22 posts
  • 3 / 3
  • 1
  • 3
 by Hacksaw
9 years 6 months ago
 Total posts:   24523  
 Joined:  Apr 15 2015
United States of America   AT THE BEACH
Moderator

I'd love to read that Loyal. I agree he can leave StLouis, I'm just not so sure he can enter Los Angeles. The NFL lifted their leg a pee'd on it last year claiming it. Personally, I never got how they got the region bestowed upon them. I get their supposed control over the franchises, but other than that, what exactly do they control about LA?

 by ramsman34
9 years 6 months ago
 Total posts:   10040  
 Joined:  Apr 16 2015
United States of America   Back in LA baby!
Moderator

Should the Rams be denied, virtually no one in the NFL expects Stan Kroenke to remain in St. Louis indefinitely. London or San Diego are the leading potential landing spots if he can’t be in Los Angeles. The NFL will be closely watching how San Diego responds if it loses the Chargers – primarily Mayor Kevin Faulconer and other officials. The league has noted a subtle shift in the private tone of city officials – from one focused on the immediate goal of keeping the Chargers to a more long-term play to be “an NFL city.” Most important, San Diego would still have to approve some sort of public financing before a team officially agrees to move there. It has been proposed that the NFL could help the “losing” team with extra money to build in its home market or even waive or reduce a relocation fee if it were to move to one of the vacated markets.


The San Diego RAMS?? Whaaat?? Better than London, but, and I was born in San Diego, I will vehemently HATE Spanos if that goes down.

  • 3 / 3
  • 1
  • 3
22 posts Jul 13 2025