7 posts
  • 1 / 1
 by Elvis
1 day 23 hours ago
 Total posts:   39914  
 Joined:  Mar 28 2015
United States of America   Los Angeles
Administrator

Rams, Seahawks and Niners all .500 but Rams doing it for less money. Still, i'd rather have more wins and less money but we can see the Rams are being very efficient especially compared to the Niners...

 by ziggy
1 day 23 hours ago
 Total posts:   623  
 Joined:  Apr 24 2018
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Veteran

I don't quite get this chart. We are spending less money. I assume that 'less' money is based on current active players? Because the Rams have hit their max salary cap just like every team in the league, I would assume?

 by Elvis
1 day 21 hours ago
 Total posts:   39914  
 Joined:  Mar 28 2015
United States of America   Los Angeles
Administrator

ziggy wrote:I don't quite get this chart. We are spending less money. I assume that 'less' money is based on current active players? Because the Rams have hit their max salary cap just like every team in the league, I would assume?


That's a good question. The salary numbers are just for the active roster so maybe all we're looking at here is the inverse of dead cap?

 by ziggy
1 day 20 hours ago
 Total posts:   623  
 Joined:  Apr 24 2018
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Veteran

And perhaps this chart indicates terrible situation the 9ers find themselves in because Purdy is the lowest paid qb (possibly player) in the league currently…

 by safer
5 hours 26 minutes ago
 Total posts:   1343  
 Joined:  Feb 03 2016
United States of America   LA Coliseum
Pro Bowl

I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL.

 by Elvis
5 hours 51 seconds ago
 Total posts:   39914  
 Joined:  Mar 28 2015
United States of America   Los Angeles
Administrator

safer wrote:I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL.


Their record is .500 so they dead middle vertically which is win/loss. The horizontal is money spent on current roster and only the Raiders are lower than the Rams by that metric.

Purdy is a bargain but Niners are spending a lot on other players, yet are also .500 at the moment...

  • 1 / 1
7 posts Nov 21 2024