[safer]

Just curious here. Most of the time I think they are pretty accurate, but the after listening to McVay's glowing comments and then seeing cb Forbes as a third stringer causes me pause. Where do the major sports sites get this type of info?

[Dare]

Any depth chart you see now is probably from last year. It's too early for one now. At most they will adjust to eliminate roster cuts. After that I would think they simply use what is posted by the teams.

[safer]

actually, ESPN does list our draftees on their charts. Not a biggie, just curious where they find their info

[69RamFan]

actually, ESPN does list our draftees on their charts. Not a biggie, just curious where they find their info

I would say the Espn sports reporters, Travis Rodgers, Doug McKain, and others,
to include DeMarco Farr, Kirk Morrison as the football experts.
I would say it's basically simple, they are there at the OTA's,
and they watch how they line up as 1st, 2nd and 3rd string, on their 11 vs 11. or 7 vs 7.

I made a post with OTA video, and I was looking how the OL lined up as 1st, 2nd & 3rd string.
It was basically the same.

[Elvis]

If you wanna read way too much into nothing, here's your RB depth chart:

[BobCarl]

actually, ESPN does list our draftees on their charts. Not a biggie, just curious where they find their info

The question is: where does their AI finds their info?

The average AI tends to do a quick search based on certain metadata. It has built-in analysis for human error ... and it tries to do the task in a limited amount of time, thus it prioritizes older results with lots of human reads as being more accurate than new search results which have fewer reads. thus the "Rams depth chart" isn't up to date..

On one task a certain "AI", yes you know which one, told me that Derek Carr is the current Raiders QB. On other tasks it told me that Gardner Minshew is their QB.