by BuiltRamTough 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #11 Goodell's letter just made tonights game more exciting, didn't it? Lol We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by BuiltRamTough 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #12 We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #13 Elvis wrote:So who lied? Richardson? Peacock?McNair most likely. It doesn't matter now. Talk about going rogue. The LA Spanos committee has a couple of rogue members. Who appointed that lot again?? GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #14 My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #15 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair.That's why i thought it might be some kind of back handed kabuki to get Oakland $100 million to stay in Oakland... RFU Season Ticket Holder by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #16 Elvis wrote:bluecoconuts wrote:My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair.That's why i thought it might be some kind of back handed kabuki to get Oakland $100 million to stay in Oakland...I wouldn't imagine that is the case, because if they wanted to get money to Oakland it would be better to do so via relocation fees. Doing it by allowing an extra 100 million from the G4 or whatever the plan was sets a precedence that other cities would (in theory) be able to take advantage of as well. Doing it via relocation fees would be something that isn't repeatable unless we find ourselves with multiple teams jockeying for a specific city again. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #17 not only that, but just shows how shady the task force is, when this was told to them 2 days ago and yet they still worked it into b of a vote. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #18 TOPIC AUTHOR That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #19 Last edited by Hacksaw on Dec 17 2015, edited 1 time in total. NM GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #20 Elvis wrote:That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that?An Alderman is saying they will pass the bill as is because all the private money is hypothetical. Okay, sounds like a wonderful strategy. I guess they're playing with monopoly money now. If that's the case, they're passing a proposal that is 100 million short of budget. Looks like Bernie needs to grovel to Grubman again.I really don't want to hear ANYONE say the St. Louis proposal is good enough. It's a joke right now. Reply 2 / 4 1 2 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 40 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by BuiltRamTough 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 5357 Joined: May 15 2015 Los Angeles Hall of Fame Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #12 We Not Me RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #13 Elvis wrote:So who lied? Richardson? Peacock?McNair most likely. It doesn't matter now. Talk about going rogue. The LA Spanos committee has a couple of rogue members. Who appointed that lot again?? GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #14 My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #15 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair.That's why i thought it might be some kind of back handed kabuki to get Oakland $100 million to stay in Oakland... RFU Season Ticket Holder by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #16 Elvis wrote:bluecoconuts wrote:My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair.That's why i thought it might be some kind of back handed kabuki to get Oakland $100 million to stay in Oakland...I wouldn't imagine that is the case, because if they wanted to get money to Oakland it would be better to do so via relocation fees. Doing it by allowing an extra 100 million from the G4 or whatever the plan was sets a precedence that other cities would (in theory) be able to take advantage of as well. Doing it via relocation fees would be something that isn't repeatable unless we find ourselves with multiple teams jockeying for a specific city again. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #17 not only that, but just shows how shady the task force is, when this was told to them 2 days ago and yet they still worked it into b of a vote. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #18 TOPIC AUTHOR That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #19 Last edited by Hacksaw on Dec 17 2015, edited 1 time in total. NM GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #20 Elvis wrote:That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that?An Alderman is saying they will pass the bill as is because all the private money is hypothetical. Okay, sounds like a wonderful strategy. I guess they're playing with monopoly money now. If that's the case, they're passing a proposal that is 100 million short of budget. Looks like Bernie needs to grovel to Grubman again.I really don't want to hear ANYONE say the St. Louis proposal is good enough. It's a joke right now. Reply 2 / 4 1 2 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 40 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #13 Elvis wrote:So who lied? Richardson? Peacock?McNair most likely. It doesn't matter now. Talk about going rogue. The LA Spanos committee has a couple of rogue members. Who appointed that lot again?? GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #14 My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #15 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair.That's why i thought it might be some kind of back handed kabuki to get Oakland $100 million to stay in Oakland... RFU Season Ticket Holder by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #16 Elvis wrote:bluecoconuts wrote:My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair.That's why i thought it might be some kind of back handed kabuki to get Oakland $100 million to stay in Oakland...I wouldn't imagine that is the case, because if they wanted to get money to Oakland it would be better to do so via relocation fees. Doing it by allowing an extra 100 million from the G4 or whatever the plan was sets a precedence that other cities would (in theory) be able to take advantage of as well. Doing it via relocation fees would be something that isn't repeatable unless we find ourselves with multiple teams jockeying for a specific city again. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #17 not only that, but just shows how shady the task force is, when this was told to them 2 days ago and yet they still worked it into b of a vote. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #18 TOPIC AUTHOR That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #19 Last edited by Hacksaw on Dec 17 2015, edited 1 time in total. NM GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #20 Elvis wrote:That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that?An Alderman is saying they will pass the bill as is because all the private money is hypothetical. Okay, sounds like a wonderful strategy. I guess they're playing with monopoly money now. If that's the case, they're passing a proposal that is 100 million short of budget. Looks like Bernie needs to grovel to Grubman again.I really don't want to hear ANYONE say the St. Louis proposal is good enough. It's a joke right now. Reply 2 / 4 1 2 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 40 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #14 My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #15 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair.That's why i thought it might be some kind of back handed kabuki to get Oakland $100 million to stay in Oakland... RFU Season Ticket Holder by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #16 Elvis wrote:bluecoconuts wrote:My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair.That's why i thought it might be some kind of back handed kabuki to get Oakland $100 million to stay in Oakland...I wouldn't imagine that is the case, because if they wanted to get money to Oakland it would be better to do so via relocation fees. Doing it by allowing an extra 100 million from the G4 or whatever the plan was sets a precedence that other cities would (in theory) be able to take advantage of as well. Doing it via relocation fees would be something that isn't repeatable unless we find ourselves with multiple teams jockeying for a specific city again. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #17 not only that, but just shows how shady the task force is, when this was told to them 2 days ago and yet they still worked it into b of a vote. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #18 TOPIC AUTHOR That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #19 Last edited by Hacksaw on Dec 17 2015, edited 1 time in total. NM GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #20 Elvis wrote:That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that?An Alderman is saying they will pass the bill as is because all the private money is hypothetical. Okay, sounds like a wonderful strategy. I guess they're playing with monopoly money now. If that's the case, they're passing a proposal that is 100 million short of budget. Looks like Bernie needs to grovel to Grubman again.I really don't want to hear ANYONE say the St. Louis proposal is good enough. It's a joke right now. Reply 2 / 4 1 2 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 40 posts Jul 11 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #15 TOPIC AUTHOR bluecoconuts wrote:My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair.That's why i thought it might be some kind of back handed kabuki to get Oakland $100 million to stay in Oakland... RFU Season Ticket Holder by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #16 Elvis wrote:bluecoconuts wrote:My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair.That's why i thought it might be some kind of back handed kabuki to get Oakland $100 million to stay in Oakland...I wouldn't imagine that is the case, because if they wanted to get money to Oakland it would be better to do so via relocation fees. Doing it by allowing an extra 100 million from the G4 or whatever the plan was sets a precedence that other cities would (in theory) be able to take advantage of as well. Doing it via relocation fees would be something that isn't repeatable unless we find ourselves with multiple teams jockeying for a specific city again. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #17 not only that, but just shows how shady the task force is, when this was told to them 2 days ago and yet they still worked it into b of a vote. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #18 TOPIC AUTHOR That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #19 Last edited by Hacksaw on Dec 17 2015, edited 1 time in total. NM GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #20 Elvis wrote:That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that?An Alderman is saying they will pass the bill as is because all the private money is hypothetical. Okay, sounds like a wonderful strategy. I guess they're playing with monopoly money now. If that's the case, they're passing a proposal that is 100 million short of budget. Looks like Bernie needs to grovel to Grubman again.I really don't want to hear ANYONE say the St. Louis proposal is good enough. It's a joke right now. Reply 2 / 4 1 2 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 40 posts Jul 11 2025
by bluecoconuts 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 273 Joined: Aug 29 2015 LA Coliseum Rookie Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #16 Elvis wrote:bluecoconuts wrote:My guess is that Goodell knows that if that deal gets approved everyone will want that same deal, meaning more cost for the NFL, and that Kroenke would call foul.It seems it wasn't well thought out of by McNair.That's why i thought it might be some kind of back handed kabuki to get Oakland $100 million to stay in Oakland...I wouldn't imagine that is the case, because if they wanted to get money to Oakland it would be better to do so via relocation fees. Doing it by allowing an extra 100 million from the G4 or whatever the plan was sets a precedence that other cities would (in theory) be able to take advantage of as well. Doing it via relocation fees would be something that isn't repeatable unless we find ourselves with multiple teams jockeying for a specific city again. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #17 not only that, but just shows how shady the task force is, when this was told to them 2 days ago and yet they still worked it into b of a vote. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #18 TOPIC AUTHOR That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #19 Last edited by Hacksaw on Dec 17 2015, edited 1 time in total. NM GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #20 Elvis wrote:That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that?An Alderman is saying they will pass the bill as is because all the private money is hypothetical. Okay, sounds like a wonderful strategy. I guess they're playing with monopoly money now. If that's the case, they're passing a proposal that is 100 million short of budget. Looks like Bernie needs to grovel to Grubman again.I really don't want to hear ANYONE say the St. Louis proposal is good enough. It's a joke right now. Reply 2 / 4 1 2 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 40 posts Jul 11 2025
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #17 not only that, but just shows how shady the task force is, when this was told to them 2 days ago and yet they still worked it into b of a vote. by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #18 TOPIC AUTHOR That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #19 Last edited by Hacksaw on Dec 17 2015, edited 1 time in total. NM GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #20 Elvis wrote:That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that?An Alderman is saying they will pass the bill as is because all the private money is hypothetical. Okay, sounds like a wonderful strategy. I guess they're playing with monopoly money now. If that's the case, they're passing a proposal that is 100 million short of budget. Looks like Bernie needs to grovel to Grubman again.I really don't want to hear ANYONE say the St. Louis proposal is good enough. It's a joke right now. Reply 2 / 4 1 2 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 40 posts Jul 11 2025
by Elvis 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 41518 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #18 TOPIC AUTHOR That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that? RFU Season Ticket Holder by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #19 Last edited by Hacksaw on Dec 17 2015, edited 1 time in total. NM GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #20 Elvis wrote:That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that?An Alderman is saying they will pass the bill as is because all the private money is hypothetical. Okay, sounds like a wonderful strategy. I guess they're playing with monopoly money now. If that's the case, they're passing a proposal that is 100 million short of budget. Looks like Bernie needs to grovel to Grubman again.I really don't want to hear ANYONE say the St. Louis proposal is good enough. It's a joke right now. Reply 2 / 4 1 2 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 40 posts Jul 11 2025
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #19 Last edited by Hacksaw on Dec 17 2015, edited 1 time in total. NM GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #20 Elvis wrote:That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that?An Alderman is saying they will pass the bill as is because all the private money is hypothetical. Okay, sounds like a wonderful strategy. I guess they're playing with monopoly money now. If that's the case, they're passing a proposal that is 100 million short of budget. Looks like Bernie needs to grovel to Grubman again.I really don't want to hear ANYONE say the St. Louis proposal is good enough. It's a joke right now. Reply 2 / 4 1 2 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 40 posts Jul 11 2025
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: Goodell: $300 million for St. Louis stadium 'fundamentally inconsistent' with NFL policy POST #20 Elvis wrote:That fake $100 million was in exchange for letting Rams keep amusement tax. So what happens with that?An Alderman is saying they will pass the bill as is because all the private money is hypothetical. Okay, sounds like a wonderful strategy. I guess they're playing with monopoly money now. If that's the case, they're passing a proposal that is 100 million short of budget. Looks like Bernie needs to grovel to Grubman again.I really don't want to hear ANYONE say the St. Louis proposal is good enough. It's a joke right now. Reply 2 / 4 1 2 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business