by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #11 Ramfan46 wrote:Elvis wrote:dieterbrock wrote:I would think that if the owners were acting in the best interest of their league, they would push for the simplest of resolutions.Knock out the bottom playerDavis has the least to offer, seemingly is the least committed and has the least amount of baggage.Knock the Raiders out, and tell Kroenke and Spanos to figure it out together or they both are deniedIt just seems too easy and obviousI'd go the other way: Approve both projects, they'll start talking...I'll do ya one better, relocation will only be approved upon payment of the relocation fee. See how serious Spanos and Davis are when it's time to start cuttin checks?!I like that one. In fact, why not make it part of the application.... by BuiltRamTough 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #12 By the time Carson has completed cleaning the site the Inglewood stadium should be complete lol We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #13 If ESK were to start building it anyways he may screw up the Carson funding. Doesn't have to be for the Rams necessarily....... wink GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #14 The big question is do both sides have at least 9 solid votes to block.If they do, then there is the risk that nothing gets approved and who does that hurt the most? ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #15 If everyone plays nice,,,Hurts:LA, Get's no teamStL, Nixon out, time for voting which should fail, time for ESK to just goKroenke, (assuming he doesn't just go) Allows others to catch up. Loss of revenue 2016 Rams sales? Davis, Might lose his meal ticket with Spanos. Owners, The problems remain unresolved and the fans start looking away.NFL, Makes less moneyHelps:Spanos, Can catch up some. Get's a chance for vote in SD. Blocks KroenkeCarson, Can catch up some.StL, Temp blocks KroenkeNow if Kroenke decides to play hardball (fingers crossed) and prevails.Hurts:StL bye bye RamsSpanoise bye bye CarsonDavis bye bye free rideHelps:ESK, Becomes one of the most powerful sports owners anywhereRams, First class operation for our teamLA Rams fans, get our team back. Tailgating season officially opens in SeptNFL, makes more money.Man, I just got more confused than ever. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #16 Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Elvis wrote:I'd go the other way: Approve both projects, they'll start talking...Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #17 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.That's true, and my suggestion was a little tongue in cheek.I think the reality is Spanos is bent on keeping Kroenke out of L.A. He's going to stay on that for as long as he can.Only if that becomes untenable will we see what his fallback position is, could be share with Stan or stay in SD, i really don't know... RFU Season Ticket Holder by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #18 After the private league vote approves neither stadium since both sides cant muster 24 votes Goodell to Spanos: this will end in one of two ways: 1) you negotiate with Kroenke about Inglewood or 2) Kroenke starts construction next week and the league cannot stop him. by azramsfan93 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #19 bluecoconuts wrote:Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.Spanos says he does want or need to work with Stan. I am not sure how telling him to go it alone is misaligned with what the Carson contingent is saying. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #20 Alone = without Davis. That would change the entire dynamic. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by BuiltRamTough 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #12 By the time Carson has completed cleaning the site the Inglewood stadium should be complete lol We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #13 If ESK were to start building it anyways he may screw up the Carson funding. Doesn't have to be for the Rams necessarily....... wink GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #14 The big question is do both sides have at least 9 solid votes to block.If they do, then there is the risk that nothing gets approved and who does that hurt the most? ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #15 If everyone plays nice,,,Hurts:LA, Get's no teamStL, Nixon out, time for voting which should fail, time for ESK to just goKroenke, (assuming he doesn't just go) Allows others to catch up. Loss of revenue 2016 Rams sales? Davis, Might lose his meal ticket with Spanos. Owners, The problems remain unresolved and the fans start looking away.NFL, Makes less moneyHelps:Spanos, Can catch up some. Get's a chance for vote in SD. Blocks KroenkeCarson, Can catch up some.StL, Temp blocks KroenkeNow if Kroenke decides to play hardball (fingers crossed) and prevails.Hurts:StL bye bye RamsSpanoise bye bye CarsonDavis bye bye free rideHelps:ESK, Becomes one of the most powerful sports owners anywhereRams, First class operation for our teamLA Rams fans, get our team back. Tailgating season officially opens in SeptNFL, makes more money.Man, I just got more confused than ever. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #16 Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Elvis wrote:I'd go the other way: Approve both projects, they'll start talking...Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #17 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.That's true, and my suggestion was a little tongue in cheek.I think the reality is Spanos is bent on keeping Kroenke out of L.A. He's going to stay on that for as long as he can.Only if that becomes untenable will we see what his fallback position is, could be share with Stan or stay in SD, i really don't know... RFU Season Ticket Holder by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #18 After the private league vote approves neither stadium since both sides cant muster 24 votes Goodell to Spanos: this will end in one of two ways: 1) you negotiate with Kroenke about Inglewood or 2) Kroenke starts construction next week and the league cannot stop him. by azramsfan93 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #19 bluecoconuts wrote:Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.Spanos says he does want or need to work with Stan. I am not sure how telling him to go it alone is misaligned with what the Carson contingent is saying. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #20 Alone = without Davis. That would change the entire dynamic. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #13 If ESK were to start building it anyways he may screw up the Carson funding. Doesn't have to be for the Rams necessarily....... wink GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #14 The big question is do both sides have at least 9 solid votes to block.If they do, then there is the risk that nothing gets approved and who does that hurt the most? ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #15 If everyone plays nice,,,Hurts:LA, Get's no teamStL, Nixon out, time for voting which should fail, time for ESK to just goKroenke, (assuming he doesn't just go) Allows others to catch up. Loss of revenue 2016 Rams sales? Davis, Might lose his meal ticket with Spanos. Owners, The problems remain unresolved and the fans start looking away.NFL, Makes less moneyHelps:Spanos, Can catch up some. Get's a chance for vote in SD. Blocks KroenkeCarson, Can catch up some.StL, Temp blocks KroenkeNow if Kroenke decides to play hardball (fingers crossed) and prevails.Hurts:StL bye bye RamsSpanoise bye bye CarsonDavis bye bye free rideHelps:ESK, Becomes one of the most powerful sports owners anywhereRams, First class operation for our teamLA Rams fans, get our team back. Tailgating season officially opens in SeptNFL, makes more money.Man, I just got more confused than ever. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #16 Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Elvis wrote:I'd go the other way: Approve both projects, they'll start talking...Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #17 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.That's true, and my suggestion was a little tongue in cheek.I think the reality is Spanos is bent on keeping Kroenke out of L.A. He's going to stay on that for as long as he can.Only if that becomes untenable will we see what his fallback position is, could be share with Stan or stay in SD, i really don't know... RFU Season Ticket Holder by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #18 After the private league vote approves neither stadium since both sides cant muster 24 votes Goodell to Spanos: this will end in one of two ways: 1) you negotiate with Kroenke about Inglewood or 2) Kroenke starts construction next week and the league cannot stop him. by azramsfan93 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #19 bluecoconuts wrote:Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.Spanos says he does want or need to work with Stan. I am not sure how telling him to go it alone is misaligned with what the Carson contingent is saying. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #20 Alone = without Davis. That would change the entire dynamic. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by max 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5714 Joined: Jun 01 2015 Sarasota, FL Hall of Fame Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #14 The big question is do both sides have at least 9 solid votes to block.If they do, then there is the risk that nothing gets approved and who does that hurt the most? ~ max ~“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #15 If everyone plays nice,,,Hurts:LA, Get's no teamStL, Nixon out, time for voting which should fail, time for ESK to just goKroenke, (assuming he doesn't just go) Allows others to catch up. Loss of revenue 2016 Rams sales? Davis, Might lose his meal ticket with Spanos. Owners, The problems remain unresolved and the fans start looking away.NFL, Makes less moneyHelps:Spanos, Can catch up some. Get's a chance for vote in SD. Blocks KroenkeCarson, Can catch up some.StL, Temp blocks KroenkeNow if Kroenke decides to play hardball (fingers crossed) and prevails.Hurts:StL bye bye RamsSpanoise bye bye CarsonDavis bye bye free rideHelps:ESK, Becomes one of the most powerful sports owners anywhereRams, First class operation for our teamLA Rams fans, get our team back. Tailgating season officially opens in SeptNFL, makes more money.Man, I just got more confused than ever. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #16 Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Elvis wrote:I'd go the other way: Approve both projects, they'll start talking...Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #17 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.That's true, and my suggestion was a little tongue in cheek.I think the reality is Spanos is bent on keeping Kroenke out of L.A. He's going to stay on that for as long as he can.Only if that becomes untenable will we see what his fallback position is, could be share with Stan or stay in SD, i really don't know... RFU Season Ticket Holder by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #18 After the private league vote approves neither stadium since both sides cant muster 24 votes Goodell to Spanos: this will end in one of two ways: 1) you negotiate with Kroenke about Inglewood or 2) Kroenke starts construction next week and the league cannot stop him. by azramsfan93 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #19 bluecoconuts wrote:Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.Spanos says he does want or need to work with Stan. I am not sure how telling him to go it alone is misaligned with what the Carson contingent is saying. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #20 Alone = without Davis. That would change the entire dynamic. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #15 If everyone plays nice,,,Hurts:LA, Get's no teamStL, Nixon out, time for voting which should fail, time for ESK to just goKroenke, (assuming he doesn't just go) Allows others to catch up. Loss of revenue 2016 Rams sales? Davis, Might lose his meal ticket with Spanos. Owners, The problems remain unresolved and the fans start looking away.NFL, Makes less moneyHelps:Spanos, Can catch up some. Get's a chance for vote in SD. Blocks KroenkeCarson, Can catch up some.StL, Temp blocks KroenkeNow if Kroenke decides to play hardball (fingers crossed) and prevails.Hurts:StL bye bye RamsSpanoise bye bye CarsonDavis bye bye free rideHelps:ESK, Becomes one of the most powerful sports owners anywhereRams, First class operation for our teamLA Rams fans, get our team back. Tailgating season officially opens in SeptNFL, makes more money.Man, I just got more confused than ever. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #16 Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Elvis wrote:I'd go the other way: Approve both projects, they'll start talking...Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #17 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.That's true, and my suggestion was a little tongue in cheek.I think the reality is Spanos is bent on keeping Kroenke out of L.A. He's going to stay on that for as long as he can.Only if that becomes untenable will we see what his fallback position is, could be share with Stan or stay in SD, i really don't know... RFU Season Ticket Holder by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #18 After the private league vote approves neither stadium since both sides cant muster 24 votes Goodell to Spanos: this will end in one of two ways: 1) you negotiate with Kroenke about Inglewood or 2) Kroenke starts construction next week and the league cannot stop him. by azramsfan93 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #19 bluecoconuts wrote:Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.Spanos says he does want or need to work with Stan. I am not sure how telling him to go it alone is misaligned with what the Carson contingent is saying. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #20 Alone = without Davis. That would change the entire dynamic. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025
by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #16 Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Elvis wrote:I'd go the other way: Approve both projects, they'll start talking...Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #17 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.That's true, and my suggestion was a little tongue in cheek.I think the reality is Spanos is bent on keeping Kroenke out of L.A. He's going to stay on that for as long as he can.Only if that becomes untenable will we see what his fallback position is, could be share with Stan or stay in SD, i really don't know... RFU Season Ticket Holder by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #18 After the private league vote approves neither stadium since both sides cant muster 24 votes Goodell to Spanos: this will end in one of two ways: 1) you negotiate with Kroenke about Inglewood or 2) Kroenke starts construction next week and the league cannot stop him. by azramsfan93 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #19 bluecoconuts wrote:Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.Spanos says he does want or need to work with Stan. I am not sure how telling him to go it alone is misaligned with what the Carson contingent is saying. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #20 Alone = without Davis. That would change the entire dynamic. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025
by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #17 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.That's true, and my suggestion was a little tongue in cheek.I think the reality is Spanos is bent on keeping Kroenke out of L.A. He's going to stay on that for as long as he can.Only if that becomes untenable will we see what his fallback position is, could be share with Stan or stay in SD, i really don't know... RFU Season Ticket Holder by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #18 After the private league vote approves neither stadium since both sides cant muster 24 votes Goodell to Spanos: this will end in one of two ways: 1) you negotiate with Kroenke about Inglewood or 2) Kroenke starts construction next week and the league cannot stop him. by azramsfan93 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #19 bluecoconuts wrote:Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.Spanos says he does want or need to work with Stan. I am not sure how telling him to go it alone is misaligned with what the Carson contingent is saying. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #20 Alone = without Davis. That would change the entire dynamic. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025
by majik 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1269 Joined: Aug 31 2015 New Jersey Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #18 After the private league vote approves neither stadium since both sides cant muster 24 votes Goodell to Spanos: this will end in one of two ways: 1) you negotiate with Kroenke about Inglewood or 2) Kroenke starts construction next week and the league cannot stop him. by azramsfan93 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #19 bluecoconuts wrote:Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.Spanos says he does want or need to work with Stan. I am not sure how telling him to go it alone is misaligned with what the Carson contingent is saying. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #20 Alone = without Davis. That would change the entire dynamic. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025
by azramsfan93 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1562 Joined: Jun 30 2015 Chandler, Arizona Pro Bowl Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #19 bluecoconuts wrote:Elvis wrote:LA RamsFan JSJ wrote:Really?I'd think that's exactly what Stan wants. His project is ahead on the timeline, and he's got much more capital to work with. He'd have no reason to do anything but tell Dean "Good luck with Carson" and go about his business.Exactly. Dean's the one who refuses to talk. Approve Carson (and Inglewood) and i bet he starts talking...Problem with that move is that it gives no guarantees that Kroenke wont tell Spanos to piss off after the headache he gave him. Once they approve they can't say no, but Kroenke may not want to play ball anymore. If that happens then Spanos gets screwed over pretty hard, which is what the NFL is trying to avoid.Spanos says he does want or need to work with Stan. I am not sure how telling him to go it alone is misaligned with what the Carson contingent is saying. by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #20 Alone = without Davis. That would change the entire dynamic. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 21 posts Jul 11 2025
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Don’t count on Rams, Raiders & Chargers talking together in California next week POST #20 Alone = without Davis. That would change the entire dynamic. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS Reply 2 / 3 1 2 3 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business