[bubbaramfan]

I question points 2 and 3. The whole article completely exonerates St. Louis. The "Top Tier" was a lure. However its portrayed, St. Louis' failure to keep the lease enabled Kroenke to leave. The article wants us to believe St. Louis planned another stadium all along. It was up to them to upgrade the ED. Arbitration ruled they spend 700 mil to renovate the Ed. "Cost to much" . Now they want Stan to pay for half a stadium when he shouldn't have to have paid a dime. They wanted him to spend his own money, well he is, just not in St, Louis, and its their own fault.

[OldSchool]

That whole list is a farce and a pipe dream. If I were a St. Louis resident I'd be embarrassed that somebody felt the article cast the city and its residents in a positive light.

[Hacksaw]

FYI, All 1,500 tickets available in StL sold for a venue which seats 3,100. Apparently the smaller venues in Oakland and SD only hold 1,500, and the NFL wanted all things equal.

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football ... 71b75.html

[Elvis]

We can all watch live...

Those who were unsuccessful in gaining attendance to the St. Louis hearing can watch on the live stream at http://www.nfl.com/stlhearing. They may also send comments by Nov. 13 to [email protected].

[RedAlice]

I received my entry pass for the one in San Diego, so I will be there on Thursday.

I'm not a STH, and the thread on the Charger forum has no traction. Curious to see how many Charger fans attend.