by Elvis 1 day 23 hours ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #1 TOPIC AUTHOR RFU Season Ticket Holder by Elvis 1 day 23 hours ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Bang For The Buck POST #2 TOPIC AUTHOR DaveFromOhio liked this post Rams, Seahawks and Niners all .500 but Rams doing it for less money. Still, i'd rather have more wins and less money but we can see the Rams are being very efficient especially compared to the Niners... RFU Season Ticket Holder 1 by ziggy 1 day 23 hours ago Total posts: 623 Joined: Apr 24 2018 LA Coliseum Veteran Bang For The Buck POST #3 I don't quite get this chart. We are spending less money. I assume that 'less' money is based on current active players? Because the Rams have hit their max salary cap just like every team in the league, I would assume? by Elvis 1 day 21 hours ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #4 TOPIC AUTHOR ziggy wrote:I don't quite get this chart. We are spending less money. I assume that 'less' money is based on current active players? Because the Rams have hit their max salary cap just like every team in the league, I would assume?That's a good question. The salary numbers are just for the active roster so maybe all we're looking at here is the inverse of dead cap? RFU Season Ticket Holder by ziggy 1 day 20 hours ago Total posts: 623 Joined: Apr 24 2018 LA Coliseum Veteran Bang For The Buck POST #5 And perhaps this chart indicates terrible situation the 9ers find themselves in because Purdy is the lowest paid qb (possibly player) in the league currently… by safer 5 hours 26 minutes ago Total posts: 1343 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bang For The Buck POST #6 I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL. by Elvis 5 hours 51 seconds ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #7 TOPIC AUTHOR safer wrote:I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL.Their record is .500 so they dead middle vertically which is win/loss. The horizontal is money spent on current roster and only the Raiders are lower than the Rams by that metric.Purdy is a bargain but Niners are spending a lot on other players, yet are also .500 at the moment... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 7 posts Nov 21 2024 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by Elvis 1 day 23 hours ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Bang For The Buck POST #2 TOPIC AUTHOR DaveFromOhio liked this post Rams, Seahawks and Niners all .500 but Rams doing it for less money. Still, i'd rather have more wins and less money but we can see the Rams are being very efficient especially compared to the Niners... RFU Season Ticket Holder 1 by ziggy 1 day 23 hours ago Total posts: 623 Joined: Apr 24 2018 LA Coliseum Veteran Bang For The Buck POST #3 I don't quite get this chart. We are spending less money. I assume that 'less' money is based on current active players? Because the Rams have hit their max salary cap just like every team in the league, I would assume? by Elvis 1 day 21 hours ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #4 TOPIC AUTHOR ziggy wrote:I don't quite get this chart. We are spending less money. I assume that 'less' money is based on current active players? Because the Rams have hit their max salary cap just like every team in the league, I would assume?That's a good question. The salary numbers are just for the active roster so maybe all we're looking at here is the inverse of dead cap? RFU Season Ticket Holder by ziggy 1 day 20 hours ago Total posts: 623 Joined: Apr 24 2018 LA Coliseum Veteran Bang For The Buck POST #5 And perhaps this chart indicates terrible situation the 9ers find themselves in because Purdy is the lowest paid qb (possibly player) in the league currently… by safer 5 hours 26 minutes ago Total posts: 1343 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bang For The Buck POST #6 I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL. by Elvis 5 hours 51 seconds ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #7 TOPIC AUTHOR safer wrote:I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL.Their record is .500 so they dead middle vertically which is win/loss. The horizontal is money spent on current roster and only the Raiders are lower than the Rams by that metric.Purdy is a bargain but Niners are spending a lot on other players, yet are also .500 at the moment... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 7 posts Nov 21 2024
by ziggy 1 day 23 hours ago Total posts: 623 Joined: Apr 24 2018 LA Coliseum Veteran Bang For The Buck POST #3 I don't quite get this chart. We are spending less money. I assume that 'less' money is based on current active players? Because the Rams have hit their max salary cap just like every team in the league, I would assume? by Elvis 1 day 21 hours ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #4 TOPIC AUTHOR ziggy wrote:I don't quite get this chart. We are spending less money. I assume that 'less' money is based on current active players? Because the Rams have hit their max salary cap just like every team in the league, I would assume?That's a good question. The salary numbers are just for the active roster so maybe all we're looking at here is the inverse of dead cap? RFU Season Ticket Holder by ziggy 1 day 20 hours ago Total posts: 623 Joined: Apr 24 2018 LA Coliseum Veteran Bang For The Buck POST #5 And perhaps this chart indicates terrible situation the 9ers find themselves in because Purdy is the lowest paid qb (possibly player) in the league currently… by safer 5 hours 26 minutes ago Total posts: 1343 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bang For The Buck POST #6 I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL. by Elvis 5 hours 51 seconds ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #7 TOPIC AUTHOR safer wrote:I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL.Their record is .500 so they dead middle vertically which is win/loss. The horizontal is money spent on current roster and only the Raiders are lower than the Rams by that metric.Purdy is a bargain but Niners are spending a lot on other players, yet are also .500 at the moment... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 7 posts Nov 21 2024
by Elvis 1 day 21 hours ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #4 TOPIC AUTHOR ziggy wrote:I don't quite get this chart. We are spending less money. I assume that 'less' money is based on current active players? Because the Rams have hit their max salary cap just like every team in the league, I would assume?That's a good question. The salary numbers are just for the active roster so maybe all we're looking at here is the inverse of dead cap? RFU Season Ticket Holder by ziggy 1 day 20 hours ago Total posts: 623 Joined: Apr 24 2018 LA Coliseum Veteran Bang For The Buck POST #5 And perhaps this chart indicates terrible situation the 9ers find themselves in because Purdy is the lowest paid qb (possibly player) in the league currently… by safer 5 hours 26 minutes ago Total posts: 1343 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bang For The Buck POST #6 I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL. by Elvis 5 hours 51 seconds ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #7 TOPIC AUTHOR safer wrote:I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL.Their record is .500 so they dead middle vertically which is win/loss. The horizontal is money spent on current roster and only the Raiders are lower than the Rams by that metric.Purdy is a bargain but Niners are spending a lot on other players, yet are also .500 at the moment... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 7 posts Nov 21 2024
by ziggy 1 day 20 hours ago Total posts: 623 Joined: Apr 24 2018 LA Coliseum Veteran Bang For The Buck POST #5 And perhaps this chart indicates terrible situation the 9ers find themselves in because Purdy is the lowest paid qb (possibly player) in the league currently… by safer 5 hours 26 minutes ago Total posts: 1343 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bang For The Buck POST #6 I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL. by Elvis 5 hours 51 seconds ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #7 TOPIC AUTHOR safer wrote:I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL.Their record is .500 so they dead middle vertically which is win/loss. The horizontal is money spent on current roster and only the Raiders are lower than the Rams by that metric.Purdy is a bargain but Niners are spending a lot on other players, yet are also .500 at the moment... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 7 posts Nov 21 2024
by safer 5 hours 26 minutes ago Total posts: 1343 Joined: Feb 03 2016 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Bang For The Buck POST #6 I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL. by Elvis 5 hours 51 seconds ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #7 TOPIC AUTHOR safer wrote:I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL.Their record is .500 so they dead middle vertically which is win/loss. The horizontal is money spent on current roster and only the Raiders are lower than the Rams by that metric.Purdy is a bargain but Niners are spending a lot on other players, yet are also .500 at the moment... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 7 posts Nov 21 2024
by Elvis 5 hours 51 seconds ago Total posts: 39914 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Bang For The Buck POST #7 TOPIC AUTHOR safer wrote:I'm confused with the left side of this graph. What I don't understand is why the Rams aren't at, or near the top left with all of the hits they've had in the draft the last two years. It was mentioned that the Niners are with low cost Purdy at QB. Why doesn't this chart reflect that about the many young, ascending, starting players the Rams now have. 2nd youngest roster in the NFL.Their record is .500 so they dead middle vertically which is win/loss. The horizontal is money spent on current roster and only the Raiders are lower than the Rams by that metric.Purdy is a bargain but Niners are spending a lot on other players, yet are also .500 at the moment... RFU Season Ticket Holder Reply 1 / 1 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business