by The Ripper 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 494 Joined: May 13 2015 Naples, FL Starter Re: Roger Goodell’s Anti-St. Louis Report Was No Surprise POST #11 Hacksaw wrote:"I was fooled twice in the early stages of this STL drama when Kroenke and Goodell, in separate conversations, told me that the Rams weren’t going anywhere. That’s why I wrongly underestimated the danger of the Rams leaving. I’ve said this before, so let me state it again for the folks that missed it the first 100 times: shame on me for trusting the commissioner and the owner. And even after Kroenke purchased land in Inglewood, Rams executive Kevin Demoff told me that the land deal was made to spur action on a new stadium in St. Louis" Excuses.;"Bernie comments: The $100 million was pledged by McNair and at least one other owner, probably Carolina Panthers’ owner Jerry Richardson. Peacock never would have included that money in the stadium-funding plan presented to the Board of Aldermen unless he was confident in its legitimacy."Is it possible Pisscock was set up?More lies from Pinocchio. No one would call out a bluff until that bluffed had accomplished it's goal and that's why the Demoff quote is bogus.2 owners may have suggested the $100 million but they would never have told them to include it in a bill that the Alderman were preparing to vote on without first getting it approved by the League and then by a vote of the owners. Reply 2 / 2 1 2 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business