Elvis wrote:
He's not totally wrong.
snackdaddy wrote:Lol, those shows are putting him out of business.
It's easy to say NFL owners should pay for their own stadiums and there's a good argument to be made. But on the other hand, there are a lot more cities than NFL teams, supply and demand is working in favor of the teams. We know there are some painful examples to the contrary but for the most part ...
Might as well start the thread now because we already have one clock ticking.https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/mike ... er-report/
She knows her strengths and where the camera is.
I get angry every time I see the prices at Mercedes Benz Stadium in Atlanta.These are their prices for all events, including football.
rams1974 wrote:I guess I'd say they're not a two-football team town. You could probably put 5 MLB teams in Chicago (or St. Louis) and they'd thrive, though.
Yeah, and how are the White Sox doing, attendance wise? How come Chicago doesn't feature 2 teams in Basketball and Hockey like N.Y. and L.A. do? I see you're going with the exception there instead of the rule. And by the way, if Chicago is a "big-city behemoth" how come they've only had O...