/zn/ wrote:Why is being honestly critical of the 2021 pick a case of "agonizing"?
It's just being fair in draft discussions about a particularly strong example of the Snead/McV Rams not getting particularly high value out of round 2.
In my experience, criticisms like that tend to linger as long as that particular GM/coach regime combo is in power. So nowadays people tend not to bring up the OT Smith pick from 2009 or the OT Robinson pick from 2014. As long as this particular regime is in power it's fair to discuss their record, and in this case that record includes a very high percentage of quality drafting right alongside their much less common more mediocre moments. That's just fair discussion.
Myself? I tend not to make it so much about Atwell per se as it being a more general thing where with Snead/McV, round 2 doesn't really have the kind of results you would expect from picks that high. Round 3 tends to be better. That's of course absolutely not as bad as taking Phillips and Kennison both in round 1 in 96, but it is a thing worth mentioning.
Well to be fair, honestly critical is one thing. Overly critical is completely another. Even agonizing. Different fans go to different degrees.
However......your suggestion the Rams do better in round 3 than round two may be a perfect example of why this year's 14 pick draft class might have a better chance for success.
Including this draft, they've made six 2nd round selections compared to twelve 3rd rounders. And I'd submit there have been more 'misses' in the 3rd round. So have they been 'more successful' in round 3 or is it simply they've had twice as many chances for success?
Been following the horns since the Coliseum had a Roman playing there.
McVay: 77-49, 2 Superbowls, 1 Lombardi............Doubt at your own peril
McVay: 77-49, 2 Superbowls, 1 Lombardi............Doubt at your own peril