. IIRC this happened 2008/2009 right as the Great Recession slammed the economy and Stan said no. In the end it's where the IKEA was built.)Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance. I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off. by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #198 moklerman wrote:I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off.That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the Lou by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #199 dieterbrock wrote:That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the LouYeah, I've got it stuck in my head that he had GRAND plans to not only build the Rams a stadium of their own but to make a sports an entertainment hub that would be hosting Final Fours, NFL Drafts...I think soccer and so on. Basically what he's doing in LA.And, depending on how sentimental one thinks he might be, it's still hard to believe that he wanted to screw over Missouri. by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #200 moklerman wrote:Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.I don't remember it and can't find anything about that proposal.moklerman wrote:In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance.St. Louis probably wanted to give Stan enough land for a Kroenkeworld but couldn't because the previously mentioned Paul McKee held first rights. St. Louis and the state had to jump through a bunch of hoops to yank the NGA West land from him.http://nextngawest.com/ Reply 20 / 88 1 20 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #194 Hacksaw wrote:Haha, love the "Tomb" reference. Touchè.It did suck; horribly.Hacksaw wrote:Stan did throw a $700M set of plans at the CVC for his desired upgrades for the tomb to get them within lease stipulations..$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city. by Hacksaw 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #195 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:It did suck; horribly.$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city.Just clarifying that he did do something with regard to the "tomb" even if it was a nonstarter. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #196 St. Loser Fan wrote:It did suck; horribly.$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city.Exactly. Stan was willing to work with St Louis but they poo poo’d Him so he got pissed and bought half of Los Angeles by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #197 St. Loser Fan wrote:Stan was never involved with either of the proposals that were floated for the area north of the Edward Jones Tomb.The first was in the mid 2000's and collapsed with the Great Recession.https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/sto ... tory5.htmlThe second was from a guy named Paul McKee. If you want more homework here are some articles about him.https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 6e49f.htmlhttps://www.riverfronttimes.com/stlouis ... ul%20McKeeStan never proposed anything by the Dome, so how could the city demand profits and control?(The only thing the city did with Stan was ask if he was interested in building one of his Wal Mart/Sams strip plazas about 3 miles away by the Saint Louis University campus. IIRC this happened 2008/2009 right as the Great Recession slammed the economy and Stan said no. In the end it's where the IKEA was built.)Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance. I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off. by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #198 moklerman wrote:I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off.That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the Lou by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #199 dieterbrock wrote:That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the LouYeah, I've got it stuck in my head that he had GRAND plans to not only build the Rams a stadium of their own but to make a sports an entertainment hub that would be hosting Final Fours, NFL Drafts...I think soccer and so on. Basically what he's doing in LA.And, depending on how sentimental one thinks he might be, it's still hard to believe that he wanted to screw over Missouri. by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #200 moklerman wrote:Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.I don't remember it and can't find anything about that proposal.moklerman wrote:In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance.St. Louis probably wanted to give Stan enough land for a Kroenkeworld but couldn't because the previously mentioned Paul McKee held first rights. St. Louis and the state had to jump through a bunch of hoops to yank the NGA West land from him.http://nextngawest.com/ Reply 20 / 88 1 20 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Jul 12 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #195 TOPIC AUTHOR St. Loser Fan wrote:It did suck; horribly.$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city.Just clarifying that he did do something with regard to the "tomb" even if it was a nonstarter. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #196 St. Loser Fan wrote:It did suck; horribly.$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city.Exactly. Stan was willing to work with St Louis but they poo poo’d Him so he got pissed and bought half of Los Angeles by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #197 St. Loser Fan wrote:Stan was never involved with either of the proposals that were floated for the area north of the Edward Jones Tomb.The first was in the mid 2000's and collapsed with the Great Recession.https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/sto ... tory5.htmlThe second was from a guy named Paul McKee. If you want more homework here are some articles about him.https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 6e49f.htmlhttps://www.riverfronttimes.com/stlouis ... ul%20McKeeStan never proposed anything by the Dome, so how could the city demand profits and control?(The only thing the city did with Stan was ask if he was interested in building one of his Wal Mart/Sams strip plazas about 3 miles away by the Saint Louis University campus. IIRC this happened 2008/2009 right as the Great Recession slammed the economy and Stan said no. In the end it's where the IKEA was built.)Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance. I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off. by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #198 moklerman wrote:I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off.That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the Lou by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #199 dieterbrock wrote:That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the LouYeah, I've got it stuck in my head that he had GRAND plans to not only build the Rams a stadium of their own but to make a sports an entertainment hub that would be hosting Final Fours, NFL Drafts...I think soccer and so on. Basically what he's doing in LA.And, depending on how sentimental one thinks he might be, it's still hard to believe that he wanted to screw over Missouri. by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #200 moklerman wrote:Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.I don't remember it and can't find anything about that proposal.moklerman wrote:In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance.St. Louis probably wanted to give Stan enough land for a Kroenkeworld but couldn't because the previously mentioned Paul McKee held first rights. St. Louis and the state had to jump through a bunch of hoops to yank the NGA West land from him.http://nextngawest.com/ Reply 20 / 88 1 20 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Jul 12 2025
by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #196 St. Loser Fan wrote:It did suck; horribly.$700 million that would have meant:- the Rams playing 2 (if not 3) seasons on the road while the work was done.-tearing down half the stadium-tearing down half of the convention center, making it completely unusable for 18 months at an economic cost of a few hundred million in lost convention business.-closing down Broadway Ave alongside the Dome for goodAll that $700 million would have done was kept the Rams here through 2025. They wouldn't even agree to a minimal extension: not even the 2 or 3 years they would have had to play elsewhere. And in 2025 the Rams could have demanded a whole new stadium or moved to another city.Exactly. Stan was willing to work with St Louis but they poo poo’d Him so he got pissed and bought half of Los Angeles by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #197 St. Loser Fan wrote:Stan was never involved with either of the proposals that were floated for the area north of the Edward Jones Tomb.The first was in the mid 2000's and collapsed with the Great Recession.https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/sto ... tory5.htmlThe second was from a guy named Paul McKee. If you want more homework here are some articles about him.https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 6e49f.htmlhttps://www.riverfronttimes.com/stlouis ... ul%20McKeeStan never proposed anything by the Dome, so how could the city demand profits and control?(The only thing the city did with Stan was ask if he was interested in building one of his Wal Mart/Sams strip plazas about 3 miles away by the Saint Louis University campus. IIRC this happened 2008/2009 right as the Great Recession slammed the economy and Stan said no. In the end it's where the IKEA was built.)Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance. I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off. by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #198 moklerman wrote:I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off.That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the Lou by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #199 dieterbrock wrote:That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the LouYeah, I've got it stuck in my head that he had GRAND plans to not only build the Rams a stadium of their own but to make a sports an entertainment hub that would be hosting Final Fours, NFL Drafts...I think soccer and so on. Basically what he's doing in LA.And, depending on how sentimental one thinks he might be, it's still hard to believe that he wanted to screw over Missouri. by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #200 moklerman wrote:Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.I don't remember it and can't find anything about that proposal.moklerman wrote:In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance.St. Louis probably wanted to give Stan enough land for a Kroenkeworld but couldn't because the previously mentioned Paul McKee held first rights. St. Louis and the state had to jump through a bunch of hoops to yank the NGA West land from him.http://nextngawest.com/ Reply 20 / 88 1 20 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Jul 12 2025
by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #197 St. Loser Fan wrote:Stan was never involved with either of the proposals that were floated for the area north of the Edward Jones Tomb.The first was in the mid 2000's and collapsed with the Great Recession.https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/sto ... tory5.htmlThe second was from a guy named Paul McKee. If you want more homework here are some articles about him.https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 6e49f.htmlhttps://www.riverfronttimes.com/stlouis ... ul%20McKeeStan never proposed anything by the Dome, so how could the city demand profits and control?(The only thing the city did with Stan was ask if he was interested in building one of his Wal Mart/Sams strip plazas about 3 miles away by the Saint Louis University campus. IIRC this happened 2008/2009 right as the Great Recession slammed the economy and Stan said no. In the end it's where the IKEA was built.)Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance. I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off. by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #198 moklerman wrote:I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off.That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the Lou by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #199 dieterbrock wrote:That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the LouYeah, I've got it stuck in my head that he had GRAND plans to not only build the Rams a stadium of their own but to make a sports an entertainment hub that would be hosting Final Fours, NFL Drafts...I think soccer and so on. Basically what he's doing in LA.And, depending on how sentimental one thinks he might be, it's still hard to believe that he wanted to screw over Missouri. by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #200 moklerman wrote:Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.I don't remember it and can't find anything about that proposal.moklerman wrote:In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance.St. Louis probably wanted to give Stan enough land for a Kroenkeworld but couldn't because the previously mentioned Paul McKee held first rights. St. Louis and the state had to jump through a bunch of hoops to yank the NGA West land from him.http://nextngawest.com/ Reply 20 / 88 1 20 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Jul 12 2025
by dieterbrock 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #198 moklerman wrote:I still feel like when he gained majority control that he didn't intend to move away from St. Louis and something or someone along the way really pissed him off.That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the Lou by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #199 dieterbrock wrote:That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the LouYeah, I've got it stuck in my head that he had GRAND plans to not only build the Rams a stadium of their own but to make a sports an entertainment hub that would be hosting Final Fours, NFL Drafts...I think soccer and so on. Basically what he's doing in LA.And, depending on how sentimental one thinks he might be, it's still hard to believe that he wanted to screw over Missouri. by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #200 moklerman wrote:Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.I don't remember it and can't find anything about that proposal.moklerman wrote:In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance.St. Louis probably wanted to give Stan enough land for a Kroenkeworld but couldn't because the previously mentioned Paul McKee held first rights. St. Louis and the state had to jump through a bunch of hoops to yank the NGA West land from him.http://nextngawest.com/ Reply 20 / 88 1 20 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Jul 12 2025
by moklerman 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #199 dieterbrock wrote:That’s how I remember it too. And I’d like to think I’m pretty unbiased since I’m not from either LA or St LouI think he was more than happy to build his empire in the LouYeah, I've got it stuck in my head that he had GRAND plans to not only build the Rams a stadium of their own but to make a sports an entertainment hub that would be hosting Final Fours, NFL Drafts...I think soccer and so on. Basically what he's doing in LA.And, depending on how sentimental one thinks he might be, it's still hard to believe that he wanted to screw over Missouri. by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #200 moklerman wrote:Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.I don't remember it and can't find anything about that proposal.moklerman wrote:In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance.St. Louis probably wanted to give Stan enough land for a Kroenkeworld but couldn't because the previously mentioned Paul McKee held first rights. St. Louis and the state had to jump through a bunch of hoops to yank the NGA West land from him.http://nextngawest.com/ Reply 20 / 88 1 20 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 875 posts Jul 12 2025
by St. Loser Fan 6 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10893 Joined: May 31 2016 Saint Louis MO Hall of Fame St. Louis NFL lawsuit likely headed to trial POST #200 moklerman wrote:Thanks for all of the info but I also swear that there was talk of making the Rams and St. Louis into some sort of sports destination by the Rams' brass? Which I would assume meant it was coming from Kroenke.I don't remember it and can't find anything about that proposal.moklerman wrote:In his few statements about keeping the Rams in St. Louis maybe? When he eventually left it made sense in retrospect that he wanted to build a Kroenkeworld in St. Louis but the local officials gave him too much resistance.St. Louis probably wanted to give Stan enough land for a Kroenkeworld but couldn't because the previously mentioned Paul McKee held first rights. St. Louis and the state had to jump through a bunch of hoops to yank the NGA West land from him.http://nextngawest.com/ Reply 20 / 88 1 20 88 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business