I wouldn't piss on him if he were on fire.

St. Loser Fan wrote:

Hate it. That is all.....

I'm sorry for being an asshole... I've always felt that when posting it would be like talking to my friends in a bar, and playful jabs would be common place. It is fun to debate, argue and what not, and in person when calling someone a jack ass, moron etc can clearly be seen as such. Bust balls? Ge...

I think "Mike Stud" might have had a couple too many beers.

dieterbrock wrote:Great, now you get it.
You can feel free to apologize for being an asshole, but I know better.
Good lord.
First response in the thread:

Fact

Thanks to everyone who replied. It appears as if the game has been called the Super Bowl since the beginning but not officially recognized as such until the third one. Lamar Hunt may or may not have come up with the name. But, I guess in general my question was answered because I didn't know if any...

They called it Super Bowl You’re right though, you have nothing to add. Maybe you should try reading the thread so you can see that you are making no sense here. Or not. Doesn’t matter to me Maybe you should read the OP's original question... or have someone read it for you. In summation... It was ...

So what newspaper do you consider legit if the “Muncie Star” isn’t credible? Was the “Daily Northwestern” legit? The “Dallas Morning News”? Or perhaps a paper nobody ever heard of in the “New York Times”? Not sure what your problem is, but my point was that clearly the 1st Super Bowl was referred t...

Well if it was printed in newspapers like Super Bowl was, it might as well been your name. LOL... Not if it was printed in the, "Muncie Star." Moklerman's question was in response to a trivia question which (for me anyway) assumes the first official naming of the game, as opposed to the f...