[moklerman]

Even the staunchiest of Bradford fans could not say that with a straight face if they had watched the game
He was absolutely horrific in that game and only was saved by playing a more inept offensive team in the Jets and a Punt return for TD that gave the Eagles a comfortable lead.
Ryan Matthews was the sole reason they won that game

All in all, its a wash. Bradford first game he looked pretty good (in the 2nd half) and they lost, last week he was terrible, but they won

Sorry Dieter, but you're the last person to preach objectivity about Bradford. What I wrote is true. He did take a step forward from his first two games simply because he didn't have a turnover and the Eagles won.

That isn't to say he didn't make any mistakes, but he and his receivers are still finding their way. The same thing happened when he was with the Rams. For whatever reason, he needs time with his receivers to get on the same page. Granted, he's missed some throws but IMO, everything's progressing.

You got it backwards bud, you are clearly not being objective. He was terrible. 118 yards passing on 28 attempts? He was bailed out by having a good running game and the Jets playing terrible.

It's a response like this that just reinforces my opinion that you're not objective on this subject. It seems like your disregarding what I've written just so you can keep banging your shoe on the table.

[dieterbrock]

Sorry Dieter, but you're the last person to preach objectivity about Bradford. What I wrote is true. He did take a step forward from his first two games simply because he didn't have a turnover and the Eagles won.

That isn't to say he didn't make any mistakes, but he and his receivers are still finding their way. The same thing happened when he was with the Rams. For whatever reason, he needs time with his receivers to get on the same page. Granted, he's missed some throws but IMO, everything's progressing.

You got it backwards bud, you are clearly not being objective. He was terrible. 118 yards passing on 28 attempts? He was bailed out by having a good running game and the Jets playing terrible.

It's a response like this that just reinforces my opinion that you're not objective on this subject. It seems like your disregarding what I've written just so you can keep banging your shoe on the table.

I'm totally objective.
It's clear you can not be. And you obviously didn't watch the game. He had 2-3 passes that should have been picked off, and his big play was on a busted coverage where Matthews was left alone.
Heck I've heard Kelly on the radio and even he said it wasn't Sam's best performance but I guess he's just not being objective either.
I get it though, you're just gonna dig your heels in and not budge. It's what I dig about you, just hate when we're on opposite sides of the fence. Lol

[moklerman]

You got it backwards bud, you are clearly not being objective. He was terrible. 118 yards passing on 28 attempts? He was bailed out by having a good running game and the Jets playing terrible.

It's a response like this that just reinforces my opinion that you're not objective on this subject. It seems like your disregarding what I've written just so you can keep banging your shoe on the table.

I'm totally objective.
It's clear you can not be. And you obviously didn't watch the game. He had 2-3 passes that should have been picked off, and his big play was on a busted coverage where Matthews was left alone.
Heck I've heard Kelly on the radio and even he said it wasn't Sam's best performance but I guess he's just not being objective either.
I get it though, you're just gonna dig your heels in and not budge. It's what I dig about you, just hate when we're on opposite sides of the fence. Lol

But you're arguing against something that I am not. I say he's progressed from the first two games and you say no, he played terrible.

I recall the first pass of the game being a potential pick but I don't recall 2-3 passes that should have been picked. Bradford isn't comfortable yet and I said he probably wouldn't get there against the Jets CB's. Bradford didn't place the ball where he should on various throws but that goes back to his comfort level IMO. He doesn't have the system down yet and is rusty. I think this week he progresses a little more and has multiple TD's for the first time as an Eagle.

[RedAlice]

Do you think Bradford will still be the QB next week?

If so, I will be there to root for him v Saints....I find this very weird. Last year, I was there to root for our little Austin Davis v enemy Foles. This year, Foles is my guy and I will be rooting for Bradford as an Eagle. It's all very creepy-funny.

Also last year I ended up in the same bar as Sanchez. Apparently, we have the same favorite bar.

And...I love Philly as a city. Go to a game each year now.

[moklerman]

Do you think Bradford will still be the QB next week?

Unless he gets injured.

As I said before, if this was a case of Bradford being plugged into an offense that was working, a la Sanchez last year, then I could see why benching him might have some effect. But the whole offense is struggling and learning on the job right now. Bradford hasn't been perfect or even looked comfortable yet but that's true of the whole offense.

Last week, the offense was scaled back and focused more on the running game. And it worked. It wasn't pretty and it didn't light up the stat sheet but they had to get the running game going. This week, I think they're going to be able to pass the ball better than they have in the first 3 weeks and things will start gelling.

[Hacksaw]

But the whole offense is struggling and learning on the job right now. _________ hasn't been perfect or even looked comfortable yet but that's true of the whole offense.

Last week, the offense was scaled back and focused more on the running game. And it worked. It wasn't pretty and it didn't light up the stat sheet but they had to get the running game going. This week, I think they're going to be able to pass the ball better than they have in the first 3 weeks and things will start gelling.

You could be describing the Rams offensive situation by inserting Foles into the blank where Bradford's name was. Perhaps we should all give the Rams the same benefit of the doubt?

I never knew you are such a Bradford fan bro.

[moklerman]

But the whole offense is struggling and learning on the job right now. _________ hasn't been perfect or even looked comfortable yet but that's true of the whole offense.

Last week, the offense was scaled back and focused more on the running game. And it worked. It wasn't pretty and it didn't light up the stat sheet but they had to get the running game going. This week, I think they're going to be able to pass the ball better than they have in the first 3 weeks and things will start gelling.

You could be describing the Rams offensive situation by inserting Foles into the blank where Bradford's name was. Perhaps we should all give the Rams the same benefit of the doubt?

I never knew you are such a Bradford fan bro.

Who said the Rams weren't in the same boat? New OC, new linemen, new QB...it's only reasonable to assume that it will take some time for them to be what they're going to be.

[Hacksaw]

But the whole offense is struggling and learning on the job right now. _________ hasn't been perfect or even looked comfortable yet but that's true of the whole offense.

Last week, the offense was scaled back and focused more on the running game. And it worked. It wasn't pretty and it didn't light up the stat sheet but they had to get the running game going. This week, I think they're going to be able to pass the ball better than they have in the first 3 weeks and things will start gelling.

You could be describing the Rams offensive situation by inserting Foles into the blank where Bradford's name was. Perhaps we should all give the Rams the same benefit of the doubt?

I never knew you are such a Bradford fan bro.

Who said the Rams weren't in the same boat? New OC, new linemen, new QB...it's only reasonable to assume that it will take some time for them to be what they're going to be.

Hey bro, no one in particular said it. I was commenting on how your statement about Bradford fit our 'sitch too. Connecting the dots for patients for our club,, similar to your argument for Bradford. Personally, I hope it's correct for both parties.

[Elvis]

Last week, the offense was scaled back and focused more on the running game.

This really plays into one of my main Bradford concerns.

His 2nd year here he was supposed to make the line calls in McD's offense but he couldn't do it . There was that play where Amendola had to explain to Bradford that it was zone coverage and Amendola had in fact run the right route, it was Bradford who made the mistake. And now Kelly is scaling back his offense?

Might be nothing in both cases and happening for lots of other reasons but i worried that Bradford couldn't really master the game and this seems to be telling me the same thing...

[Hacksaw]

Isn't Kelleys O similar to what SB played at OU?