by dieterbrock 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 11512 Joined: Mar 31 2015 New Jersey Hall of Fame Re: BofA W&M committee 12.10/15 POST #11 My head hurts... by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: BofA W&M committee 12.10/15 POST #12 TOPIC AUTHOR SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:The full board is on the clock. I would prefer that vote be held in January of fails as it quiets the Richardsons,, C Hunts and who ever else feels StL did enough so they can jump in with Spanos.Didn't you hear, Bernie says it's a done deal that St. Louis will offer the Rams a better deal once they're shot down from LA. The Grubman plan was strategy. Bernie is a conspiracy theorist now.I believe he believes himself.I guess we can lump that promise into all the other hollow promises 2nd tierville has made and not kept.I just don't see how a mediocre and somewhat shady offer can compel the owners to stick one of their most influential own in that place in good conscience. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #13 TOPIC AUTHOR ST. LOUIS • A month of heated debate culminated on Thursday with an aldermanic committee backing a proposal where St. Louis would finance $150 million of a proposed $1 billion riverfront football stadium. The committee voted 7-2. Now, the bill will move to a vote of the full Board of Aldermen. The board is expected to debate the matter on Friday, but procedural rules will require the board to come back next week for a special session to take a final vote. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #14 Hacksaw wrote:ST. LOUIS • A month of heated debate culminated on Thursday with an aldermanic committee backing a proposal where St. Louis would finance $150 million of a proposed $1 billion riverfront football stadium. The committee voted 7-2. Now, the bill will move to a vote of the full Board of Aldermen. The board is expected to debate the matter on Friday, but procedural rules will require the board to come back next week for a special session to take a final vote.As I said yesterday in a thread I started, this will all pass, and the offer will stand as currently constructed. The question will be, is that enough to not only block SK from LA but also give the go to the Charaiders? Remember, there are two other long term California NFL markets here, two relatively poor owners trying to get a stadium deal on a piece of land that isn't close to being built on. by moklerman 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #15 http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-l ... ium-121015Was wondering if this had already been covered and it looks like it has. So, they voted to okay paying 10% of the proposed stadium, right? The proposed stadium that isn't up to standards the NFL wants and the stadium that Kroenke will have to pay for and not have any say in? Just want to make sure I've got the story straight. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #16 moklerman wrote:http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-louis-rams-committee-approves-financing-new-stadium-121015Was wondering if this had already been covered and it looks like it has. So, they voted to okay paying 10% of the proposed stadium, right? The proposed stadium that isn't up to standards the NFL wants and the stadium that Kroenke will have to pay for and not have any say in? Just want to make sure I've got the story straight.This article is incorrect, the city's contribution is half that total, 75 million. Reply 2 / 2 1 2 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 16 posts Jul 10 2025
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: BofA W&M committee 12.10/15 POST #12 TOPIC AUTHOR SoCalRam78 wrote:Hacksaw wrote:The full board is on the clock. I would prefer that vote be held in January of fails as it quiets the Richardsons,, C Hunts and who ever else feels StL did enough so they can jump in with Spanos.Didn't you hear, Bernie says it's a done deal that St. Louis will offer the Rams a better deal once they're shot down from LA. The Grubman plan was strategy. Bernie is a conspiracy theorist now.I believe he believes himself.I guess we can lump that promise into all the other hollow promises 2nd tierville has made and not kept.I just don't see how a mediocre and somewhat shady offer can compel the owners to stick one of their most influential own in that place in good conscience. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #13 TOPIC AUTHOR ST. LOUIS • A month of heated debate culminated on Thursday with an aldermanic committee backing a proposal where St. Louis would finance $150 million of a proposed $1 billion riverfront football stadium. The committee voted 7-2. Now, the bill will move to a vote of the full Board of Aldermen. The board is expected to debate the matter on Friday, but procedural rules will require the board to come back next week for a special session to take a final vote. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #14 Hacksaw wrote:ST. LOUIS • A month of heated debate culminated on Thursday with an aldermanic committee backing a proposal where St. Louis would finance $150 million of a proposed $1 billion riverfront football stadium. The committee voted 7-2. Now, the bill will move to a vote of the full Board of Aldermen. The board is expected to debate the matter on Friday, but procedural rules will require the board to come back next week for a special session to take a final vote.As I said yesterday in a thread I started, this will all pass, and the offer will stand as currently constructed. The question will be, is that enough to not only block SK from LA but also give the go to the Charaiders? Remember, there are two other long term California NFL markets here, two relatively poor owners trying to get a stadium deal on a piece of land that isn't close to being built on. by moklerman 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #15 http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-l ... ium-121015Was wondering if this had already been covered and it looks like it has. So, they voted to okay paying 10% of the proposed stadium, right? The proposed stadium that isn't up to standards the NFL wants and the stadium that Kroenke will have to pay for and not have any say in? Just want to make sure I've got the story straight. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #16 moklerman wrote:http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-louis-rams-committee-approves-financing-new-stadium-121015Was wondering if this had already been covered and it looks like it has. So, they voted to okay paying 10% of the proposed stadium, right? The proposed stadium that isn't up to standards the NFL wants and the stadium that Kroenke will have to pay for and not have any say in? Just want to make sure I've got the story straight.This article is incorrect, the city's contribution is half that total, 75 million. Reply 2 / 2 1 2 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 16 posts Jul 10 2025
by Hacksaw 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 24523 Joined: Apr 15 2015 AT THE BEACH Moderator Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #13 TOPIC AUTHOR ST. LOUIS • A month of heated debate culminated on Thursday with an aldermanic committee backing a proposal where St. Louis would finance $150 million of a proposed $1 billion riverfront football stadium. The committee voted 7-2. Now, the bill will move to a vote of the full Board of Aldermen. The board is expected to debate the matter on Friday, but procedural rules will require the board to come back next week for a special session to take a final vote. GO RAMS !!! GO DODGERS !!! GO LAKERS !!!THE GREATEST SHOW ON TURF,, WAS by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #14 Hacksaw wrote:ST. LOUIS • A month of heated debate culminated on Thursday with an aldermanic committee backing a proposal where St. Louis would finance $150 million of a proposed $1 billion riverfront football stadium. The committee voted 7-2. Now, the bill will move to a vote of the full Board of Aldermen. The board is expected to debate the matter on Friday, but procedural rules will require the board to come back next week for a special session to take a final vote.As I said yesterday in a thread I started, this will all pass, and the offer will stand as currently constructed. The question will be, is that enough to not only block SK from LA but also give the go to the Charaiders? Remember, there are two other long term California NFL markets here, two relatively poor owners trying to get a stadium deal on a piece of land that isn't close to being built on. by moklerman 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #15 http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-l ... ium-121015Was wondering if this had already been covered and it looks like it has. So, they voted to okay paying 10% of the proposed stadium, right? The proposed stadium that isn't up to standards the NFL wants and the stadium that Kroenke will have to pay for and not have any say in? Just want to make sure I've got the story straight. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #16 moklerman wrote:http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-louis-rams-committee-approves-financing-new-stadium-121015Was wondering if this had already been covered and it looks like it has. So, they voted to okay paying 10% of the proposed stadium, right? The proposed stadium that isn't up to standards the NFL wants and the stadium that Kroenke will have to pay for and not have any say in? Just want to make sure I've got the story straight.This article is incorrect, the city's contribution is half that total, 75 million. Reply 2 / 2 1 2 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 16 posts Jul 10 2025
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #14 Hacksaw wrote:ST. LOUIS • A month of heated debate culminated on Thursday with an aldermanic committee backing a proposal where St. Louis would finance $150 million of a proposed $1 billion riverfront football stadium. The committee voted 7-2. Now, the bill will move to a vote of the full Board of Aldermen. The board is expected to debate the matter on Friday, but procedural rules will require the board to come back next week for a special session to take a final vote.As I said yesterday in a thread I started, this will all pass, and the offer will stand as currently constructed. The question will be, is that enough to not only block SK from LA but also give the go to the Charaiders? Remember, there are two other long term California NFL markets here, two relatively poor owners trying to get a stadium deal on a piece of land that isn't close to being built on. by moklerman 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #15 http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-l ... ium-121015Was wondering if this had already been covered and it looks like it has. So, they voted to okay paying 10% of the proposed stadium, right? The proposed stadium that isn't up to standards the NFL wants and the stadium that Kroenke will have to pay for and not have any say in? Just want to make sure I've got the story straight. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #16 moklerman wrote:http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-louis-rams-committee-approves-financing-new-stadium-121015Was wondering if this had already been covered and it looks like it has. So, they voted to okay paying 10% of the proposed stadium, right? The proposed stadium that isn't up to standards the NFL wants and the stadium that Kroenke will have to pay for and not have any say in? Just want to make sure I've got the story straight.This article is incorrect, the city's contribution is half that total, 75 million. Reply 2 / 2 1 2 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 16 posts Jul 10 2025
by moklerman 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 7680 Joined: Apr 17 2015 Bakersfield, CA Hall of Fame Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #15 http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-l ... ium-121015Was wondering if this had already been covered and it looks like it has. So, they voted to okay paying 10% of the proposed stadium, right? The proposed stadium that isn't up to standards the NFL wants and the stadium that Kroenke will have to pay for and not have any say in? Just want to make sure I've got the story straight. by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #16 moklerman wrote:http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-louis-rams-committee-approves-financing-new-stadium-121015Was wondering if this had already been covered and it looks like it has. So, they voted to okay paying 10% of the proposed stadium, right? The proposed stadium that isn't up to standards the NFL wants and the stadium that Kroenke will have to pay for and not have any say in? Just want to make sure I've got the story straight.This article is incorrect, the city's contribution is half that total, 75 million. Reply 2 / 2 1 2 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business 16 posts Jul 10 2025
by SoCalRam78 9 years 6 months ago Total posts: 1087 Joined: May 25 2015 SoCal Pro Bowl Re: BofA W&M committee 12/10/15 POST #16 moklerman wrote:http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-louis-rams-committee-approves-financing-new-stadium-121015Was wondering if this had already been covered and it looks like it has. So, they voted to okay paying 10% of the proposed stadium, right? The proposed stadium that isn't up to standards the NFL wants and the stadium that Kroenke will have to pay for and not have any say in? Just want to make sure I've got the story straight.This article is incorrect, the city's contribution is half that total, 75 million. Reply 2 / 2 1 2 Display: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by: AuthorPost timeSubject Sort by: AscendingDescending Jump to: Forum Rams/NFL Other Sports Rams Fans United Q&A's Board Business