by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41522 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #31 RFU Season Ticket Holder by RamsFanSince82 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 5851 Joined: Aug 20 2015 So. Cal. Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #32 RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread. by snackdaddy 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #33 Elvis wrote:https://twitter.com/jthom1/status/688806836451950592Thanks a lot Georgia/Shaw/Ziggy. Your bad decisions are still haunting us. by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41522 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #34 RamsFanSince82 wrote:RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread.Nice job.After going 2-2 last week i went 2-1-1 this week.Who want's to buy my picks? RFU Season Ticket Holder by snackdaddy 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #35 Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing. by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 wrote:RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread.well done! guessin' there were more than a few that cursed when the steelers went for 3 instead of unsuccessfully trying for 7 first as time ran out... by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR snackdaddy wrote:Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing.yet they finished 6th in offensive scoring, 1st in qb rating, 6th in td passes thrown, just 2 behind league leading new england, and 7th in rush yards per carry, and they did this with lynch missing more than half the season (i mention this because some think lynch is responsible for their offensive success)... life's good when ya have talent under center. by OldSchool 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #38 OldSchool wrote:Straight up winners: Chiefs, Cards, Panthers BroncosSpread winners: Chiefs, Packers, Panthers Broncos3-1 Straight up and 2-2 vs spread. Honestly only reason I took the Chiefs is my deep seated hatred for the Patriots. Probably still would have taken them vs the spread but not straight up oh well. Reply 4 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 38 posts Jul 14 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by RamsFanSince82 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 5851 Joined: Aug 20 2015 So. Cal. Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #32 RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread. by snackdaddy 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #33 Elvis wrote:https://twitter.com/jthom1/status/688806836451950592Thanks a lot Georgia/Shaw/Ziggy. Your bad decisions are still haunting us. by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41522 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #34 RamsFanSince82 wrote:RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread.Nice job.After going 2-2 last week i went 2-1-1 this week.Who want's to buy my picks? RFU Season Ticket Holder by snackdaddy 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #35 Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing. by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 wrote:RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread.well done! guessin' there were more than a few that cursed when the steelers went for 3 instead of unsuccessfully trying for 7 first as time ran out... by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR snackdaddy wrote:Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing.yet they finished 6th in offensive scoring, 1st in qb rating, 6th in td passes thrown, just 2 behind league leading new england, and 7th in rush yards per carry, and they did this with lynch missing more than half the season (i mention this because some think lynch is responsible for their offensive success)... life's good when ya have talent under center. by OldSchool 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #38 OldSchool wrote:Straight up winners: Chiefs, Cards, Panthers BroncosSpread winners: Chiefs, Packers, Panthers Broncos3-1 Straight up and 2-2 vs spread. Honestly only reason I took the Chiefs is my deep seated hatred for the Patriots. Probably still would have taken them vs the spread but not straight up oh well. Reply 4 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 38 posts Jul 14 2025 FOLLOW US @RAMSFANSUNITED Who liked this post
by snackdaddy 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #33 Elvis wrote:https://twitter.com/jthom1/status/688806836451950592Thanks a lot Georgia/Shaw/Ziggy. Your bad decisions are still haunting us. by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41522 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #34 RamsFanSince82 wrote:RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread.Nice job.After going 2-2 last week i went 2-1-1 this week.Who want's to buy my picks? RFU Season Ticket Holder by snackdaddy 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #35 Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing. by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 wrote:RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread.well done! guessin' there were more than a few that cursed when the steelers went for 3 instead of unsuccessfully trying for 7 first as time ran out... by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR snackdaddy wrote:Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing.yet they finished 6th in offensive scoring, 1st in qb rating, 6th in td passes thrown, just 2 behind league leading new england, and 7th in rush yards per carry, and they did this with lynch missing more than half the season (i mention this because some think lynch is responsible for their offensive success)... life's good when ya have talent under center. by OldSchool 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #38 OldSchool wrote:Straight up winners: Chiefs, Cards, Panthers BroncosSpread winners: Chiefs, Packers, Panthers Broncos3-1 Straight up and 2-2 vs spread. Honestly only reason I took the Chiefs is my deep seated hatred for the Patriots. Probably still would have taken them vs the spread but not straight up oh well. Reply 4 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 38 posts Jul 14 2025
by Elvis 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 41522 Joined: Mar 28 2015 Los Angeles Administrator Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #34 RamsFanSince82 wrote:RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread.Nice job.After going 2-2 last week i went 2-1-1 this week.Who want's to buy my picks? RFU Season Ticket Holder by snackdaddy 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #35 Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing. by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 wrote:RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread.well done! guessin' there were more than a few that cursed when the steelers went for 3 instead of unsuccessfully trying for 7 first as time ran out... by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR snackdaddy wrote:Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing.yet they finished 6th in offensive scoring, 1st in qb rating, 6th in td passes thrown, just 2 behind league leading new england, and 7th in rush yards per carry, and they did this with lynch missing more than half the season (i mention this because some think lynch is responsible for their offensive success)... life's good when ya have talent under center. by OldSchool 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #38 OldSchool wrote:Straight up winners: Chiefs, Cards, Panthers BroncosSpread winners: Chiefs, Packers, Panthers Broncos3-1 Straight up and 2-2 vs spread. Honestly only reason I took the Chiefs is my deep seated hatred for the Patriots. Probably still would have taken them vs the spread but not straight up oh well. Reply 4 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 38 posts Jul 14 2025
by snackdaddy 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 10049 Joined: May 30 2015 Merced California Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #35 Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing. by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 wrote:RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread.well done! guessin' there were more than a few that cursed when the steelers went for 3 instead of unsuccessfully trying for 7 first as time ran out... by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR snackdaddy wrote:Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing.yet they finished 6th in offensive scoring, 1st in qb rating, 6th in td passes thrown, just 2 behind league leading new england, and 7th in rush yards per carry, and they did this with lynch missing more than half the season (i mention this because some think lynch is responsible for their offensive success)... life's good when ya have talent under center. by OldSchool 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #38 OldSchool wrote:Straight up winners: Chiefs, Cards, Panthers BroncosSpread winners: Chiefs, Packers, Panthers Broncos3-1 Straight up and 2-2 vs spread. Honestly only reason I took the Chiefs is my deep seated hatred for the Patriots. Probably still would have taken them vs the spread but not straight up oh well. Reply 4 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 38 posts Jul 14 2025
by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #36 TOPIC AUTHOR RamsFanSince82 wrote:RamsFanSince82 wrote:Straight up winners: Pats, Cards, Panthers, Broncos.Against the spread winners: Pats, Packers, Panthers, Steelers.4-0 straight up. 3-0-1 against the spread.well done! guessin' there were more than a few that cursed when the steelers went for 3 instead of unsuccessfully trying for 7 first as time ran out... by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR snackdaddy wrote:Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing.yet they finished 6th in offensive scoring, 1st in qb rating, 6th in td passes thrown, just 2 behind league leading new england, and 7th in rush yards per carry, and they did this with lynch missing more than half the season (i mention this because some think lynch is responsible for their offensive success)... life's good when ya have talent under center. by OldSchool 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #38 OldSchool wrote:Straight up winners: Chiefs, Cards, Panthers BroncosSpread winners: Chiefs, Packers, Panthers Broncos3-1 Straight up and 2-2 vs spread. Honestly only reason I took the Chiefs is my deep seated hatred for the Patriots. Probably still would have taken them vs the spread but not straight up oh well. Reply 4 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 38 posts Jul 14 2025
by aeneas1 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 16894 Joined: Sep 13 2015 Norcal Hall of Fame Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #37 TOPIC AUTHOR snackdaddy wrote:Well, both teams I was pulling for yesterday lost. And both teams I pulled for today won. So I'm .500 on the teams I wanted to win. Seeing the hags get eliminated and abused for the first half was enjoyable. I have to wonder if it isn't the beginning of the end for them. They've got so much committed to their core players there isn't enough to address issues of concern or depth. Their offensive line is horrible. Even worse than ours. And how much can they commit to improving it? If any key starters go down they don't have the depth to overcome it. Its possible the window for them is closing.yet they finished 6th in offensive scoring, 1st in qb rating, 6th in td passes thrown, just 2 behind league leading new england, and 7th in rush yards per carry, and they did this with lynch missing more than half the season (i mention this because some think lynch is responsible for their offensive success)... life's good when ya have talent under center. by OldSchool 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #38 OldSchool wrote:Straight up winners: Chiefs, Cards, Panthers BroncosSpread winners: Chiefs, Packers, Panthers Broncos3-1 Straight up and 2-2 vs spread. Honestly only reason I took the Chiefs is my deep seated hatred for the Patriots. Probably still would have taken them vs the spread but not straight up oh well. Reply 4 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 38 posts Jul 14 2025
by OldSchool 9 years 5 months ago Total posts: 1750 Joined: Jun 09 2015 LA Coliseum Pro Bowl Re: Divisional Round Numbers POST #38 OldSchool wrote:Straight up winners: Chiefs, Cards, Panthers BroncosSpread winners: Chiefs, Packers, Panthers Broncos3-1 Straight up and 2-2 vs spread. Honestly only reason I took the Chiefs is my deep seated hatred for the Patriots. Probably still would have taken them vs the spread but not straight up oh well. Reply 4 / 4 1 4 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business